“I contain multitudes”: Exploring individual differences in proneness to doublethink
Конференцијски прилог (Објављена верзија)
Метаподаци
Приказ свих података о документуАпстракт
Despite a large body of work on consistency as a basic psychological need, people often simultaneously endorse contradictory beliefs. If they do, we say they are prone to doublethink. Across two studies (Study 1 – N = 240; Study 2 – N = 149), we develop a scale to assess this tendency and explore its predictivity of conspiratorial beliefs. We show that it is possible to capture individual differences in proneness to doublethink, and that this tendency meaningfully relates to both thinking styles and conspiratorial beliefs. Furthermore, doublethink contributes to prediction of conspiratorial beliefs, over and above measures of thinking styles, while a frequently used measure of self-assessed preference for consistency does not. We conclude by proposing two ways to consider doublethink: either as a high entropy thinking style that easily encompasses contradictory beliefs or as a lack of ability to spot inconsistencies. In Study 3 (N=234), we will contrast these two conceptualizations, b...y relating doublethink a. to the ability to spot inconsistencies in neutral material and b. to different measures of thinking styles, while controlling for working memory capacity.
Кључне речи:
contradictory beliefs / individual differences / doublethink / conspiratorial beliefs / thinking stylesИзвор:
Program Agenda, SPSP Annual Convention, 2023Институција/група
Psihologija / PsychologyTY - CONF AU - Petrović, Marija AU - Žeželj, Iris PY - 2023 UR - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/5088 AB - Despite a large body of work on consistency as a basic psychological need, people often simultaneously endorse contradictory beliefs. If they do, we say they are prone to doublethink. Across two studies (Study 1 – N = 240; Study 2 – N = 149), we develop a scale to assess this tendency and explore its predictivity of conspiratorial beliefs. We show that it is possible to capture individual differences in proneness to doublethink, and that this tendency meaningfully relates to both thinking styles and conspiratorial beliefs. Furthermore, doublethink contributes to prediction of conspiratorial beliefs, over and above measures of thinking styles, while a frequently used measure of self-assessed preference for consistency does not. We conclude by proposing two ways to consider doublethink: either as a high entropy thinking style that easily encompasses contradictory beliefs or as a lack of ability to spot inconsistencies. In Study 3 (N=234), we will contrast these two conceptualizations, by relating doublethink a. to the ability to spot inconsistencies in neutral material and b. to different measures of thinking styles, while controlling for working memory capacity. C3 - Program Agenda, SPSP Annual Convention T1 - “I contain multitudes”: Exploring individual differences in proneness to doublethink UR - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_5088 ER -
@conference{ author = "Petrović, Marija and Žeželj, Iris", year = "2023", abstract = "Despite a large body of work on consistency as a basic psychological need, people often simultaneously endorse contradictory beliefs. If they do, we say they are prone to doublethink. Across two studies (Study 1 – N = 240; Study 2 – N = 149), we develop a scale to assess this tendency and explore its predictivity of conspiratorial beliefs. We show that it is possible to capture individual differences in proneness to doublethink, and that this tendency meaningfully relates to both thinking styles and conspiratorial beliefs. Furthermore, doublethink contributes to prediction of conspiratorial beliefs, over and above measures of thinking styles, while a frequently used measure of self-assessed preference for consistency does not. We conclude by proposing two ways to consider doublethink: either as a high entropy thinking style that easily encompasses contradictory beliefs or as a lack of ability to spot inconsistencies. In Study 3 (N=234), we will contrast these two conceptualizations, by relating doublethink a. to the ability to spot inconsistencies in neutral material and b. to different measures of thinking styles, while controlling for working memory capacity.", journal = "Program Agenda, SPSP Annual Convention", title = "“I contain multitudes”: Exploring individual differences in proneness to doublethink", url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_5088" }
Petrović, M.,& Žeželj, I.. (2023). “I contain multitudes”: Exploring individual differences in proneness to doublethink. in Program Agenda, SPSP Annual Convention. https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_5088
Petrović M, Žeželj I. “I contain multitudes”: Exploring individual differences in proneness to doublethink. in Program Agenda, SPSP Annual Convention. 2023;. https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_5088 .
Petrović, Marija, Žeželj, Iris, "“I contain multitudes”: Exploring individual differences in proneness to doublethink" in Program Agenda, SPSP Annual Convention (2023), https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_5088 .