Correct end-of-study guess does not moderate the effects of tDCS on associative and working memory
Conference object (Published version)
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
In recent years, non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques have shown promising effects on cognitive enhancement. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is one of the most widely used NIBS techniques in cognitive neuroscience. Even though the neurophysiological and behavioral effects of tDCS have been demonstrated across a wide range of cognitive and motor functions, the findings were not always consistent. Hence, there is an increasing interest in factors that may moderate the effects, one of which could be the participants’ beliefs of the tDCS condition (i.e., real or sham) they received. Thus, this study aimed to explore if participants’ beliefs about received stimulation type (i.e., the success of blinding) impacted their task performance in tDCS experiments on associative memory (AM) and working memory (WM). We analyzed data from
four within-subject, sham-controlled tDCS experiments (N = 83). Two AM experiments included 20 minutes of anodal 1.5mA tDCS over the post...erior-parietal cortex (PPC) – left hemisphere in Experiment 1; right hemisphere in Experiment 2. WM experiments targeted PPC and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex – left side in Experiment 3; right side in Experiment 4, with 20 minutes of 1.8mA anodal tDCS. The participants completed memory tasks after the stimulation. The order of the sessions was counterbalanced across participants. At the end of the last session, they were asked to try to guess the session in which they received sham stimulation. We found no evidence that sham guessing moderated post-tDCS memory performance in experiments in which tDCS effects were observed as well as in those that showed null effects of tDCS. Specifically, we found no evidence for the interaction between actual stimulation condition and correct sham-guessing across all experiments and outcome measures (p-values range 0.12 – 0.99). Also, correct sham-guessing had no effect on the AM or WM improvement following active stimulation in the joint analysis performed on a single dataset combined from all experiments (F(1,248) = 1.61, p = 0.21, partial eta squared = 0.01, BF10 = 0.31). The results suggest that the placebo-like effect stemming from participants’ beliefs about the stimulation type they received is unlikely to influence the results
in tDCS memory experiments. We discuss the results in light of the growing debate about the relevance and effectiveness of blinding in brain stimulation research.
Keywords:
transcranial direct current stimulation (tdcs) / blinding / sham-guessing / placebo effect / associative memory / working memorySource:
Clinical Neurophysiology, 2022, 141, S3-Funding / projects:
- TWINNIBS - Twinning for excellence in non-invasive brain stimulation in Western Balkans (EU-HE-CSA-101059369)
- Ministry of Science, Technological Development and Innovation of the Republic of Serbia, institutional funding - 200015 (University of Belgrade, Institute for Medical Research) (RS-MESTD-inst-2020-200015)
- Ministry of Science, Technological Development and Innovation of the Republic of Serbia, institutional funding - 200163 (University of Belgrade, Faculty of Philosophy) (RS-MESTD-inst-2020-200163)
Note:
- Abstracts of the 32nd International Congress of Clinical Neurophysiology (ICCN) of the IFCN, September 4-8, 2022, Geneva, Switzerland - Volume 141, Supplement, Pages SS1-S186 (September 2022)
Institution/Community
Psihologija / PsychologyTY - CONF AU - Stanković, Marija AU - Živanović, Marko AU - Bjekić, Jovana AU - Filipović, Saša R. PY - 2022 UR - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/4858 AB - In recent years, non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques have shown promising effects on cognitive enhancement. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is one of the most widely used NIBS techniques in cognitive neuroscience. Even though the neurophysiological and behavioral effects of tDCS have been demonstrated across a wide range of cognitive and motor functions, the findings were not always consistent. Hence, there is an increasing interest in factors that may moderate the effects, one of which could be the participants’ beliefs of the tDCS condition (i.e., real or sham) they received. Thus, this study aimed to explore if participants’ beliefs about received stimulation type (i.e., the success of blinding) impacted their task performance in tDCS experiments on associative memory (AM) and working memory (WM). We analyzed data from four within-subject, sham-controlled tDCS experiments (N = 83). Two AM experiments included 20 minutes of anodal 1.5mA tDCS over the posterior-parietal cortex (PPC) – left hemisphere in Experiment 1; right hemisphere in Experiment 2. WM experiments targeted PPC and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex – left side in Experiment 3; right side in Experiment 4, with 20 minutes of 1.8mA anodal tDCS. The participants completed memory tasks after the stimulation. The order of the sessions was counterbalanced across participants. At the end of the last session, they were asked to try to guess the session in which they received sham stimulation. We found no evidence that sham guessing moderated post-tDCS memory performance in experiments in which tDCS effects were observed as well as in those that showed null effects of tDCS. Specifically, we found no evidence for the interaction between actual stimulation condition and correct sham-guessing across all experiments and outcome measures (p-values range 0.12 – 0.99). Also, correct sham-guessing had no effect on the AM or WM improvement following active stimulation in the joint analysis performed on a single dataset combined from all experiments (F(1,248) = 1.61, p = 0.21, partial eta squared = 0.01, BF10 = 0.31). The results suggest that the placebo-like effect stemming from participants’ beliefs about the stimulation type they received is unlikely to influence the results in tDCS memory experiments. We discuss the results in light of the growing debate about the relevance and effectiveness of blinding in brain stimulation research. C3 - Clinical Neurophysiology T1 - Correct end-of-study guess does not moderate the effects of tDCS on associative and working memory SP - S3 VL - 141 DO - 10.1016/j.clinph.2022.07.010 ER -
@conference{ author = "Stanković, Marija and Živanović, Marko and Bjekić, Jovana and Filipović, Saša R.", year = "2022", abstract = "In recent years, non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques have shown promising effects on cognitive enhancement. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is one of the most widely used NIBS techniques in cognitive neuroscience. Even though the neurophysiological and behavioral effects of tDCS have been demonstrated across a wide range of cognitive and motor functions, the findings were not always consistent. Hence, there is an increasing interest in factors that may moderate the effects, one of which could be the participants’ beliefs of the tDCS condition (i.e., real or sham) they received. Thus, this study aimed to explore if participants’ beliefs about received stimulation type (i.e., the success of blinding) impacted their task performance in tDCS experiments on associative memory (AM) and working memory (WM). We analyzed data from four within-subject, sham-controlled tDCS experiments (N = 83). Two AM experiments included 20 minutes of anodal 1.5mA tDCS over the posterior-parietal cortex (PPC) – left hemisphere in Experiment 1; right hemisphere in Experiment 2. WM experiments targeted PPC and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex – left side in Experiment 3; right side in Experiment 4, with 20 minutes of 1.8mA anodal tDCS. The participants completed memory tasks after the stimulation. The order of the sessions was counterbalanced across participants. At the end of the last session, they were asked to try to guess the session in which they received sham stimulation. We found no evidence that sham guessing moderated post-tDCS memory performance in experiments in which tDCS effects were observed as well as in those that showed null effects of tDCS. Specifically, we found no evidence for the interaction between actual stimulation condition and correct sham-guessing across all experiments and outcome measures (p-values range 0.12 – 0.99). Also, correct sham-guessing had no effect on the AM or WM improvement following active stimulation in the joint analysis performed on a single dataset combined from all experiments (F(1,248) = 1.61, p = 0.21, partial eta squared = 0.01, BF10 = 0.31). The results suggest that the placebo-like effect stemming from participants’ beliefs about the stimulation type they received is unlikely to influence the results in tDCS memory experiments. We discuss the results in light of the growing debate about the relevance and effectiveness of blinding in brain stimulation research.", journal = "Clinical Neurophysiology", title = "Correct end-of-study guess does not moderate the effects of tDCS on associative and working memory", pages = "S3", volume = "141", doi = "10.1016/j.clinph.2022.07.010" }
Stanković, M., Živanović, M., Bjekić, J.,& Filipović, S. R.. (2022). Correct end-of-study guess does not moderate the effects of tDCS on associative and working memory. in Clinical Neurophysiology, 141, S3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2022.07.010
Stanković M, Živanović M, Bjekić J, Filipović SR. Correct end-of-study guess does not moderate the effects of tDCS on associative and working memory. in Clinical Neurophysiology. 2022;141:S3. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2022.07.010 .
Stanković, Marija, Živanović, Marko, Bjekić, Jovana, Filipović, Saša R., "Correct end-of-study guess does not moderate the effects of tDCS on associative and working memory" in Clinical Neurophysiology, 141 (2022):S3, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2022.07.010 . .