Nauka o narodu i antropologija čoveka

Abstract

Određivanje odnosa etnologije i antropologije, koje polazi od etimologije nužno gubi razvojnu dimenziju. Osim toga, redukcija antropologije na pitanje 'šta je čovek' i razmatranje 'opštih karakteristika ljudske egzistencije' predstavlja redukovanje antropologije na jednu jedinu temu, što je uzrok njenog perifernog institucionalnog položaja. Sa druge strane, pojam etnologije je ispražnjen od sadržaja raskidom sa metafizički konstituisanim pojmom 'narodnog duha' i svim 'etno' odrednicama koje iz njega proizilaze. Stoga je nesvrsishodno raspravljati o odnosu potpuno redukovane antropologije i dekonstruisane etnologije. Stvarni tok akademski konstituisanih disciplina u Srbiji pokazao je da prazan prostor nastao dekonstrukcijom etnologije nije popunila antropologija redukovana na 'antropologiju Čoveka' već temeljna antropologizacija etnološkog institucionalnog okvira.

A determination of a relationship between ethnology and anthropology with etymology as a starting point, loses a developmental dimension. Besides, a reduction in anthropology to the question:' What is a man' and discussion of 'general characteristics of human existence' represents reduction of anthropology to only one subject, which is the cause of the anthropology's marginalized position. On the other hand, a notion of ethnology is being discharged from the content by a break-up with a metaphysically constructed conception of 'folk spirit' and all the rest 'ethno' dispositions. Hence there is no point in discussing the relationship of a totally reduced anthropology and de-constructed ethnology. Current state of affairs within academically constituted disciplines in Serbia has shown that the vacancy originated by an ethnology de-construction was not filled in by anthropology, reduced to 'anthropology of Man' but a considerable 'anthropologization' of ethnological institutional frame.