Mišljenje korisnika psihijatrijskih usluga o slici kakvu ostavljaju na druge i terminima koji ih stigmatizuju - razmatranje doživljene stigme i predloga za promenu termina
Opinions of users of psychiatric services about the image they leave on others and stigmatizing terms: Consideration of the experienced stigma and suggestions for alternative terms
Abstract
U radu se bavimo istraživanjem mišljenja korisnika psihijatrijskih usluga o tome kako ih drugi, "zdravi" vide, i terminima koji se koriste u javnom diskursu za osobe koje imaju psihičke tegobe, ali pre svega, interesuje nas koji su termini najadekvatniji i najprihvatljiviji za ispitanike. Ova tema je potpuno neistražena, što verovatno znači za našu naučnu javnost i nedovoljno važna. Podaci ukazuju da su najčešće korišćeni upravo stigmatizujući i diskvalifikujući termini, a da se preporuka SZO o korišćenju drugačijih (manje stigmatizujućih) ne poštuje u svim zdravstvenim ustanovama, a još manje u drugim institucijama ili radnoj organizaciji. Većina ispitanika smatra da ih drugi vide u negativnom svetlu kao "nefunkcionalne", "drugačijeg raspoloženja i izgleda" i "opasne". U radu predstavljamo i podatke o doživljenoj diskriminaciji u radnom i porodičnom okruženju iz dva intervjua. Smatramo da su osim preporuka za preimenovanje, potrebne edukacija u obrazovnim institucijama, dobro osmišlje...ni antistigma programi i odgovorno izveštavanje u medijima, i znatno veći broj istraživanja u kojima su ispitanici osobe koje imaju psihičke tegobe.
This paper considers opinions of users of psychiatric services on how others see them and about the terms used in public discourse for people with mental disorders. Above all, we are interested in terms that the responders deem most appropriate and respectful. In Serbia, this topic remains largely unexplored and is given almost no scholarly attention. The data however indicate that the most commonly used terms are precisely those which are stigmatizing and disqualifying and that the WHO recommendations on the use of different (less stigmatizing) terms has not been followed in all health institutions, and even less so in other institutions or work organizations. Most respondents think that others see them in a negative light, as "dysfunctional", "oddly behaving and looking", or even as "dangerous". We hence present the data on experienced discrimination in work and family environments obtained from two interviews. We believe that, besides the recommendations for the usage of alternative... terms, education in educational institutions is needed, as well as well-designed anti-stigma programs and responsible media reporting, and considerably more research in which respondents are persons with mental disorders.
Keywords:
stigmatizujući termini / stereotipi / promena termina / korisnici psihijatrijskih usluga / doživljena stigma / users of psychiatric services / stigmatizing terms / stereotypes / experienced stigma / change of termsSource:
Sociološki pregled, 2019, 53, 1, 100-135Publisher:
- Sociološko društvo Srbije, Beograd
Institution/Community
Sociologija / SociologyTY - JOUR AU - Dragišić-Labaš, Slađana PY - 2019 UR - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2858 AB - U radu se bavimo istraživanjem mišljenja korisnika psihijatrijskih usluga o tome kako ih drugi, "zdravi" vide, i terminima koji se koriste u javnom diskursu za osobe koje imaju psihičke tegobe, ali pre svega, interesuje nas koji su termini najadekvatniji i najprihvatljiviji za ispitanike. Ova tema je potpuno neistražena, što verovatno znači za našu naučnu javnost i nedovoljno važna. Podaci ukazuju da su najčešće korišćeni upravo stigmatizujući i diskvalifikujući termini, a da se preporuka SZO o korišćenju drugačijih (manje stigmatizujućih) ne poštuje u svim zdravstvenim ustanovama, a još manje u drugim institucijama ili radnoj organizaciji. Većina ispitanika smatra da ih drugi vide u negativnom svetlu kao "nefunkcionalne", "drugačijeg raspoloženja i izgleda" i "opasne". U radu predstavljamo i podatke o doživljenoj diskriminaciji u radnom i porodičnom okruženju iz dva intervjua. Smatramo da su osim preporuka za preimenovanje, potrebne edukacija u obrazovnim institucijama, dobro osmišljeni antistigma programi i odgovorno izveštavanje u medijima, i znatno veći broj istraživanja u kojima su ispitanici osobe koje imaju psihičke tegobe. AB - This paper considers opinions of users of psychiatric services on how others see them and about the terms used in public discourse for people with mental disorders. Above all, we are interested in terms that the responders deem most appropriate and respectful. In Serbia, this topic remains largely unexplored and is given almost no scholarly attention. The data however indicate that the most commonly used terms are precisely those which are stigmatizing and disqualifying and that the WHO recommendations on the use of different (less stigmatizing) terms has not been followed in all health institutions, and even less so in other institutions or work organizations. Most respondents think that others see them in a negative light, as "dysfunctional", "oddly behaving and looking", or even as "dangerous". We hence present the data on experienced discrimination in work and family environments obtained from two interviews. We believe that, besides the recommendations for the usage of alternative terms, education in educational institutions is needed, as well as well-designed anti-stigma programs and responsible media reporting, and considerably more research in which respondents are persons with mental disorders. PB - Sociološko društvo Srbije, Beograd T2 - Sociološki pregled T1 - Mišljenje korisnika psihijatrijskih usluga o slici kakvu ostavljaju na druge i terminima koji ih stigmatizuju - razmatranje doživljene stigme i predloga za promenu termina T1 - Opinions of users of psychiatric services about the image they leave on others and stigmatizing terms: Consideration of the experienced stigma and suggestions for alternative terms EP - 135 IS - 1 SP - 100 VL - 53 DO - 10.5937/socpreg53-20565 ER -
@article{ author = "Dragišić-Labaš, Slađana", year = "2019", abstract = "U radu se bavimo istraživanjem mišljenja korisnika psihijatrijskih usluga o tome kako ih drugi, "zdravi" vide, i terminima koji se koriste u javnom diskursu za osobe koje imaju psihičke tegobe, ali pre svega, interesuje nas koji su termini najadekvatniji i najprihvatljiviji za ispitanike. Ova tema je potpuno neistražena, što verovatno znači za našu naučnu javnost i nedovoljno važna. Podaci ukazuju da su najčešće korišćeni upravo stigmatizujući i diskvalifikujući termini, a da se preporuka SZO o korišćenju drugačijih (manje stigmatizujućih) ne poštuje u svim zdravstvenim ustanovama, a još manje u drugim institucijama ili radnoj organizaciji. Većina ispitanika smatra da ih drugi vide u negativnom svetlu kao "nefunkcionalne", "drugačijeg raspoloženja i izgleda" i "opasne". U radu predstavljamo i podatke o doživljenoj diskriminaciji u radnom i porodičnom okruženju iz dva intervjua. Smatramo da su osim preporuka za preimenovanje, potrebne edukacija u obrazovnim institucijama, dobro osmišljeni antistigma programi i odgovorno izveštavanje u medijima, i znatno veći broj istraživanja u kojima su ispitanici osobe koje imaju psihičke tegobe., This paper considers opinions of users of psychiatric services on how others see them and about the terms used in public discourse for people with mental disorders. Above all, we are interested in terms that the responders deem most appropriate and respectful. In Serbia, this topic remains largely unexplored and is given almost no scholarly attention. The data however indicate that the most commonly used terms are precisely those which are stigmatizing and disqualifying and that the WHO recommendations on the use of different (less stigmatizing) terms has not been followed in all health institutions, and even less so in other institutions or work organizations. Most respondents think that others see them in a negative light, as "dysfunctional", "oddly behaving and looking", or even as "dangerous". We hence present the data on experienced discrimination in work and family environments obtained from two interviews. We believe that, besides the recommendations for the usage of alternative terms, education in educational institutions is needed, as well as well-designed anti-stigma programs and responsible media reporting, and considerably more research in which respondents are persons with mental disorders.", publisher = "Sociološko društvo Srbije, Beograd", journal = "Sociološki pregled", title = "Mišljenje korisnika psihijatrijskih usluga o slici kakvu ostavljaju na druge i terminima koji ih stigmatizuju - razmatranje doživljene stigme i predloga za promenu termina, Opinions of users of psychiatric services about the image they leave on others and stigmatizing terms: Consideration of the experienced stigma and suggestions for alternative terms", pages = "135-100", number = "1", volume = "53", doi = "10.5937/socpreg53-20565" }
Dragišić-Labaš, S.. (2019). Mišljenje korisnika psihijatrijskih usluga o slici kakvu ostavljaju na druge i terminima koji ih stigmatizuju - razmatranje doživljene stigme i predloga za promenu termina. in Sociološki pregled Sociološko društvo Srbije, Beograd., 53(1), 100-135. https://doi.org/10.5937/socpreg53-20565
Dragišić-Labaš S. Mišljenje korisnika psihijatrijskih usluga o slici kakvu ostavljaju na druge i terminima koji ih stigmatizuju - razmatranje doživljene stigme i predloga za promenu termina. in Sociološki pregled. 2019;53(1):100-135. doi:10.5937/socpreg53-20565 .
Dragišić-Labaš, Slađana, "Mišljenje korisnika psihijatrijskih usluga o slici kakvu ostavljaju na druge i terminima koji ih stigmatizuju - razmatranje doživljene stigme i predloga za promenu termina" in Sociološki pregled, 53, no. 1 (2019):100-135, https://doi.org/10.5937/socpreg53-20565 . .