McDowell and Brandom on observational knowledge
Само за регистроване кориснике
2021
Чланак у часопису (Објављена верзија)
Метаподаци
Приказ свих података о документуАпстракт
In this paper, I will analyze whether John McDowell’s critique of Robert Brandom’s account of observational knowledge is a success. First, I will present Brandom’s view of observational knowledge. Then I will lay out the main objections that McDowell raises against it. I will argue that McDowell’s arguments can be divided into semantic and epistemic. The analysis will show that the epistemic arguments face serious difficulty and that McDowell should focus on semantic critique.
Кључне речи:
Reliability / Observational knowledge / Justification / Inference / Empirical contentИзвор:
Filozofia, 2021, 76, 6, 423-435Издавач:
- Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Theatre and Film Research of the Center for Research in Art
DOI: 10.31577/filozofia.2021.76.6.3
ISSN: 0046-385X
WoS: 000708059800003
Scopus: 2-s2.0-85113225685
Институција/група
Filozofija / PhilosophyTY - JOUR AU - Čukljević, Filip PY - 2021 UR - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/3285 AB - In this paper, I will analyze whether John McDowell’s critique of Robert Brandom’s account of observational knowledge is a success. First, I will present Brandom’s view of observational knowledge. Then I will lay out the main objections that McDowell raises against it. I will argue that McDowell’s arguments can be divided into semantic and epistemic. The analysis will show that the epistemic arguments face serious difficulty and that McDowell should focus on semantic critique. PB - Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Theatre and Film Research of the Center for Research in Art T2 - Filozofia T1 - McDowell and Brandom on observational knowledge EP - 435 IS - 6 SP - 423 VL - 76 DO - 10.31577/filozofia.2021.76.6.3 ER -
@article{ author = "Čukljević, Filip", year = "2021", abstract = "In this paper, I will analyze whether John McDowell’s critique of Robert Brandom’s account of observational knowledge is a success. First, I will present Brandom’s view of observational knowledge. Then I will lay out the main objections that McDowell raises against it. I will argue that McDowell’s arguments can be divided into semantic and epistemic. The analysis will show that the epistemic arguments face serious difficulty and that McDowell should focus on semantic critique.", publisher = "Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Theatre and Film Research of the Center for Research in Art", journal = "Filozofia", title = "McDowell and Brandom on observational knowledge", pages = "435-423", number = "6", volume = "76", doi = "10.31577/filozofia.2021.76.6.3" }
Čukljević, F.. (2021). McDowell and Brandom on observational knowledge. in Filozofia Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Theatre and Film Research of the Center for Research in Art., 76(6), 423-435. https://doi.org/10.31577/filozofia.2021.76.6.3
Čukljević F. McDowell and Brandom on observational knowledge. in Filozofia. 2021;76(6):423-435. doi:10.31577/filozofia.2021.76.6.3 .
Čukljević, Filip, "McDowell and Brandom on observational knowledge" in Filozofia, 76, no. 6 (2021):423-435, https://doi.org/10.31577/filozofia.2021.76.6.3 . .