Protiv Eratostena ili kako je jedno političko ubistvo prošlo nekažnjeno
Against Eratosthenes or how a political murder remained unpunished
Апстракт
Autori rada analiziraju Lisijinu besedu sačuvanu u korpusu pod brojem 12. Ova beseda predstavlja živ opis društvenopolitičkih prilika odmah nakon restauracije demokratije u Atini 403. godine pre n. ere, ali i događaja koji su doveli do njenog rušenja godinu dana ranije. Beseda Protiv Eratostena je višeslojna, a dopuna je glavnim istorijskim izvorima, Ksenofontovoj Helenskoj istoriji i Aristotelovom Ustavu atinskom, predstavljajući događaje iz drugog ideološkog ugla.
Against Eratosthenes is the only oration delivered personally by Lysias. It was the occasion on which he, although being an alien - metoikos istoteles, accused an Athenian citizen of murder, i.e. Eratosthenes for arresting and murdering Polemarchus, Lysias' brother. The orator took advantage of a case in the field of the general amnesty practice, which excluded only the crimes committed by the Thirty. Having this case in mind, Lysias took Eratosthenes to trial for murder. This trial was probably a private one, but since Eratosthenes was a prominent figure of the previous regime, actually one of the Thirty, drew the attention of many. By means of this oration Lysias as a foreigner, who did not have the right to actively participate in the political life of Athens, announced his political views on the past and recent events, on the nature of the regime of the Thirty, on their main leaders Critias and especially on Theramenes, to whom he put the most of the blame for the subversion of dem...ocracy. In his other speech on a Charge of Overthrowing the Democracy, which was delivered several years later, Lysias, this time in the role of the logographos, also disagreed with the common views on collective guilt, expressing his disapproval on leaving crimes unpunished and emphasized the importance of naming every perpetrator and his crime(s), not generalizing them.
Кључне речи:
zločini / ubistvo / Tridesetorica / Teramen / oligarhija / Eratosten / demokratija / Thirty / Theramenes / oligarchy / murder / Eratosthenes / democracy / crimesИзвор:
Lucida intervalla - prilozi odeljenja za klasične nauke, 2018, 47, 55-73Издавач:
- Univerzitet u Beogradu - Filozofski fakultet - Odeljenje za klasične nauke, Beograd
Финансирање / пројекти:
- Rad je deo istraživanja na projektu Interakcija kultura, privredni tokovi i socijalne strukture na tlu Vojvodine kao istorijski proces dugog trajanja (od antike do 16. veka), koji finansira Pokrajinski sekretarijat za nauku i tehnološki razvoj AP Vojvodin
Институција/група
Klasične nauke / Classical StudiesTY - JOUR AU - Radulović, Ifigenija AU - Maričić, Gordan PY - 2018 UR - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2528 AB - Autori rada analiziraju Lisijinu besedu sačuvanu u korpusu pod brojem 12. Ova beseda predstavlja živ opis društvenopolitičkih prilika odmah nakon restauracije demokratije u Atini 403. godine pre n. ere, ali i događaja koji su doveli do njenog rušenja godinu dana ranije. Beseda Protiv Eratostena je višeslojna, a dopuna je glavnim istorijskim izvorima, Ksenofontovoj Helenskoj istoriji i Aristotelovom Ustavu atinskom, predstavljajući događaje iz drugog ideološkog ugla. AB - Against Eratosthenes is the only oration delivered personally by Lysias. It was the occasion on which he, although being an alien - metoikos istoteles, accused an Athenian citizen of murder, i.e. Eratosthenes for arresting and murdering Polemarchus, Lysias' brother. The orator took advantage of a case in the field of the general amnesty practice, which excluded only the crimes committed by the Thirty. Having this case in mind, Lysias took Eratosthenes to trial for murder. This trial was probably a private one, but since Eratosthenes was a prominent figure of the previous regime, actually one of the Thirty, drew the attention of many. By means of this oration Lysias as a foreigner, who did not have the right to actively participate in the political life of Athens, announced his political views on the past and recent events, on the nature of the regime of the Thirty, on their main leaders Critias and especially on Theramenes, to whom he put the most of the blame for the subversion of democracy. In his other speech on a Charge of Overthrowing the Democracy, which was delivered several years later, Lysias, this time in the role of the logographos, also disagreed with the common views on collective guilt, expressing his disapproval on leaving crimes unpunished and emphasized the importance of naming every perpetrator and his crime(s), not generalizing them. PB - Univerzitet u Beogradu - Filozofski fakultet - Odeljenje za klasične nauke, Beograd T2 - Lucida intervalla - prilozi odeljenja za klasične nauke T1 - Protiv Eratostena ili kako je jedno političko ubistvo prošlo nekažnjeno T1 - Against Eratosthenes or how a political murder remained unpunished EP - 73 IS - 47 SP - 55 UR - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_2528 ER -
@article{ author = "Radulović, Ifigenija and Maričić, Gordan", year = "2018", abstract = "Autori rada analiziraju Lisijinu besedu sačuvanu u korpusu pod brojem 12. Ova beseda predstavlja živ opis društvenopolitičkih prilika odmah nakon restauracije demokratije u Atini 403. godine pre n. ere, ali i događaja koji su doveli do njenog rušenja godinu dana ranije. Beseda Protiv Eratostena je višeslojna, a dopuna je glavnim istorijskim izvorima, Ksenofontovoj Helenskoj istoriji i Aristotelovom Ustavu atinskom, predstavljajući događaje iz drugog ideološkog ugla., Against Eratosthenes is the only oration delivered personally by Lysias. It was the occasion on which he, although being an alien - metoikos istoteles, accused an Athenian citizen of murder, i.e. Eratosthenes for arresting and murdering Polemarchus, Lysias' brother. The orator took advantage of a case in the field of the general amnesty practice, which excluded only the crimes committed by the Thirty. Having this case in mind, Lysias took Eratosthenes to trial for murder. This trial was probably a private one, but since Eratosthenes was a prominent figure of the previous regime, actually one of the Thirty, drew the attention of many. By means of this oration Lysias as a foreigner, who did not have the right to actively participate in the political life of Athens, announced his political views on the past and recent events, on the nature of the regime of the Thirty, on their main leaders Critias and especially on Theramenes, to whom he put the most of the blame for the subversion of democracy. In his other speech on a Charge of Overthrowing the Democracy, which was delivered several years later, Lysias, this time in the role of the logographos, also disagreed with the common views on collective guilt, expressing his disapproval on leaving crimes unpunished and emphasized the importance of naming every perpetrator and his crime(s), not generalizing them.", publisher = "Univerzitet u Beogradu - Filozofski fakultet - Odeljenje za klasične nauke, Beograd", journal = "Lucida intervalla - prilozi odeljenja za klasične nauke", title = "Protiv Eratostena ili kako je jedno političko ubistvo prošlo nekažnjeno, Against Eratosthenes or how a political murder remained unpunished", pages = "73-55", number = "47", url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_2528" }
Radulović, I.,& Maričić, G.. (2018). Protiv Eratostena ili kako je jedno političko ubistvo prošlo nekažnjeno. in Lucida intervalla - prilozi odeljenja za klasične nauke Univerzitet u Beogradu - Filozofski fakultet - Odeljenje za klasične nauke, Beograd.(47), 55-73. https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_2528
Radulović I, Maričić G. Protiv Eratostena ili kako je jedno političko ubistvo prošlo nekažnjeno. in Lucida intervalla - prilozi odeljenja za klasične nauke. 2018;(47):55-73. https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_2528 .
Radulović, Ifigenija, Maričić, Gordan, "Protiv Eratostena ili kako je jedno političko ubistvo prošlo nekažnjeno" in Lucida intervalla - prilozi odeljenja za klasične nauke, no. 47 (2018):55-73, https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_2528 .