Nauka o narodu i antropologija čoveka
Science of people and anthropology of man
Abstract
Određivanje odnosa etnologije i antropologije, koje polazi od etimologije nužno gubi razvojnu dimenziju. Osim toga, redukcija antropologije na pitanje 'šta je čovek' i razmatranje 'opštih karakteristika ljudske egzistencije' predstavlja redukovanje antropologije na jednu jedinu temu, što je uzrok njenog perifernog institucionalnog položaja. Sa druge strane, pojam etnologije je ispražnjen od sadržaja raskidom sa metafizički konstituisanim pojmom 'narodnog duha' i svim 'etno' odrednicama koje iz njega proizilaze. Stoga je nesvrsishodno raspravljati o odnosu potpuno redukovane antropologije i dekonstruisane etnologije. Stvarni tok akademski konstituisanih disciplina u Srbiji pokazao je da prazan prostor nastao dekonstrukcijom etnologije nije popunila antropologija redukovana na 'antropologiju Čoveka' već temeljna antropologizacija etnološkog institucionalnog okvira.
A determination of a relationship between ethnology and anthropology with etymology as a starting point, loses a developmental dimension. Besides, a reduction in anthropology to the question:' What is a man' and discussion of 'general characteristics of human existence' represents reduction of anthropology to only one subject, which is the cause of the anthropology's marginalized position. On the other hand, a notion of ethnology is being discharged from the content by a break-up with a metaphysically constructed conception of 'folk spirit' and all the rest 'ethno' dispositions. Hence there is no point in discussing the relationship of a totally reduced anthropology and de-constructed ethnology. Current state of affairs within academically constituted disciplines in Serbia has shown that the vacancy originated by an ethnology de-construction was not filled in by anthropology, reduced to 'anthropology of Man' but a considerable 'anthropologization' of ethnological institutional frame.
Keywords:
univerzitetska disciplina / Srbija / naučna tradicija / etnologija / antropologija / university discipline / Serbia / scientific tradition / ethnology / anthropologySource:
Glasnik Etnografskog instituta SANU, 2008, 56, 1, 245-252Publisher:
- Srpska akademija nauka i umetnosti SANU - Etnografski institut, Beograd
Collections
Institution/Community
Etnologija i antropologija / Ethnology and AnthropologyTY - JOUR AU - Kovačević, Ivan PY - 2008 UR - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/758 AB - Određivanje odnosa etnologije i antropologije, koje polazi od etimologije nužno gubi razvojnu dimenziju. Osim toga, redukcija antropologije na pitanje 'šta je čovek' i razmatranje 'opštih karakteristika ljudske egzistencije' predstavlja redukovanje antropologije na jednu jedinu temu, što je uzrok njenog perifernog institucionalnog položaja. Sa druge strane, pojam etnologije je ispražnjen od sadržaja raskidom sa metafizički konstituisanim pojmom 'narodnog duha' i svim 'etno' odrednicama koje iz njega proizilaze. Stoga je nesvrsishodno raspravljati o odnosu potpuno redukovane antropologije i dekonstruisane etnologije. Stvarni tok akademski konstituisanih disciplina u Srbiji pokazao je da prazan prostor nastao dekonstrukcijom etnologije nije popunila antropologija redukovana na 'antropologiju Čoveka' već temeljna antropologizacija etnološkog institucionalnog okvira. AB - A determination of a relationship between ethnology and anthropology with etymology as a starting point, loses a developmental dimension. Besides, a reduction in anthropology to the question:' What is a man' and discussion of 'general characteristics of human existence' represents reduction of anthropology to only one subject, which is the cause of the anthropology's marginalized position. On the other hand, a notion of ethnology is being discharged from the content by a break-up with a metaphysically constructed conception of 'folk spirit' and all the rest 'ethno' dispositions. Hence there is no point in discussing the relationship of a totally reduced anthropology and de-constructed ethnology. Current state of affairs within academically constituted disciplines in Serbia has shown that the vacancy originated by an ethnology de-construction was not filled in by anthropology, reduced to 'anthropology of Man' but a considerable 'anthropologization' of ethnological institutional frame. PB - Srpska akademija nauka i umetnosti SANU - Etnografski institut, Beograd T2 - Glasnik Etnografskog instituta SANU T1 - Nauka o narodu i antropologija čoveka T1 - Science of people and anthropology of man EP - 252 IS - 1 SP - 245 VL - 56 UR - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_758 ER -
@article{ author = "Kovačević, Ivan", year = "2008", abstract = "Određivanje odnosa etnologije i antropologije, koje polazi od etimologije nužno gubi razvojnu dimenziju. Osim toga, redukcija antropologije na pitanje 'šta je čovek' i razmatranje 'opštih karakteristika ljudske egzistencije' predstavlja redukovanje antropologije na jednu jedinu temu, što je uzrok njenog perifernog institucionalnog položaja. Sa druge strane, pojam etnologije je ispražnjen od sadržaja raskidom sa metafizički konstituisanim pojmom 'narodnog duha' i svim 'etno' odrednicama koje iz njega proizilaze. Stoga je nesvrsishodno raspravljati o odnosu potpuno redukovane antropologije i dekonstruisane etnologije. Stvarni tok akademski konstituisanih disciplina u Srbiji pokazao je da prazan prostor nastao dekonstrukcijom etnologije nije popunila antropologija redukovana na 'antropologiju Čoveka' već temeljna antropologizacija etnološkog institucionalnog okvira., A determination of a relationship between ethnology and anthropology with etymology as a starting point, loses a developmental dimension. Besides, a reduction in anthropology to the question:' What is a man' and discussion of 'general characteristics of human existence' represents reduction of anthropology to only one subject, which is the cause of the anthropology's marginalized position. On the other hand, a notion of ethnology is being discharged from the content by a break-up with a metaphysically constructed conception of 'folk spirit' and all the rest 'ethno' dispositions. Hence there is no point in discussing the relationship of a totally reduced anthropology and de-constructed ethnology. Current state of affairs within academically constituted disciplines in Serbia has shown that the vacancy originated by an ethnology de-construction was not filled in by anthropology, reduced to 'anthropology of Man' but a considerable 'anthropologization' of ethnological institutional frame.", publisher = "Srpska akademija nauka i umetnosti SANU - Etnografski institut, Beograd", journal = "Glasnik Etnografskog instituta SANU", title = "Nauka o narodu i antropologija čoveka, Science of people and anthropology of man", pages = "252-245", number = "1", volume = "56", url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_758" }
Kovačević, I.. (2008). Nauka o narodu i antropologija čoveka. in Glasnik Etnografskog instituta SANU Srpska akademija nauka i umetnosti SANU - Etnografski institut, Beograd., 56(1), 245-252. https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_758
Kovačević I. Nauka o narodu i antropologija čoveka. in Glasnik Etnografskog instituta SANU. 2008;56(1):245-252. https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_758 .
Kovačević, Ivan, "Nauka o narodu i antropologija čoveka" in Glasnik Etnografskog instituta SANU, 56, no. 1 (2008):245-252, https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_758 .