Приказ основних података о документу

dc.creatorNinković, Milica
dc.creatorIlić, Sandra
dc.creatorLazarević, Aleksandra
dc.creatorKovačević, Katarina
dc.creatorPavlović, Svetlana
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-31T09:09:12Z
dc.date.available2023-07-31T09:09:12Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.isbn978-86-6427-166-0
dc.identifier.urihttp://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/4639
dc.description.abstractTrust in physicians and health care system is paramount to delivering quality healthcare and crucial for maintaining favorable physician-patient relationship. There are multiple models of physician-patient relationship that differ by patients’ role in his/her health-related decisionmaking. Although legislation has changed towards deliberative model, in practice, the paternalistic model of relationship might still be widespread in Serbian healthcare system. If this is true, trust in physicians and healthcare system should be positively correlated to passivity normalization. Conversely, if the model that best describes real patient-physician relationship in Serbia is deliberative, trust should be negatively correlated to patients’ passivity normalization. Women who gave birth at least once (N = 274, Mage = 42.4) completed two sets of items: (a) 24 about their relationship with physicians and attitudes toward healthcare system in general, and (b) seven regarding normalization of passivity during childbirth. Canonical correlational analysis on the two sets of items revealed two significant pairs of canonical functions. The first pair (Rho = .62, χ2 (168) = 316.73, p < .001) captured the positive relation between trust in physicians (13 items, e.g., I believe that physicians and healthcare workers care about me as a person) and all seven items from passivity normalization set. Here, trust in physicians explained 12.6% of the variance of passivity normalization. The second pair of functions (Rho = .48, χ2 (138) = 192.71, p = .001) pointed to the negative relation between trust in public healthcare system (5 items, e.g. If I could afford it, I would always choose a private hospital) and three items from passivity normalization set that indicate full submissiveness during childbirth (e.g., During a childbirth, a woman must do whatever the physician tells her). This function accounted for only 2.9% of the variance. Our results indicate that trust in healthcare providers and system reflects on women’s passivity normalization, that is – paternalistic physician-patient relationship is present, accepted and supported by patients. This is reflected in positive relation between trust in physicians and passivity normalization. However, negative relation between trust in public healthcare system and full submissiveness during childbirth indicates that, alongside the existing paternalistic model, there is slight but far from comprehensive shift to the deliberative model.sr
dc.language.isoensr
dc.publisherInstitut za psihologiju i Laboratorija za eksperimentalnu psihologijusr
dc.rightsopenAccesssr
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceBook of abstracts, XXVII Scientific Conference “Empirical Studies in Psychology”, Belgradesr
dc.subjecttrust in the healthcare systemsr
dc.subjectphysician-patient relationshipsr
dc.subjectpassivity normalizationsr
dc.titleIs paternalistic model of physician-patient relationship really in the past: The role of trust in passivity normalizationsr
dc.typearticlesr
dc.rights.licenseBYsr
dc.citation.spage127
dc.identifier.fulltexthttp://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/bitstream/id/11441/bitstream_11441.pdf
dc.identifier.rcubhttps://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4639
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionsr


Документи

Thumbnail

Овај документ се појављује у следећим колекцијама

Приказ основних података о документу