Seeking Proxies for Internal States as a Possible Alternative for Rationality and Experientiality
Апстракт
The Cognitive-Experiential Self-Theory (CEST) proposes rationality and experientiality as independent personality constructs explaining how people process information. Recent empirical studies show that some people have low scores on both of these dimensions (the so-called disengaged profile). Another model, Seeking Proxies for Internal States (SPIS), primarily proposed to explain obsessive-compulsive tendencies, provides a framework under which both rationality and experientiality can be understood as internal resources of a person. Low rationality and experientiality could thus be overcome by seeking external clues. In two subsequent studies on independent nonclinical samples (psychology students N = 268 and technical sciences students N = 549), we examined the relationship between constructs from CEST and SPIS models, and in addition, explored their patterns of interoceptive awareness (IA) in Study 2. A latent profile analysis showed that the disengaged profile was related to high S...PIS and OC tendencies in both samples. In addition, rationality and experientiality had similar and more positive correlations with some IA dimensions, compared to SPIS (and OCI)-IA correlations. Thus, impaired connection to internal states together with OC tendencies might contribute to the understanding of the specific thinking style of those who do not primarily rely on either rationality or experientiality.
Кључне речи:
thinking styles / Seeking Proxies for Internal States (SPIS) / Rational-Experiential Inventory (REI) / Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory-Revised (OCI-R) / Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (MAIA)Извор:
Sage Open, 2021, 11, 1Издавач:
- Sage Publications Inc, Thousand Oaks
Финансирање / пројекти:
- Идентификација, мерење и развој когнитивних и емоционалних компетенција важних друштву оријентисаном на европске интеграције (RS-MESTD-Basic Research (BR or ON)-179018)
DOI: 10.1177/2158244020986533
ISSN: 2158-2440
WoS: 000609269800001
Scopus: 2-s2.0-85099452134
Институција/група
Psihologija / PsychologyTY - JOUR AU - Jokić, Biljana AU - Purić, Danka PY - 2021 UR - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/3306 AB - The Cognitive-Experiential Self-Theory (CEST) proposes rationality and experientiality as independent personality constructs explaining how people process information. Recent empirical studies show that some people have low scores on both of these dimensions (the so-called disengaged profile). Another model, Seeking Proxies for Internal States (SPIS), primarily proposed to explain obsessive-compulsive tendencies, provides a framework under which both rationality and experientiality can be understood as internal resources of a person. Low rationality and experientiality could thus be overcome by seeking external clues. In two subsequent studies on independent nonclinical samples (psychology students N = 268 and technical sciences students N = 549), we examined the relationship between constructs from CEST and SPIS models, and in addition, explored their patterns of interoceptive awareness (IA) in Study 2. A latent profile analysis showed that the disengaged profile was related to high SPIS and OC tendencies in both samples. In addition, rationality and experientiality had similar and more positive correlations with some IA dimensions, compared to SPIS (and OCI)-IA correlations. Thus, impaired connection to internal states together with OC tendencies might contribute to the understanding of the specific thinking style of those who do not primarily rely on either rationality or experientiality. PB - Sage Publications Inc, Thousand Oaks T2 - Sage Open T1 - Seeking Proxies for Internal States as a Possible Alternative for Rationality and Experientiality IS - 1 VL - 11 DO - 10.1177/2158244020986533 ER -
@article{ author = "Jokić, Biljana and Purić, Danka", year = "2021", abstract = "The Cognitive-Experiential Self-Theory (CEST) proposes rationality and experientiality as independent personality constructs explaining how people process information. Recent empirical studies show that some people have low scores on both of these dimensions (the so-called disengaged profile). Another model, Seeking Proxies for Internal States (SPIS), primarily proposed to explain obsessive-compulsive tendencies, provides a framework under which both rationality and experientiality can be understood as internal resources of a person. Low rationality and experientiality could thus be overcome by seeking external clues. In two subsequent studies on independent nonclinical samples (psychology students N = 268 and technical sciences students N = 549), we examined the relationship between constructs from CEST and SPIS models, and in addition, explored their patterns of interoceptive awareness (IA) in Study 2. A latent profile analysis showed that the disengaged profile was related to high SPIS and OC tendencies in both samples. In addition, rationality and experientiality had similar and more positive correlations with some IA dimensions, compared to SPIS (and OCI)-IA correlations. Thus, impaired connection to internal states together with OC tendencies might contribute to the understanding of the specific thinking style of those who do not primarily rely on either rationality or experientiality.", publisher = "Sage Publications Inc, Thousand Oaks", journal = "Sage Open", title = "Seeking Proxies for Internal States as a Possible Alternative for Rationality and Experientiality", number = "1", volume = "11", doi = "10.1177/2158244020986533" }
Jokić, B.,& Purić, D.. (2021). Seeking Proxies for Internal States as a Possible Alternative for Rationality and Experientiality. in Sage Open Sage Publications Inc, Thousand Oaks., 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020986533
Jokić B, Purić D. Seeking Proxies for Internal States as a Possible Alternative for Rationality and Experientiality. in Sage Open. 2021;11(1). doi:10.1177/2158244020986533 .
Jokić, Biljana, Purić, Danka, "Seeking Proxies for Internal States as a Possible Alternative for Rationality and Experientiality" in Sage Open, 11, no. 1 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020986533 . .