Kosmološki argument za a/teizam - Krejgova i Smitova interpretacija big beng kosmologije

Abstract

U ovom radu razmotrićemo preko trideset godina dugu raspravu između teističkog filozofa religije Viljema Lejna Krejga (Craig, L. W.) i ateističkog filozofa Kventina Smita (Smith, Q.) koja se tiče odnosa između kalam kosmološkog argumentra i big beng kosmološke hipoteze. Glavno pitanje njihove rasprave odnosi se na problem uzroka nastanka univerzuma. Krejg nastoji da nam ponudi argumente za tezu da je big beng kosmologija kompatibilna sa njegovim kalam kosmološkim argumentom i da je, konsekventno tome, Bog uzrok big benga. Smit se, međutim, trudi da nam ponudi argumente za tezu da kalam kosmološki argument nije dobar i da uzrok big benga nije Bog. Na početku ove rasprave Smit je branio tezu da big beng nema uzrok. On kasnije, međutim, brani tezu da je univerzum samouzrokovan. Tokom ove duge i intenzivne rasprave razvijeni su interesantni argumenti od kojih ćemo neke ovde predstaviti.

In this paper we shall consider over 30-Years larg disscusion between theistic philosopher of religion William Lane Craig and athestic philosopher Quentin Smith about kalam cosmological argument and big bang cosmological hypothesis. Main issue of their's disscusion is the problem of the cause of the beginnig of the universe. Craig tries to give us arguments for the thesis that the big bang cosmology is compatible with the his kalam kosmological argument, and, consenquently, that God is cause of the big bang. Smith but tries to give us the arguments for the thesis that the kalam cosmological argument is not sound, and that cause of the big bang is not God. At the beginnig of the discussion Smith has defended thesis that big bang has no cause. Lather but he defends the thesis that the universe is self-caused. During this larg and intensive discussion are developed interesting arguments, some of which we shall present here.