Приказ основних података о документу

dc.creatorLazić, Aleksandra
dc.creatorŽeželj, Iris
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-22T14:47:08Z
dc.date.available2023-09-22T14:47:08Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.urihttps://2023.ehps.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/EHPS_2023_Abstracts_UPLOAD.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/4879
dc.description.abstractBackground: We explored the reasons young people in Serbia give for getting or not getting vaccinated and whether these reasons correspond to the selfish-rational and social norms models of vaccination choices. Methods: 229 participants aged 18–35 (71% women) completed an online survey. In a fictitious disease scenario, n=89 ‘vaccinators’ reported they would definitely/probably get vaccinated, while n=140 ‘nonvaccinators’ would definitely/probably not. They rated a list of reasons for (non-)vaccination (‘completely/somewhat describes my reasons’ indicated endorsement); an open-ended question elicited reasons outside of the two models. Findings: While vaccinators reported not relying on others for protection (46%), non-vaccinators rarely endorsed free-riding (‘many people got vaccinated so I don’t have to’; 19%). What the majority was doing (descriptive norm) was relevant for vaccinators (47%) and they trusted the ‘wisdom of the common man’ (43%); others' behavior was less important for non-vaccinators (25% and 33%, respectively). Weighing personal benefits against risks of vaccination was a common reason for both vaccinators (85%) and non-vaccinators (73%). Vaccinators viewed vaccination as necessary to protect oneself (99%) and others (90%) and as a collective effort to stop the disease (91%). Non-vaccinators believed they did not need vaccination to protect their health (62%). A part of the survey about COVID-19 (n=213) replicated this pattern of results. Discussion: While the reasons stemming from the two theoretical models were less endorsed by non-vaccinators (perhaps due to distrust in vaccine effectiveness), the analysis of open ended responses revealed new reasons (e.g. conspiratorial beliefs). Overall, this study can inform more targeted communication interventions.sr
dc.language.isoensr
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MESTD/inst-2020/200163/RS//sr
dc.relationSociety for the Psychological Study of Social Issues Researchers in the Global South Grantsr
dc.rightsopenAccesssr
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.source37th Annual Conference of the European Health Psychology Society, 4-8 Septembersr
dc.subjectvaccinationsr
dc.subjectsocial normssr
dc.subjectrationalitysr
dc.subjectself-interestsr
dc.subjectcovid-19 pandemicsr
dc.titleWhy did you do it? Reasons for vaccination and non-vaccination among young adults in Serbiasr
dc.typeconferenceObjectsr
dc.rights.licenseBYsr
dc.identifier.doi10.17605/OSF.IO/3RD6Z
dc.identifier.fulltexthttp://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/bitstream/id/11900/Lazic_ReasonsForVaccination_Poster.pdf
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionsr


Документи

Thumbnail

Овај документ се појављује у следећим колекцијама

Приказ основних података о документу