Tri paradoksa
Three paradoxes
dc.creator | Đorđević, Vladan | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-10-12T10:59:44Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-10-12T10:59:44Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2009 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0351-2274 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/912 | |
dc.description.abstract | Mada na prvi pogled izgleda da tri paradoksa kojima ću se ovde baviti nemaju ništa bitno zajedničko, smatram da sva tri sadrže skrivenu dvosmislenost iste vrste, i na osnovu toga nudim rešenje. Prvi je poznat u literaturi kao 'direktni argument', drugi je jedan od standardnih argumenata za fatalizam a treći je Mekgijev kontraprimer za modus ponens. | sr |
dc.description.abstract | Although it may seem that the three paradoxes I deal with in this paper have nothing in common, I believe that they all involve an equivocation of the same kind. The first is known as the 'direct argument', the second is one of the standard arguments for fatalism, and the third is McGee's counterexample to modus poenes. | en |
dc.publisher | Srpsko filozofsko društvo, Beograd | |
dc.rights | openAccess | |
dc.source | Theoria | |
dc.title | Tri paradoksa | sr |
dc.title | Three paradoxes | en |
dc.type | article | |
dc.rights.license | ARR | |
dc.citation.epage | 16 | |
dc.citation.issue | 3 | |
dc.citation.other | 52(3): 5-16 | |
dc.citation.rank | M24 | |
dc.citation.spage | 5 | |
dc.citation.volume | 52 | |
dc.identifier.fulltext | http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/bitstream/id/2434/909.pdf | |
dc.identifier.rcub | https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_912 | |
dc.type.version | publishedVersion |