Konstrukcija i ko-konstrukcija u zoni narednog razvoja - da li i Pijaže i Vigotski mogu biti u pravu?
Construction and co-construction in the zone of proximal development: Could both Piaget and Vygotsky be right?
dc.creator | Baucal, Aleksandar | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-10-12T10:29:29Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-10-12T10:29:29Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2003 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0048-5705 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/430 | |
dc.description.abstract | Osnovni cilj ovog istraživanja je da se odgovori na sledeća pitanja: (1) Kakva je povezanost između zone aktuelnog razvoja (ZAR) i zone narednog razvoja (ZNR)?, (2) Da li će efekti rešavanja zadataka uz pomoć odrasle osobe biti relativno trajni?, (3) Da li ZNR ima prediktivnu vrednost za buduće postignuće nezavisno od ZAR? i (4) Koji aspekt zajedničkog rešavanja ima veći značaj za predikciju budućeg postignuća dece - afektivno-motivacioni ili kognitivni? Izveden je eksperiment sa paralelnim grupama u kojem je učestvovalo 126 dece. Eksperimentalni tretman se sastojao od zajedničkog rešavanja Ravenovih matrica pri čemu je eksperimentator pružao graduiranu pomoć ispitanicima. Dobijeni rezultati sugerišu: (1) da postoji pozitivna niska korelacija između ZAR i ZNR, (2) da zajedničko rešavanje ima relativno trajne efekte kada je u pitanju kasnije postignuće dece, (3) da je ZNR važan prediktor kasnijeg postignuća nezavisno od ZAR, i (4) da afektivno-motivacioni aspekt zajedničke delatnosti ima snažniji uticaj na kasnije postignuće nego kognitivni aspekti mada i oni imaju određeni efekat. | sr |
dc.description.abstract | The main goal of the research is to get evidence to address the following issues: (1) What is the relationship between the Zone of Actual Development (ZAD) and the Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD)?, (2) Is the effect of the tasks joint solving relatively durable?, (3) Does the ZPD have predictive values for the future achievement over and above of ZAD?, and (4) What is more important for the prediction of future achievements - affective-motivational or cognitive help in joint solving? The experiment with parallel groups with 126 subjects is realised. Experimental treatment is consisted of solving of Raven matrices items with a gradual help given by experimenter according to previously defined plan. The results suggest: (1) there is positive and low correlation between ZAD and ZPD, (2) the effect of joint solving is relatively durable, (3) ZPD is significant predictor of future achievements over and above of ZAD, and (4) affective-motivational aspect of joint activity has stronger influence on future achievements than cognitive one. | en |
dc.publisher | Društvo psihologa Srbije, Beograd | |
dc.rights | openAccess | |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ | |
dc.source | Psihologija | |
dc.subject | Zona narednog razvoja | sr |
dc.subject | Vigotski | sr |
dc.subject | Ravenove matrice | sr |
dc.subject | Kognitivni razvoj | sr |
dc.title | Konstrukcija i ko-konstrukcija u zoni narednog razvoja - da li i Pijaže i Vigotski mogu biti u pravu? | sr |
dc.title | Construction and co-construction in the zone of proximal development: Could both Piaget and Vygotsky be right? | en |
dc.type | article | |
dc.rights.license | BY-SA | |
dc.citation.epage | 542 | |
dc.citation.issue | 4 | |
dc.citation.other | 36(4): 517-542 | |
dc.citation.spage | 517 | |
dc.citation.volume | 36 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.2298/PSI0304517B | |
dc.identifier.fulltext | http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/bitstream/id/1988/427.pdf | |
dc.type.version | publishedVersion |