dc.creator | Jovanović, Dušanka | |
dc.creator | Grbić, Sanja | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-03-18T18:13:58Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-03-18T18:13:58Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2024 | |
dc.identifier.isbn | 978-86-6427-284-1 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/6284 | |
dc.description.abstract | From the perspective of the dialogic approach, the initial stage of partner therapy is
characterized by monitoring the dialogic exchange of partners, to identify the characteristics of
relational dynamics that facilitate or hinder constructive exchange. These relational microprocesses,
however, are largely unexplored. The goal of this exploratory study (as a part of
larger research) is to map in-session couple dynamics in the initial stage of therapy. The
question that guided us was: what formally defined phases characterize the development of
partner interaction? The participants were six heterosexual couples (29–45 years old, ≥2 years
together, 5 without children). The data was collected through videotaping the second therapy
session. The material for the analysis were contact episodes: couple interaction regarding the
self-selected topic, during which the therapist entered the observer role. Thematic analysis was
applied by the authors, with the interpretation based on Martin Buber’s dialogical approach
and theory of Gestalt therapy. Five themes, i.e., phases of the contact episode were identified,
with some variations of these phases being more and some less supportive of constructive
exchange. The first phase is The emergence of the need, in which the couple defines the
individual or relational needs and the obstacles to their realization. Variations concern
participation in problem definition (one-sided or mutual), way of defining (as relational or as
personal), and communication style (e.g., criticizing). The second phase is the Habitual attempt
to satisfy the needs and concerns couple’s usual problem-solving style, which can be less
constructive (e.g., blaming, fruitless confrontation), or more constructive (communicating
personal shortcomings and boundaries). The third stage is Impasse, in which repeated
unsuccessful attempts at resolution lead to a feeling of being stuck. This could appear in the
form of polarization of positions, or the form of resignation and withdrawal. The fourth stage
is Novelty and regression, in which a constructive change appears briefly before it is quickly
lost by returning to previous communication patterns. The fifth stage is a Constructive
dialogical relationship, in which the novelty introduced by one partner brings either calmness
and reflection, or empathy and validation of the other partner. The paper extends the efforts of
the integrative family therapists regarding the process diagnostic in the initial stage of couple
therapy, by offering tools that could be useful in the shorter time frame – within one therapy
session. | sr |
dc.language.iso | en | sr |
dc.publisher | Belgrade: Institute of Psychology, Laboratory for Experimental Psychology, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Belgrade | sr |
dc.relation | This research is funded by the Ministry of Science, Technological Development and Innovation of the Republic of Serbia (Contract No. 451-03-66/2024-03/200163) | sr |
dc.rights | openAccess | sr |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | |
dc.source | Book of Abstracts, XXIX International Scientific Conference Empirical Studies in Psychology, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Belgrade | sr |
dc.subject | couple therapy | sr |
dc.subject | in-session couple dynamics | sr |
dc.subject | dialogical approach | sr |
dc.subject | qualitative study | sr |
dc.subject | gestalt therapy | sr |
dc.title | „Do you even listen to me?“: Phases in the development of couples’ contact episode in the initial stage of couple therapy | sr |
dc.type | conferenceObject | sr |
dc.rights.license | BY | sr |
dc.citation.spage | 134 | |
dc.identifier.fulltext | http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/bitstream/id/16022/bitstream_16022.pdf | |
dc.identifier.rcub | https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_6284 | |
dc.type.version | publishedVersion | sr |