Живковић, Ивица

Link to this page

Authority KeyName Variants
2fe0bb6f-5f38-4e0b-ae05-ada0fb48b983
  • Живковић, Ивица (2)
Projects

Author's Bibliography

Концепт гостољубља и трпезно правило у уставима Св. Бенедикта Нурсијског и Св. Саве Српског

Митровић, Катарина С.; Живковић, Ивица

(Центар за византијско‒словенске студије Универзитета у Нишу, 2023)

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Митровић, Катарина С.
AU  - Живковић, Ивица
PY  - 2023
UR  - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/5380
AB  - У раду разматрамо прописе о монашкој трпези у Правилу Св.
Бенедикта Нурсијског и Хиландарском и Студеничком типику Св. Саве Српског. Св.
Бенедикт је пред очима имао поуке Св. Јована Касијана, док се Св. Сава угледао на типик
Евергетидског манастира у Цариграду. Оба аутора велику пажњу поклањају, не само
врсти и количини хране и пића која се износи пред монахе, већ и понашању за трпезом.
Монашка трпезарија представља једну од главних просторија манастирског комплекса.
У православном свету она припада култном простору, док у бенедиктинским опатијама
чини прелаз између сакралне и стамбене зоне. Заједничко обедовање представља
наставак богослужења у обе традиције, због чега му се и поклања велика пажња. Без
обзира на то што постоје извесне разлике, обе традиције веома држе до гостољубља,
јер присуство гостију, посебно оних који су сиромашни, болесни, одбачени од породице и
шире заједнице, као и ходочасника, монахе подсећа на непрекидно служење Христу кроз
одрицање од властите удобности и прихватање другог и другачијег.
AB  - This paper examines the ordinances regulating the dining rules for monks as defined in
the Rule of St Benedict of Nursia as well as the Chilandar and Studenica Typikons of St Sava of
Serbia. St Benedict had kept in mind St John Cassian’s recommendations, while St Sava look to
the typikon of the Evergetide Monastery in Constantinople. Both authors paid great attention not
only to the type and the quantity of food and drinks laid before the brethren, but also to the
behaviour at the dining table. The dining room is considered one of the main rooms in a
monastery complex. In the Orthodox world it is part of the cult area, while in the Benedictine
abbey it is a transitory place between sacral and residential zones. Both traditions consider
communal meals a continuation of the worship, which is why they much attention is paid to
them. St Benedict and St Sava have both regulated that the monks should arrive to meals on time,
that they should dine in silence, without exaggerated movements and gestures, so they can
concentrate not only on eating and drinking, but also on the listening of the excerpts from the
Holy Bible or hagiographies which are read by one of the brothers. Monks are supposed to have
maximum two meals a day and both before sunset. All three sets of rules insist on orderly
kitchens and dining rooms, hygiene rules and restraint from excessive intake of food or drinks.
Food preparation and consumption outside the dining room is forbidden both to the Benedictine
order monks and to the Serbian monks on Athos and in Studenica. The duties of a cellerariusi.e.
of the dining table attendant and their assistants were defined in detail. Gluttony and negligent
behaviour were punished first by oral reprimand and if it failed to give result, then by removal
from the dining table and other punishments decided upon by the priors of the monasteries:
abbots i.e. hegumen. St Sava assigned much more attention to the eating during Easter, Christmas
or St Peter’s fasting periods, while St Benedict mentioned fasting in the passing, as something
taken for granted. As far as the concept of hospitability is concerned, it is evident that the two
communities for which the rules were written, differ in some aspects. As it happens,
Montecassino as St Benedict’s endowment and Studenica as the endowment of rulers, were
much more open to receiving guests – some of whom were quite eminent. Moreover, it is
regulated that many events of significance to the monastic community should take place in the
presence of representatives of both civil and church governments. St Sava has regulated how to
greet the guests in the Chilandar typikon, as copied from the Evergetide typikon, but this was
probably hard to implement consistently on Mount Athos where access was quite restricted to
strangers, in comparison to other monasteries. Regardless of evident differences, both traditions
show much respect for the concept of hospitability, because the presence of guests, especially
those of poor station, the sick, the abandoned by their families or wider communities, as well as
pilgrims, remind the monks of the continuous service to Christ through relinquishing personal
comforts and acceptance of others and otherness.
PB  - Центар за византијско‒словенске студије Универзитета у Нишу
PB  - Међународни центар за православне студије
PB  - Центар за црквене студије, Ниш
T2  - Византијско‒словенска чтенија VI
T1  - Концепт гостољубља и трпезно правило у уставима Св. Бенедикта Нурсијског и Св. Саве Српског
T1  - The concept of hospitability and the dining rules in the rules of ST Benedict of Nursia and ST Sava of Serbia
EP  - 382
SP  - 361
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_5380
ER  - 
@inbook{
author = "Митровић, Катарина С. and Живковић, Ивица",
year = "2023",
abstract = "У раду разматрамо прописе о монашкој трпези у Правилу Св.
Бенедикта Нурсијског и Хиландарском и Студеничком типику Св. Саве Српског. Св.
Бенедикт је пред очима имао поуке Св. Јована Касијана, док се Св. Сава угледао на типик
Евергетидског манастира у Цариграду. Оба аутора велику пажњу поклањају, не само
врсти и количини хране и пића која се износи пред монахе, већ и понашању за трпезом.
Монашка трпезарија представља једну од главних просторија манастирског комплекса.
У православном свету она припада култном простору, док у бенедиктинским опатијама
чини прелаз између сакралне и стамбене зоне. Заједничко обедовање представља
наставак богослужења у обе традиције, због чега му се и поклања велика пажња. Без
обзира на то што постоје извесне разлике, обе традиције веома држе до гостољубља,
јер присуство гостију, посебно оних који су сиромашни, болесни, одбачени од породице и
шире заједнице, као и ходочасника, монахе подсећа на непрекидно служење Христу кроз
одрицање од властите удобности и прихватање другог и другачијег., This paper examines the ordinances regulating the dining rules for monks as defined in
the Rule of St Benedict of Nursia as well as the Chilandar and Studenica Typikons of St Sava of
Serbia. St Benedict had kept in mind St John Cassian’s recommendations, while St Sava look to
the typikon of the Evergetide Monastery in Constantinople. Both authors paid great attention not
only to the type and the quantity of food and drinks laid before the brethren, but also to the
behaviour at the dining table. The dining room is considered one of the main rooms in a
monastery complex. In the Orthodox world it is part of the cult area, while in the Benedictine
abbey it is a transitory place between sacral and residential zones. Both traditions consider
communal meals a continuation of the worship, which is why they much attention is paid to
them. St Benedict and St Sava have both regulated that the monks should arrive to meals on time,
that they should dine in silence, without exaggerated movements and gestures, so they can
concentrate not only on eating and drinking, but also on the listening of the excerpts from the
Holy Bible or hagiographies which are read by one of the brothers. Monks are supposed to have
maximum two meals a day and both before sunset. All three sets of rules insist on orderly
kitchens and dining rooms, hygiene rules and restraint from excessive intake of food or drinks.
Food preparation and consumption outside the dining room is forbidden both to the Benedictine
order monks and to the Serbian monks on Athos and in Studenica. The duties of a cellerariusi.e.
of the dining table attendant and their assistants were defined in detail. Gluttony and negligent
behaviour were punished first by oral reprimand and if it failed to give result, then by removal
from the dining table and other punishments decided upon by the priors of the monasteries:
abbots i.e. hegumen. St Sava assigned much more attention to the eating during Easter, Christmas
or St Peter’s fasting periods, while St Benedict mentioned fasting in the passing, as something
taken for granted. As far as the concept of hospitability is concerned, it is evident that the two
communities for which the rules were written, differ in some aspects. As it happens,
Montecassino as St Benedict’s endowment and Studenica as the endowment of rulers, were
much more open to receiving guests – some of whom were quite eminent. Moreover, it is
regulated that many events of significance to the monastic community should take place in the
presence of representatives of both civil and church governments. St Sava has regulated how to
greet the guests in the Chilandar typikon, as copied from the Evergetide typikon, but this was
probably hard to implement consistently on Mount Athos where access was quite restricted to
strangers, in comparison to other monasteries. Regardless of evident differences, both traditions
show much respect for the concept of hospitability, because the presence of guests, especially
those of poor station, the sick, the abandoned by their families or wider communities, as well as
pilgrims, remind the monks of the continuous service to Christ through relinquishing personal
comforts and acceptance of others and otherness.",
publisher = "Центар за византијско‒словенске студије Универзитета у Нишу, Међународни центар за православне студије, Центар за црквене студије, Ниш",
journal = "Византијско‒словенска чтенија VI",
booktitle = "Концепт гостољубља и трпезно правило у уставима Св. Бенедикта Нурсијског и Св. Саве Српског, The concept of hospitability and the dining rules in the rules of ST Benedict of Nursia and ST Sava of Serbia",
pages = "382-361",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_5380"
}
Митровић, К. С.,& Живковић, И.. (2023). Концепт гостољубља и трпезно правило у уставима Св. Бенедикта Нурсијског и Св. Саве Српског. in Византијско‒словенска чтенија VI
Центар за византијско‒словенске студије Универзитета у Нишу., 361-382.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_5380
Митровић КС, Живковић И. Концепт гостољубља и трпезно правило у уставима Св. Бенедикта Нурсијског и Св. Саве Српског. in Византијско‒словенска чтенија VI. 2023;:361-382.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_5380 .
Митровић, Катарина С., Живковић, Ивица, "Концепт гостољубља и трпезно правило у уставима Св. Бенедикта Нурсијског и Св. Саве Српског" in Византијско‒словенска чтенија VI (2023):361-382,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_5380 .

Настојатељ манастира у Правилу Св. Бенедикта Нурсијског и у Хиландарском и Студеничком типику Св. Саве

Митровић, Катарина С.; Живковић, Ивица

(Центар за византијско‒словенске студије Универзитета у Нишу, 2022)

TY  - CONF
AU  - Митровић, Катарина С.
AU  - Живковић, Ивица
PY  - 2022
UR  - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/4783
AB  - У овом раду излажемо резултате упоредног сагледавања дужности 
настојатеља у Правилу Св. Бенедикта Нурсијског и у типицима које је седам векова 
касније, под непосредним утицајем наслеђа из једне другачије монашке традиције, 
саставио Св. Сава Српски. На који начин ове различите традиције, исказане у уставним 
документима ове двојице светитеља, разматрају иста питања: постављање опата 
односно игумана манастирског братства, њихову улогу у надгледању целокупног 
живота заједнице и у духовном руковођењу њених учесника? Први корак у тумачењу 
сличности и разлика свакако је њихово уочавање и навођење. Ако историја типика 
установљује структуру и њихов развој разматраних односа, тек литургичко богословље 
и хришћанска етика црквених односа могу да разоткрију њихов смисао.
AB  - This paper shows results of a comparative study of the duties of a monastery custodian
according to the Rules of St. Benedict of Nursia, and the typikons of Hilandar and Studenica
which were construed by St. Sava of Serbia seven centuries later, under the influence of a
different monastic heritage. In the tradition of Christian monkhood, a typikon or a written order
aimed at regulating the rules of living in a monastic community, is created upon establishment
of a monastery, not so much to explain its theory (precise Christian learning about monkhood)
but as a draft of regulated relationships in different situations i.e. as a rulebook for solving some
critical issues in the monastic practice. Therefore, each typikon offers answers to the questions
related to dominant or foreseeable situations in a certain Christian community, deemed important
for the monastic practice at the time of its writing. In his relationship with the monks of the
monastery, a custodian must follow the typikon from the earliest start. This means that he
adheres to certain rules, established order or rank. The Benedictine monk tradition was created
in the Christian West, in the region of South Italy in the 6th century, and it has continued to
develop to this date. Serbian monastic tradition was created at the time of St. Sava, at the end of
12th and the beginning of the 13th century; its development started with regulation of monastic
life in two monasteries simultaneously: in Hilandar and in Studenica, based on East Christian
monastery traditions. The typikons of St. Sava were written following the example of the
Evergetide typikon, which was a living testimony of the planned and regulated monastic life in
the Byzantine Empire at the start of the 12th century. The typikon of Evergetide Monastery with
which St. Simeon and St. Sava had close connections, was an exclusive typikon aimed at
regulating liturgies in imperial churches and monasteries involving high logistics requirements.
Its distinctive feature was introduction of the all-night wake service. The Evergetide typikon
dates back to the era of the so-called ktetor typikons from the 9th and the 10th century. The
Hilandar and the Studenica Typikons of St. Sava were part of this process and this era. A few
generations before this period in history, the first serious dogmatic discussions between Eastern
and Western authorities were recorded on the topic of Christian learning, ecclesial customs and
practices. How do these different traditions, laid down in the order documents of St. Benedict of
Nursia and St. Sava of Serbia, treat the same issues: nomination of abbots i.e. hegoumenos of
monastery brotherhoods, their roles in supervision of the entire community life and in the
spiritual leadership of its members? The first step towards an interpretation of their similarities
and differences is definitely their identification and citing, while only liturgical theology and
Christian ethics of ecclesial relations can lead us to their true meaning.
PB  - Центар за византијско‒словенске студије Универзитета у Нишу
PB  - Међународни центар за православне студије
PB  - Центар за црквене студије, Ниш
C3  - Византијско‒словенска чтенија V
T1  - Настојатељ манастира у Правилу Св. Бенедикта Нурсијског и у Хиландарском и Студеничком типику Св. Саве
T1  - Monastery custodian according to the rules of St. Benedict of Nursia and the Typikons of Hilandar and Studenica of St. Sava
EP  - 189
SP  - 163
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4783
ER  - 
@conference{
author = "Митровић, Катарина С. and Живковић, Ивица",
year = "2022",
abstract = "У овом раду излажемо резултате упоредног сагледавања дужности 
настојатеља у Правилу Св. Бенедикта Нурсијског и у типицима које је седам векова 
касније, под непосредним утицајем наслеђа из једне другачије монашке традиције, 
саставио Св. Сава Српски. На који начин ове различите традиције, исказане у уставним 
документима ове двојице светитеља, разматрају иста питања: постављање опата 
односно игумана манастирског братства, њихову улогу у надгледању целокупног 
живота заједнице и у духовном руковођењу њених учесника? Први корак у тумачењу 
сличности и разлика свакако је њихово уочавање и навођење. Ако историја типика 
установљује структуру и њихов развој разматраних односа, тек литургичко богословље 
и хришћанска етика црквених односа могу да разоткрију њихов смисао., This paper shows results of a comparative study of the duties of a monastery custodian
according to the Rules of St. Benedict of Nursia, and the typikons of Hilandar and Studenica
which were construed by St. Sava of Serbia seven centuries later, under the influence of a
different monastic heritage. In the tradition of Christian monkhood, a typikon or a written order
aimed at regulating the rules of living in a monastic community, is created upon establishment
of a monastery, not so much to explain its theory (precise Christian learning about monkhood)
but as a draft of regulated relationships in different situations i.e. as a rulebook for solving some
critical issues in the monastic practice. Therefore, each typikon offers answers to the questions
related to dominant or foreseeable situations in a certain Christian community, deemed important
for the monastic practice at the time of its writing. In his relationship with the monks of the
monastery, a custodian must follow the typikon from the earliest start. This means that he
adheres to certain rules, established order or rank. The Benedictine monk tradition was created
in the Christian West, in the region of South Italy in the 6th century, and it has continued to
develop to this date. Serbian monastic tradition was created at the time of St. Sava, at the end of
12th and the beginning of the 13th century; its development started with regulation of monastic
life in two monasteries simultaneously: in Hilandar and in Studenica, based on East Christian
monastery traditions. The typikons of St. Sava were written following the example of the
Evergetide typikon, which was a living testimony of the planned and regulated monastic life in
the Byzantine Empire at the start of the 12th century. The typikon of Evergetide Monastery with
which St. Simeon and St. Sava had close connections, was an exclusive typikon aimed at
regulating liturgies in imperial churches and monasteries involving high logistics requirements.
Its distinctive feature was introduction of the all-night wake service. The Evergetide typikon
dates back to the era of the so-called ktetor typikons from the 9th and the 10th century. The
Hilandar and the Studenica Typikons of St. Sava were part of this process and this era. A few
generations before this period in history, the first serious dogmatic discussions between Eastern
and Western authorities were recorded on the topic of Christian learning, ecclesial customs and
practices. How do these different traditions, laid down in the order documents of St. Benedict of
Nursia and St. Sava of Serbia, treat the same issues: nomination of abbots i.e. hegoumenos of
monastery brotherhoods, their roles in supervision of the entire community life and in the
spiritual leadership of its members? The first step towards an interpretation of their similarities
and differences is definitely their identification and citing, while only liturgical theology and
Christian ethics of ecclesial relations can lead us to their true meaning.",
publisher = "Центар за византијско‒словенске студије Универзитета у Нишу, Међународни центар за православне студије, Центар за црквене студије, Ниш",
journal = "Византијско‒словенска чтенија V",
title = "Настојатељ манастира у Правилу Св. Бенедикта Нурсијског и у Хиландарском и Студеничком типику Св. Саве, Monastery custodian according to the rules of St. Benedict of Nursia and the Typikons of Hilandar and Studenica of St. Sava",
pages = "189-163",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4783"
}
Митровић, К. С.,& Живковић, И.. (2022). Настојатељ манастира у Правилу Св. Бенедикта Нурсијског и у Хиландарском и Студеничком типику Св. Саве. in Византијско‒словенска чтенија V
Центар за византијско‒словенске студије Универзитета у Нишу., 163-189.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4783
Митровић КС, Живковић И. Настојатељ манастира у Правилу Св. Бенедикта Нурсијског и у Хиландарском и Студеничком типику Св. Саве. in Византијско‒словенска чтенија V. 2022;:163-189.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4783 .
Митровић, Катарина С., Живковић, Ивица, "Настојатељ манастира у Правилу Св. Бенедикта Нурсијског и у Хиландарском и Студеничком типику Св. Саве" in Византијско‒словенска чтенија V (2022):163-189,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4783 .