TY  - CONF
AU  - Purić, Danka
AU  - Opačić, Goran
AU  - Petrović, Marija
AU  - Knežević, Goran
AU  - Stanković, Sanda
AU  - Lazić, Aleksandra
AU  - Lukić, Petar
AU  - Lazarević, Ljiljana B.
AU  - Teovanović, Predrag
AU  - Zupan, Zorana
AU  - Ninković, Milica
AU  - Branković, Marija
AU  - Živanović, Marko
AU  - Žeželj, Iris
PY  - 2023
UR  - http://empirijskaistrazivanja.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/EIP23_proceedings.pdf
UR  - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/4927
AB  - To understand the reasons behind the trend of growing use of traditional, complementary and alternative (TCAM) practices this study sought to uncover how people use them - to prevent disease/promote health, to treat medical conditions by complementing official medical treatments, or as an alternative to them. A sample of N = 583 Serbian citizens completed an online questionnaire assessing four TCAM domains: Alternative medical systems (AMS), Natural product-based practices (NP), New Age medicine (NA), and Rituals/Customs (RC). Participants indicated whether they had used a given practice in the past year, and if yes, how they used it. Overall, participants used TCAM preventively in two-thirds of cases, but we also found a significant association between TCAM domain and way of use. AMS was used alternatively more than any other TCAM domain, NP was the most prevalent complementary treatment, while NA and RC were predominantly used preventively. Our results suggest that different domains of TCAM practices may impact people’s health differently, depending on how they are used, which should inform interventions.
PB  - Institut za psihologiju, Filozofski fakultet, Beograd
PB  - Laboratorija za eksperimentalnu psihologiju, Filozofski fakultet, Beograd
C3  - Proceedings - XXIX scientific conference Empirical Studies in Psychology
T1  - To prevent or to cure: How people use traditional, complementary and alternative medicine
EP  - 25
SP  - 22
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4927
ER  - 

@conference{
author = "Purić, Danka and Opačić, Goran and Petrović, Marija and Knežević, Goran and Stanković, Sanda and Lazić, Aleksandra and Lukić, Petar and Lazarević, Ljiljana B. and Teovanović, Predrag and Zupan, Zorana and Ninković, Milica and Branković, Marija and Živanović, Marko and Žeželj, Iris",
year = "2023",
abstract = "To understand the reasons behind the trend of growing use of traditional, complementary and alternative (TCAM) practices this study sought to uncover how people use them - to prevent disease/promote health, to treat medical conditions by complementing official medical treatments, or as an alternative to them. A sample of N = 583 Serbian citizens completed an online questionnaire assessing four TCAM domains: Alternative medical systems (AMS), Natural product-based practices (NP), New Age medicine (NA), and Rituals/Customs (RC). Participants indicated whether they had used a given practice in the past year, and if yes, how they used it. Overall, participants used TCAM preventively in two-thirds of cases, but we also found a significant association between TCAM domain and way of use. AMS was used alternatively more than any other TCAM domain, NP was the most prevalent complementary treatment, while NA and RC were predominantly used preventively. Our results suggest that different domains of TCAM practices may impact people’s health differently, depending on how they are used, which should inform interventions.",
publisher = "Institut za psihologiju, Filozofski fakultet, Beograd, Laboratorija za eksperimentalnu psihologiju, Filozofski fakultet, Beograd",
journal = "Proceedings - XXIX scientific conference Empirical Studies in Psychology",
title = "To prevent or to cure: How people use traditional, complementary and alternative medicine",
pages = "25-22",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4927"
}

Purić, D., Opačić, G., Petrović, M., Knežević, G., Stanković, S., Lazić, A., Lukić, P., Lazarević, L. B., Teovanović, P., Zupan, Z., Ninković, M., Branković, M., Živanović, M.,& Žeželj, I.. (2023). To prevent or to cure: How people use traditional, complementary and alternative medicine. in Proceedings - XXIX scientific conference Empirical Studies in Psychology
Institut za psihologiju, Filozofski fakultet, Beograd., 22-25.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4927

Purić D, Opačić G, Petrović M, Knežević G, Stanković S, Lazić A, Lukić P, Lazarević LB, Teovanović P, Zupan Z, Ninković M, Branković M, Živanović M, Žeželj I. To prevent or to cure: How people use traditional, complementary and alternative medicine. in Proceedings - XXIX scientific conference Empirical Studies in Psychology. 2023;:22-25.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4927 .

Purić, Danka, Opačić, Goran, Petrović, Marija, Knežević, Goran, Stanković, Sanda, Lazić, Aleksandra, Lukić, Petar, Lazarević, Ljiljana B., Teovanović, Predrag, Zupan, Zorana, Ninković, Milica, Branković, Marija, Živanović, Marko, Žeželj, Iris, "To prevent or to cure: How people use traditional, complementary and alternative medicine" in Proceedings - XXIX scientific conference Empirical Studies in Psychology (2023):22-25,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4927 .

TY  - CONF
AU  - Purić, Danka
AU  - Opačić, Goran
AU  - Petrović, Marija
AU  - Stanković, Sanda
AU  - Lazić, Aleksandra
AU  - Lukić, Petar
AU  - Lazarević, Ljiljana B.
AU  - Teovanović, Predrag
AU  - Zupan, Zorana
AU  - Ninković, Milica
AU  - Branković, Marija
AU  - Živanović, Marko
AU  - Žeželj, Iris
PY  - 2023
UR  - http://empirijskaistrazivanja.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/EIP2023_book_of_abstracts.pdf
UR  - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/4928
AB  - To understand the reasons behind the trend of growing use of traditional, complementary and alternative (TCAM) practices we should first reflect on how people use them - to prevent disease/promote health, to treat medical conditions by complementing official medical treatments, or as an alternative to them. A total of N = 583 (Mage = 39.01 years, SDage = 12.10; 74.4% females) participants from Serbia completed an online survey including a list of 24 TCAM practices, grouped into four domains: Alternative Medical Systems (e.g., acupuncture, homeopathy), Natural product-based practices (e.g., herbal extracts/supplements), New Age medicine (e.g., yoga, mindfulness) and Rituals/Customs (e.g., visiting monasteries for health). Participants who indicated using a certain practice in the past year were asked to consider their most recent experience with that practice and choose only one option for how they used it: for preventive purposes/advancing health, at the same time with official medicine therapy, instead of official medicine therapy. Participants also provided information on whether a TCAM practitioner was involved in their last use of any of the TCAM practices and how often, in general, they consult TCAM practitioners. Overall, 63%, 95%CI [60, 65] of participants used TCAM practices for preventive purposes, 31% [29, 34] in parallel with, and 6% [5, 8] as an alternative to official treatments. Of the four domains of TCAM use, New Age medicine and Rituals/Customs were most frequently used for prevention, with 78% [74, 83] and 77% [72, 82], respectively, while Natural product-based practices were used for prevention in 57% [54, 60] and Alternative Medical Systems in 41% [33, 49] of the cases. Alternative use of TCAM practices was the most common in the case of Alternative Medical Systems (21% [14, 28]), while it amounted to no more than 7% of participants for any of the other domains. For 24% of participants, a TCAM practitioner was present during their last TCAM use, 10% reported a practitioner previously prescribing the practice, while 66% of participants reported no practitioner involvement. The results suggest the importance of treating different domains of TCAM practices separately, as they may have different impacts on people’s health behavior. We especially point to the importance of monitoring adherence to alternative medical systems, as they may potentially distract patients from official therapies and thus further compromise their health.
C3  - Book of abstracts - XXIX scientific conference Empirical Studies in Psychology
T1  - To prevent or to cure: How people use traditional, complementary and alternative medicine
EP  - 56
SP  - 55
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4928
ER  - 

@conference{
author = "Purić, Danka and Opačić, Goran and Petrović, Marija and Stanković, Sanda and Lazić, Aleksandra and Lukić, Petar and Lazarević, Ljiljana B. and Teovanović, Predrag and Zupan, Zorana and Ninković, Milica and Branković, Marija and Živanović, Marko and Žeželj, Iris",
year = "2023",
abstract = "To understand the reasons behind the trend of growing use of traditional, complementary and alternative (TCAM) practices we should first reflect on how people use them - to prevent disease/promote health, to treat medical conditions by complementing official medical treatments, or as an alternative to them. A total of N = 583 (Mage = 39.01 years, SDage = 12.10; 74.4% females) participants from Serbia completed an online survey including a list of 24 TCAM practices, grouped into four domains: Alternative Medical Systems (e.g., acupuncture, homeopathy), Natural product-based practices (e.g., herbal extracts/supplements), New Age medicine (e.g., yoga, mindfulness) and Rituals/Customs (e.g., visiting monasteries for health). Participants who indicated using a certain practice in the past year were asked to consider their most recent experience with that practice and choose only one option for how they used it: for preventive purposes/advancing health, at the same time with official medicine therapy, instead of official medicine therapy. Participants also provided information on whether a TCAM practitioner was involved in their last use of any of the TCAM practices and how often, in general, they consult TCAM practitioners. Overall, 63%, 95%CI [60, 65] of participants used TCAM practices for preventive purposes, 31% [29, 34] in parallel with, and 6% [5, 8] as an alternative to official treatments. Of the four domains of TCAM use, New Age medicine and Rituals/Customs were most frequently used for prevention, with 78% [74, 83] and 77% [72, 82], respectively, while Natural product-based practices were used for prevention in 57% [54, 60] and Alternative Medical Systems in 41% [33, 49] of the cases. Alternative use of TCAM practices was the most common in the case of Alternative Medical Systems (21% [14, 28]), while it amounted to no more than 7% of participants for any of the other domains. For 24% of participants, a TCAM practitioner was present during their last TCAM use, 10% reported a practitioner previously prescribing the practice, while 66% of participants reported no practitioner involvement. The results suggest the importance of treating different domains of TCAM practices separately, as they may have different impacts on people’s health behavior. We especially point to the importance of monitoring adherence to alternative medical systems, as they may potentially distract patients from official therapies and thus further compromise their health.",
journal = "Book of abstracts - XXIX scientific conference Empirical Studies in Psychology",
title = "To prevent or to cure: How people use traditional, complementary and alternative medicine",
pages = "56-55",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4928"
}

Purić, D., Opačić, G., Petrović, M., Stanković, S., Lazić, A., Lukić, P., Lazarević, L. B., Teovanović, P., Zupan, Z., Ninković, M., Branković, M., Živanović, M.,& Žeželj, I.. (2023). To prevent or to cure: How people use traditional, complementary and alternative medicine. in Book of abstracts - XXIX scientific conference Empirical Studies in Psychology, 55-56.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4928

Purić D, Opačić G, Petrović M, Stanković S, Lazić A, Lukić P, Lazarević LB, Teovanović P, Zupan Z, Ninković M, Branković M, Živanović M, Žeželj I. To prevent or to cure: How people use traditional, complementary and alternative medicine. in Book of abstracts - XXIX scientific conference Empirical Studies in Psychology. 2023;:55-56.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4928 .

Purić, Danka, Opačić, Goran, Petrović, Marija, Stanković, Sanda, Lazić, Aleksandra, Lukić, Petar, Lazarević, Ljiljana B., Teovanović, Predrag, Zupan, Zorana, Ninković, Milica, Branković, Marija, Živanović, Marko, Žeželj, Iris, "To prevent or to cure: How people use traditional, complementary and alternative medicine" in Book of abstracts - XXIX scientific conference Empirical Studies in Psychology (2023):55-56,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4928 .

TY  - CONF
AU  - Purić, Danka
AU  - Petrović, Marija
AU  - Teovanović, Predrag
AU  - Živanović, Marko
AU  - Ninković, Milica
AU  - Zupan, Zorana
AU  - Lazarević, Ljiljana B.
AU  - Stanković, Sanda
AU  - Lukić, Petar
AU  - Branković, Marija
AU  - Opačić, Goran
AU  - Lazić, Aleksandra
AU  - Žeželj, Iris
PY  - 2023
UR  - http://empirijskaistrazivanja.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/EIP2023_book_of_abstracts.pdf
UR  - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/4925
AB  - Despite unknown efficiency, known risks, and associated adverse effects of certain traditional, complementary, and alternative medicine (TCAM) practices, the number of people using them appears to be on the rise. Existing taxonomies of TCAM practices mostly relied on either conceptual reasons, or they relied on attitudes toward TCAM, rather than its actual use. In this study, we sought to group TCAM practices based on their patterns of use. A sample of N = 583 (Mage = 39.01 years, SDage = 12.10; 74.4% females) participants residing in Serbia completed an online survey including a list of 71 TCAM practices. For each practice, they indicated if and when they used it to promote their own or their children's health (options: never heard about it/never used it/more than a year ago/in the past year/during the past two weeks). To evaluate the lifetime use of TCAM, we binarized all TCAM items to reflect whether participants have ever used a given practice (never using a practice was coded as 0, using it at least once as 1). After excluding items with frequencies below 5%, we performed an exploratory factor analysis on the tetrachoric correlation matrix for the remaining 49 items. Using a minimum residual method of extraction and oblimin rotation, we identified four meaningful factors explaining 42% of total variance: 1) Natural product-based practices (NP) comprising the use of products such as extracts and supplements of herbal and non-herbal origin; 2) Rituals/Customs (RC) which reflected the use of traditional medicine and religious practices, such as visiting monasteries; 3) New age medicine (NA) incorporating mind-body therapies and energy medicine practices; and 4) Alternative medical systems (AMS) such as acupuncture, homeopathy, quantum medicine, and osteopathy/chiropractic. Factor correlations ranged from r = .18, p <.001 for RC and AMS to r = .30, p < .001 for NA and AMS. The latent structure we obtained based on the pattern of TCAM use corresponds closely to existing conceptual typologies, as well as to those based on attitudes toward TCAM. This suggests that consumers are sensitive to common characteristics of certain TCAM treatments and are more likely to resort to similar types of TCAM practices to promote their health. The existence of relatively independent factors of TCAM use opens the possibility of differential patterns of their psychological predictors and health-related outcomes.
C3  - Book of abstracts - XXIX scientific conference Empirical Studies in Psychology
T1  - The latent structure of traditional, complementary, and alternative medicine practices based on patterns of use
EP  - 55
SP  - 54
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4925
ER  - 

@conference{
author = "Purić, Danka and Petrović, Marija and Teovanović, Predrag and Živanović, Marko and Ninković, Milica and Zupan, Zorana and Lazarević, Ljiljana B. and Stanković, Sanda and Lukić, Petar and Branković, Marija and Opačić, Goran and Lazić, Aleksandra and Žeželj, Iris",
year = "2023",
abstract = "Despite unknown efficiency, known risks, and associated adverse effects of certain traditional, complementary, and alternative medicine (TCAM) practices, the number of people using them appears to be on the rise. Existing taxonomies of TCAM practices mostly relied on either conceptual reasons, or they relied on attitudes toward TCAM, rather than its actual use. In this study, we sought to group TCAM practices based on their patterns of use. A sample of N = 583 (Mage = 39.01 years, SDage = 12.10; 74.4% females) participants residing in Serbia completed an online survey including a list of 71 TCAM practices. For each practice, they indicated if and when they used it to promote their own or their children's health (options: never heard about it/never used it/more than a year ago/in the past year/during the past two weeks). To evaluate the lifetime use of TCAM, we binarized all TCAM items to reflect whether participants have ever used a given practice (never using a practice was coded as 0, using it at least once as 1). After excluding items with frequencies below 5%, we performed an exploratory factor analysis on the tetrachoric correlation matrix for the remaining 49 items. Using a minimum residual method of extraction and oblimin rotation, we identified four meaningful factors explaining 42% of total variance: 1) Natural product-based practices (NP) comprising the use of products such as extracts and supplements of herbal and non-herbal origin; 2) Rituals/Customs (RC) which reflected the use of traditional medicine and religious practices, such as visiting monasteries; 3) New age medicine (NA) incorporating mind-body therapies and energy medicine practices; and 4) Alternative medical systems (AMS) such as acupuncture, homeopathy, quantum medicine, and osteopathy/chiropractic. Factor correlations ranged from r = .18, p <.001 for RC and AMS to r = .30, p < .001 for NA and AMS. The latent structure we obtained based on the pattern of TCAM use corresponds closely to existing conceptual typologies, as well as to those based on attitudes toward TCAM. This suggests that consumers are sensitive to common characteristics of certain TCAM treatments and are more likely to resort to similar types of TCAM practices to promote their health. The existence of relatively independent factors of TCAM use opens the possibility of differential patterns of their psychological predictors and health-related outcomes.",
journal = "Book of abstracts - XXIX scientific conference Empirical Studies in Psychology",
title = "The latent structure of traditional, complementary, and alternative medicine practices based on patterns of use",
pages = "55-54",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4925"
}

Purić, D., Petrović, M., Teovanović, P., Živanović, M., Ninković, M., Zupan, Z., Lazarević, L. B., Stanković, S., Lukić, P., Branković, M., Opačić, G., Lazić, A.,& Žeželj, I.. (2023). The latent structure of traditional, complementary, and alternative medicine practices based on patterns of use. in Book of abstracts - XXIX scientific conference Empirical Studies in Psychology, 54-55.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4925

Purić D, Petrović M, Teovanović P, Živanović M, Ninković M, Zupan Z, Lazarević LB, Stanković S, Lukić P, Branković M, Opačić G, Lazić A, Žeželj I. The latent structure of traditional, complementary, and alternative medicine practices based on patterns of use. in Book of abstracts - XXIX scientific conference Empirical Studies in Psychology. 2023;:54-55.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4925 .

Purić, Danka, Petrović, Marija, Teovanović, Predrag, Živanović, Marko, Ninković, Milica, Zupan, Zorana, Lazarević, Ljiljana B., Stanković, Sanda, Lukić, Petar, Branković, Marija, Opačić, Goran, Lazić, Aleksandra, Žeželj, Iris, "The latent structure of traditional, complementary, and alternative medicine practices based on patterns of use" in Book of abstracts - XXIX scientific conference Empirical Studies in Psychology (2023):54-55,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4925 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Lazarević, Ljiljana
AU  - Knežević, Goran
AU  - Purić, Danka
AU  - Teovanović, Predrag
AU  - Petrović, Marija
AU  - Ninković, Milica
AU  - Živanović, Marko
AU  - Stanković, Sanda
AU  - Branković, Marija
AU  - Lukić, Petar
AU  - Opačić, Goran
AU  - Žeželj, Iris
PY  - 2023
UR  - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/4763
AB  - People resort to various questionable health practices to preserve or regain health - they intentionally do not adhere to medical recommendations (e.g. self-medicate or modify the prescribed therapies; iNAR), or use traditional/complementary/alternative (TCAM) medicine. As retrospective reports overestimate adherence and suffer from recall and desirability bias, we tracked the variations in daily questionable health behaviors and compared them to their retrospectively reported lifetime use. We also preregistered and explored their relations to a wide set of psychological predictors - distal (personality traits and basic thinking dispositions) and proximal (different unfounded beliefs and biases grouped under the term irrational mindset). A community sample (N = 224) tracked daily engagement in iNAR and TCAM use for 14 days, resulting in 3136 data points. We observed a high rate of questionable health practices over the 14 days; daily engagement rates roughly corresponded to lifetime ones. Both iNAR and TCAM were weakly, but robustly positively related. Independent of the assessment method, an irrational mindset was the most important predictor of TCAM use. For iNAR, however, psychological predictors emerged as relevant only when assessed retrospectively. Our study offers insight into questionable health behaviors from both a within and between-person perspective and highlights the importance of their psychological roots.
T2  - Scientific Reports
T1  - Tracking variations in daily questionable health behaviors and their psychological roots: a preregistered experience sampling study
SP  - 14058
VL  - 13
DO  - 10.1038/s41598-023-41243-w
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Lazarević, Ljiljana and Knežević, Goran and Purić, Danka and Teovanović, Predrag and Petrović, Marija and Ninković, Milica and Živanović, Marko and Stanković, Sanda and Branković, Marija and Lukić, Petar and Opačić, Goran and Žeželj, Iris",
year = "2023",
abstract = "People resort to various questionable health practices to preserve or regain health - they intentionally do not adhere to medical recommendations (e.g. self-medicate or modify the prescribed therapies; iNAR), or use traditional/complementary/alternative (TCAM) medicine. As retrospective reports overestimate adherence and suffer from recall and desirability bias, we tracked the variations in daily questionable health behaviors and compared them to their retrospectively reported lifetime use. We also preregistered and explored their relations to a wide set of psychological predictors - distal (personality traits and basic thinking dispositions) and proximal (different unfounded beliefs and biases grouped under the term irrational mindset). A community sample (N = 224) tracked daily engagement in iNAR and TCAM use for 14 days, resulting in 3136 data points. We observed a high rate of questionable health practices over the 14 days; daily engagement rates roughly corresponded to lifetime ones. Both iNAR and TCAM were weakly, but robustly positively related. Independent of the assessment method, an irrational mindset was the most important predictor of TCAM use. For iNAR, however, psychological predictors emerged as relevant only when assessed retrospectively. Our study offers insight into questionable health behaviors from both a within and between-person perspective and highlights the importance of their psychological roots.",
journal = "Scientific Reports",
title = "Tracking variations in daily questionable health behaviors and their psychological roots: a preregistered experience sampling study",
pages = "14058",
volume = "13",
doi = "10.1038/s41598-023-41243-w"
}

Lazarević, L., Knežević, G., Purić, D., Teovanović, P., Petrović, M., Ninković, M., Živanović, M., Stanković, S., Branković, M., Lukić, P., Opačić, G.,& Žeželj, I.. (2023). Tracking variations in daily questionable health behaviors and their psychological roots: a preregistered experience sampling study. in Scientific Reports, 13, 14058.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-41243-w

Lazarević L, Knežević G, Purić D, Teovanović P, Petrović M, Ninković M, Živanović M, Stanković S, Branković M, Lukić P, Opačić G, Žeželj I. Tracking variations in daily questionable health behaviors and their psychological roots: a preregistered experience sampling study. in Scientific Reports. 2023;13:14058.
doi:10.1038/s41598-023-41243-w .

Lazarević, Ljiljana, Knežević, Goran, Purić, Danka, Teovanović, Predrag, Petrović, Marija, Ninković, Milica, Živanović, Marko, Stanković, Sanda, Branković, Marija, Lukić, Petar, Opačić, Goran, Žeželj, Iris, "Tracking variations in daily questionable health behaviors and their psychological roots: a preregistered experience sampling study" in Scientific Reports, 13 (2023):14058,
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-41243-w . .

TY  - CONF
AU  - Ninković, Milica
AU  - Puhalo, Srđan
AU  - Petrović, Marija
AU  - Purić, Danka
AU  - Lukić, Petar
AU  - Žeželj, Iris Lav
PY  - 2023
UR  - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/5879
AB  - Traditional, complementary, and alternative medicine (TCAM) refers to healthcare practices that are not a part of conventional health systems. Their use can be subsumed into four domains: Alternative medical systems (e.g., homeopathy), New age practices (e.g., art therapy), Natural product-based practices (e.g., herbal balms), and Rituals/Customs (e.g., prayers for health). These practices can be used in three distinct ways: for preventive purposes, together with official medical practices, or as an alternative to them, with the latter being the most problematic. Psychological roots of the tendency to resort to these practices is repeatedly proved to be an “irrational mindset” (IM), a composite of irrational beliefs and cognitive biases. Here we explored whether IM (Superstition, Magical health beliefs, Conspiracy mentality, and Naturalness bias) can differentiate between different types of TCAM use. To this end, for each of the four domains participants indicated the way they typically use it. We recruited 470 participants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (Mage = 44.9, SDage = 10.2; 65 % women). Using Linear discriminant analysis (LDA), we explored the relation between ways of TCAM use and IM. Since only Natural product-based medicine had frequency of alternative use > 4 %, we ran LDA to explore how IM predicts the way of use for this TCAM domain. Discriminant function indicated that IM has a role in predicting the way people use natural product-based medicine (Wilk’s Λ = .96, χ2 (12) = 21.06, R = .20, p = .050), with Superstition and Naturalness bias as the crucial predictors. The obtained function best
differentiates the individuals who used natural product-based medicine as an alternative to the conventional treatments from the others. Our results show that people who tend to abandon official medical practices for TCAM are those prone to superstition and searching for naturalness. The official health communication could be tailored to specifically target these beliefs.
PB  - Odsjek za psihologiju Filozofskog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Zagrebu
C3  - Book of Abstracts, 26th Ramiro and Zoran Bujas Days
T1  - Who replaces conventional medicine with herbs and supplements? The role of irrational mindset
SP  - 102
DO  - 10.17234/DRZB26
ER  - 

@conference{
author = "Ninković, Milica and Puhalo, Srđan and Petrović, Marija and Purić, Danka and Lukić, Petar and Žeželj, Iris Lav",
year = "2023",
abstract = "Traditional, complementary, and alternative medicine (TCAM) refers to healthcare practices that are not a part of conventional health systems. Their use can be subsumed into four domains: Alternative medical systems (e.g., homeopathy), New age practices (e.g., art therapy), Natural product-based practices (e.g., herbal balms), and Rituals/Customs (e.g., prayers for health). These practices can be used in three distinct ways: for preventive purposes, together with official medical practices, or as an alternative to them, with the latter being the most problematic. Psychological roots of the tendency to resort to these practices is repeatedly proved to be an “irrational mindset” (IM), a composite of irrational beliefs and cognitive biases. Here we explored whether IM (Superstition, Magical health beliefs, Conspiracy mentality, and Naturalness bias) can differentiate between different types of TCAM use. To this end, for each of the four domains participants indicated the way they typically use it. We recruited 470 participants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (Mage = 44.9, SDage = 10.2; 65 % women). Using Linear discriminant analysis (LDA), we explored the relation between ways of TCAM use and IM. Since only Natural product-based medicine had frequency of alternative use > 4 %, we ran LDA to explore how IM predicts the way of use for this TCAM domain. Discriminant function indicated that IM has a role in predicting the way people use natural product-based medicine (Wilk’s Λ = .96, χ2 (12) = 21.06, R = .20, p = .050), with Superstition and Naturalness bias as the crucial predictors. The obtained function best
differentiates the individuals who used natural product-based medicine as an alternative to the conventional treatments from the others. Our results show that people who tend to abandon official medical practices for TCAM are those prone to superstition and searching for naturalness. The official health communication could be tailored to specifically target these beliefs.",
publisher = "Odsjek za psihologiju Filozofskog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Zagrebu",
journal = "Book of Abstracts, 26th Ramiro and Zoran Bujas Days",
title = "Who replaces conventional medicine with herbs and supplements? The role of irrational mindset",
pages = "102",
doi = "10.17234/DRZB26"
}

Ninković, M., Puhalo, S., Petrović, M., Purić, D., Lukić, P.,& Žeželj, I. L.. (2023). Who replaces conventional medicine with herbs and supplements? The role of irrational mindset. in Book of Abstracts, 26th Ramiro and Zoran Bujas Days
Odsjek za psihologiju Filozofskog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Zagrebu., 102.
https://doi.org/10.17234/DRZB26

Ninković M, Puhalo S, Petrović M, Purić D, Lukić P, Žeželj IL. Who replaces conventional medicine with herbs and supplements? The role of irrational mindset. in Book of Abstracts, 26th Ramiro and Zoran Bujas Days. 2023;:102.
doi:10.17234/DRZB26 .

Ninković, Milica, Puhalo, Srđan, Petrović, Marija, Purić, Danka, Lukić, Petar, Žeželj, Iris Lav, "Who replaces conventional medicine with herbs and supplements? The role of irrational mindset" in Book of Abstracts, 26th Ramiro and Zoran Bujas Days (2023):102,
https://doi.org/10.17234/DRZB26 . .

TY  - CONF
AU  - Petrović, Marija
AU  - Puhalo, Srđan
AU  - Ninković, Milica
AU  - Purić, Danka
AU  - Lukić, Petar
AU  - Žeželj, Iris Lav
PY  - 2023
UR  - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/5878
AB  - To preserve their health, people are increasingly resorting to traditional, complementary and alternative medicine (TCAM). While its appeal grows, it is still lacking a strong evidence base and can lead to adverse effects. In a previous study in Serbia, we developed a new instrument to measure the lifetime use of diverse TCAM practices (e.g., acupuncture, art therapy, herbal balms, prayer, etc.) and explored its psychological antecedents. The results showed that the pattern of use of TCAM practices can be classified into four domains: Alternative medical systems, Natural product-based practices, New age medicine, and Rituals/Customs. Moreover, an irrational mindset (IM; consisting of irrational beliefs and cognitive biases) contributed to the prediction of TCAM use, over and above socio-demographics, ideological beliefs, and self-reported health status. To conceptually replicate the results, we validated the measure in a novel setting (Bosnia and Herzegovina). Participants first reported their lifetime TCAM use (N = 580). Using CFA, we replicated a four-factor structure of TCAM domains (CFI = 0.94; TLI = 0.93; RMSEA = .03 (95 % CI .03-.04)). Next, for the participants who filled out all measures (N = 470, 65 % women; Mage = 44.9, SDage = 10.2), we explored whether IM variables (magical health beliefs, conspiracist thinking, superstition, and the naturalness bias) contributed to the prediction of TCAM use. As expected, after controlling for sociodemographics, ideological beliefs, and self-reported health 
status, IM significantly contributed to the prediction (ΔF (4,457) = 20.33, p < .001, ΔR2 = .127), with magical health beliefs, superstition, and naturalness bias contributing over and above other predictors. Magical health beliefs were the strongest predictor, alongside gender. We find that our
results largely replicate in a novel setting, offering further evidence of the importance of
including IM when considering the susceptibility to TCAM use.
C3  - Book of Abstracts, 26th Ramiro and Zoran Bujas Days
T1  - Some superstition, some magical health, but all natural: beliefs that makes us prone to traditional, complementary and alternative medicine practices
SP  - 109
DO  - 10.17234/DRZB26
ER  - 

@conference{
author = "Petrović, Marija and Puhalo, Srđan and Ninković, Milica and Purić, Danka and Lukić, Petar and Žeželj, Iris Lav",
year = "2023",
abstract = "To preserve their health, people are increasingly resorting to traditional, complementary and alternative medicine (TCAM). While its appeal grows, it is still lacking a strong evidence base and can lead to adverse effects. In a previous study in Serbia, we developed a new instrument to measure the lifetime use of diverse TCAM practices (e.g., acupuncture, art therapy, herbal balms, prayer, etc.) and explored its psychological antecedents. The results showed that the pattern of use of TCAM practices can be classified into four domains: Alternative medical systems, Natural product-based practices, New age medicine, and Rituals/Customs. Moreover, an irrational mindset (IM; consisting of irrational beliefs and cognitive biases) contributed to the prediction of TCAM use, over and above socio-demographics, ideological beliefs, and self-reported health status. To conceptually replicate the results, we validated the measure in a novel setting (Bosnia and Herzegovina). Participants first reported their lifetime TCAM use (N = 580). Using CFA, we replicated a four-factor structure of TCAM domains (CFI = 0.94; TLI = 0.93; RMSEA = .03 (95 % CI .03-.04)). Next, for the participants who filled out all measures (N = 470, 65 % women; Mage = 44.9, SDage = 10.2), we explored whether IM variables (magical health beliefs, conspiracist thinking, superstition, and the naturalness bias) contributed to the prediction of TCAM use. As expected, after controlling for sociodemographics, ideological beliefs, and self-reported health 
status, IM significantly contributed to the prediction (ΔF (4,457) = 20.33, p < .001, ΔR2 = .127), with magical health beliefs, superstition, and naturalness bias contributing over and above other predictors. Magical health beliefs were the strongest predictor, alongside gender. We find that our
results largely replicate in a novel setting, offering further evidence of the importance of
including IM when considering the susceptibility to TCAM use.",
journal = "Book of Abstracts, 26th Ramiro and Zoran Bujas Days",
title = "Some superstition, some magical health, but all natural: beliefs that makes us prone to traditional, complementary and alternative medicine practices",
pages = "109",
doi = "10.17234/DRZB26"
}

Petrović, M., Puhalo, S., Ninković, M., Purić, D., Lukić, P.,& Žeželj, I. L.. (2023). Some superstition, some magical health, but all natural: beliefs that makes us prone to traditional, complementary and alternative medicine practices. in Book of Abstracts, 26th Ramiro and Zoran Bujas Days, 109.
https://doi.org/10.17234/DRZB26

Petrović M, Puhalo S, Ninković M, Purić D, Lukić P, Žeželj IL. Some superstition, some magical health, but all natural: beliefs that makes us prone to traditional, complementary and alternative medicine practices. in Book of Abstracts, 26th Ramiro and Zoran Bujas Days. 2023;:109.
doi:10.17234/DRZB26 .

Petrović, Marija, Puhalo, Srđan, Ninković, Milica, Purić, Danka, Lukić, Petar, Žeželj, Iris Lav, "Some superstition, some magical health, but all natural: beliefs that makes us prone to traditional, complementary and alternative medicine practices" in Book of Abstracts, 26th Ramiro and Zoran Bujas Days (2023):109,
https://doi.org/10.17234/DRZB26 . .

TY  - CONF
AU  - Petrović, Marija
AU  - Purić, Danka
AU  - Branković, Marija
AU  - Lukić, Petar
AU  - Ninković, Milica
AU  - Žeželj, Iris
PY  - 2023
UR  - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/5628
AB  - While some health practices are supported by science and recommended by authorities, for others scientific evidence-base might be lacking or is yet to be established. Both non-adhering to recommendations and resorting to non evidence-based practices (typically in the domain of traditional, complementary and alternative medicine (TCAM)) can be detrimental for health. We investigated psychological roots of two types of health practices, focusing on their relationship with an “irrational mindset”, an umbrella term comprising certain cognitive biases, belief in conspiracy theories, superstition and magical health beliefs. In a preregistered study (N = 583) we contrasted how an irrational mindset contributes to the prediction of both types of health practices, above other relevant factors, such as sociodemographics, ideological beliefs, health status or relation to the healthcare system. Although the two types of health practices were positively related, they could be traced to different predictors: non-adherence was primarily explained by negative experiences with the health system, whilst irrational mindset did not additionally contribute. In contrast, irrational mindset consistently added to the prediction of different types of TCAM use, with magical health beliefs being the strongest predictor. We highlight the importance of tailoring interventions to the type of health practices so they also target underlying irrational beliefs, on top of providing correct information.
C3  - Book of abstracts, 19th General Meeting of the European Association of Social Psychology, Krakow, Poland
T1  - Irrational health choices: What drives people to not adhere to science-based recommendations and resort to alternatives
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_5628
ER  - 

@conference{
author = "Petrović, Marija and Purić, Danka and Branković, Marija and Lukić, Petar and Ninković, Milica and Žeželj, Iris",
year = "2023",
abstract = "While some health practices are supported by science and recommended by authorities, for others scientific evidence-base might be lacking or is yet to be established. Both non-adhering to recommendations and resorting to non evidence-based practices (typically in the domain of traditional, complementary and alternative medicine (TCAM)) can be detrimental for health. We investigated psychological roots of two types of health practices, focusing on their relationship with an “irrational mindset”, an umbrella term comprising certain cognitive biases, belief in conspiracy theories, superstition and magical health beliefs. In a preregistered study (N = 583) we contrasted how an irrational mindset contributes to the prediction of both types of health practices, above other relevant factors, such as sociodemographics, ideological beliefs, health status or relation to the healthcare system. Although the two types of health practices were positively related, they could be traced to different predictors: non-adherence was primarily explained by negative experiences with the health system, whilst irrational mindset did not additionally contribute. In contrast, irrational mindset consistently added to the prediction of different types of TCAM use, with magical health beliefs being the strongest predictor. We highlight the importance of tailoring interventions to the type of health practices so they also target underlying irrational beliefs, on top of providing correct information.",
journal = "Book of abstracts, 19th General Meeting of the European Association of Social Psychology, Krakow, Poland",
title = "Irrational health choices: What drives people to not adhere to science-based recommendations and resort to alternatives",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_5628"
}

Petrović, M., Purić, D., Branković, M., Lukić, P., Ninković, M.,& Žeželj, I.. (2023). Irrational health choices: What drives people to not adhere to science-based recommendations and resort to alternatives. in Book of abstracts, 19th General Meeting of the European Association of Social Psychology, Krakow, Poland.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_5628

Petrović M, Purić D, Branković M, Lukić P, Ninković M, Žeželj I. Irrational health choices: What drives people to not adhere to science-based recommendations and resort to alternatives. in Book of abstracts, 19th General Meeting of the European Association of Social Psychology, Krakow, Poland. 2023;.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_5628 .

Petrović, Marija, Purić, Danka, Branković, Marija, Lukić, Petar, Ninković, Milica, Žeželj, Iris, "Irrational health choices: What drives people to not adhere to science-based recommendations and resort to alternatives" in Book of abstracts, 19th General Meeting of the European Association of Social Psychology, Krakow, Poland (2023),
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_5628 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Purić, Danka
AU  - Petrović, Marija
AU  - Živanović, Marko
AU  - Lukić, Petar
AU  - Zupan, Zorana
AU  - Branković, Marija
AU  - Ninković, Milica
AU  - Lazarević, Ljiljana
AU  - Stanković, Sanda
AU  - Žeželj, Iris
PY  - 2023
UR  - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/4631
AB  - Objectives We aimed to (1) develop a novel instrument, suitable for the general population, capturing intentional non-adherence (iNAR), consisting of non-adherence to prescribed therapy, self-medication and avoidance of seeking medical treatment; (2) differentiate it from other forms of non-adherence, for example, smoking; and (3) relate iNAR to patient-related factors, such as sociodemographics, health status and endorsement of irrational beliefs (conspiratorial thinking and superstitions) and to healthcare-related beliefs and experiences ((mis)trust and negative experiences with the healthcare system, normalisation of patient passivity).

Design То generate iNAR items, we employed a focus group with medical doctors, supplemented it with a literature search and invited a public health expert to refine it further. We examined the internal structure and predictors of iNAR in an observational study.

Setting Data were collected online using snowball sampling and social networks.

Participants After excluding those who failed one or more out of three attention checks, the final sample size was n=583 adult Serbian citizens, 74.4% female, mean age 39.01 years (SD=12.10).

Primary and secondary outcome measures The primary, planned outcome is the iNAR Questionnaire, while smoking was used for comparison purposes.

Results Factor analysis yielded a one-factor solution, and the final 12-item iNAR Questionnaire had satisfactory internal reliability (alpha=0.72). Health condition and healthcare-related variables accounted for 14% of the variance of iNAR behaviours, whereas sociodemographics and irrational beliefs did not additionally contribute.

Conclusions We constructed a brief yet comprehensive measure of iNAR behaviours and related them to health and sociodemographic variables and irrational beliefs. The findings suggest that public health interventions should attempt to improve patients' experiences with the system and build trust with their healthcare practitioners rather than aim at specific demographic groups or at correcting patients’ unfounded beliefs.
T2  - BMJ Open
T1  - Development of a novel instrument for assessing intentional non-adherence to official medical recommendations (iNAR-12): a sequential mixed-methods study in Serbia
IS  - 6
SP  - e069978
VL  - 13
DO  - 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069978
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Purić, Danka and Petrović, Marija and Živanović, Marko and Lukić, Petar and Zupan, Zorana and Branković, Marija and Ninković, Milica and Lazarević, Ljiljana and Stanković, Sanda and Žeželj, Iris",
year = "2023",
abstract = "Objectives We aimed to (1) develop a novel instrument, suitable for the general population, capturing intentional non-adherence (iNAR), consisting of non-adherence to prescribed therapy, self-medication and avoidance of seeking medical treatment; (2) differentiate it from other forms of non-adherence, for example, smoking; and (3) relate iNAR to patient-related factors, such as sociodemographics, health status and endorsement of irrational beliefs (conspiratorial thinking and superstitions) and to healthcare-related beliefs and experiences ((mis)trust and negative experiences with the healthcare system, normalisation of patient passivity).

Design То generate iNAR items, we employed a focus group with medical doctors, supplemented it with a literature search and invited a public health expert to refine it further. We examined the internal structure and predictors of iNAR in an observational study.

Setting Data were collected online using snowball sampling and social networks.

Participants After excluding those who failed one or more out of three attention checks, the final sample size was n=583 adult Serbian citizens, 74.4% female, mean age 39.01 years (SD=12.10).

Primary and secondary outcome measures The primary, planned outcome is the iNAR Questionnaire, while smoking was used for comparison purposes.

Results Factor analysis yielded a one-factor solution, and the final 12-item iNAR Questionnaire had satisfactory internal reliability (alpha=0.72). Health condition and healthcare-related variables accounted for 14% of the variance of iNAR behaviours, whereas sociodemographics and irrational beliefs did not additionally contribute.

Conclusions We constructed a brief yet comprehensive measure of iNAR behaviours and related them to health and sociodemographic variables and irrational beliefs. The findings suggest that public health interventions should attempt to improve patients' experiences with the system and build trust with their healthcare practitioners rather than aim at specific demographic groups or at correcting patients’ unfounded beliefs.",
journal = "BMJ Open",
title = "Development of a novel instrument for assessing intentional non-adherence to official medical recommendations (iNAR-12): a sequential mixed-methods study in Serbia",
number = "6",
pages = "e069978",
volume = "13",
doi = "10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069978"
}

Purić, D., Petrović, M., Živanović, M., Lukić, P., Zupan, Z., Branković, M., Ninković, M., Lazarević, L., Stanković, S.,& Žeželj, I.. (2023). Development of a novel instrument for assessing intentional non-adherence to official medical recommendations (iNAR-12): a sequential mixed-methods study in Serbia. in BMJ Open, 13(6), e069978.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069978

Purić D, Petrović M, Živanović M, Lukić P, Zupan Z, Branković M, Ninković M, Lazarević L, Stanković S, Žeželj I. Development of a novel instrument for assessing intentional non-adherence to official medical recommendations (iNAR-12): a sequential mixed-methods study in Serbia. in BMJ Open. 2023;13(6):e069978.
doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069978 .

Purić, Danka, Petrović, Marija, Živanović, Marko, Lukić, Petar, Zupan, Zorana, Branković, Marija, Ninković, Milica, Lazarević, Ljiljana, Stanković, Sanda, Žeželj, Iris, "Development of a novel instrument for assessing intentional non-adherence to official medical recommendations (iNAR-12): a sequential mixed-methods study in Serbia" in BMJ Open, 13, no. 6 (2023):e069978,
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069978 . .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Knežević, Goran
AU  - Lazarević, Ljiljana
AU  - Purić, Danka
AU  - Zupan, Zorana
AU  - Žeželj, Iris
PY  - 2023
UR  - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/5673
AB  - Introduction We will launch a national survey in Serbia to document the prevalence of two types of questionable health behaviours: (1) intentional non-adherence to medical recommendations and (2) use of traditional, complementary and alternative medicine practices, as well as the relation between the two. We will also investigate their psychological roots, including (a) ‘distal’ predictors such as HEXACO personality traits (plus Disintegration) and thinking dispositions (rational/experiential thinking and cognitive reflexivity), and (b) ‘proximal’ predictors under the umbrella ‘irrational mindset’ (set of unfounded beliefs consisting of conspiratorial thinking, superstition, magical health beliefs as well as selected cognitive biases), which have more content-wise overlap with the health behaviours.

Methods and analysis In this cross-sectional study, a research agency will collect data from a nationally representative sample (n=1043; age 18–75 years; estimated start/end—June/November 2023) recruited online (approximately, 70% of the sample, aged 18–54; 11 years) and face-to-face (approximately, 30% of the sample, aged 55–75 years). Participants will complete a battery of tests assessing questionable health behaviours, basic personality traits, thinking dispositions, irrational mindset, sociopolitical beliefs, sociodemographic and health-related variables. Prevalence rates will be calculated using descriptive statistics. To explore the relation between (psychological) predictors and questionable health behaviours, we will use hierarchical regression and partial mediation models (path analysis or full SEM models).

Ethics and dissemination Ethical Committees of the Faculty of Philosophy in Belgrade (#935/1), Faculty of Special Education and Rehabilitation (#139/1) and Faculty of Media and Communications (#228) approved the protocol. Only participants who provide informed consent will participate in the study. A research report based on the study results will be submitted to peer-reviewed journals and results will be made available to stakeholders through reports on the project website https://reasonforhealth.f.bg.ac.rs/en/ and disseminated via social media.
T2  - BMJ Open
T1  - Prevalence of questionable health behaviours in Serbia and their psychological roots: protocol for a nationally representative survey
IS  - 10
SP  - e075274
VL  - 13
DO  - 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075274
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Knežević, Goran and Lazarević, Ljiljana and Purić, Danka and Zupan, Zorana and Žeželj, Iris",
year = "2023",
abstract = "Introduction We will launch a national survey in Serbia to document the prevalence of two types of questionable health behaviours: (1) intentional non-adherence to medical recommendations and (2) use of traditional, complementary and alternative medicine practices, as well as the relation between the two. We will also investigate their psychological roots, including (a) ‘distal’ predictors such as HEXACO personality traits (plus Disintegration) and thinking dispositions (rational/experiential thinking and cognitive reflexivity), and (b) ‘proximal’ predictors under the umbrella ‘irrational mindset’ (set of unfounded beliefs consisting of conspiratorial thinking, superstition, magical health beliefs as well as selected cognitive biases), which have more content-wise overlap with the health behaviours.

Methods and analysis In this cross-sectional study, a research agency will collect data from a nationally representative sample (n=1043; age 18–75 years; estimated start/end—June/November 2023) recruited online (approximately, 70% of the sample, aged 18–54; 11 years) and face-to-face (approximately, 30% of the sample, aged 55–75 years). Participants will complete a battery of tests assessing questionable health behaviours, basic personality traits, thinking dispositions, irrational mindset, sociopolitical beliefs, sociodemographic and health-related variables. Prevalence rates will be calculated using descriptive statistics. To explore the relation between (psychological) predictors and questionable health behaviours, we will use hierarchical regression and partial mediation models (path analysis or full SEM models).

Ethics and dissemination Ethical Committees of the Faculty of Philosophy in Belgrade (#935/1), Faculty of Special Education and Rehabilitation (#139/1) and Faculty of Media and Communications (#228) approved the protocol. Only participants who provide informed consent will participate in the study. A research report based on the study results will be submitted to peer-reviewed journals and results will be made available to stakeholders through reports on the project website https://reasonforhealth.f.bg.ac.rs/en/ and disseminated via social media.",
journal = "BMJ Open",
title = "Prevalence of questionable health behaviours in Serbia and their psychological roots: protocol for a nationally representative survey",
number = "10",
pages = "e075274",
volume = "13",
doi = "10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075274"
}

Knežević, G., Lazarević, L., Purić, D., Zupan, Z.,& Žeželj, I.. (2023). Prevalence of questionable health behaviours in Serbia and their psychological roots: protocol for a nationally representative survey. in BMJ Open, 13(10), e075274.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075274

Knežević G, Lazarević L, Purić D, Zupan Z, Žeželj I. Prevalence of questionable health behaviours in Serbia and their psychological roots: protocol for a nationally representative survey. in BMJ Open. 2023;13(10):e075274.
doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075274 .

Knežević, Goran, Lazarević, Ljiljana, Purić, Danka, Zupan, Zorana, Žeželj, Iris, "Prevalence of questionable health behaviours in Serbia and their psychological roots: protocol for a nationally representative survey" in BMJ Open, 13, no. 10 (2023):e075274,
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075274 . .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Purić, Danka
AU  - Jokić, Biljana
PY  - 2023
UR  - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/5663
AB  - The widely used Rational-Experiential Inventory-40 (REI-40) assesses Rational and Experiential thinking styles. Recently, the authors have distinguished three aspects of the Experiential style: Intuition, Emotionality and Imagination and developed the Rational-Experiential Multimodal Inventory (REIm). In this study, we examined the internal consistency, structural/factorial, discriminant and known-groups validity of both REI-40 and REIm, in two samples of Serbian students. Participants in Study 1 (N = 819, mean age M = 19.81, 31% males) completed REI-40 and HEXACO Personality Inventory (HEXACO-PI-R), while participants in Study 2 (N = 304, mean age M = 19.47, 29% males) completed REIm, HEXACO-PI-R and Disintegration inventory DELTA. The internal consistency of both REI version subscales was acceptable to good. The results of CFA analyses indicated an acceptable fit for REI-40, while the structural validity of REIm was poor. Both REI-40 subscales (Rationality and Experientiality), as well as REIm Intuition demonstrated only a small content overlap with basic personality traits, while REIm Experientiality, Emotionality and Imagination correlated highly with Openness and Emotionality. We also observed some gender differences in the expected direction.
T2  - PLOS One
T1  - The Serbian validation of the Rational-Experiential Inventory-40 and the Rational-Experiential Multimodal Inventory
IS  - 11
SP  - e0294705
VL  - 18
DO  - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0294705
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Purić, Danka and Jokić, Biljana",
year = "2023",
abstract = "The widely used Rational-Experiential Inventory-40 (REI-40) assesses Rational and Experiential thinking styles. Recently, the authors have distinguished three aspects of the Experiential style: Intuition, Emotionality and Imagination and developed the Rational-Experiential Multimodal Inventory (REIm). In this study, we examined the internal consistency, structural/factorial, discriminant and known-groups validity of both REI-40 and REIm, in two samples of Serbian students. Participants in Study 1 (N = 819, mean age M = 19.81, 31% males) completed REI-40 and HEXACO Personality Inventory (HEXACO-PI-R), while participants in Study 2 (N = 304, mean age M = 19.47, 29% males) completed REIm, HEXACO-PI-R and Disintegration inventory DELTA. The internal consistency of both REI version subscales was acceptable to good. The results of CFA analyses indicated an acceptable fit for REI-40, while the structural validity of REIm was poor. Both REI-40 subscales (Rationality and Experientiality), as well as REIm Intuition demonstrated only a small content overlap with basic personality traits, while REIm Experientiality, Emotionality and Imagination correlated highly with Openness and Emotionality. We also observed some gender differences in the expected direction.",
journal = "PLOS One",
title = "The Serbian validation of the Rational-Experiential Inventory-40 and the Rational-Experiential Multimodal Inventory",
number = "11",
pages = "e0294705",
volume = "18",
doi = "https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0294705"
}

Purić, D.,& Jokić, B.. (2023). The Serbian validation of the Rational-Experiential Inventory-40 and the Rational-Experiential Multimodal Inventory. in PLOS One, 18(11), e0294705.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0294705

Purić D, Jokić B. The Serbian validation of the Rational-Experiential Inventory-40 and the Rational-Experiential Multimodal Inventory. in PLOS One. 2023;18(11):e0294705.
doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0294705 .

Purić, Danka, Jokić, Biljana, "The Serbian validation of the Rational-Experiential Inventory-40 and the Rational-Experiential Multimodal Inventory" in PLOS One, 18, no. 11 (2023):e0294705,
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0294705 . .

TY  - CONF
AU  - Jokić, Biljana
AU  - Purić, Danka
AU  - Knežević, Goran
PY  - 2023
UR  - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/5662
AB  - The Rational-Experiential Inventory-40 (REI-40, Pacini & Epstein, 1999), proposed in the framework of the cognitive-experiential self-theory (CEST) is a widely used instrument for measuring thinking styles. Similar to other dual-processing models, CEST distinguishes between automatic, effortless, rapid (experientiality) and conscious, analytical, effortful, slower (rationality) thinking styles. A short version, REI-10, has already been proposed (Epstein et al., 1996), however, it is based on an outdated REI version and is not compatible with REI-40. There are also modified versions of REI which attempt to capture facets of experientiality, but REI-40 is still used more often than other versions. In the current study we aimed to provide a brief version of REI-40 by employing an Ant Colony Optimisation (ACO) algorithm (Leite et al., 2008; Marcoulides & Drezner, 2009). 
We used an existing dataset, collected in the Serbian validation of REI-40, comprising  N = 813 students (Purić & Jokić, 2022), 68% females, Mage = 19.79 (SD = 1.85). We used the ACO procedure to select four items per each REI scale - Rationality and Experientiality, so as to maximize both confirmatory factor analysis model fit, indicated by high Comparative Fit Index (CFI) and low Root Mean Square of Approximation (RMSEA), and high reliability. 
The resulting instrument, REI-8 demonstrated good model fit: CFI  = .99 and RMSEA = .062 [95% CI .048, .076], as well as reliability - Cronbach’s alpha was .75 for both Rationality and Experientiality, while McDonald’s omega was slightly higher at .78 for both REI-8 scales. The correlations between REI-8 scales and corresponding REI-40 scales were very high, r = .82 and r = .84, for rationality and experientiality, respectively, and the two dimensions were practically uncorrelated r = .04, as the CEST model proposes. 
Overall, we have constructed a very brief 8-item version of REI which is both reliable and structurally valid. This instrument could be used in large-scale studies where time is limited.
PB  - Institut za psihologiju i Laboratorija za eksperimentalnu psihologiju, Beograd: Filozofski fakultet
C3  - Book of abstracts, XXIX scientific conference Empirical studies in psychology, Belgrade
T1  - REI-8: Development of a very brief version of Rational-Experiential Inventory using ant colony optimization procedure
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_5662
ER  - 

@conference{
author = "Jokić, Biljana and Purić, Danka and Knežević, Goran",
year = "2023",
abstract = "The Rational-Experiential Inventory-40 (REI-40, Pacini & Epstein, 1999), proposed in the framework of the cognitive-experiential self-theory (CEST) is a widely used instrument for measuring thinking styles. Similar to other dual-processing models, CEST distinguishes between automatic, effortless, rapid (experientiality) and conscious, analytical, effortful, slower (rationality) thinking styles. A short version, REI-10, has already been proposed (Epstein et al., 1996), however, it is based on an outdated REI version and is not compatible with REI-40. There are also modified versions of REI which attempt to capture facets of experientiality, but REI-40 is still used more often than other versions. In the current study we aimed to provide a brief version of REI-40 by employing an Ant Colony Optimisation (ACO) algorithm (Leite et al., 2008; Marcoulides & Drezner, 2009). 
We used an existing dataset, collected in the Serbian validation of REI-40, comprising  N = 813 students (Purić & Jokić, 2022), 68% females, Mage = 19.79 (SD = 1.85). We used the ACO procedure to select four items per each REI scale - Rationality and Experientiality, so as to maximize both confirmatory factor analysis model fit, indicated by high Comparative Fit Index (CFI) and low Root Mean Square of Approximation (RMSEA), and high reliability. 
The resulting instrument, REI-8 demonstrated good model fit: CFI  = .99 and RMSEA = .062 [95% CI .048, .076], as well as reliability - Cronbach’s alpha was .75 for both Rationality and Experientiality, while McDonald’s omega was slightly higher at .78 for both REI-8 scales. The correlations between REI-8 scales and corresponding REI-40 scales were very high, r = .82 and r = .84, for rationality and experientiality, respectively, and the two dimensions were practically uncorrelated r = .04, as the CEST model proposes. 
Overall, we have constructed a very brief 8-item version of REI which is both reliable and structurally valid. This instrument could be used in large-scale studies where time is limited.",
publisher = "Institut za psihologiju i Laboratorija za eksperimentalnu psihologiju, Beograd: Filozofski fakultet",
journal = "Book of abstracts, XXIX scientific conference Empirical studies in psychology, Belgrade",
title = "REI-8: Development of a very brief version of Rational-Experiential Inventory using ant colony optimization procedure",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_5662"
}

Jokić, B., Purić, D.,& Knežević, G.. (2023). REI-8: Development of a very brief version of Rational-Experiential Inventory using ant colony optimization procedure. in Book of abstracts, XXIX scientific conference Empirical studies in psychology, Belgrade
Institut za psihologiju i Laboratorija za eksperimentalnu psihologiju, Beograd: Filozofski fakultet..
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_5662

Jokić B, Purić D, Knežević G. REI-8: Development of a very brief version of Rational-Experiential Inventory using ant colony optimization procedure. in Book of abstracts, XXIX scientific conference Empirical studies in psychology, Belgrade. 2023;.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_5662 .

Jokić, Biljana, Purić, Danka, Knežević, Goran, "REI-8: Development of a very brief version of Rational-Experiential Inventory using ant colony optimization procedure" in Book of abstracts, XXIX scientific conference Empirical studies in psychology, Belgrade (2023),
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_5662 .

TY  - BOOK
AU  - Purić, Danka
PY  - 2023
UR  - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/4547
AB  - Knjiga Interne metrijske karakteristike psiholoških instrumenata. Vodič kroz Psihometriju 1 kao svoje osnovne teme postavlja one psihometrijske karakteristike instrumenata koje se mogu utvrditi samo na osnovu rezultata na datom testu, bez njegovog dovođenja u vezu sa drugim konstruktima. U skladu sa tim, kao osnovne teme pojavljuju se diskriminativnost, objektivnost, pouzdanost, homogenost i reprezentativnost testa. Dodatno, ovaj vodič pokriva i različite modele merenja, kao što su Gutmanova teorija merenja i teorija odgovora na stavke, a koje se mogu koristiti komplementarno sa klasičnim pristupom prilikom utvrđivanja internih metrijskih karakteristika instrumenata. Na kraju, iako u procesu izrade instrumenta sledi nakon dokazivanja valjanosti, prikazan je i proces normiranja psiholoških instrumenata, jer je i ovo procedura za koju nisu potrebni dodatni podaci osim odgovora na sam test. Vodič kroz Psihometriju 1 zamišljen je kao vodič i kroz teoriju i kroz praksu provere metrijskih karakteristika instrumenata. Svako poglavlje počinje kratkim uvodom u temu iz laičke perspektive, zatim se uvode i objašnjavaju osnovni teorijski pojmovi, da bi na kraju njihova primena bila ilustrovana primerima na konkretnim podacima. Svako poglavlje takođe sadrži i detaljne instrukcije kako se opisani postupci provere metrijskih karakteristika sprovode u IBM© SPSS© statističkom softveru, odnosno, u slučaju teorije odgovora na stavke, u programu Winsteps/Ministep. Takođe, postoji posebno, dodatno poglavlje u kome je detaljno objašnjen rad u IBM SPSS sintaksi, kao i poglavlje koje opisuje proveru metrijskih karakteristika instrumenta korišćenjem makroa RTT10G, koji se pokreće preko SPSS sintakse.
PB  - Institut za psihologiju, Filozofski fakultet, Univerzitet u Beogradu, Čika Ljubina 18-20, Beograd, Srbija
T1  - Interne metrijske karakteristike psiholoških instrumenata. Vodič kroz Psihometriju 1
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4547
ER  - 

@book{
author = "Purić, Danka",
year = "2023",
abstract = "Knjiga Interne metrijske karakteristike psiholoških instrumenata. Vodič kroz Psihometriju 1 kao svoje osnovne teme postavlja one psihometrijske karakteristike instrumenata koje se mogu utvrditi samo na osnovu rezultata na datom testu, bez njegovog dovođenja u vezu sa drugim konstruktima. U skladu sa tim, kao osnovne teme pojavljuju se diskriminativnost, objektivnost, pouzdanost, homogenost i reprezentativnost testa. Dodatno, ovaj vodič pokriva i različite modele merenja, kao što su Gutmanova teorija merenja i teorija odgovora na stavke, a koje se mogu koristiti komplementarno sa klasičnim pristupom prilikom utvrđivanja internih metrijskih karakteristika instrumenata. Na kraju, iako u procesu izrade instrumenta sledi nakon dokazivanja valjanosti, prikazan je i proces normiranja psiholoških instrumenata, jer je i ovo procedura za koju nisu potrebni dodatni podaci osim odgovora na sam test. Vodič kroz Psihometriju 1 zamišljen je kao vodič i kroz teoriju i kroz praksu provere metrijskih karakteristika instrumenata. Svako poglavlje počinje kratkim uvodom u temu iz laičke perspektive, zatim se uvode i objašnjavaju osnovni teorijski pojmovi, da bi na kraju njihova primena bila ilustrovana primerima na konkretnim podacima. Svako poglavlje takođe sadrži i detaljne instrukcije kako se opisani postupci provere metrijskih karakteristika sprovode u IBM© SPSS© statističkom softveru, odnosno, u slučaju teorije odgovora na stavke, u programu Winsteps/Ministep. Takođe, postoji posebno, dodatno poglavlje u kome je detaljno objašnjen rad u IBM SPSS sintaksi, kao i poglavlje koje opisuje proveru metrijskih karakteristika instrumenta korišćenjem makroa RTT10G, koji se pokreće preko SPSS sintakse.",
publisher = "Institut za psihologiju, Filozofski fakultet, Univerzitet u Beogradu, Čika Ljubina 18-20, Beograd, Srbija",
title = "Interne metrijske karakteristike psiholoških instrumenata. Vodič kroz Psihometriju 1",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4547"
}

Purić, D.. (2023). Interne metrijske karakteristike psiholoških instrumenata. Vodič kroz Psihometriju 1. 
Institut za psihologiju, Filozofski fakultet, Univerzitet u Beogradu, Čika Ljubina 18-20, Beograd, Srbija..
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4547

Purić D. Interne metrijske karakteristike psiholoških instrumenata. Vodič kroz Psihometriju 1. 2023;.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4547 .

Purić, Danka, "Interne metrijske karakteristike psiholoških instrumenata. Vodič kroz Psihometriju 1" (2023),
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4547 .

TY  - CONF
AU  - Zupan, Zorana
AU  - Žeželj, Iris
AU  - Knežević, Goran
AU  - Opačić, Goran
AU  - Lazarević, Ljiljana B.
AU  - Purić, Danka
AU  - Branković, Marija
AU  - Teovanović, Predrag
AU  - Živanović, Marko
AU  - Stanković, Sanda
AU  - Lazić, Aleksandra
AU  - Lukić, Petar
AU  - Ninković, Milica
AU  - Petrović, Marija
PY  - 2022
UR  - http://empirijskaistrazivanja.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/KNJIGA-REZIMEA-2022_FIN-sa-isbn_bez_linija-1.pdf
UR  - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/4930
AB  - The main project methodology is planned in five stages that inform one another and cross-validate data from multiple methods. These include: (1) A study documenting online media coverage of TM/CAM practices in Serbia. This study will use a qualitative methodology, and conduct a content analysis of news stories from the five most popular news websites in Serbia, focusing on identifying the types of reported practices and content of the advice (e.g., whether risks are addressed) (2) Development of instruments for assessing familiarity and frequency of two types of health behaviors: engagement with different TM/CAM practices, as well as the frequency of NAR. Instrument development will be based on the results of the qualitative study, literature review, input from medical and CAM practitioners. The instrument will be piloted on a convenience sample (3) A study tracking the prevalence and the pattern of TM/CAM usage and NAR during 3 weeks on a community sample. This study will consist of a development of a mobile app and battery for experience sampling of TM/CAM and NAR behaviors over 21 days and their relations with personality and cognitive styles in a community sample (4) Examining the relations between these two types of health behaviors on a general population. This study will explore the relations between TM/CAM, NAR, personality, and cognitive styles on a representative sample in Serbia. (5) Developing interventions aimed at reducing TM/CAM use and NAR through changing the irrational mindset. This study will be experimental and will examine how inducing or reducing irrational beliefs affects health behaviors, and if certain personality traits and/or thinking styles moderate the outcome of these interventions.
C3  - Book of abstracts - XXVIII scientific conference Empirical Studies in Psychology
T1  - REASON4HEALTH: Methodology
SP  - 27
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4930
ER  - 

@conference{
author = "Zupan, Zorana and Žeželj, Iris and Knežević, Goran and Opačić, Goran and Lazarević, Ljiljana B. and Purić, Danka and Branković, Marija and Teovanović, Predrag and Živanović, Marko and Stanković, Sanda and Lazić, Aleksandra and Lukić, Petar and Ninković, Milica and Petrović, Marija",
year = "2022",
abstract = "The main project methodology is planned in five stages that inform one another and cross-validate data from multiple methods. These include: (1) A study documenting online media coverage of TM/CAM practices in Serbia. This study will use a qualitative methodology, and conduct a content analysis of news stories from the five most popular news websites in Serbia, focusing on identifying the types of reported practices and content of the advice (e.g., whether risks are addressed) (2) Development of instruments for assessing familiarity and frequency of two types of health behaviors: engagement with different TM/CAM practices, as well as the frequency of NAR. Instrument development will be based on the results of the qualitative study, literature review, input from medical and CAM practitioners. The instrument will be piloted on a convenience sample (3) A study tracking the prevalence and the pattern of TM/CAM usage and NAR during 3 weeks on a community sample. This study will consist of a development of a mobile app and battery for experience sampling of TM/CAM and NAR behaviors over 21 days and their relations with personality and cognitive styles in a community sample (4) Examining the relations between these two types of health behaviors on a general population. This study will explore the relations between TM/CAM, NAR, personality, and cognitive styles on a representative sample in Serbia. (5) Developing interventions aimed at reducing TM/CAM use and NAR through changing the irrational mindset. This study will be experimental and will examine how inducing or reducing irrational beliefs affects health behaviors, and if certain personality traits and/or thinking styles moderate the outcome of these interventions.",
journal = "Book of abstracts - XXVIII scientific conference Empirical Studies in Psychology",
title = "REASON4HEALTH: Methodology",
pages = "27",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4930"
}

Zupan, Z., Žeželj, I., Knežević, G., Opačić, G., Lazarević, L. B., Purić, D., Branković, M., Teovanović, P., Živanović, M., Stanković, S., Lazić, A., Lukić, P., Ninković, M.,& Petrović, M.. (2022). REASON4HEALTH: Methodology. in Book of abstracts - XXVIII scientific conference Empirical Studies in Psychology, 27.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4930

Zupan Z, Žeželj I, Knežević G, Opačić G, Lazarević LB, Purić D, Branković M, Teovanović P, Živanović M, Stanković S, Lazić A, Lukić P, Ninković M, Petrović M. REASON4HEALTH: Methodology. in Book of abstracts - XXVIII scientific conference Empirical Studies in Psychology. 2022;:27.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4930 .

Zupan, Zorana, Žeželj, Iris, Knežević, Goran, Opačić, Goran, Lazarević, Ljiljana B., Purić, Danka, Branković, Marija, Teovanović, Predrag, Živanović, Marko, Stanković, Sanda, Lazić, Aleksandra, Lukić, Petar, Ninković, Milica, Petrović, Marija, "REASON4HEALTH: Methodology" in Book of abstracts - XXVIII scientific conference Empirical Studies in Psychology (2022):27,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4930 .

TY  - CONF
AU  - Žeželj, Iris
AU  - Knežević, Goran
AU  - Opačić, Goran
AU  - Lazarević, Ljiljana B.
AU  - Purić, Danka
AU  - Branković, Marija
AU  - Zupan, Zorana
AU  - Teovanović, Predrag
AU  - Živanović, Marko
AU  - Stanković, Sanda
AU  - Lazić, Aleksandra
AU  - Lukić, Petar
AU  - Ninković, Milica
AU  - Petrović, Marija
PY  - 2022
UR  - http://empirijskaistrazivanja.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/KNJIGA-REZIMEA-2022_FIN-sa-isbn_bez_linija-1.pdf
UR  - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/4929
AB  - Non-adherence to medical recommendations (NAR) leads to increasing mortality/disease rates and raises the costs of treatments, thus it is a burden on the healthcare system. Typically viewed as harmless, the use of traditional/complementary/alternative medicine (TM/CAM) can lead to adverse health events, but also to avoidance of official treatment or undesirable interaction with it. Thus, there is an increasing call in the medical community to promote evidence-based use of TM/CAM and adherence to official advice; understanding why consumers opt for questionable health practices can contribute to this call. We put forward a comprehensive program to study the psychological roots of these two broad categories of questionable health practices. The program offers a framework for concepts from cognitive, personality, social, and health psychology. We propose that an irrational mindset (a system of irrational thinking and beliefs), rooted in basic psychological dispositions (personality, thinking styles) makes certain consumers susceptible to NAR and TM/CAM practices. We plan to: a. explore the media environment the consumers are exposed to (e.g. predatory practices in advertising TM/CAM), b. identify the large spectrum of NAR and TM/CAM typical for the local cultural context, c. test whether irrational beliefs of very different content really form a mindset (how they are interrelated), d. measure the prevalence of NAR and TM/CAM and relate them to irrational mindset and further to personality traits, and e. test whether the TM/CAM proneness can be affected by manipulating irrational beliefs. The results will be useful to stakeholders in different ways: information on the prevalence of TM/CAM and NAR in Serbia is useful by itself, but identifying their underlying psychological mechanisms will help in understanding the most vulnerable portions of the population. In addition, we will provide useful input for designing interventions that will support consumers in making rational health decisions.
C3  - Book of abstracts - XXVIII scientific conference Empirical Studies in Psychology
T1  - REASON4HEALTH: Rationale and impact
SP  - 26
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4929
ER  - 

@conference{
author = "Žeželj, Iris and Knežević, Goran and Opačić, Goran and Lazarević, Ljiljana B. and Purić, Danka and Branković, Marija and Zupan, Zorana and Teovanović, Predrag and Živanović, Marko and Stanković, Sanda and Lazić, Aleksandra and Lukić, Petar and Ninković, Milica and Petrović, Marija",
year = "2022",
abstract = "Non-adherence to medical recommendations (NAR) leads to increasing mortality/disease rates and raises the costs of treatments, thus it is a burden on the healthcare system. Typically viewed as harmless, the use of traditional/complementary/alternative medicine (TM/CAM) can lead to adverse health events, but also to avoidance of official treatment or undesirable interaction with it. Thus, there is an increasing call in the medical community to promote evidence-based use of TM/CAM and adherence to official advice; understanding why consumers opt for questionable health practices can contribute to this call. We put forward a comprehensive program to study the psychological roots of these two broad categories of questionable health practices. The program offers a framework for concepts from cognitive, personality, social, and health psychology. We propose that an irrational mindset (a system of irrational thinking and beliefs), rooted in basic psychological dispositions (personality, thinking styles) makes certain consumers susceptible to NAR and TM/CAM practices. We plan to: a. explore the media environment the consumers are exposed to (e.g. predatory practices in advertising TM/CAM), b. identify the large spectrum of NAR and TM/CAM typical for the local cultural context, c. test whether irrational beliefs of very different content really form a mindset (how they are interrelated), d. measure the prevalence of NAR and TM/CAM and relate them to irrational mindset and further to personality traits, and e. test whether the TM/CAM proneness can be affected by manipulating irrational beliefs. The results will be useful to stakeholders in different ways: information on the prevalence of TM/CAM and NAR in Serbia is useful by itself, but identifying their underlying psychological mechanisms will help in understanding the most vulnerable portions of the population. In addition, we will provide useful input for designing interventions that will support consumers in making rational health decisions.",
journal = "Book of abstracts - XXVIII scientific conference Empirical Studies in Psychology",
title = "REASON4HEALTH: Rationale and impact",
pages = "26",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4929"
}

Žeželj, I., Knežević, G., Opačić, G., Lazarević, L. B., Purić, D., Branković, M., Zupan, Z., Teovanović, P., Živanović, M., Stanković, S., Lazić, A., Lukić, P., Ninković, M.,& Petrović, M.. (2022). REASON4HEALTH: Rationale and impact. in Book of abstracts - XXVIII scientific conference Empirical Studies in Psychology, 26.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4929

Žeželj I, Knežević G, Opačić G, Lazarević LB, Purić D, Branković M, Zupan Z, Teovanović P, Živanović M, Stanković S, Lazić A, Lukić P, Ninković M, Petrović M. REASON4HEALTH: Rationale and impact. in Book of abstracts - XXVIII scientific conference Empirical Studies in Psychology. 2022;:26.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4929 .

Žeželj, Iris, Knežević, Goran, Opačić, Goran, Lazarević, Ljiljana B., Purić, Danka, Branković, Marija, Zupan, Zorana, Teovanović, Predrag, Živanović, Marko, Stanković, Sanda, Lazić, Aleksandra, Lukić, Petar, Ninković, Milica, Petrović, Marija, "REASON4HEALTH: Rationale and impact" in Book of abstracts - XXVIII scientific conference Empirical Studies in Psychology (2022):26,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4929 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Bago, Bence
AU  - Kovacs, Marton
AU  - Protzko, John
AU  - Nagy, Tamas
AU  - Kekecs, Zoltan
AU  - Palfi, Bence
AU  - Adamkovic, Matus
AU  - Adamus, Sylwia
AU  - Albalooshi, Sumaya
AU  - Albayrak-Aydemir, Nihan
AU  - Alfian, Ilham N.
AU  - Alper, Sinan
AU  - Alvarez-Solas, Sara
AU  - Alves, Sara G.
AU  - Amaya, Santiago
AU  - Andresen, Pia K.
AU  - Anjum, Gulnaz
AU  - Ansari, Daniel
AU  - Arriaga, Patrícia
AU  - Aruta, John Jamir Benzon R.
AU  - Arvanitis, Alexios
AU  - Babincak, Peter
AU  - Barzykowski, Krystian
AU  - Bashour, Bana
AU  - Baskin, Ernest
AU  - Batalha, Luisa
AU  - Batres, Carlota
AU  - Bavolar, Jozef
AU  - Bayrak, Fatih
AU  - Becker, Benjamin
AU  - Becker, Maja
AU  - Belaus, Anabel
AU  - Białek, Michał
AU  - Bilancini, Ennio
AU  - Boller, Daniel
AU  - Boncinelli, Leonardo
AU  - Boudesseul, Jordane
AU  - Brown, Benjamin T.
AU  - Buchanan, Erin M.
AU  - Butt, Muhammad M.
AU  - Calvillo, Dustin P.
AU  - Carnes, Nate C.
AU  - Celniker, Jared B.
AU  - Chartier, Christopher R.
AU  - Chopik, William J.
AU  - Chotikavan, Poom
AU  - Chuan-Peng, Hu
AU  - Clancy, Rockwell F.
AU  - Çoker, Ogeday
AU  - Correia, Rita C.
AU  - Adoric, Vera Cubela
AU  - Cubillas, Carmelo P.
AU  - Czoschke, Stefan
AU  - Daryani, Yalda
AU  - de Grefte, Job A. M.
AU  - de Vries, Wieteke C.
AU  - Burak, Elif G. Demirag
AU  - Dias, Carina
AU  - Dixson, Barnaby J. W.
AU  - Du, Xinkai
AU  - Dumančić, Francesca
AU  - Dumbravă, Andrei
AU  - Dutra, Natalia B.
AU  - Enachescu, Janina
AU  - Esteban-Serna, Celia
AU  - Eudave, Luis
AU  - Evans, Thomas R.
AU  - Feldman, Gilad
AU  - Felisberti, Fatima M.
AU  - Fiedler, Susann
AU  - Findor, Andrej
AU  - Fleischmann, Alexandra
AU  - Foroni, Francesco
AU  - Francová, Radka
AU  - Frank, Darius-Aurel
AU  - Fu, Cynthia H. Y.
AU  - Gao, Shan
AU  - Ghasemi, Omid
AU  - Ghazi-Noori, Ali-Reza
AU  - Ghossainy, Maliki E.
AU  - Giammusso, Isabella
AU  - Gill, Tripat
AU  - Gjoneska, Biljana
AU  - Gollwitzer, Mario
AU  - Graton, Aurélien
AU  - Grinberg, Maurice
AU  - Groyecka-Bernard, Agata
AU  - Harris, Elizabeth A.
AU  - Hartanto, Andree
AU  - Hassan, Widad A. N. M.
AU  - Hatami, Javad
AU  - Heimark, Katrina R.
AU  - Hidding, Jasper J. J.
AU  - Hristova, Evgeniya
AU  - Hruška, Matej
AU  - Hudson, Charlotte A.
AU  - Huskey, Richard
AU  - Ikeda, Ayumi
AU  - Inbar, Yoel
AU  - Ingram, Gordon P. D.
AU  - Isler, Ozan
AU  - Isloi, Chris
AU  - Iyer, Aishwarya
AU  - Jaeger, Bastian
AU  - Janssen, Steve M. J.
AU  - Jiménez-Leal, William
AU  - Jokić, Biljana
AU  - Kačmár, Pavol
AU  - Kadreva, Veselina
AU  - Kaminski, Gwenaël
AU  - Karimi-Malekabadi, Farzan
AU  - Kasper, Arno T. A.
AU  - Kendrick, Keith M.
AU  - Kennedy, Bradley J.
AU  - Kocalar, Halil E.
AU  - Kodapanakkal, Rabia I.
AU  - Kowal, Marta
AU  - Kruse, Elliott
AU  - Kučerová, Lenka
AU  - Kühberger, Anton
AU  - Kuzminska, Anna O.
AU  - Lalot, Fanny
AU  - Lamm, Claus
AU  - Lammers, Joris
AU  - Lange, Elke B.
AU  - Lantian, Anthony
AU  - Lau, Ivy Y.-M.
AU  - Lazarevic, Ljiljana B.
AU  - Leliveld, Marijke C.
AU  - Lenz, Jennifer N.
AU  - Levitan, Carmel A.
AU  - Lewis, Savannah C.
AU  - Li, Manyu
AU  - Li, Yansong
AU  - Li, Haozheng
AU  - Lima, Tiago J. S.
AU  - Lins, Samuel
AU  - Liuzza, Marco Tullio
AU  - Lopes, Paula
AU  - Lu, Jackson G.
AU  - Lynds, Trent
AU  - Máčel, Martin
AU  - Mackinnon, Sean P.
AU  - Maganti, Madhavilatha
AU  - Magraw-Mickelson, Zoe
AU  - Magson, Leon F.
AU  - Manley, Harry
AU  - Marcu, Gabriela M.
AU  - Seršić, Darja Masli
AU  - Matibag, Celine-Justine
AU  - Mattiassi, Alan D. A.
AU  - Mazidi, Mahdi
AU  - McFall, Joseph P.
AU  - McLatchie, Neil
AU  - Mensink, Michael C.
AU  - Miketta, Lena
AU  - Milfont, Taciano L.
AU  - Mirisola, Alberto
AU  - Misiak, Michal
AU  - Mitkidis, Panagiotis
AU  - Moeini-Jazani, Mehrad
AU  - Monajem, Arash
AU  - Moreau, David
AU  - Musser, Erica D.
AU  - Narhetali, Erita
AU  - Ochoa, Danielle P.
AU  - Olsen, Jerome
AU  - Owsley, Nicholas C.
AU  - Özdoğru, Asil A.
AU  - Panning, Miriam
AU  - Papadatou-Pastou, Marietta
AU  - Parashar, Neha
AU  - Pärnamets, Philip
AU  - Paruzel-Czachura, Mariola
AU  - Parzuchowski, Michal
AU  - Paterlini, Julia V.
AU  - Pavlacic, Jeffrey M.
AU  - Peker, Mehmet
AU  - Peters, Kim
AU  - Piatnitckaia, Liudmila
AU  - Pinto, Isabel
AU  - Policarpio, Monica Renee
AU  - Pop-Jordanova, Nada
AU  - Pratama, Annas J.
AU  - Primbs, Maximilian A.
AU  - Pronizius, Ekaterina
AU  - Purić, Danka
AU  - Puvia, Elisa
AU  - Qamari, Vahid
AU  - Qian, Kun
AU  - Quiamzade, Alain
AU  - Ráczová, Beáta
AU  - Reinero, Diego A.
AU  - Reips, Ulf-Dietrich
AU  - Reyna, Cecilia
AU  - Reynolds, Kimberly
AU  - Ribeiro, Matheus F. F.
AU  - Röer, Jan P.
AU  - Ross, Robert M.
AU  - Roussos, Petros
AU  - Ruiz-Dodobara, Fernando
AU  - Ruiz-Fernandez, Susana
AU  - Rutjens, Bastiaan T.
AU  - Rybus, Katarzyna
AU  - Samekin, Adil
AU  - Santos, Anabela C.
AU  - Say, Nicolas
AU  - Schild, Christoph
AU  - Schmidt, Kathleen
AU  - Ścigała, Karolina A.
AU  - Sharifian, MohammadHasan
AU  - Shi, Jiaxin
AU  - Shi, Yaoxi
AU  - Sievers, Erin
AU  - Sirota, Miroslav
AU  - Slipenkyj, Michael
AU  - Solak, Çağlar
AU  - Sorokowska, Agnieszka
AU  - Sorokowski, Piotr
AU  - Söylemez, Sinem
AU  - Steffens, Niklas K.
AU  - Stephen, Ian D.
AU  - Sternisko, Anni
AU  - Stevens-Wilson, Laura
AU  - Stewart, Suzanne L. K.
AU  - Stieger, Stefan
AU  - Storage, Daniel
AU  - Strube, Justine
AU  - Susa, Kyle J.
AU  - Szekely-Copîndean, Raluca D.
AU  - Szostak, Natalia M.
AU  - Takwin, Bagus
AU  - Tatachari, Srinivasan
AU  - Thomas, Andrew G.
AU  - Tiede, Kevin E.
AU  - Tiong, Lucas E.
AU  - Tonković, Mirjana
AU  - Trémolière, Bastien
AU  - Tunstead, Lauren V.
AU  - Türkan, Belgüzar N.
AU  - Twardawski, Mathias
AU  - Vadillo, Miguel A.
AU  - Vally, Zahir
AU  - Vaughn, Leigh Ann
AU  - Verschuere, Bruno
AU  - Vlašiček, Denis
AU  - Voracek, Martin
AU  - Vranka, Marek A.
AU  - Wang, Shuzhen
AU  - West, Skye-Loren
AU  - Whyte, Stephen
AU  - Wilton, Leigh S.
AU  - Wlodarczyk, Anna
AU  - Wu, Xue
AU  - Xin, Fei
AU  - Yadanar, Su
AU  - Yama, Hiroshi
AU  - Yamada, Yuki
AU  - Yilmaz, Onurcan
AU  - Yoon, Sangsuk
AU  - Young, Danielle M.
AU  - Zakharov, Ilya
AU  - Zein, Rizqy A.
AU  - Zettler, Ingo
AU  - Žeželj, Iris L.
AU  - Zhang, Don C.
AU  - Zhang, Jin
AU  - Zheng, Xiaoxiao
AU  - Hoekstra, Rink
AU  - Aczel, Balazs
PY  - 2022
UR  - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/5005
AB  - The study of moral judgements often centres on moral dilemmas in which options consistent with deontological perspectives (that is, emphasizing rules, individual rights and duties) are in conflict with options consistent with utilitarian judgements (that is, following the greater good based on consequences). Greene et al. (2009) showed that psychological and situational factors (for example, the intent of the agent or the presence of physical contact between the agent and the victim) can play an important role in moral dilemma judgements (for example, the trolley problem). Our knowledge is limited concerning both the universality of these effects outside the United States and the impact of culture on the situational and psychological factors affecting moral judgements. Thus, we empirically tested the universality of the effects of intent and personal force on moral dilemma judgements by replicating the experiments of Greene et al. in 45 countries from all inhabited continents. We found that personal force and its interaction with intention exert influence on moral judgements in the US and Western cultural clusters, replicating and expanding the original findings. Moreover, the personal force effect was present in all cultural clusters, suggesting it is culturally universal. The evidence for the cultural universality of the interaction effect was inconclusive in the Eastern and Southern cultural clusters (depending on exclusion criteria). We found no strong association between collectivism/individualism and moral dilemma judgements.
PB  - Springer Science and Business Media LLC
T2  - Nature Human Behaviour
T1  - Situational factors shape moral judgements in the trolley dilemma in Eastern, Southern and Western countries in a culturally diverse sample
EP  - 895
IS  - 6
SP  - 880
VL  - 6
DO  - 10.1038/s41562-022-01319-5
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Bago, Bence and Kovacs, Marton and Protzko, John and Nagy, Tamas and Kekecs, Zoltan and Palfi, Bence and Adamkovic, Matus and Adamus, Sylwia and Albalooshi, Sumaya and Albayrak-Aydemir, Nihan and Alfian, Ilham N. and Alper, Sinan and Alvarez-Solas, Sara and Alves, Sara G. and Amaya, Santiago and Andresen, Pia K. and Anjum, Gulnaz and Ansari, Daniel and Arriaga, Patrícia and Aruta, John Jamir Benzon R. and Arvanitis, Alexios and Babincak, Peter and Barzykowski, Krystian and Bashour, Bana and Baskin, Ernest and Batalha, Luisa and Batres, Carlota and Bavolar, Jozef and Bayrak, Fatih and Becker, Benjamin and Becker, Maja and Belaus, Anabel and Białek, Michał and Bilancini, Ennio and Boller, Daniel and Boncinelli, Leonardo and Boudesseul, Jordane and Brown, Benjamin T. and Buchanan, Erin M. and Butt, Muhammad M. and Calvillo, Dustin P. and Carnes, Nate C. and Celniker, Jared B. and Chartier, Christopher R. and Chopik, William J. and Chotikavan, Poom and Chuan-Peng, Hu and Clancy, Rockwell F. and Çoker, Ogeday and Correia, Rita C. and Adoric, Vera Cubela and Cubillas, Carmelo P. and Czoschke, Stefan and Daryani, Yalda and de Grefte, Job A. M. and de Vries, Wieteke C. and Burak, Elif G. Demirag and Dias, Carina and Dixson, Barnaby J. W. and Du, Xinkai and Dumančić, Francesca and Dumbravă, Andrei and Dutra, Natalia B. and Enachescu, Janina and Esteban-Serna, Celia and Eudave, Luis and Evans, Thomas R. and Feldman, Gilad and Felisberti, Fatima M. and Fiedler, Susann and Findor, Andrej and Fleischmann, Alexandra and Foroni, Francesco and Francová, Radka and Frank, Darius-Aurel and Fu, Cynthia H. Y. and Gao, Shan and Ghasemi, Omid and Ghazi-Noori, Ali-Reza and Ghossainy, Maliki E. and Giammusso, Isabella and Gill, Tripat and Gjoneska, Biljana and Gollwitzer, Mario and Graton, Aurélien and Grinberg, Maurice and Groyecka-Bernard, Agata and Harris, Elizabeth A. and Hartanto, Andree and Hassan, Widad A. N. M. and Hatami, Javad and Heimark, Katrina R. and Hidding, Jasper J. J. and Hristova, Evgeniya and Hruška, Matej and Hudson, Charlotte A. and Huskey, Richard and Ikeda, Ayumi and Inbar, Yoel and Ingram, Gordon P. D. and Isler, Ozan and Isloi, Chris and Iyer, Aishwarya and Jaeger, Bastian and Janssen, Steve M. J. and Jiménez-Leal, William and Jokić, Biljana and Kačmár, Pavol and Kadreva, Veselina and Kaminski, Gwenaël and Karimi-Malekabadi, Farzan and Kasper, Arno T. A. and Kendrick, Keith M. and Kennedy, Bradley J. and Kocalar, Halil E. and Kodapanakkal, Rabia I. and Kowal, Marta and Kruse, Elliott and Kučerová, Lenka and Kühberger, Anton and Kuzminska, Anna O. and Lalot, Fanny and Lamm, Claus and Lammers, Joris and Lange, Elke B. and Lantian, Anthony and Lau, Ivy Y.-M. and Lazarevic, Ljiljana B. and Leliveld, Marijke C. and Lenz, Jennifer N. and Levitan, Carmel A. and Lewis, Savannah C. and Li, Manyu and Li, Yansong and Li, Haozheng and Lima, Tiago J. S. and Lins, Samuel and Liuzza, Marco Tullio and Lopes, Paula and Lu, Jackson G. and Lynds, Trent and Máčel, Martin and Mackinnon, Sean P. and Maganti, Madhavilatha and Magraw-Mickelson, Zoe and Magson, Leon F. and Manley, Harry and Marcu, Gabriela M. and Seršić, Darja Masli and Matibag, Celine-Justine and Mattiassi, Alan D. A. and Mazidi, Mahdi and McFall, Joseph P. and McLatchie, Neil and Mensink, Michael C. and Miketta, Lena and Milfont, Taciano L. and Mirisola, Alberto and Misiak, Michal and Mitkidis, Panagiotis and Moeini-Jazani, Mehrad and Monajem, Arash and Moreau, David and Musser, Erica D. and Narhetali, Erita and Ochoa, Danielle P. and Olsen, Jerome and Owsley, Nicholas C. and Özdoğru, Asil A. and Panning, Miriam and Papadatou-Pastou, Marietta and Parashar, Neha and Pärnamets, Philip and Paruzel-Czachura, Mariola and Parzuchowski, Michal and Paterlini, Julia V. and Pavlacic, Jeffrey M. and Peker, Mehmet and Peters, Kim and Piatnitckaia, Liudmila and Pinto, Isabel and Policarpio, Monica Renee and Pop-Jordanova, Nada and Pratama, Annas J. and Primbs, Maximilian A. and Pronizius, Ekaterina and Purić, Danka and Puvia, Elisa and Qamari, Vahid and Qian, Kun and Quiamzade, Alain and Ráczová, Beáta and Reinero, Diego A. and Reips, Ulf-Dietrich and Reyna, Cecilia and Reynolds, Kimberly and Ribeiro, Matheus F. F. and Röer, Jan P. and Ross, Robert M. and Roussos, Petros and Ruiz-Dodobara, Fernando and Ruiz-Fernandez, Susana and Rutjens, Bastiaan T. and Rybus, Katarzyna and Samekin, Adil and Santos, Anabela C. and Say, Nicolas and Schild, Christoph and Schmidt, Kathleen and Ścigała, Karolina A. and Sharifian, MohammadHasan and Shi, Jiaxin and Shi, Yaoxi and Sievers, Erin and Sirota, Miroslav and Slipenkyj, Michael and Solak, Çağlar and Sorokowska, Agnieszka and Sorokowski, Piotr and Söylemez, Sinem and Steffens, Niklas K. and Stephen, Ian D. and Sternisko, Anni and Stevens-Wilson, Laura and Stewart, Suzanne L. K. and Stieger, Stefan and Storage, Daniel and Strube, Justine and Susa, Kyle J. and Szekely-Copîndean, Raluca D. and Szostak, Natalia M. and Takwin, Bagus and Tatachari, Srinivasan and Thomas, Andrew G. and Tiede, Kevin E. and Tiong, Lucas E. and Tonković, Mirjana and Trémolière, Bastien and Tunstead, Lauren V. and Türkan, Belgüzar N. and Twardawski, Mathias and Vadillo, Miguel A. and Vally, Zahir and Vaughn, Leigh Ann and Verschuere, Bruno and Vlašiček, Denis and Voracek, Martin and Vranka, Marek A. and Wang, Shuzhen and West, Skye-Loren and Whyte, Stephen and Wilton, Leigh S. and Wlodarczyk, Anna and Wu, Xue and Xin, Fei and Yadanar, Su and Yama, Hiroshi and Yamada, Yuki and Yilmaz, Onurcan and Yoon, Sangsuk and Young, Danielle M. and Zakharov, Ilya and Zein, Rizqy A. and Zettler, Ingo and Žeželj, Iris L. and Zhang, Don C. and Zhang, Jin and Zheng, Xiaoxiao and Hoekstra, Rink and Aczel, Balazs",
year = "2022",
abstract = "The study of moral judgements often centres on moral dilemmas in which options consistent with deontological perspectives (that is, emphasizing rules, individual rights and duties) are in conflict with options consistent with utilitarian judgements (that is, following the greater good based on consequences). Greene et al. (2009) showed that psychological and situational factors (for example, the intent of the agent or the presence of physical contact between the agent and the victim) can play an important role in moral dilemma judgements (for example, the trolley problem). Our knowledge is limited concerning both the universality of these effects outside the United States and the impact of culture on the situational and psychological factors affecting moral judgements. Thus, we empirically tested the universality of the effects of intent and personal force on moral dilemma judgements by replicating the experiments of Greene et al. in 45 countries from all inhabited continents. We found that personal force and its interaction with intention exert influence on moral judgements in the US and Western cultural clusters, replicating and expanding the original findings. Moreover, the personal force effect was present in all cultural clusters, suggesting it is culturally universal. The evidence for the cultural universality of the interaction effect was inconclusive in the Eastern and Southern cultural clusters (depending on exclusion criteria). We found no strong association between collectivism/individualism and moral dilemma judgements.",
publisher = "Springer Science and Business Media LLC",
journal = "Nature Human Behaviour",
title = "Situational factors shape moral judgements in the trolley dilemma in Eastern, Southern and Western countries in a culturally diverse sample",
pages = "895-880",
number = "6",
volume = "6",
doi = "10.1038/s41562-022-01319-5"
}

Bago, B., Kovacs, M., Protzko, J., Nagy, T., Kekecs, Z., Palfi, B., Adamkovic, M., Adamus, S., Albalooshi, S., Albayrak-Aydemir, N., Alfian, I. N., Alper, S., Alvarez-Solas, S., Alves, S. G., Amaya, S., Andresen, P. K., Anjum, G., Ansari, D., Arriaga, P., Aruta, J. J. B. R., Arvanitis, A., Babincak, P., Barzykowski, K., Bashour, B., Baskin, E., Batalha, L., Batres, C., Bavolar, J., Bayrak, F., Becker, B., Becker, M., Belaus, A., Białek, M., Bilancini, E., Boller, D., Boncinelli, L., Boudesseul, J., Brown, B. T., Buchanan, E. M., Butt, M. M., Calvillo, D. P., Carnes, N. C., Celniker, J. B., Chartier, C. R., Chopik, W. J., Chotikavan, P., Chuan-Peng, H., Clancy, R. F., Çoker, O., Correia, R. C., Adoric, V. C., Cubillas, C. P., Czoschke, S., Daryani, Y., de Grefte, J. A. M., de Vries, W. C., Burak, E. G. D., Dias, C., Dixson, B. J. W., Du, X., Dumančić, F., Dumbravă, A., Dutra, N. B., Enachescu, J., Esteban-Serna, C., Eudave, L., Evans, T. R., Feldman, G., Felisberti, F. M., Fiedler, S., Findor, A., Fleischmann, A., Foroni, F., Francová, R., Frank, D., Fu, C. H. Y., Gao, S., Ghasemi, O., Ghazi-Noori, A., Ghossainy, M. E., Giammusso, I., Gill, T., Gjoneska, B., Gollwitzer, M., Graton, A., Grinberg, M., Groyecka-Bernard, A., Harris, E. A., Hartanto, A., Hassan, W. A. N. M., Hatami, J., Heimark, K. R., Hidding, J. J. J., Hristova, E., Hruška, M., Hudson, C. A., Huskey, R., Ikeda, A., Inbar, Y., Ingram, G. P. D., Isler, O., Isloi, C., Iyer, A., Jaeger, B., Janssen, S. M. J., Jiménez-Leal, W., Jokić, B., Kačmár, P., Kadreva, V., Kaminski, G., Karimi-Malekabadi, F., Kasper, A. T. A., Kendrick, K. M., Kennedy, B. J., Kocalar, H. E., Kodapanakkal, R. I., Kowal, M., Kruse, E., Kučerová, L., Kühberger, A., Kuzminska, A. O., Lalot, F., Lamm, C., Lammers, J., Lange, E. B., Lantian, A., Lau, I. Y.-M., Lazarevic, L. B., Leliveld, M. C., Lenz, J. N., Levitan, C. A., Lewis, S. C., Li, M., Li, Y., Li, H., Lima, T. J. S., Lins, S., Liuzza, M. T., Lopes, P., Lu, J. G., Lynds, T., Máčel, M., Mackinnon, S. P., Maganti, M., Magraw-Mickelson, Z., Magson, L. F., Manley, H., Marcu, G. M., Seršić, D. M., Matibag, C., Mattiassi, A. D. A., Mazidi, M., McFall, J. P., McLatchie, N., Mensink, M. C., Miketta, L., Milfont, T. L., Mirisola, A., Misiak, M., Mitkidis, P., Moeini-Jazani, M., Monajem, A., Moreau, D., Musser, E. D., Narhetali, E., Ochoa, D. P., Olsen, J., Owsley, N. C., Özdoğru, A. A., Panning, M., Papadatou-Pastou, M., Parashar, N., Pärnamets, P., Paruzel-Czachura, M., Parzuchowski, M., Paterlini, J. V., Pavlacic, J. M., Peker, M., Peters, K., Piatnitckaia, L., Pinto, I., Policarpio, M. R., Pop-Jordanova, N., Pratama, A. J., Primbs, M. A., Pronizius, E., Purić, D., Puvia, E., Qamari, V., Qian, K., Quiamzade, A., Ráczová, B., Reinero, D. A., Reips, U., Reyna, C., Reynolds, K., Ribeiro, M. F. F., Röer, J. P., Ross, R. M., Roussos, P., Ruiz-Dodobara, F., Ruiz-Fernandez, S., Rutjens, B. T., Rybus, K., Samekin, A., Santos, A. C., Say, N., Schild, C., Schmidt, K., Ścigała, K. A., Sharifian, M., Shi, J., Shi, Y., Sievers, E., Sirota, M., Slipenkyj, M., Solak, Ç., Sorokowska, A., Sorokowski, P., Söylemez, S., Steffens, N. K., Stephen, I. D., Sternisko, A., Stevens-Wilson, L., Stewart, S. L. K., Stieger, S., Storage, D., Strube, J., Susa, K. J., Szekely-Copîndean, R. D., Szostak, N. M., Takwin, B., Tatachari, S., Thomas, A. G., Tiede, K. E., Tiong, L. E., Tonković, M., Trémolière, B., Tunstead, L. V., Türkan, B. N., Twardawski, M., Vadillo, M. A., Vally, Z., Vaughn, L. A., Verschuere, B., Vlašiček, D., Voracek, M., Vranka, M. A., Wang, S., West, S., Whyte, S., Wilton, L. S., Wlodarczyk, A., Wu, X., Xin, F., Yadanar, S., Yama, H., Yamada, Y., Yilmaz, O., Yoon, S., Young, D. M., Zakharov, I., Zein, R. A., Zettler, I., Žeželj, I. L., Zhang, D. C., Zhang, J., Zheng, X., Hoekstra, R.,& Aczel, B.. (2022). Situational factors shape moral judgements in the trolley dilemma in Eastern, Southern and Western countries in a culturally diverse sample. in Nature Human Behaviour
Springer Science and Business Media LLC., 6(6), 880-895.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-022-01319-5

Bago B, Kovacs M, Protzko J, Nagy T, Kekecs Z, Palfi B, Adamkovic M, Adamus S, Albalooshi S, Albayrak-Aydemir N, Alfian IN, Alper S, Alvarez-Solas S, Alves SG, Amaya S, Andresen PK, Anjum G, Ansari D, Arriaga P, Aruta JJBR, Arvanitis A, Babincak P, Barzykowski K, Bashour B, Baskin E, Batalha L, Batres C, Bavolar J, Bayrak F, Becker B, Becker M, Belaus A, Białek M, Bilancini E, Boller D, Boncinelli L, Boudesseul J, Brown BT, Buchanan EM, Butt MM, Calvillo DP, Carnes NC, Celniker JB, Chartier CR, Chopik WJ, Chotikavan P, Chuan-Peng H, Clancy RF, Çoker O, Correia RC, Adoric VC, Cubillas CP, Czoschke S, Daryani Y, de Grefte JAM, de Vries WC, Burak EGD, Dias C, Dixson BJW, Du X, Dumančić F, Dumbravă A, Dutra NB, Enachescu J, Esteban-Serna C, Eudave L, Evans TR, Feldman G, Felisberti FM, Fiedler S, Findor A, Fleischmann A, Foroni F, Francová R, Frank D, Fu CHY, Gao S, Ghasemi O, Ghazi-Noori A, Ghossainy ME, Giammusso I, Gill T, Gjoneska B, Gollwitzer M, Graton A, Grinberg M, Groyecka-Bernard A, Harris EA, Hartanto A, Hassan WANM, Hatami J, Heimark KR, Hidding JJJ, Hristova E, Hruška M, Hudson CA, Huskey R, Ikeda A, Inbar Y, Ingram GPD, Isler O, Isloi C, Iyer A, Jaeger B, Janssen SMJ, Jiménez-Leal W, Jokić B, Kačmár P, Kadreva V, Kaminski G, Karimi-Malekabadi F, Kasper ATA, Kendrick KM, Kennedy BJ, Kocalar HE, Kodapanakkal RI, Kowal M, Kruse E, Kučerová L, Kühberger A, Kuzminska AO, Lalot F, Lamm C, Lammers J, Lange EB, Lantian A, Lau IY, Lazarevic LB, Leliveld MC, Lenz JN, Levitan CA, Lewis SC, Li M, Li Y, Li H, Lima TJS, Lins S, Liuzza MT, Lopes P, Lu JG, Lynds T, Máčel M, Mackinnon SP, Maganti M, Magraw-Mickelson Z, Magson LF, Manley H, Marcu GM, Seršić DM, Matibag C, Mattiassi ADA, Mazidi M, McFall JP, McLatchie N, Mensink MC, Miketta L, Milfont TL, Mirisola A, Misiak M, Mitkidis P, Moeini-Jazani M, Monajem A, Moreau D, Musser ED, Narhetali E, Ochoa DP, Olsen J, Owsley NC, Özdoğru AA, Panning M, Papadatou-Pastou M, Parashar N, Pärnamets P, Paruzel-Czachura M, Parzuchowski M, Paterlini JV, Pavlacic JM, Peker M, Peters K, Piatnitckaia L, Pinto I, Policarpio MR, Pop-Jordanova N, Pratama AJ, Primbs MA, Pronizius E, Purić D, Puvia E, Qamari V, Qian K, Quiamzade A, Ráczová B, Reinero DA, Reips U, Reyna C, Reynolds K, Ribeiro MFF, Röer JP, Ross RM, Roussos P, Ruiz-Dodobara F, Ruiz-Fernandez S, Rutjens BT, Rybus K, Samekin A, Santos AC, Say N, Schild C, Schmidt K, Ścigała KA, Sharifian M, Shi J, Shi Y, Sievers E, Sirota M, Slipenkyj M, Solak Ç, Sorokowska A, Sorokowski P, Söylemez S, Steffens NK, Stephen ID, Sternisko A, Stevens-Wilson L, Stewart SLK, Stieger S, Storage D, Strube J, Susa KJ, Szekely-Copîndean RD, Szostak NM, Takwin B, Tatachari S, Thomas AG, Tiede KE, Tiong LE, Tonković M, Trémolière B, Tunstead LV, Türkan BN, Twardawski M, Vadillo MA, Vally Z, Vaughn LA, Verschuere B, Vlašiček D, Voracek M, Vranka MA, Wang S, West S, Whyte S, Wilton LS, Wlodarczyk A, Wu X, Xin F, Yadanar S, Yama H, Yamada Y, Yilmaz O, Yoon S, Young DM, Zakharov I, Zein RA, Zettler I, Žeželj IL, Zhang DC, Zhang J, Zheng X, Hoekstra R, Aczel B. Situational factors shape moral judgements in the trolley dilemma in Eastern, Southern and Western countries in a culturally diverse sample. in Nature Human Behaviour. 2022;6(6):880-895.
doi:10.1038/s41562-022-01319-5 .

Bago, Bence, Kovacs, Marton, Protzko, John, Nagy, Tamas, Kekecs, Zoltan, Palfi, Bence, Adamkovic, Matus, Adamus, Sylwia, Albalooshi, Sumaya, Albayrak-Aydemir, Nihan, Alfian, Ilham N., Alper, Sinan, Alvarez-Solas, Sara, Alves, Sara G., Amaya, Santiago, Andresen, Pia K., Anjum, Gulnaz, Ansari, Daniel, Arriaga, Patrícia, Aruta, John Jamir Benzon R., Arvanitis, Alexios, Babincak, Peter, Barzykowski, Krystian, Bashour, Bana, Baskin, Ernest, Batalha, Luisa, Batres, Carlota, Bavolar, Jozef, Bayrak, Fatih, Becker, Benjamin, Becker, Maja, Belaus, Anabel, Białek, Michał, Bilancini, Ennio, Boller, Daniel, Boncinelli, Leonardo, Boudesseul, Jordane, Brown, Benjamin T., Buchanan, Erin M., Butt, Muhammad M., Calvillo, Dustin P., Carnes, Nate C., Celniker, Jared B., Chartier, Christopher R., Chopik, William J., Chotikavan, Poom, Chuan-Peng, Hu, Clancy, Rockwell F., Çoker, Ogeday, Correia, Rita C., Adoric, Vera Cubela, Cubillas, Carmelo P., Czoschke, Stefan, Daryani, Yalda, de Grefte, Job A. M., de Vries, Wieteke C., Burak, Elif G. Demirag, Dias, Carina, Dixson, Barnaby J. W., Du, Xinkai, Dumančić, Francesca, Dumbravă, Andrei, Dutra, Natalia B., Enachescu, Janina, Esteban-Serna, Celia, Eudave, Luis, Evans, Thomas R., Feldman, Gilad, Felisberti, Fatima M., Fiedler, Susann, Findor, Andrej, Fleischmann, Alexandra, Foroni, Francesco, Francová, Radka, Frank, Darius-Aurel, Fu, Cynthia H. Y., Gao, Shan, Ghasemi, Omid, Ghazi-Noori, Ali-Reza, Ghossainy, Maliki E., Giammusso, Isabella, Gill, Tripat, Gjoneska, Biljana, Gollwitzer, Mario, Graton, Aurélien, Grinberg, Maurice, Groyecka-Bernard, Agata, Harris, Elizabeth A., Hartanto, Andree, Hassan, Widad A. N. M., Hatami, Javad, Heimark, Katrina R., Hidding, Jasper J. J., Hristova, Evgeniya, Hruška, Matej, Hudson, Charlotte A., Huskey, Richard, Ikeda, Ayumi, Inbar, Yoel, Ingram, Gordon P. D., Isler, Ozan, Isloi, Chris, Iyer, Aishwarya, Jaeger, Bastian, Janssen, Steve M. J., Jiménez-Leal, William, Jokić, Biljana, Kačmár, Pavol, Kadreva, Veselina, Kaminski, Gwenaël, Karimi-Malekabadi, Farzan, Kasper, Arno T. A., Kendrick, Keith M., Kennedy, Bradley J., Kocalar, Halil E., Kodapanakkal, Rabia I., Kowal, Marta, Kruse, Elliott, Kučerová, Lenka, Kühberger, Anton, Kuzminska, Anna O., Lalot, Fanny, Lamm, Claus, Lammers, Joris, Lange, Elke B., Lantian, Anthony, Lau, Ivy Y.-M., Lazarevic, Ljiljana B., Leliveld, Marijke C., Lenz, Jennifer N., Levitan, Carmel A., Lewis, Savannah C., Li, Manyu, Li, Yansong, Li, Haozheng, Lima, Tiago J. S., Lins, Samuel, Liuzza, Marco Tullio, Lopes, Paula, Lu, Jackson G., Lynds, Trent, Máčel, Martin, Mackinnon, Sean P., Maganti, Madhavilatha, Magraw-Mickelson, Zoe, Magson, Leon F., Manley, Harry, Marcu, Gabriela M., Seršić, Darja Masli, Matibag, Celine-Justine, Mattiassi, Alan D. A., Mazidi, Mahdi, McFall, Joseph P., McLatchie, Neil, Mensink, Michael C., Miketta, Lena, Milfont, Taciano L., Mirisola, Alberto, Misiak, Michal, Mitkidis, Panagiotis, Moeini-Jazani, Mehrad, Monajem, Arash, Moreau, David, Musser, Erica D., Narhetali, Erita, Ochoa, Danielle P., Olsen, Jerome, Owsley, Nicholas C., Özdoğru, Asil A., Panning, Miriam, Papadatou-Pastou, Marietta, Parashar, Neha, Pärnamets, Philip, Paruzel-Czachura, Mariola, Parzuchowski, Michal, Paterlini, Julia V., Pavlacic, Jeffrey M., Peker, Mehmet, Peters, Kim, Piatnitckaia, Liudmila, Pinto, Isabel, Policarpio, Monica Renee, Pop-Jordanova, Nada, Pratama, Annas J., Primbs, Maximilian A., Pronizius, Ekaterina, Purić, Danka, Puvia, Elisa, Qamari, Vahid, Qian, Kun, Quiamzade, Alain, Ráczová, Beáta, Reinero, Diego A., Reips, Ulf-Dietrich, Reyna, Cecilia, Reynolds, Kimberly, Ribeiro, Matheus F. F., Röer, Jan P., Ross, Robert M., Roussos, Petros, Ruiz-Dodobara, Fernando, Ruiz-Fernandez, Susana, Rutjens, Bastiaan T., Rybus, Katarzyna, Samekin, Adil, Santos, Anabela C., Say, Nicolas, Schild, Christoph, Schmidt, Kathleen, Ścigała, Karolina A., Sharifian, MohammadHasan, Shi, Jiaxin, Shi, Yaoxi, Sievers, Erin, Sirota, Miroslav, Slipenkyj, Michael, Solak, Çağlar, Sorokowska, Agnieszka, Sorokowski, Piotr, Söylemez, Sinem, Steffens, Niklas K., Stephen, Ian D., Sternisko, Anni, Stevens-Wilson, Laura, Stewart, Suzanne L. K., Stieger, Stefan, Storage, Daniel, Strube, Justine, Susa, Kyle J., Szekely-Copîndean, Raluca D., Szostak, Natalia M., Takwin, Bagus, Tatachari, Srinivasan, Thomas, Andrew G., Tiede, Kevin E., Tiong, Lucas E., Tonković, Mirjana, Trémolière, Bastien, Tunstead, Lauren V., Türkan, Belgüzar N., Twardawski, Mathias, Vadillo, Miguel A., Vally, Zahir, Vaughn, Leigh Ann, Verschuere, Bruno, Vlašiček, Denis, Voracek, Martin, Vranka, Marek A., Wang, Shuzhen, West, Skye-Loren, Whyte, Stephen, Wilton, Leigh S., Wlodarczyk, Anna, Wu, Xue, Xin, Fei, Yadanar, Su, Yama, Hiroshi, Yamada, Yuki, Yilmaz, Onurcan, Yoon, Sangsuk, Young, Danielle M., Zakharov, Ilya, Zein, Rizqy A., Zettler, Ingo, Žeželj, Iris L., Zhang, Don C., Zhang, Jin, Zheng, Xiaoxiao, Hoekstra, Rink, Aczel, Balazs, "Situational factors shape moral judgements in the trolley dilemma in Eastern, Southern and Western countries in a culturally diverse sample" in Nature Human Behaviour, 6, no. 6 (2022):880-895,
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-022-01319-5 . .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Lazić, Aleksandra
AU  - Purić, Danka
AU  - Krstić, Ksenija
PY  - 2021
UR  - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/3248
AB  - Although previous meta-analytic evidence supports the existence of parochialism in cooperation among adults, the extent to which children and adolescents are more willing to incur a personal cost to benefit ingroups, compared to outgroups, is not yet clear. We provide the first meta-analysis on the existence and magnitude of parochialism in cooperation among pre-adults. Based on 20 experimental economics studies (k = 69, N = 5268, age = 3-19, 12 countries, published 2008-2019), a multilevel meta-analytic model revealed a small overall effect size indicating that children and adolescents were more cooperative towards ingroups (d = 0.22, 95% CI [0.07, 0.38]). A series of single-moderator analyses tested for the following conditions: participant age and sex; game type ([mini-]dictator game, prisoner's dilemma, public goods dilemma, trust game, ultimatum game); outcome interdependence; membership manipulation (between- vs. within-subjects); group type (natural vs. experimental); reward type (monetary vs. non-monetary); and country of the participant. Parochial cooperation did not vary with participants' age. Parochialism was larger in non-interdependent (dictator-type) compared to interdependent (bargaining and social dilemma) games. There were no moderating effects of group type, membership manipulation or reward type. To provide more data on how parochialism develops, primary studies should report age ranges more precisely and use more restricted age groups.
PB  - John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester
T2  - International Journal of Psychology
T1  - Does parochial cooperation exist in childhood and adolescence? A meta-analysis
DO  - 10.1002/ijop.12791
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Lazić, Aleksandra and Purić, Danka and Krstić, Ksenija",
year = "2021",
abstract = "Although previous meta-analytic evidence supports the existence of parochialism in cooperation among adults, the extent to which children and adolescents are more willing to incur a personal cost to benefit ingroups, compared to outgroups, is not yet clear. We provide the first meta-analysis on the existence and magnitude of parochialism in cooperation among pre-adults. Based on 20 experimental economics studies (k = 69, N = 5268, age = 3-19, 12 countries, published 2008-2019), a multilevel meta-analytic model revealed a small overall effect size indicating that children and adolescents were more cooperative towards ingroups (d = 0.22, 95% CI [0.07, 0.38]). A series of single-moderator analyses tested for the following conditions: participant age and sex; game type ([mini-]dictator game, prisoner's dilemma, public goods dilemma, trust game, ultimatum game); outcome interdependence; membership manipulation (between- vs. within-subjects); group type (natural vs. experimental); reward type (monetary vs. non-monetary); and country of the participant. Parochial cooperation did not vary with participants' age. Parochialism was larger in non-interdependent (dictator-type) compared to interdependent (bargaining and social dilemma) games. There were no moderating effects of group type, membership manipulation or reward type. To provide more data on how parochialism develops, primary studies should report age ranges more precisely and use more restricted age groups.",
publisher = "John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester",
journal = "International Journal of Psychology",
title = "Does parochial cooperation exist in childhood and adolescence? A meta-analysis",
doi = "10.1002/ijop.12791"
}

Lazić, A., Purić, D.,& Krstić, K.. (2021). Does parochial cooperation exist in childhood and adolescence? A meta-analysis. in International Journal of Psychology
John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester..
https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12791

Lazić A, Purić D, Krstić K. Does parochial cooperation exist in childhood and adolescence? A meta-analysis. in International Journal of Psychology. 2021;.
doi:10.1002/ijop.12791 .

Lazić, Aleksandra, Purić, Danka, Krstić, Ksenija, "Does parochial cooperation exist in childhood and adolescence? A meta-analysis" in International Journal of Psychology (2021),
https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12791 . .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Lazarević, Ljiljana
AU  - Purić, Danka
AU  - Teovanović, Predrag
AU  - Lukić, Petar
AU  - Zupan, Zorana
AU  - Knežević, Goran
PY  - 2021
UR  - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/3324
AB  - The study aimed to investigate the role of personality, thinking styles, and conspiracy mentality in health-related behaviors during the COVID-19 pandemic, i.e., recommended health behaviors according to COVID-19 guidelines and engagement in pseudoscientific practices related to COVID-19. Basic personality space was defined by the HEXACO model complemented by Disintegration, which represents psychotic-like experiences and behaviors reconceptualized as a personality trait. Mediation analyses conducted on a convenient sample from the general population recruited via social media and by snowballing (N = 417) showed that engagement in pseudoscientific behaviors was predicted by high Disintegration. However, this relationship was entirely mediated by high experiential and low rational thinking styles. Adherence to health practices recommended by COVID-19 guidelines was predicted by high Honesty traits, while low Disintegration had both direct and indirect effects through conspiracy mentality.
PB  - Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd, Oxford
T2  - Personality and Individual Differences
T1  - What drives us to be (ir)responsible for our health during the COVID-19 pandemic? The role of personality, thinking styles, and conspiracy mentality
VL  - 176
DO  - 10.1016/j.paid.2021.110771
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Lazarević, Ljiljana and Purić, Danka and Teovanović, Predrag and Lukić, Petar and Zupan, Zorana and Knežević, Goran",
year = "2021",
abstract = "The study aimed to investigate the role of personality, thinking styles, and conspiracy mentality in health-related behaviors during the COVID-19 pandemic, i.e., recommended health behaviors according to COVID-19 guidelines and engagement in pseudoscientific practices related to COVID-19. Basic personality space was defined by the HEXACO model complemented by Disintegration, which represents psychotic-like experiences and behaviors reconceptualized as a personality trait. Mediation analyses conducted on a convenient sample from the general population recruited via social media and by snowballing (N = 417) showed that engagement in pseudoscientific behaviors was predicted by high Disintegration. However, this relationship was entirely mediated by high experiential and low rational thinking styles. Adherence to health practices recommended by COVID-19 guidelines was predicted by high Honesty traits, while low Disintegration had both direct and indirect effects through conspiracy mentality.",
publisher = "Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd, Oxford",
journal = "Personality and Individual Differences",
title = "What drives us to be (ir)responsible for our health during the COVID-19 pandemic? The role of personality, thinking styles, and conspiracy mentality",
volume = "176",
doi = "10.1016/j.paid.2021.110771"
}

Lazarević, L., Purić, D., Teovanović, P., Lukić, P., Zupan, Z.,& Knežević, G.. (2021). What drives us to be (ir)responsible for our health during the COVID-19 pandemic? The role of personality, thinking styles, and conspiracy mentality. in Personality and Individual Differences
Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd, Oxford., 176.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.110771

Lazarević L, Purić D, Teovanović P, Lukić P, Zupan Z, Knežević G. What drives us to be (ir)responsible for our health during the COVID-19 pandemic? The role of personality, thinking styles, and conspiracy mentality. in Personality and Individual Differences. 2021;176.
doi:10.1016/j.paid.2021.110771 .

Lazarević, Ljiljana, Purić, Danka, Teovanović, Predrag, Lukić, Petar, Zupan, Zorana, Knežević, Goran, "What drives us to be (ir)responsible for our health during the COVID-19 pandemic? The role of personality, thinking styles, and conspiracy mentality" in Personality and Individual Differences, 176 (2021),
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.110771 . .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Симић, Наташа
AU  - Марушић Јаблановић, Милица
AU  - Пурић, Данка
PY  - 2021
UR  - http://ipir.ipisr.org.rs/handle/123456789/746
UR  - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/4169
AB  - Примењујући приступ усмерен на особу, у овом раду смо настојале да утврдимо профи-ле будућих наставника на основу њихове мотивације за избор наставничке професије иупоредимо их имајући у виду њихову перцепцију дате професије и задовољство изборомпрофесије. Додатни циљ представљало је испитивање могућих разлика између мушкара-ца и жена, као и између будућих наставника разредне и предметне наставе. Скалу Чини-ци који утичу на избор посла наставника попунило је 364 будућих наставника из Србије.Анализом латентних профила издвојиле смо три профила. Незаинтересовани негативи-сти се одликују слабом мотивацијом, негативнијом перцепцијом професије наставни-ка и најнижим степеном задовољства избором професије, тако да се овај профил можесматрати маладаптивним. Некритички ентузијасти имају највиши степен мотивације инајпозитивнију перцепцију добити од посла наставника. Профил који смо назвали ау-тономним реалистима одликује се најнижом екстринзичком и мотивацијом која потичеод социјалних утицаја. Регистроване су полне разлике између профила, али не и разликекоје се тичу типа иницијалног образовања. Познавање профила наставника може помоћи у предвиђању различитих каријерних путања и у осмишљавању интервенција којеће бити прилагођене потребама специфичних подгрупа будућих наставника у Србији.
AB  - profiles based on their motivation for a teaching profession and compare them in terms ofperceptions of the profession and satisfaction with career choice. An additional goal was toinvestigate potential differences between males and females, as well as prospective class andsubject teachers. FIT-Choice scale was administered to 364 Serbian preservice teachers.A latent profile analysis identified three profiles. Disengaged negativists are distinguishedby weak motivations, more negative perceptions of the teaching profession and the lowestsatisfaction with the career choice, so this profile could be considered maladaptive. UncriticalEnthusiasts have the highest level of motivations and the most positive perceptions of taskreturn. The profile named Autonomous realists is characterised by the lowest extrinsic andsocial influence motivation. The profiles differ with respect to gender, but no differences wereobserved between profiles in terms of educational background. Knowing about profiles can help in creating predictions about career paths and designing interventions that would be tailored tothe needs of specific subgroups of Serbian preservice teachers.
AB  - Применяя личностно-ориентированный подход, в данной статье мы по-пытались определить профили будущих преподавателей на основе их мотивации квыбору преподавательской профессии, а также сопоставить их с аспекта восприятияэтой профессии и удовлетворённости выбором профессии. Дополнительной цельюявлялось изучение возможных различий между мужчинами и женщинами, а такжемежду будущими учителями в начальных и старших классах. Шкалу мотивации длявыбора работы преподавателя заполнило 364 будущих преподавателей из Сербии.Анализируя латентные профили, мы выделили три. Незаинтересованные негативи-сты характеризуются слабой мотивацией, более негативным восприятием профессиипреподавателя и самой низкой степенью удовлетворённости выбором профессии, по-этому этот профиль можно считать малоадаптивным. Некритические энтузиасты от-личаются самым высоким уровнем мотивации и наиболее позитивным восприятиемпреимуществ и выгод от работы преподавателя. Профиль, названный нами автоном-ные реалисты характеризуется самой низкой внешней мотивацией, а также мотиваци-ей, исходящей из социальных влияний. Были зарегистрированы гендерные различиямежду профилями, но не выявлено различий в отношении типа начального образо-вания. Знание профиля преподавателя может быть полезным при прогнозированииразных путей развития карьеры и при разработке мероприятий и действий, которыебудут приспособлены потребностям конкретных специфических подгрупп будущихпреподавателей в Сербии.
PB  - Београд : Институт за педагошка истраживања
T2  - Зборник Института за педагошка истраживања
T1  - Мотивација будућих наставника за избор наставничке професије – приступ усмерен на особу
T1  - Preservice teachers’ motivation for a teaching career – a person-centred perspective
T1  - Мотивация будущих преподавателей при выборе преподавательской профессии – личностно-ориентированный подход
EP  - 238
IS  - 2
SP  - 207
VL  - 53
DO  - 10.2298/ZIPI2102207S
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Симић, Наташа and Марушић Јаблановић, Милица and Пурић, Данка",
year = "2021",
abstract = "Примењујући приступ усмерен на особу, у овом раду смо настојале да утврдимо профи-ле будућих наставника на основу њихове мотивације за избор наставничке професије иупоредимо их имајући у виду њихову перцепцију дате професије и задовољство изборомпрофесије. Додатни циљ представљало је испитивање могућих разлика између мушкара-ца и жена, као и између будућих наставника разредне и предметне наставе. Скалу Чини-ци који утичу на избор посла наставника попунило је 364 будућих наставника из Србије.Анализом латентних профила издвојиле смо три профила. Незаинтересовани негативи-сти се одликују слабом мотивацијом, негативнијом перцепцијом професије наставни-ка и најнижим степеном задовољства избором професије, тако да се овај профил можесматрати маладаптивним. Некритички ентузијасти имају највиши степен мотивације инајпозитивнију перцепцију добити од посла наставника. Профил који смо назвали ау-тономним реалистима одликује се најнижом екстринзичком и мотивацијом која потичеод социјалних утицаја. Регистроване су полне разлике између профила, али не и разликекоје се тичу типа иницијалног образовања. Познавање профила наставника може помоћи у предвиђању различитих каријерних путања и у осмишљавању интервенција којеће бити прилагођене потребама специфичних подгрупа будућих наставника у Србији., profiles based on their motivation for a teaching profession and compare them in terms ofperceptions of the profession and satisfaction with career choice. An additional goal was toinvestigate potential differences between males and females, as well as prospective class andsubject teachers. FIT-Choice scale was administered to 364 Serbian preservice teachers.A latent profile analysis identified three profiles. Disengaged negativists are distinguishedby weak motivations, more negative perceptions of the teaching profession and the lowestsatisfaction with the career choice, so this profile could be considered maladaptive. UncriticalEnthusiasts have the highest level of motivations and the most positive perceptions of taskreturn. The profile named Autonomous realists is characterised by the lowest extrinsic andsocial influence motivation. The profiles differ with respect to gender, but no differences wereobserved between profiles in terms of educational background. Knowing about profiles can help in creating predictions about career paths and designing interventions that would be tailored tothe needs of specific subgroups of Serbian preservice teachers., Применяя личностно-ориентированный подход, в данной статье мы по-пытались определить профили будущих преподавателей на основе их мотивации квыбору преподавательской профессии, а также сопоставить их с аспекта восприятияэтой профессии и удовлетворённости выбором профессии. Дополнительной цельюявлялось изучение возможных различий между мужчинами и женщинами, а такжемежду будущими учителями в начальных и старших классах. Шкалу мотивации длявыбора работы преподавателя заполнило 364 будущих преподавателей из Сербии.Анализируя латентные профили, мы выделили три. Незаинтересованные негативи-сты характеризуются слабой мотивацией, более негативным восприятием профессиипреподавателя и самой низкой степенью удовлетворённости выбором профессии, по-этому этот профиль можно считать малоадаптивным. Некритические энтузиасты от-личаются самым высоким уровнем мотивации и наиболее позитивным восприятиемпреимуществ и выгод от работы преподавателя. Профиль, названный нами автоном-ные реалисты характеризуется самой низкой внешней мотивацией, а также мотиваци-ей, исходящей из социальных влияний. Были зарегистрированы гендерные различиямежду профилями, но не выявлено различий в отношении типа начального образо-вания. Знание профиля преподавателя может быть полезным при прогнозированииразных путей развития карьеры и при разработке мероприятий и действий, которыебудут приспособлены потребностям конкретных специфических подгрупп будущихпреподавателей в Сербии.",
publisher = "Београд : Институт за педагошка истраживања",
journal = "Зборник Института за педагошка истраживања",
title = "Мотивација будућих наставника за избор наставничке професије – приступ усмерен на особу, Preservice teachers’ motivation for a teaching career – a person-centred perspective, Мотивация будущих преподавателей при выборе преподавательской профессии – личностно-ориентированный подход",
pages = "238-207",
number = "2",
volume = "53",
doi = "10.2298/ZIPI2102207S"
}

Симић, Н., Марушић Јаблановић, М.,& Пурић, Д.. (2021). Мотивација будућих наставника за избор наставничке професије – приступ усмерен на особу. in Зборник Института за педагошка истраживања
Београд : Институт за педагошка истраживања., 53(2), 207-238.
https://doi.org/10.2298/ZIPI2102207S

Симић Н, Марушић Јаблановић М, Пурић Д. Мотивација будућих наставника за избор наставничке професије – приступ усмерен на особу. in Зборник Института за педагошка истраживања. 2021;53(2):207-238.
doi:10.2298/ZIPI2102207S .

Симић, Наташа, Марушић Јаблановић, Милица, Пурић, Данка, "Мотивација будућих наставника за избор наставничке професије – приступ усмерен на особу" in Зборник Института за педагошка истраживања, 53, no. 2 (2021):207-238,
https://doi.org/10.2298/ZIPI2102207S . .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Simić, Nataša
AU  - Marušić Jablanović, Milica
AU  - Purić, Danka
PY  - 2021
UR  - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/5167
AB  - Примењујући приступ усмерен на особу, у овом раду смо настојале да утврдимо профиле будућих наставника на основу њихове мотивације за избор наставничке професије и
упоредимо их имајући у виду њихову перцепцију дате професије и задовољство избором
професије. Додатни циљ представљало је испитивање могућих разлика између мушкараца и жена, као и између будућих наставника разредне и предметне наставе. Скалу Чиници који утичу на избор посла наставника попунило је 364 будућих наставника из Србије.
Анализом латентних профила издвојиле смо три профила. Незаинтересовани негативисти се одликују слабом мотивацијом, негативнијом перцепцијом професије наставника и најнижим степеном задовољства избором професије, тако да се овај профил може
сматрати маладаптивним. Некритички ентузијасти имају највиши степен мотивације и
најпозитивнију перцепцију добити од посла наставника. Профил који смо назвали аутономним реалистима одликује се најнижом екстринзичком и мотивацијом која потиче
од социјалних утицаја. Регистроване су полне разлике између профила, али не и разлике
које се тичу типа иницијалног образовања. Познавање профила наставника може помоћи у предвиђању различитих каријерних путања и у осмишљавању интервенција које
ће бити прилагођене потребама специфичних подгрупа будућих наставника у Србији.
T2  - Зборник Института за педагошка истраживања
T1  - Мотивација будућих наставника за избор наставничке професије – приступ усмерен на особу
EP  - 238
IS  - 2
SP  - 207
VL  - 53
DO  - https://doi.org/10.2298/ZIPI2102207S
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Simić, Nataša and Marušić Jablanović, Milica and Purić, Danka",
year = "2021",
abstract = "Примењујући приступ усмерен на особу, у овом раду смо настојале да утврдимо профиле будућих наставника на основу њихове мотивације за избор наставничке професије и
упоредимо их имајући у виду њихову перцепцију дате професије и задовољство избором
професије. Додатни циљ представљало је испитивање могућих разлика између мушкараца и жена, као и између будућих наставника разредне и предметне наставе. Скалу Чиници који утичу на избор посла наставника попунило је 364 будућих наставника из Србије.
Анализом латентних профила издвојиле смо три профила. Незаинтересовани негативисти се одликују слабом мотивацијом, негативнијом перцепцијом професије наставника и најнижим степеном задовољства избором професије, тако да се овај профил може
сматрати маладаптивним. Некритички ентузијасти имају највиши степен мотивације и
најпозитивнију перцепцију добити од посла наставника. Профил који смо назвали аутономним реалистима одликује се најнижом екстринзичком и мотивацијом која потиче
од социјалних утицаја. Регистроване су полне разлике између профила, али не и разлике
које се тичу типа иницијалног образовања. Познавање профила наставника може помоћи у предвиђању различитих каријерних путања и у осмишљавању интервенција које
ће бити прилагођене потребама специфичних подгрупа будућих наставника у Србији.",
journal = "Зборник Института за педагошка истраживања",
title = "Мотивација будућих наставника за избор наставничке професије – приступ усмерен на особу",
pages = "238-207",
number = "2",
volume = "53",
doi = "https://doi.org/10.2298/ZIPI2102207S"
}

Simić, N., Marušić Jablanović, M.,& Purić, D.. (2021). Мотивација будућих наставника за избор наставничке професије – приступ усмерен на особу. in Зборник Института за педагошка истраживања, 53(2), 207-238.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2298/ZIPI2102207S

Simić N, Marušić Jablanović M, Purić D. Мотивација будућих наставника за избор наставничке професије – приступ усмерен на особу. in Зборник Института за педагошка истраживања. 2021;53(2):207-238.
doi:https://doi.org/10.2298/ZIPI2102207S .

Simić, Nataša, Marušić Jablanović, Milica, Purić, Danka, "Мотивација будућих наставника за избор наставничке професије – приступ усмерен на особу" in Зборник Института за педагошка истраживања, 53, no. 2 (2021):207-238,
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2298/ZIPI2102207S . .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Milošević, Vladimir J.
AU  - Orlić, Ana
AU  - Purić, Danka
AU  - Radisavljević-Janić, Snežana
AU  - Lazarević, Dušanka
AU  - Milanović, Ivana
PY  - 2021
UR  - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/3325
AB  - Recent research findings have indicated that aerobic fitness and motor fitness are related to specific executive functions (EF). However, it is not clear whether the relationships of these fitness factors with executive functions are dependent on each other. The goal of this study was thus to investigate the relationship of aerobic fitness, motor fitness, and their interaction with EF in preadolescents. The sample consisted of 137 students (67 boys) aged 9-10 years. Physical fitness assessment included measures of aerobic fitness (20 m shuttle run test) and motor fitness (Hurdle and crawl test), while EF assessment encompassed measures of inhibition (Modified Stroop task), shifting (Smiley task) and updating (Letter memory task). The results showed that motor fitness was positively related to inhibition, r = .22, p  lt  .05, while aerobic fitness was positively related to shifting r = .22, p  lt  .05. Multiple regression and post hoc analyses indicated that aerobic fitness was positively related to shifting only when motor fitness was also high (beta = .44, p  lt  .01). This pattern of results could indicate the potential relevance of high levels of both motor and aerobic fitness for EF.
PB  - Springer, New York
T2  - Current Psychology
T1  - The relationship of aerobic and motor fitness with executive functions in preadolescents
DO  - 10.1007/s12144-019-00514-4
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Milošević, Vladimir J. and Orlić, Ana and Purić, Danka and Radisavljević-Janić, Snežana and Lazarević, Dušanka and Milanović, Ivana",
year = "2021",
abstract = "Recent research findings have indicated that aerobic fitness and motor fitness are related to specific executive functions (EF). However, it is not clear whether the relationships of these fitness factors with executive functions are dependent on each other. The goal of this study was thus to investigate the relationship of aerobic fitness, motor fitness, and their interaction with EF in preadolescents. The sample consisted of 137 students (67 boys) aged 9-10 years. Physical fitness assessment included measures of aerobic fitness (20 m shuttle run test) and motor fitness (Hurdle and crawl test), while EF assessment encompassed measures of inhibition (Modified Stroop task), shifting (Smiley task) and updating (Letter memory task). The results showed that motor fitness was positively related to inhibition, r = .22, p  lt  .05, while aerobic fitness was positively related to shifting r = .22, p  lt  .05. Multiple regression and post hoc analyses indicated that aerobic fitness was positively related to shifting only when motor fitness was also high (beta = .44, p  lt  .01). This pattern of results could indicate the potential relevance of high levels of both motor and aerobic fitness for EF.",
publisher = "Springer, New York",
journal = "Current Psychology",
title = "The relationship of aerobic and motor fitness with executive functions in preadolescents",
doi = "10.1007/s12144-019-00514-4"
}

Milošević, V. J., Orlić, A., Purić, D., Radisavljević-Janić, S., Lazarević, D.,& Milanović, I.. (2021). The relationship of aerobic and motor fitness with executive functions in preadolescents. in Current Psychology
Springer, New York..
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00514-4

Milošević VJ, Orlić A, Purić D, Radisavljević-Janić S, Lazarević D, Milanović I. The relationship of aerobic and motor fitness with executive functions in preadolescents. in Current Psychology. 2021;.
doi:10.1007/s12144-019-00514-4 .

Milošević, Vladimir J., Orlić, Ana, Purić, Danka, Radisavljević-Janić, Snežana, Lazarević, Dušanka, Milanović, Ivana, "The relationship of aerobic and motor fitness with executive functions in preadolescents" in Current Psychology (2021),
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00514-4 . .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Jokić, Biljana
AU  - Purić, Danka
PY  - 2021
UR  - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/3306
AB  - The Cognitive-Experiential Self-Theory (CEST) proposes rationality and experientiality as independent personality constructs explaining how people process information. Recent empirical studies show that some people have low scores on both of these dimensions (the so-called disengaged profile). Another model, Seeking Proxies for Internal States (SPIS), primarily proposed to explain obsessive-compulsive tendencies, provides a framework under which both rationality and experientiality can be understood as internal resources of a person. Low rationality and experientiality could thus be overcome by seeking external clues. In two subsequent studies on independent nonclinical samples (psychology students N = 268 and technical sciences students N = 549), we examined the relationship between constructs from CEST and SPIS models, and in addition, explored their patterns of interoceptive awareness (IA) in Study 2. A latent profile analysis showed that the disengaged profile was related to high SPIS and OC tendencies in both samples. In addition, rationality and experientiality had similar and more positive correlations with some IA dimensions, compared to SPIS (and OCI)-IA correlations. Thus, impaired connection to internal states together with OC tendencies might contribute to the understanding of the specific thinking style of those who do not primarily rely on either rationality or experientiality.
PB  - Sage Publications Inc, Thousand Oaks
T2  - Sage Open
T1  - Seeking Proxies for Internal States as a Possible Alternative for Rationality and Experientiality
IS  - 1
VL  - 11
DO  - 10.1177/2158244020986533
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Jokić, Biljana and Purić, Danka",
year = "2021",
abstract = "The Cognitive-Experiential Self-Theory (CEST) proposes rationality and experientiality as independent personality constructs explaining how people process information. Recent empirical studies show that some people have low scores on both of these dimensions (the so-called disengaged profile). Another model, Seeking Proxies for Internal States (SPIS), primarily proposed to explain obsessive-compulsive tendencies, provides a framework under which both rationality and experientiality can be understood as internal resources of a person. Low rationality and experientiality could thus be overcome by seeking external clues. In two subsequent studies on independent nonclinical samples (psychology students N = 268 and technical sciences students N = 549), we examined the relationship between constructs from CEST and SPIS models, and in addition, explored their patterns of interoceptive awareness (IA) in Study 2. A latent profile analysis showed that the disengaged profile was related to high SPIS and OC tendencies in both samples. In addition, rationality and experientiality had similar and more positive correlations with some IA dimensions, compared to SPIS (and OCI)-IA correlations. Thus, impaired connection to internal states together with OC tendencies might contribute to the understanding of the specific thinking style of those who do not primarily rely on either rationality or experientiality.",
publisher = "Sage Publications Inc, Thousand Oaks",
journal = "Sage Open",
title = "Seeking Proxies for Internal States as a Possible Alternative for Rationality and Experientiality",
number = "1",
volume = "11",
doi = "10.1177/2158244020986533"
}

Jokić, B.,& Purić, D.. (2021). Seeking Proxies for Internal States as a Possible Alternative for Rationality and Experientiality. in Sage Open
Sage Publications Inc, Thousand Oaks., 11(1).
https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020986533

Jokić B, Purić D. Seeking Proxies for Internal States as a Possible Alternative for Rationality and Experientiality. in Sage Open. 2021;11(1).
doi:10.1177/2158244020986533 .

Jokić, Biljana, Purić, Danka, "Seeking Proxies for Internal States as a Possible Alternative for Rationality and Experientiality" in Sage Open, 11, no. 1 (2021),
https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020986533 . .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Lazarević, Ljiljana
AU  - Purić, Danka
AU  - Žeželj, Iris
AU  - Belopavlović, R.
AU  - Bodroža, Bojana
AU  - Čolić, M.V.
AU  - Ebersole, C.R.
AU  - Ford, M.
AU  - Orlić, Ana
AU  - Pedović, I.
AU  - Petrović, B.
AU  - Shabazian, A.N.
AU  - Stojilović, D.
PY  - 2020
UR  - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/3137
AB  - Across three studies, LoBue and DeLoache (2008) provided evidence suggesting that both young children and adults exhibit enhanced visual detection of evolutionarily relevant threat stimuli (as compared with nonthreatening stimuli). A replication of their Experiment 3, conducted by Cramblet Alvarez and Pipitone (2015) as part of the Reproducibility Project: Psychology (RP:P), demonstrated trends similar to those of the original study, but the effect sizes were smaller and not statistically significant. There were, however, some methodological differences (e.g., screen size) and sampling differences (the age of recruited children) between the original study and the RP:P replication study. Additionally, LoBue and DeLoache expressed concern over the choice of stimuli used in the RP:P replication. We sought to explore the possible moderating effects of these factors by conducting two new replications—one using the protocol from the RP:P and the other using a revised protocol. We collected data at four sites, three in Serbia and one in the United States (total N = 553). Overall, participants were not significantly faster at detecting threatening stimuli. Thus, results were not supportive of the hypothesis that visual detection of evolutionarily relevant threat stimuli is enhanced in young children. The effect from the RP:P protocol (d = −0.10, 95% confidence interval = [−1.02, 0.82]) was similar to the effect from the revised protocol (d = −0.09, 95% confidence interval = [−0.33, 0.15]), and the results from both the RP:P and the revised protocols were more similar to those found by Cramblet Alvarez and Pipitone than to those found by LoBue and DeLoache.
PB  - SAGE Publications Inc.
T2  - Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science
T1  - Many Labs 5: Registered Replication of LoBue and DeLoache (2008)
EP  - 386
IS  - 3
SP  - 377
VL  - 3
DO  - 10.1177/2515245920953350
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Lazarević, Ljiljana and Purić, Danka and Žeželj, Iris and Belopavlović, R. and Bodroža, Bojana and Čolić, M.V. and Ebersole, C.R. and Ford, M. and Orlić, Ana and Pedović, I. and Petrović, B. and Shabazian, A.N. and Stojilović, D.",
year = "2020",
abstract = "Across three studies, LoBue and DeLoache (2008) provided evidence suggesting that both young children and adults exhibit enhanced visual detection of evolutionarily relevant threat stimuli (as compared with nonthreatening stimuli). A replication of their Experiment 3, conducted by Cramblet Alvarez and Pipitone (2015) as part of the Reproducibility Project: Psychology (RP:P), demonstrated trends similar to those of the original study, but the effect sizes were smaller and not statistically significant. There were, however, some methodological differences (e.g., screen size) and sampling differences (the age of recruited children) between the original study and the RP:P replication study. Additionally, LoBue and DeLoache expressed concern over the choice of stimuli used in the RP:P replication. We sought to explore the possible moderating effects of these factors by conducting two new replications—one using the protocol from the RP:P and the other using a revised protocol. We collected data at four sites, three in Serbia and one in the United States (total N = 553). Overall, participants were not significantly faster at detecting threatening stimuli. Thus, results were not supportive of the hypothesis that visual detection of evolutionarily relevant threat stimuli is enhanced in young children. The effect from the RP:P protocol (d = −0.10, 95% confidence interval = [−1.02, 0.82]) was similar to the effect from the revised protocol (d = −0.09, 95% confidence interval = [−0.33, 0.15]), and the results from both the RP:P and the revised protocols were more similar to those found by Cramblet Alvarez and Pipitone than to those found by LoBue and DeLoache.",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
journal = "Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science",
title = "Many Labs 5: Registered Replication of LoBue and DeLoache (2008)",
pages = "386-377",
number = "3",
volume = "3",
doi = "10.1177/2515245920953350"
}

Lazarević, L., Purić, D., Žeželj, I., Belopavlović, R., Bodroža, B., Čolić, M.V., Ebersole, C.R., Ford, M., Orlić, A., Pedović, I., Petrović, B., Shabazian, A.N.,& Stojilović, D.. (2020). Many Labs 5: Registered Replication of LoBue and DeLoache (2008). in Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science
SAGE Publications Inc.., 3(3), 377-386.
https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920953350

Lazarević L, Purić D, Žeželj I, Belopavlović R, Bodroža B, Čolić M, Ebersole C, Ford M, Orlić A, Pedović I, Petrović B, Shabazian A, Stojilović D. Many Labs 5: Registered Replication of LoBue and DeLoache (2008). in Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science. 2020;3(3):377-386.
doi:10.1177/2515245920953350 .

Lazarević, Ljiljana, Purić, Danka, Žeželj, Iris, Belopavlović, R., Bodroža, Bojana, Čolić, M.V., Ebersole, C.R., Ford, M., Orlić, Ana, Pedović, I., Petrović, B., Shabazian, A.N., Stojilović, D., "Many Labs 5: Registered Replication of LoBue and DeLoache (2008)" in Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3, no. 3 (2020):377-386,
https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920953350 . .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Ebersole, C.R.
AU  - Mathur, M.B.
AU  - Baranski, Erica
AU  - Bart-Plange, D.-J.
AU  - Buttrick, N.R.
AU  - Chartier, Christopher R.
AU  - Corker, K.S.
AU  - Corley, M.
AU  - Hartshorne, J.K.
AU  - IJzerman, Hans
AU  - Lazarević, Ljiljana
AU  - Rabagliati, H.
AU  - Ropovik, I.
AU  - Aczel, Balazs
AU  - Aeschbach, L.F.
AU  - Andrighetto, L.
AU  - Arnal, Jack D.
AU  - Arrow, H.
AU  - Babincak, Peter
AU  - Bakos, B.E.
AU  - Banik, Gabriel
AU  - Baskin, Ernest
AU  - Belopavlović, R.
AU  - Bernstein, M.H.
AU  - Białek, M.
AU  - Bloxsom, Nicholas G.
AU  - Bodroža, Bojana
AU  - Bonfiglio, D.B.V.
AU  - Boucher, L.
AU  - Brühlmann, F.
AU  - Brumbaugh, C.C.
AU  - Casini, E.
AU  - Chen, Y.
AU  - Chiorri, C.
AU  - Chopik, William J.
AU  - Christ, O.
AU  - Ciunci, A.M.
AU  - Claypool, H.M.
AU  - Coary, S.
AU  - Čolić, M.V.
AU  - Collins, W.M.
AU  - Curran, P.G.
AU  - Day, C.R.
AU  - Dering, B.
AU  - Dreber, Anna
AU  - Edlund, J.E.
AU  - Falcão, F.
AU  - Fedor, A.
AU  - Feinberg, L.
AU  - Ferguson, I.R.
AU  - Ford, M.
AU  - Frank, Michael C.
AU  - Fryberger, E.
AU  - Garinther, A.
AU  - Gawryluk, K.
AU  - Ashbaugh, K.
AU  - Giacomantonio, M.
AU  - Giessner, S.R.
AU  - Grahe, Jon E.
AU  - Guadagno, R.E.
AU  - Hałasa, E.
AU  - Hancock, P.J.B.
AU  - Hilliard, R.A.
AU  - Hüffmeier, J.
AU  - Hughes, S.
AU  - Idzikowska, K.
AU  - Inzlicht, Michael
AU  - Jern, A.
AU  - Jiménez-Leal, W.
AU  - Johannesson, Magnus
AU  - Joy-Gaba, Jennifer
AU  - Kauff, M.
AU  - Kellier, D.J.
AU  - Kessinger, G.
AU  - Kidwell, Mallory C.
AU  - Kimbrough, A.M.
AU  - King, J.P.J.
AU  - Kolb, V.S.
AU  - Kołodziej, S.
AU  - Kovacs, M.
AU  - Krasuska, K.
AU  - Kraus, S.
AU  - Krueger, L.E.
AU  - Kuchno, K.
AU  - Lage, C.A.
AU  - Langford, E.V.
AU  - Levitan, C.A.
AU  - de Lima, T.J.S.
AU  - Lin, H.
AU  - Lins, Samuel
AU  - Loy, J.E.
AU  - Manfredi, D.
AU  - Markiewicz, Ł.
AU  - Menon, M.
AU  - Mercier, B.
AU  - Metzger, M.
AU  - Meyet, V.
AU  - Millen, A.E.
AU  - Miller, Jeremy K.
AU  - Montealegre, A.
AU  - Moore, D.A.
AU  - Muda, R.
AU  - Nave, G.
AU  - Nichols, A.L.
AU  - Novak, S.A.
AU  - Nunnally, C.
AU  - Orlić, Ana
AU  - Palinkas, A.
AU  - Panno, A.
AU  - Parks, K.P.
AU  - Pedović, I.
AU  - Pękala, E.
AU  - Penner, M.R.
AU  - Pessers, S.
AU  - Petrović, B.
AU  - Pfeiffer, T.
AU  - Pieńkosz, D.
AU  - Preti, E.
AU  - Purić, Danka
AU  - Ramos, T.
AU  - Ravid, J.
AU  - Razza, T.S.
AU  - Rentzsch, K.
AU  - Richetin, J.
AU  - Rife, S.C.
AU  - Rosa, A.D.
AU  - Rudy, K.H.
AU  - Salamon, J.
AU  - Saunders, B.
AU  - Sawicki, P.
AU  - Schmidt, Kathleen
AU  - Schuepfer, K.
AU  - Schultze, T.
AU  - Schulz-Hardt, S.
AU  - Schütz, A.
AU  - Shabazian, A.N.
AU  - Shubella, R.L.
AU  - Siegel, A.
AU  - Silva, R.
AU  - Sioma, B.
AU  - Skorb, L.
AU  - de Souza, L.E.C.
AU  - Steegen, Sara
AU  - Stein, L.A.R.
AU  - Sternglanz, R.W.
AU  - Stojilović, D.
AU  - Storage, Daniel
AU  - Sullivan, G.B.
AU  - Szaszi, B.
AU  - Szecsi, Peter
AU  - Szöke, O.
AU  - Szuts, A.
AU  - Thomae, M.
AU  - Tidwell, N.D.
AU  - Tocco, C.
AU  - Torka, A.-K.
AU  - Tuerlinckx, Francis
AU  - Vanpaemel, Wolf
AU  - Vaughn, Leigh Ann
AU  - Vianello, Michelangelo
AU  - Viganola, D.
AU  - Vlachou, M.
AU  - Walker, R.J.
AU  - Weissgerber, Sophia C.
AU  - Wichman, A.L.
AU  - Wiggins, B.J.
AU  - Wolf, D.
AU  - Wood, M.J.
AU  - Zealley, D.
AU  - Žeželj, Iris
AU  - Zrubka, M.
AU  - Nosek, Brian A.
PY  - 2020
UR  - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/3138
AB  - Replication studies in psychological science sometimes fail to reproduce prior findings. If these studies use methods that are unfaithful to the original study or ineffective in eliciting the phenomenon of interest, then a failure to replicate may be a failure of the protocol rather than a challenge to the original finding. Formal pre-data-collection peer review by experts may address shortcomings and increase replicability rates. We selected 10 replication studies from the Reproducibility Project: Psychology (RP:P; Open Science Collaboration, 2015) for which the original authors had expressed concerns about the replication designs before data collection; only one of these studies had yielded a statistically significant effect (p  lt .05). Commenters suggested that lack of adherence to expert review and low-powered tests were the reasons that most of these RP:P studies failed to replicate the original effects. We revised the replication protocols and received formal peer review prior to conducting new replication studies. We administered the RP:P and revised protocols in multiple laboratories (median number of laboratories per original study = 6.5, range = 3–9; median total sample = 1,279.5, range = 276–3,512) for high-powered tests of each original finding with both protocols. Overall, following the preregistered analysis plan, we found that the revised protocols produced effect sizes similar to those of the RP:P protocols (Δr =.002 or.014, depending on analytic approach). The median effect size for the revised protocols (r =.05) was similar to that of the RP:P protocols (r =.04) and the original RP:P replications (r =.11), and smaller than that of the original studies (r =.37). Analysis of the cumulative evidence across the original studies and the corresponding three replication attempts provided very precise estimates of the 10 tested effects and indicated that their effect sizes (median r =.07, range =.00–.15) were 78% smaller, on average, than the original effect sizes (median r =.37, range =.19–.50).
PB  - SAGE Publications Inc.
T2  - Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science
T1  - Many Labs 5: Testing Pre-Data-Collection Peer Review as an Intervention to Increase Replicability
EP  - 331
IS  - 3
SP  - 309
VL  - 3
DO  - 10.1177/2515245920958687
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Ebersole, C.R. and Mathur, M.B. and Baranski, Erica and Bart-Plange, D.-J. and Buttrick, N.R. and Chartier, Christopher R. and Corker, K.S. and Corley, M. and Hartshorne, J.K. and IJzerman, Hans and Lazarević, Ljiljana and Rabagliati, H. and Ropovik, I. and Aczel, Balazs and Aeschbach, L.F. and Andrighetto, L. and Arnal, Jack D. and Arrow, H. and Babincak, Peter and Bakos, B.E. and Banik, Gabriel and Baskin, Ernest and Belopavlović, R. and Bernstein, M.H. and Białek, M. and Bloxsom, Nicholas G. and Bodroža, Bojana and Bonfiglio, D.B.V. and Boucher, L. and Brühlmann, F. and Brumbaugh, C.C. and Casini, E. and Chen, Y. and Chiorri, C. and Chopik, William J. and Christ, O. and Ciunci, A.M. and Claypool, H.M. and Coary, S. and Čolić, M.V. and Collins, W.M. and Curran, P.G. and Day, C.R. and Dering, B. and Dreber, Anna and Edlund, J.E. and Falcão, F. and Fedor, A. and Feinberg, L. and Ferguson, I.R. and Ford, M. and Frank, Michael C. and Fryberger, E. and Garinther, A. and Gawryluk, K. and Ashbaugh, K. and Giacomantonio, M. and Giessner, S.R. and Grahe, Jon E. and Guadagno, R.E. and Hałasa, E. and Hancock, P.J.B. and Hilliard, R.A. and Hüffmeier, J. and Hughes, S. and Idzikowska, K. and Inzlicht, Michael and Jern, A. and Jiménez-Leal, W. and Johannesson, Magnus and Joy-Gaba, Jennifer and Kauff, M. and Kellier, D.J. and Kessinger, G. and Kidwell, Mallory C. and Kimbrough, A.M. and King, J.P.J. and Kolb, V.S. and Kołodziej, S. and Kovacs, M. and Krasuska, K. and Kraus, S. and Krueger, L.E. and Kuchno, K. and Lage, C.A. and Langford, E.V. and Levitan, C.A. and de Lima, T.J.S. and Lin, H. and Lins, Samuel and Loy, J.E. and Manfredi, D. and Markiewicz, Ł. and Menon, M. and Mercier, B. and Metzger, M. and Meyet, V. and Millen, A.E. and Miller, Jeremy K. and Montealegre, A. and Moore, D.A. and Muda, R. and Nave, G. and Nichols, A.L. and Novak, S.A. and Nunnally, C. and Orlić, Ana and Palinkas, A. and Panno, A. and Parks, K.P. and Pedović, I. and Pękala, E. and Penner, M.R. and Pessers, S. and Petrović, B. and Pfeiffer, T. and Pieńkosz, D. and Preti, E. and Purić, Danka and Ramos, T. and Ravid, J. and Razza, T.S. and Rentzsch, K. and Richetin, J. and Rife, S.C. and Rosa, A.D. and Rudy, K.H. and Salamon, J. and Saunders, B. and Sawicki, P. and Schmidt, Kathleen and Schuepfer, K. and Schultze, T. and Schulz-Hardt, S. and Schütz, A. and Shabazian, A.N. and Shubella, R.L. and Siegel, A. and Silva, R. and Sioma, B. and Skorb, L. and de Souza, L.E.C. and Steegen, Sara and Stein, L.A.R. and Sternglanz, R.W. and Stojilović, D. and Storage, Daniel and Sullivan, G.B. and Szaszi, B. and Szecsi, Peter and Szöke, O. and Szuts, A. and Thomae, M. and Tidwell, N.D. and Tocco, C. and Torka, A.-K. and Tuerlinckx, Francis and Vanpaemel, Wolf and Vaughn, Leigh Ann and Vianello, Michelangelo and Viganola, D. and Vlachou, M. and Walker, R.J. and Weissgerber, Sophia C. and Wichman, A.L. and Wiggins, B.J. and Wolf, D. and Wood, M.J. and Zealley, D. and Žeželj, Iris and Zrubka, M. and Nosek, Brian A.",
year = "2020",
abstract = "Replication studies in psychological science sometimes fail to reproduce prior findings. If these studies use methods that are unfaithful to the original study or ineffective in eliciting the phenomenon of interest, then a failure to replicate may be a failure of the protocol rather than a challenge to the original finding. Formal pre-data-collection peer review by experts may address shortcomings and increase replicability rates. We selected 10 replication studies from the Reproducibility Project: Psychology (RP:P; Open Science Collaboration, 2015) for which the original authors had expressed concerns about the replication designs before data collection; only one of these studies had yielded a statistically significant effect (p  lt .05). Commenters suggested that lack of adherence to expert review and low-powered tests were the reasons that most of these RP:P studies failed to replicate the original effects. We revised the replication protocols and received formal peer review prior to conducting new replication studies. We administered the RP:P and revised protocols in multiple laboratories (median number of laboratories per original study = 6.5, range = 3–9; median total sample = 1,279.5, range = 276–3,512) for high-powered tests of each original finding with both protocols. Overall, following the preregistered analysis plan, we found that the revised protocols produced effect sizes similar to those of the RP:P protocols (Δr =.002 or.014, depending on analytic approach). The median effect size for the revised protocols (r =.05) was similar to that of the RP:P protocols (r =.04) and the original RP:P replications (r =.11), and smaller than that of the original studies (r =.37). Analysis of the cumulative evidence across the original studies and the corresponding three replication attempts provided very precise estimates of the 10 tested effects and indicated that their effect sizes (median r =.07, range =.00–.15) were 78% smaller, on average, than the original effect sizes (median r =.37, range =.19–.50).",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
journal = "Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science",
title = "Many Labs 5: Testing Pre-Data-Collection Peer Review as an Intervention to Increase Replicability",
pages = "331-309",
number = "3",
volume = "3",
doi = "10.1177/2515245920958687"
}

Ebersole, C.R., Mathur, M.B., Baranski, E., Bart-Plange, D.-J., Buttrick, N.R., Chartier, C. R., Corker, K.S., Corley, M., Hartshorne, J.K., IJzerman, H., Lazarević, L., Rabagliati, H., Ropovik, I., Aczel, B., Aeschbach, L.F., Andrighetto, L., Arnal, J. D., Arrow, H., Babincak, P., Bakos, B.E., Banik, G., Baskin, E., Belopavlović, R., Bernstein, M.H., Białek, M., Bloxsom, N. G., Bodroža, B., Bonfiglio, D.B.V., Boucher, L., Brühlmann, F., Brumbaugh, C.C., Casini, E., Chen, Y., Chiorri, C., Chopik, W. J., Christ, O., Ciunci, A.M., Claypool, H.M., Coary, S., Čolić, M.V., Collins, W.M., Curran, P.G., Day, C.R., Dering, B., Dreber, A., Edlund, J.E., Falcão, F., Fedor, A., Feinberg, L., Ferguson, I.R., Ford, M., Frank, M. C., Fryberger, E., Garinther, A., Gawryluk, K., Ashbaugh, K., Giacomantonio, M., Giessner, S.R., Grahe, J. E., Guadagno, R.E., Hałasa, E., Hancock, P.J.B., Hilliard, R.A., Hüffmeier, J., Hughes, S., Idzikowska, K., Inzlicht, M., Jern, A., Jiménez-Leal, W., Johannesson, M., Joy-Gaba, J., Kauff, M., Kellier, D.J., Kessinger, G., Kidwell, M. C., Kimbrough, A.M., King, J.P.J., Kolb, V.S., Kołodziej, S., Kovacs, M., Krasuska, K., Kraus, S., Krueger, L.E., Kuchno, K., Lage, C.A., Langford, E.V., Levitan, C.A., de Lima, T.J.S., Lin, H., Lins, S., Loy, J.E., Manfredi, D., Markiewicz, Ł., Menon, M., Mercier, B., Metzger, M., Meyet, V., Millen, A.E., Miller, J. K., Montealegre, A., Moore, D.A., Muda, R., Nave, G., Nichols, A.L., Novak, S.A., Nunnally, C., Orlić, A., Palinkas, A., Panno, A., Parks, K.P., Pedović, I., Pękala, E., Penner, M.R., Pessers, S., Petrović, B., Pfeiffer, T., Pieńkosz, D., Preti, E., Purić, D., Ramos, T., Ravid, J., Razza, T.S., Rentzsch, K., Richetin, J., Rife, S.C., Rosa, A.D., Rudy, K.H., Salamon, J., Saunders, B., Sawicki, P., Schmidt, K., Schuepfer, K., Schultze, T., Schulz-Hardt, S., Schütz, A., Shabazian, A.N., Shubella, R.L., Siegel, A., Silva, R., Sioma, B., Skorb, L., de Souza, L.E.C., Steegen, S., Stein, L.A.R., Sternglanz, R.W., Stojilović, D., Storage, D., Sullivan, G.B., Szaszi, B., Szecsi, P., Szöke, O., Szuts, A., Thomae, M., Tidwell, N.D., Tocco, C., Torka, A.-K., Tuerlinckx, F., Vanpaemel, W., Vaughn, L. A., Vianello, M., Viganola, D., Vlachou, M., Walker, R.J., Weissgerber, S. C., Wichman, A.L., Wiggins, B.J., Wolf, D., Wood, M.J., Zealley, D., Žeželj, I., Zrubka, M.,& Nosek, B. A.. (2020). Many Labs 5: Testing Pre-Data-Collection Peer Review as an Intervention to Increase Replicability. in Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science
SAGE Publications Inc.., 3(3), 309-331.
https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920958687

Ebersole C, Mathur M, Baranski E, Bart-Plange D, Buttrick N, Chartier CR, Corker K, Corley M, Hartshorne J, IJzerman H, Lazarević L, Rabagliati H, Ropovik I, Aczel B, Aeschbach L, Andrighetto L, Arnal JD, Arrow H, Babincak P, Bakos B, Banik G, Baskin E, Belopavlović R, Bernstein M, Białek M, Bloxsom NG, Bodroža B, Bonfiglio D, Boucher L, Brühlmann F, Brumbaugh C, Casini E, Chen Y, Chiorri C, Chopik WJ, Christ O, Ciunci A, Claypool H, Coary S, Čolić M, Collins W, Curran P, Day C, Dering B, Dreber A, Edlund J, Falcão F, Fedor A, Feinberg L, Ferguson I, Ford M, Frank MC, Fryberger E, Garinther A, Gawryluk K, Ashbaugh K, Giacomantonio M, Giessner S, Grahe JE, Guadagno R, Hałasa E, Hancock P, Hilliard R, Hüffmeier J, Hughes S, Idzikowska K, Inzlicht M, Jern A, Jiménez-Leal W, Johannesson M, Joy-Gaba J, Kauff M, Kellier D, Kessinger G, Kidwell MC, Kimbrough A, King J, Kolb V, Kołodziej S, Kovacs M, Krasuska K, Kraus S, Krueger L, Kuchno K, Lage C, Langford E, Levitan C, de Lima T, Lin H, Lins S, Loy J, Manfredi D, Markiewicz Ł, Menon M, Mercier B, Metzger M, Meyet V, Millen A, Miller JK, Montealegre A, Moore D, Muda R, Nave G, Nichols A, Novak S, Nunnally C, Orlić A, Palinkas A, Panno A, Parks K, Pedović I, Pękala E, Penner M, Pessers S, Petrović B, Pfeiffer T, Pieńkosz D, Preti E, Purić D, Ramos T, Ravid J, Razza T, Rentzsch K, Richetin J, Rife S, Rosa A, Rudy K, Salamon J, Saunders B, Sawicki P, Schmidt K, Schuepfer K, Schultze T, Schulz-Hardt S, Schütz A, Shabazian A, Shubella R, Siegel A, Silva R, Sioma B, Skorb L, de Souza L, Steegen S, Stein L, Sternglanz R, Stojilović D, Storage D, Sullivan G, Szaszi B, Szecsi P, Szöke O, Szuts A, Thomae M, Tidwell N, Tocco C, Torka A, Tuerlinckx F, Vanpaemel W, Vaughn LA, Vianello M, Viganola D, Vlachou M, Walker R, Weissgerber SC, Wichman A, Wiggins B, Wolf D, Wood M, Zealley D, Žeželj I, Zrubka M, Nosek BA. Many Labs 5: Testing Pre-Data-Collection Peer Review as an Intervention to Increase Replicability. in Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science. 2020;3(3):309-331.
doi:10.1177/2515245920958687 .

Ebersole, C.R., Mathur, M.B., Baranski, Erica, Bart-Plange, D.-J., Buttrick, N.R., Chartier, Christopher R., Corker, K.S., Corley, M., Hartshorne, J.K., IJzerman, Hans, Lazarević, Ljiljana, Rabagliati, H., Ropovik, I., Aczel, Balazs, Aeschbach, L.F., Andrighetto, L., Arnal, Jack D., Arrow, H., Babincak, Peter, Bakos, B.E., Banik, Gabriel, Baskin, Ernest, Belopavlović, R., Bernstein, M.H., Białek, M., Bloxsom, Nicholas G., Bodroža, Bojana, Bonfiglio, D.B.V., Boucher, L., Brühlmann, F., Brumbaugh, C.C., Casini, E., Chen, Y., Chiorri, C., Chopik, William J., Christ, O., Ciunci, A.M., Claypool, H.M., Coary, S., Čolić, M.V., Collins, W.M., Curran, P.G., Day, C.R., Dering, B., Dreber, Anna, Edlund, J.E., Falcão, F., Fedor, A., Feinberg, L., Ferguson, I.R., Ford, M., Frank, Michael C., Fryberger, E., Garinther, A., Gawryluk, K., Ashbaugh, K., Giacomantonio, M., Giessner, S.R., Grahe, Jon E., Guadagno, R.E., Hałasa, E., Hancock, P.J.B., Hilliard, R.A., Hüffmeier, J., Hughes, S., Idzikowska, K., Inzlicht, Michael, Jern, A., Jiménez-Leal, W., Johannesson, Magnus, Joy-Gaba, Jennifer, Kauff, M., Kellier, D.J., Kessinger, G., Kidwell, Mallory C., Kimbrough, A.M., King, J.P.J., Kolb, V.S., Kołodziej, S., Kovacs, M., Krasuska, K., Kraus, S., Krueger, L.E., Kuchno, K., Lage, C.A., Langford, E.V., Levitan, C.A., de Lima, T.J.S., Lin, H., Lins, Samuel, Loy, J.E., Manfredi, D., Markiewicz, Ł., Menon, M., Mercier, B., Metzger, M., Meyet, V., Millen, A.E., Miller, Jeremy K., Montealegre, A., Moore, D.A., Muda, R., Nave, G., Nichols, A.L., Novak, S.A., Nunnally, C., Orlić, Ana, Palinkas, A., Panno, A., Parks, K.P., Pedović, I., Pękala, E., Penner, M.R., Pessers, S., Petrović, B., Pfeiffer, T., Pieńkosz, D., Preti, E., Purić, Danka, Ramos, T., Ravid, J., Razza, T.S., Rentzsch, K., Richetin, J., Rife, S.C., Rosa, A.D., Rudy, K.H., Salamon, J., Saunders, B., Sawicki, P., Schmidt, Kathleen, Schuepfer, K., Schultze, T., Schulz-Hardt, S., Schütz, A., Shabazian, A.N., Shubella, R.L., Siegel, A., Silva, R., Sioma, B., Skorb, L., de Souza, L.E.C., Steegen, Sara, Stein, L.A.R., Sternglanz, R.W., Stojilović, D., Storage, Daniel, Sullivan, G.B., Szaszi, B., Szecsi, Peter, Szöke, O., Szuts, A., Thomae, M., Tidwell, N.D., Tocco, C., Torka, A.-K., Tuerlinckx, Francis, Vanpaemel, Wolf, Vaughn, Leigh Ann, Vianello, Michelangelo, Viganola, D., Vlachou, M., Walker, R.J., Weissgerber, Sophia C., Wichman, A.L., Wiggins, B.J., Wolf, D., Wood, M.J., Zealley, D., Žeželj, Iris, Zrubka, M., Nosek, Brian A., "Many Labs 5: Testing Pre-Data-Collection Peer Review as an Intervention to Increase Replicability" in Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3, no. 3 (2020):309-331,
https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920958687 . .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Baranski, Erica
AU  - Baskin, Ernest
AU  - Coary, S.
AU  - Ebersole, C.R.
AU  - Krueger, L.E.
AU  - Lazarević, Ljiljana
AU  - Miller, Jeremy K.
AU  - Orlić, Ana
AU  - Penner, M.R.
AU  - Purić, Danka
AU  - Rife, S.C.
AU  - Vaughn, Leigh Ann
AU  - Wichman, A.L.
AU  - Žeželj, Iris
PY  - 2020
UR  - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/3136
AB  - Shnabel and Nadler (2008) assessed a needs-based model of reconciliation suggesting that in conflicts, victims and perpetrators have different psychological needs that when satisfied increase the chances of reconciliation. For instance, Shnabel and Nadler found that after a conflict, perpetrators indicated that they had a need for social acceptance and were more likely to reconcile after their sense of social acceptance was restored, whereas victims indicated that they had a need for power and were more likely to reconcile after their sense of power was restored. Gilbert (2016), as a part of the Reproducibility Project: Psychology (RP:P), attempted to replicate these findings using different study materials but did not find support for the original effect. In an attempt to reconcile these discrepant findings, we conducted two new sets of replications—one using the RP:P protocol and another using modified materials meant to be more relatable to undergraduate participants. Teams from eight universities contributed to data collection (N = 2,738). We did find moderation by protocol; the focal interaction from the revised protocol, but not from the RP:P protocol, replicated the interaction in the original study. We discuss differences in, and possible explanations for, the patterns of results across protocols.
PB  - SAGE Publications Inc.
T2  - Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science
T1  - Many Labs 5: Registered Replication of Shnabel and Nadler (2008), Study 4
EP  - 417
IS  - 3
SP  - 405
VL  - 3
DO  - 10.1177/2515245920917334
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Baranski, Erica and Baskin, Ernest and Coary, S. and Ebersole, C.R. and Krueger, L.E. and Lazarević, Ljiljana and Miller, Jeremy K. and Orlić, Ana and Penner, M.R. and Purić, Danka and Rife, S.C. and Vaughn, Leigh Ann and Wichman, A.L. and Žeželj, Iris",
year = "2020",
abstract = "Shnabel and Nadler (2008) assessed a needs-based model of reconciliation suggesting that in conflicts, victims and perpetrators have different psychological needs that when satisfied increase the chances of reconciliation. For instance, Shnabel and Nadler found that after a conflict, perpetrators indicated that they had a need for social acceptance and were more likely to reconcile after their sense of social acceptance was restored, whereas victims indicated that they had a need for power and were more likely to reconcile after their sense of power was restored. Gilbert (2016), as a part of the Reproducibility Project: Psychology (RP:P), attempted to replicate these findings using different study materials but did not find support for the original effect. In an attempt to reconcile these discrepant findings, we conducted two new sets of replications—one using the RP:P protocol and another using modified materials meant to be more relatable to undergraduate participants. Teams from eight universities contributed to data collection (N = 2,738). We did find moderation by protocol; the focal interaction from the revised protocol, but not from the RP:P protocol, replicated the interaction in the original study. We discuss differences in, and possible explanations for, the patterns of results across protocols.",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
journal = "Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science",
title = "Many Labs 5: Registered Replication of Shnabel and Nadler (2008), Study 4",
pages = "417-405",
number = "3",
volume = "3",
doi = "10.1177/2515245920917334"
}

Baranski, E., Baskin, E., Coary, S., Ebersole, C.R., Krueger, L.E., Lazarević, L., Miller, J. K., Orlić, A., Penner, M.R., Purić, D., Rife, S.C., Vaughn, L. A., Wichman, A.L.,& Žeželj, I.. (2020). Many Labs 5: Registered Replication of Shnabel and Nadler (2008), Study 4. in Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science
SAGE Publications Inc.., 3(3), 405-417.
https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920917334

Baranski E, Baskin E, Coary S, Ebersole C, Krueger L, Lazarević L, Miller JK, Orlić A, Penner M, Purić D, Rife S, Vaughn LA, Wichman A, Žeželj I. Many Labs 5: Registered Replication of Shnabel and Nadler (2008), Study 4. in Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science. 2020;3(3):405-417.
doi:10.1177/2515245920917334 .

Baranski, Erica, Baskin, Ernest, Coary, S., Ebersole, C.R., Krueger, L.E., Lazarević, Ljiljana, Miller, Jeremy K., Orlić, Ana, Penner, M.R., Purić, Danka, Rife, S.C., Vaughn, Leigh Ann, Wichman, A.L., Žeželj, Iris, "Many Labs 5: Registered Replication of Shnabel and Nadler (2008), Study 4" in Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3, no. 3 (2020):405-417,
https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920917334 . .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Jokić, Biljana
AU  - Purić, Danka
PY  - 2020
UR  - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/3058
AB  - Istraživanja o doprinosu aktivnosti u slobodno vreme, a posebno o doprinosu kulturne participacije ličnom blagostanju i doživljaju sreće predstavljaju relativno novu liniju istraživanja. Iako ima dosta nalaza o pozitivnoj vezi između ličnog blagostanja i kulturne participacije, rezultati nisu u potpunosti konzistentni, što se bar delimično može objasniti različitim teorijskim shvatanjima ovih složenih pojmova (kulturna participacija, lično blagostanje i sreća), kao i njihovim različitim operacionalizacijama, primenjenim istraživačkim tehnikama i uzorcima. Ovo istraživanje sprovedeno je na reprezentativnom uzorku građana Srbije starijih od 15 godina (N=1521, 46% muškaraca, prosečan uzrast 41.5). Terensko prikupljanje podataka realizovano je u oktobru i novembru 2019. godine. Kao potencijalni prediktori subjektivnog doživljaja sreće uključeni su: 1. socio-demografske varijable (pol, starost, stepen obrazovanja, radni status, finansijski status), 2. subjektivna procena zdravstvenog stanja, i 3. lista aktivnosti sačinjena na osnovu prethodnih istraživanja u domenu slobodnog vremena i kulturne participacije (koja je određena tako da obuhvata kulturnu produkciju, privatnu i javnu kulturnu potrošnju, a ispitanici su ocenjivali u kojoj meri im je omiljena svaka od navedenih aktivnosti). Analizom glavnih komponenti izdvojeno je šest latentnih dimenzija aktivnosti u slobodno vreme: 1) kulturna participacija u užem smislu, 2) filmovi i zabava, 3) narodnjaci i porodica, 4) aktivnosti na otvorenom, 5) sport i 6) e-knjige i e-novine. Na nivou celog uzorka subjektivni doživljaj sreće je bio visok, prosečna ocena 5.03, na 7-stepenoj Likertovoj skali. Rezultati linearne regresije izdvojili su najbolje prediktore subjektivnog doživljaja sreće. Srećniji su ljudi koji pozitivnije ocenjuju svoje zdravstveno stanje, imaju viši finansijski status, ali i oni koji su više obrazovani. Pozitivnijem doživljaju sreće takođe pozitivno doprinose tri obrasca omiljenih aktivnosti u slobodno vreme: narodnjaci i porodica, aktivnosti na otvorenom i kulturna participacija. Rezultati su diskutovani u svetlu kompleksnosti ispitivanih fenomena, a posebno su istaknute mogućnosti za naredna istraživanja, kao i praktične implikacije za donosioce odluka o u oblasti kulturne politike.
AB  - Research on the contribution of leisure activities in general and specifically cultural participation to personal wellbeing represents a relatively new and promising line of research. Results, however, are mixed - partly due to various definitions and measures of key variables, as well as their complexity and many confounding variables. This research was conducted on a sample representative for the general population of Serbia (N=1521). As potential predictors of wellbeing, we investigated a number of socio-demographic variables (gender, age, education level, employment status, financial status), subjective health status, and a list of leisure activities selected based on past research from leisure and cultural participation paradigms. A principal component analysis revealed six latent dimensions of leisure activities that were labeled as: 1) cultural participation (in a strict sense), 2) movies & entertainment, 3) folk & family, 4) outdoor activities, 5) sport, 6) e-books & e-news. A stepwise linear regression showed that subjective happiness was best predicted by a higher subjective health status, higher financial status, and higher education level, while from the domain of leisure activities, significant positive predictors were 'folk & family', 'outdoor activities', and 'cultural participation' components. Results are discussed in light of the complexity of examined phenomena, as well as practical implications for policy decision making.
PB  - Zavod za proučavanje kulturnog razvitka, Beograd
T2  - Kultura
T1  - Da li nas kulturna participacija čini srećnijim? Omiljene aktivnosti u slobodno vreme i sreća na reprezentativnom uzorku građana Srbije
T1  - Does cultural participation make us happier? Favorite leisure activities and happiness in a representative sample of the Serbian population
EP  - 393
IS  - 169
SP  - 377
DO  - 10.5937/kultura2069377J
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Jokić, Biljana and Purić, Danka",
year = "2020",
abstract = "Istraživanja o doprinosu aktivnosti u slobodno vreme, a posebno o doprinosu kulturne participacije ličnom blagostanju i doživljaju sreće predstavljaju relativno novu liniju istraživanja. Iako ima dosta nalaza o pozitivnoj vezi između ličnog blagostanja i kulturne participacije, rezultati nisu u potpunosti konzistentni, što se bar delimično može objasniti različitim teorijskim shvatanjima ovih složenih pojmova (kulturna participacija, lično blagostanje i sreća), kao i njihovim različitim operacionalizacijama, primenjenim istraživačkim tehnikama i uzorcima. Ovo istraživanje sprovedeno je na reprezentativnom uzorku građana Srbije starijih od 15 godina (N=1521, 46% muškaraca, prosečan uzrast 41.5). Terensko prikupljanje podataka realizovano je u oktobru i novembru 2019. godine. Kao potencijalni prediktori subjektivnog doživljaja sreće uključeni su: 1. socio-demografske varijable (pol, starost, stepen obrazovanja, radni status, finansijski status), 2. subjektivna procena zdravstvenog stanja, i 3. lista aktivnosti sačinjena na osnovu prethodnih istraživanja u domenu slobodnog vremena i kulturne participacije (koja je određena tako da obuhvata kulturnu produkciju, privatnu i javnu kulturnu potrošnju, a ispitanici su ocenjivali u kojoj meri im je omiljena svaka od navedenih aktivnosti). Analizom glavnih komponenti izdvojeno je šest latentnih dimenzija aktivnosti u slobodno vreme: 1) kulturna participacija u užem smislu, 2) filmovi i zabava, 3) narodnjaci i porodica, 4) aktivnosti na otvorenom, 5) sport i 6) e-knjige i e-novine. Na nivou celog uzorka subjektivni doživljaj sreće je bio visok, prosečna ocena 5.03, na 7-stepenoj Likertovoj skali. Rezultati linearne regresije izdvojili su najbolje prediktore subjektivnog doživljaja sreće. Srećniji su ljudi koji pozitivnije ocenjuju svoje zdravstveno stanje, imaju viši finansijski status, ali i oni koji su više obrazovani. Pozitivnijem doživljaju sreće takođe pozitivno doprinose tri obrasca omiljenih aktivnosti u slobodno vreme: narodnjaci i porodica, aktivnosti na otvorenom i kulturna participacija. Rezultati su diskutovani u svetlu kompleksnosti ispitivanih fenomena, a posebno su istaknute mogućnosti za naredna istraživanja, kao i praktične implikacije za donosioce odluka o u oblasti kulturne politike., Research on the contribution of leisure activities in general and specifically cultural participation to personal wellbeing represents a relatively new and promising line of research. Results, however, are mixed - partly due to various definitions and measures of key variables, as well as their complexity and many confounding variables. This research was conducted on a sample representative for the general population of Serbia (N=1521). As potential predictors of wellbeing, we investigated a number of socio-demographic variables (gender, age, education level, employment status, financial status), subjective health status, and a list of leisure activities selected based on past research from leisure and cultural participation paradigms. A principal component analysis revealed six latent dimensions of leisure activities that were labeled as: 1) cultural participation (in a strict sense), 2) movies & entertainment, 3) folk & family, 4) outdoor activities, 5) sport, 6) e-books & e-news. A stepwise linear regression showed that subjective happiness was best predicted by a higher subjective health status, higher financial status, and higher education level, while from the domain of leisure activities, significant positive predictors were 'folk & family', 'outdoor activities', and 'cultural participation' components. Results are discussed in light of the complexity of examined phenomena, as well as practical implications for policy decision making.",
publisher = "Zavod za proučavanje kulturnog razvitka, Beograd",
journal = "Kultura",
title = "Da li nas kulturna participacija čini srećnijim? Omiljene aktivnosti u slobodno vreme i sreća na reprezentativnom uzorku građana Srbije, Does cultural participation make us happier? Favorite leisure activities and happiness in a representative sample of the Serbian population",
pages = "393-377",
number = "169",
doi = "10.5937/kultura2069377J"
}

Jokić, B.,& Purić, D.. (2020). Da li nas kulturna participacija čini srećnijim? Omiljene aktivnosti u slobodno vreme i sreća na reprezentativnom uzorku građana Srbije. in Kultura
Zavod za proučavanje kulturnog razvitka, Beograd.(169), 377-393.
https://doi.org/10.5937/kultura2069377J

Jokić B, Purić D. Da li nas kulturna participacija čini srećnijim? Omiljene aktivnosti u slobodno vreme i sreća na reprezentativnom uzorku građana Srbije. in Kultura. 2020;(169):377-393.
doi:10.5937/kultura2069377J .

Jokić, Biljana, Purić, Danka, "Da li nas kulturna participacija čini srećnijim? Omiljene aktivnosti u slobodno vreme i sreća na reprezentativnom uzorku građana Srbije" in Kultura, no. 169 (2020):377-393,
https://doi.org/10.5937/kultura2069377J . .