A Rejoinder to Comments by Eyal, Liberman, & Trope and Gong & Medin
Abstract
In two replication attempts, procedural priming of a high construal mindset ("why" condition) unexpectedly led to less harsh judgment of moral transgressions compared to priming of a low construal mindset ("how" condition). Eyal, Liberman, and Trope (EL&T, 2014) proposed the mechanism that explained these findings, and obtained some supporting data. We expand on it by testing the mechanism on virtuous acts instead of on moral transgressions. We conclude by discussing the need to re-evaluate the procedures in the context of specific studies.
Keywords:
pro-social acts / moral reasoning / mindset priming / construal levelSource:
Social Psychology, 2014, 45, 4, 332-334Publisher:
- Hogrefe & Huber Publishers, Gottingen
Institution/Community
Psihologija / PsychologyTY - JOUR AU - Žeželj, Iris AU - Jokić, Biljana PY - 2014 UR - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1810 AB - In two replication attempts, procedural priming of a high construal mindset ("why" condition) unexpectedly led to less harsh judgment of moral transgressions compared to priming of a low construal mindset ("how" condition). Eyal, Liberman, and Trope (EL&T, 2014) proposed the mechanism that explained these findings, and obtained some supporting data. We expand on it by testing the mechanism on virtuous acts instead of on moral transgressions. We conclude by discussing the need to re-evaluate the procedures in the context of specific studies. PB - Hogrefe & Huber Publishers, Gottingen T2 - Social Psychology T1 - A Rejoinder to Comments by Eyal, Liberman, & Trope and Gong & Medin EP - 334 IS - 4 SP - 332 VL - 45 UR - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_1810 ER -
@article{ author = "Žeželj, Iris and Jokić, Biljana", year = "2014", abstract = "In two replication attempts, procedural priming of a high construal mindset ("why" condition) unexpectedly led to less harsh judgment of moral transgressions compared to priming of a low construal mindset ("how" condition). Eyal, Liberman, and Trope (EL&T, 2014) proposed the mechanism that explained these findings, and obtained some supporting data. We expand on it by testing the mechanism on virtuous acts instead of on moral transgressions. We conclude by discussing the need to re-evaluate the procedures in the context of specific studies.", publisher = "Hogrefe & Huber Publishers, Gottingen", journal = "Social Psychology", title = "A Rejoinder to Comments by Eyal, Liberman, & Trope and Gong & Medin", pages = "334-332", number = "4", volume = "45", url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_1810" }
Žeželj, I.,& Jokić, B.. (2014). A Rejoinder to Comments by Eyal, Liberman, & Trope and Gong & Medin. in Social Psychology Hogrefe & Huber Publishers, Gottingen., 45(4), 332-334. https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_1810
Žeželj I, Jokić B. A Rejoinder to Comments by Eyal, Liberman, & Trope and Gong & Medin. in Social Psychology. 2014;45(4):332-334. https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_1810 .
Žeželj, Iris, Jokić, Biljana, "A Rejoinder to Comments by Eyal, Liberman, & Trope and Gong & Medin" in Social Psychology, 45, no. 4 (2014):332-334, https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_1810 .