Platonova estetika lepog
Plato’s aesthetics of beauty
Апстракт
U prvom delu teksta raspravlja se o opravdanosti upotrebe izraza 'Platonova estetika lepog' (I). U drugom delu teksta, pod nazivom 'Dijalektika lepog' (II), razmatra se problem raznovrsnosti aspekata lepog iz dijaloga Hipija veći. U trećem delu teksta, pod nazivom 'Anamnestičko saznanje lepog' (III) najpre se razmatra Platonovo određenje lepog iz dijaloga Gozba, zatim se polazeći od dijaloga Teetet, pokazuje na koji je način lepo dostupno ljudskom saznanju i najzad, na temelju dijaloga Fedar, objašnjava se zbog čega je ljudima veoma teško da saznaju lepo po sebi. Autor u radu sledi tezu da postoji komplementarnost između ranog Platonovog tumačenja lepote iz dijaloga Hipija veći i poznijeg shvatanja lepog iz dijaloga Gozba i Fedar da polazeći od te komplementarnosti skicirana Platonova estetika artikuliše ambivalenciju lepog i da u tom smislu Platonova estetika lepog predstavlja integralni momenat i probni kamen našeg filozofsko-estetičkog samorazumevanja.
In the fi rst part of the article, the author argues on justifi ed usage of an
expression “Plato’s Aesthetics of Beauty”(I). The second part, which is named
“Dialectics of Beauty” (II), considers the problem of diversity of aspects of
beauty within the dialogue Hippias Major. In the third part, or “Anamnestic
Acknowledgement of Beauty” (III), Plato’s defi nition of beauty from the
dialogue Symposium is considered at fi rst. Then, referring to dialogue
Theaetetus, it is shown in what way beauty is available to human knowledge.
Finally, on the ground of dialogue Phaedrus, it is explained why is so hard
for people to take cognizance of beauty itself. Author follows the thesis
that there is complementarity between early Plato’s interpretation of beauty
in the dialogue Hippias Major and later one in Symposium and Phaedrus;
furthermore, that Plato’ aesthetics, seen in that light, does articulate
ambivalence of beauty and that that is why Plato’s aesthetics... of beauty
represents the integral moment and trial of our philosophical-aesthetical
self-understanding.
Кључне речи:
Platon / lepo / estetika / Plato / beauty / AestheticsИзвор:
Arhe, 2010, 7, 13, 95-115Издавач:
- Univerzitet u Novom Sadu - Filozofski fakultet - Odsek za filozofiju, Novi Sad
Институција/група
Filozofija / PhilosophyTY - JOUR AU - Grubor, Nebojša PY - 2010 UR - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1097 AB - U prvom delu teksta raspravlja se o opravdanosti upotrebe izraza 'Platonova estetika lepog' (I). U drugom delu teksta, pod nazivom 'Dijalektika lepog' (II), razmatra se problem raznovrsnosti aspekata lepog iz dijaloga Hipija veći. U trećem delu teksta, pod nazivom 'Anamnestičko saznanje lepog' (III) najpre se razmatra Platonovo određenje lepog iz dijaloga Gozba, zatim se polazeći od dijaloga Teetet, pokazuje na koji je način lepo dostupno ljudskom saznanju i najzad, na temelju dijaloga Fedar, objašnjava se zbog čega je ljudima veoma teško da saznaju lepo po sebi. Autor u radu sledi tezu da postoji komplementarnost između ranog Platonovog tumačenja lepote iz dijaloga Hipija veći i poznijeg shvatanja lepog iz dijaloga Gozba i Fedar da polazeći od te komplementarnosti skicirana Platonova estetika artikuliše ambivalenciju lepog i da u tom smislu Platonova estetika lepog predstavlja integralni momenat i probni kamen našeg filozofsko-estetičkog samorazumevanja. AB - In the fi rst part of the article, the author argues on justifi ed usage of an expression “Plato’s Aesthetics of Beauty”(I). The second part, which is named “Dialectics of Beauty” (II), considers the problem of diversity of aspects of beauty within the dialogue Hippias Major. In the third part, or “Anamnestic Acknowledgement of Beauty” (III), Plato’s defi nition of beauty from the dialogue Symposium is considered at fi rst. Then, referring to dialogue Theaetetus, it is shown in what way beauty is available to human knowledge. Finally, on the ground of dialogue Phaedrus, it is explained why is so hard for people to take cognizance of beauty itself. Author follows the thesis that there is complementarity between early Plato’s interpretation of beauty in the dialogue Hippias Major and later one in Symposium and Phaedrus; furthermore, that Plato’ aesthetics, seen in that light, does articulate ambivalence of beauty and that that is why Plato’s aesthetics of beauty represents the integral moment and trial of our philosophical-aesthetical self-understanding. PB - Univerzitet u Novom Sadu - Filozofski fakultet - Odsek za filozofiju, Novi Sad T2 - Arhe T1 - Platonova estetika lepog T1 - Plato’s aesthetics of beauty EP - 115 IS - 13 SP - 95 VL - 7 UR - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_1097 ER -
@article{ author = "Grubor, Nebojša", year = "2010", abstract = "U prvom delu teksta raspravlja se o opravdanosti upotrebe izraza 'Platonova estetika lepog' (I). U drugom delu teksta, pod nazivom 'Dijalektika lepog' (II), razmatra se problem raznovrsnosti aspekata lepog iz dijaloga Hipija veći. U trećem delu teksta, pod nazivom 'Anamnestičko saznanje lepog' (III) najpre se razmatra Platonovo određenje lepog iz dijaloga Gozba, zatim se polazeći od dijaloga Teetet, pokazuje na koji je način lepo dostupno ljudskom saznanju i najzad, na temelju dijaloga Fedar, objašnjava se zbog čega je ljudima veoma teško da saznaju lepo po sebi. Autor u radu sledi tezu da postoji komplementarnost između ranog Platonovog tumačenja lepote iz dijaloga Hipija veći i poznijeg shvatanja lepog iz dijaloga Gozba i Fedar da polazeći od te komplementarnosti skicirana Platonova estetika artikuliše ambivalenciju lepog i da u tom smislu Platonova estetika lepog predstavlja integralni momenat i probni kamen našeg filozofsko-estetičkog samorazumevanja., In the fi rst part of the article, the author argues on justifi ed usage of an expression “Plato’s Aesthetics of Beauty”(I). The second part, which is named “Dialectics of Beauty” (II), considers the problem of diversity of aspects of beauty within the dialogue Hippias Major. In the third part, or “Anamnestic Acknowledgement of Beauty” (III), Plato’s defi nition of beauty from the dialogue Symposium is considered at fi rst. Then, referring to dialogue Theaetetus, it is shown in what way beauty is available to human knowledge. Finally, on the ground of dialogue Phaedrus, it is explained why is so hard for people to take cognizance of beauty itself. Author follows the thesis that there is complementarity between early Plato’s interpretation of beauty in the dialogue Hippias Major and later one in Symposium and Phaedrus; furthermore, that Plato’ aesthetics, seen in that light, does articulate ambivalence of beauty and that that is why Plato’s aesthetics of beauty represents the integral moment and trial of our philosophical-aesthetical self-understanding.", publisher = "Univerzitet u Novom Sadu - Filozofski fakultet - Odsek za filozofiju, Novi Sad", journal = "Arhe", title = "Platonova estetika lepog, Plato’s aesthetics of beauty", pages = "115-95", number = "13", volume = "7", url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_1097" }
Grubor, N.. (2010). Platonova estetika lepog. in Arhe Univerzitet u Novom Sadu - Filozofski fakultet - Odsek za filozofiju, Novi Sad., 7(13), 95-115. https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_1097
Grubor N. Platonova estetika lepog. in Arhe. 2010;7(13):95-115. https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_1097 .
Grubor, Nebojša, "Platonova estetika lepog" in Arhe, 7, no. 13 (2010):95-115, https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_1097 .