Приказ основних података о документу

dc.contributorCekić, Nenad
dc.creatorSokić, Mirjana
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-15T20:36:52Z
dc.date.available2023-11-15T20:36:52Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.isbn978-86-6427-257-5
dc.identifier.urihttp://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/5318
dc.description.abstractThis paper examines the philosophical implications of Nozick’s thought experiment, specifically focusing on the assumption that most people would not want to be plugged into the experience machine. I present an “inverted” experience machine scenario in order to argue that this assumption is incorrect and that the scenario raises important philosophical questions about our purported unwillingness to be plugged in. The paper concludes that the “inverted” experience machine scenario is compatible with the central thesis of hedonism and other internalist theories of well-being, and provides strong support for the idea that happiness is truly in the head.sr
dc.language.isoensr
dc.publisherFilozofski fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradusr
dc.rightsopenAccesssr
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceVirtues and vices – between ethics and epistemology (edited volume)sr
dc.subjectNozick’s thought experimentsr
dc.subjectanti-hedonistic argumentsr
dc.subjectexperience machinesr
dc.subjectinternalist theories of well-beingsr
dc.subjectsubjective aspect of experiencesr
dc.titleIs Happiness in the Head?sr
dc.typebookPartsr
dc.rights.licenseBYsr
dc.citation.epage129
dc.citation.spage119
dc.identifier.fulltexthttp://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/bitstream/id/13099/bitstream_13099.pdf
dc.identifier.rcubhttps://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_5318
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionsr


Документи

Thumbnail

Овај документ се појављује у следећим колекцијама

Приказ основних података о документу