Приказ основних података о документу
Dejlijeva kritika razumljivosti pojma utemeljivanja
Daly’s Critique of Intelligibility of the Concept of Grounding
dc.creator | Panajotov, Miloš | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-12-15T16:48:52Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-12-15T16:48:52Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/4026 | |
dc.description.abstract | Veliko interesovanje za metafizički pojam utemeljivanja poslednjih desetak godina na savremenoj metafizičkoj sceni dovelo je do pojave onih autora koji ne dele isti entuzijazam kao i njegovi zagovornici. U ovom radu osvrnućemo se na skeptičku poziciju koju zastupa Kris Dejli. Osnovni prigovori njegove kritike zasnovani su na ideji da sam koncept utemeljivanja nije razumljiv, odnosno da zagovornici te koncepcije nisu uspeli da to pokažu. U prvom delu rada iznećemo opšti pregled temeljnih karakteristika pojma utemeljivanja i njegove teorijske funkcije, dok ćemo u drugom delu sagledati glavne Dejlijeve prigovore i pokušati da na njih odgovorimo. Na kraju, u zaključnim razmatranjima sumiraćemo glavne poente do kojih smo prethodnim uvidima došli. Pokazaće se da Dejlijevi prigovori nisu dovoljno jaki da dovedu u pitanje razumljivost govora o utemeljivanju. | sr |
dc.description.abstract | The great interest in the metaphysical concept of grounding during last decade in contemporary metaphysics had brought to the appearance of those authors who do not share the same enthusiasm as it’s proponents. In this paper, we deal with one such skeptical position defended by Chris Daly). His fundamental objections are based on the idea that the concept of grounding is unintelligible, that is, that the proponents of grounding failed to show that it is intelligible. In the first part of the paper, I will give a broad overview of basic characteristics of the concept of grounding and its theoretical function, while, in the second part, I will consider Daly’s main objections to it and attempt to answer them. In concluding considerations I will sum up my main points and conclude that Daly’s objections are not sufficiently strong to question the intelligibility of the talk of grounding. | sr |
dc.language.iso | sr | sr |
dc.publisher | Srpsko filozofsko društvo | sr |
dc.rights | openAccess | sr |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | |
dc.source | Theoria | sr |
dc.subject | metafizika | sr |
dc.subject | utemeljivanje | sr |
dc.subject | razumevanje | sr |
dc.subject | metafizičko objašnjenje | sr |
dc.subject | metaphysics | sr |
dc.subject | grounding | sr |
dc.subject | intelligibility | sr |
dc.subject | metaphysical explanation | sr |
dc.title | Dejlijeva kritika razumljivosti pojma utemeljivanja | sr |
dc.title | Daly’s Critique of Intelligibility of the Concept of Grounding | sr |
dc.type | article | sr |
dc.rights.license | BY | sr |
dc.citation.epage | 147 | |
dc.citation.issue | 64 | |
dc.citation.spage | 129 | |
dc.citation.volume | 1 | |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.2298/THEO2101129P | |
dc.identifier.fulltext | http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/bitstream/id/9407/0351-22742101129P.pdf | |
dc.type.version | publishedVersion | sr |