TY  - JOUR
AU  - Damnjanović, Kaja
AU  - Ilić, Sandra
AU  - Kušić, Marija
AU  - Lazić, Milica
AU  - Popović, Dragoslav
PY  - 2023
UR  - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/5585
AB  - The interrelatedness of social-structural aspects and psychological features with vaccination intention provides the context to explore personal psychological features related to vaccination. Specifically, we focused on general decision making and vaccine-related dispositions, and their contribution to the intention to vaccinate, within post-pandemic circumstances, after the imposed possibility of choosing a vaccine brand. Our study aimed to map the function (promotive, protective, risk, vulnerability) of a set of personal psychological aspects in the intention to vaccinate among people holding different social roles regarding the vaccination. We surveyed three samples of people: healthcare providers (HPs), parents, and laypeople, within the post-pandemic context. Negative vaccine attitudes lower intention to vaccinate in all regression models (all βs ranging from −0.128 to −0.983, all ps < 0.01). The main results indicate that, regardless of the sample/social role, there is a shared attitudinal core for positive vaccination intention. This core consists of [high] trust in large corporations, government, and healthcare systems, as well as perceived consensus on vaccine safety/efficacy and experience of freedom (protective factors), and [low] vaccination conspiracy beliefs, trust in social media, and choice overload (risk and vulnerability factors, respectively). There are no common promotive factors of intention to vaccinate: for parents, perceived consensus on vaccines, and trust in corporations and the healthcare system, play such roles; for HPs, the experience of freedom is obtained as a unique promotive factor. In contrast, for laypeople, no unique promotive factors were found. Our findings provide insights into the function of psychological factors of vaccination intention across different social roles, particularly healthcare providers, parents, and laypeople, and emphasize the need for tailored immunization interventions in the post-pandemic landscape.
PB  - MDPI
T2  - Vaccines
T1  - Psychological Factors of Vaccination Intent among Healthcare Providers, Parents, and Laypeople
IS  - 12
SP  - 1816
VL  - 11
DO  - https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11121816
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Damnjanović, Kaja and Ilić, Sandra and Kušić, Marija and Lazić, Milica and Popović, Dragoslav",
year = "2023",
abstract = "The interrelatedness of social-structural aspects and psychological features with vaccination intention provides the context to explore personal psychological features related to vaccination. Specifically, we focused on general decision making and vaccine-related dispositions, and their contribution to the intention to vaccinate, within post-pandemic circumstances, after the imposed possibility of choosing a vaccine brand. Our study aimed to map the function (promotive, protective, risk, vulnerability) of a set of personal psychological aspects in the intention to vaccinate among people holding different social roles regarding the vaccination. We surveyed three samples of people: healthcare providers (HPs), parents, and laypeople, within the post-pandemic context. Negative vaccine attitudes lower intention to vaccinate in all regression models (all βs ranging from −0.128 to −0.983, all ps < 0.01). The main results indicate that, regardless of the sample/social role, there is a shared attitudinal core for positive vaccination intention. This core consists of [high] trust in large corporations, government, and healthcare systems, as well as perceived consensus on vaccine safety/efficacy and experience of freedom (protective factors), and [low] vaccination conspiracy beliefs, trust in social media, and choice overload (risk and vulnerability factors, respectively). There are no common promotive factors of intention to vaccinate: for parents, perceived consensus on vaccines, and trust in corporations and the healthcare system, play such roles; for HPs, the experience of freedom is obtained as a unique promotive factor. In contrast, for laypeople, no unique promotive factors were found. Our findings provide insights into the function of psychological factors of vaccination intention across different social roles, particularly healthcare providers, parents, and laypeople, and emphasize the need for tailored immunization interventions in the post-pandemic landscape.",
publisher = "MDPI",
journal = "Vaccines",
title = "Psychological Factors of Vaccination Intent among Healthcare Providers, Parents, and Laypeople",
number = "12",
pages = "1816",
volume = "11",
doi = "https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11121816"
}

Damnjanović, K., Ilić, S., Kušić, M., Lazić, M.,& Popović, D.. (2023). Psychological Factors of Vaccination Intent among Healthcare Providers, Parents, and Laypeople. in Vaccines
MDPI., 11(12), 1816.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11121816

Damnjanović K, Ilić S, Kušić M, Lazić M, Popović D. Psychological Factors of Vaccination Intent among Healthcare Providers, Parents, and Laypeople. in Vaccines. 2023;11(12):1816.
doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11121816 .

Damnjanović, Kaja, Ilić, Sandra, Kušić, Marija, Lazić, Milica, Popović, Dragoslav, "Psychological Factors of Vaccination Intent among Healthcare Providers, Parents, and Laypeople" in Vaccines, 11, no. 12 (2023):1816,
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11121816 . .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Kušić, Marija
AU  - Nurkić, Petar
PY  - 2019
UR  - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2713
AB  - Artificial Morality is a new, emerging interdisciplinary field that centres around the idea of creating artificial moral agents, or AMAs, by implementing moral competence in artificial systems. AMAs are ought to be autonomous agents capable of socially correct judgements and ethically functional behaviour. This request for moral machines comes from the changes in everyday practice, where artificial systems are being frequently used in a variety of situations from home help and elderly care purposes to banking and court algorithms. It is therefore important to create reliable and responsible machines based on the same ethical principles that society demands from people. New challenges in creating such agents appear. There are philosophical questions about a machine's potential to be an agent, or moral agent, in the first place. Then comes the problem of social acceptance of such machines, regardless of their theoretic agency status. As a result of efforts to resolve this problem, there are insinuations of needed additional psychological (emotional and cognitive) competence in cold moral machines. What makes this endeavour of developing AMAs even harder is the complexity of the technical, engineering aspect of their creation. Implementation approaches such as top-down, bottom-up and hybrid approach aim to find the best way of developing fully moral agents, but they encounter their own problems throughout this effort.
PB  - Univerzitet u Beogradu - Filozofski fakultet - Institut za filozofiju, Beograd
T2  - Belgrade Philosophical Annual
T1  - Artificial morality: Making of the artificial moral agents
EP  - 49
IS  - 32
SP  - 27
DO  - 10.5937/BPA1932027K
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Kušić, Marija and Nurkić, Petar",
year = "2019",
abstract = "Artificial Morality is a new, emerging interdisciplinary field that centres around the idea of creating artificial moral agents, or AMAs, by implementing moral competence in artificial systems. AMAs are ought to be autonomous agents capable of socially correct judgements and ethically functional behaviour. This request for moral machines comes from the changes in everyday practice, where artificial systems are being frequently used in a variety of situations from home help and elderly care purposes to banking and court algorithms. It is therefore important to create reliable and responsible machines based on the same ethical principles that society demands from people. New challenges in creating such agents appear. There are philosophical questions about a machine's potential to be an agent, or moral agent, in the first place. Then comes the problem of social acceptance of such machines, regardless of their theoretic agency status. As a result of efforts to resolve this problem, there are insinuations of needed additional psychological (emotional and cognitive) competence in cold moral machines. What makes this endeavour of developing AMAs even harder is the complexity of the technical, engineering aspect of their creation. Implementation approaches such as top-down, bottom-up and hybrid approach aim to find the best way of developing fully moral agents, but they encounter their own problems throughout this effort.",
publisher = "Univerzitet u Beogradu - Filozofski fakultet - Institut za filozofiju, Beograd",
journal = "Belgrade Philosophical Annual",
title = "Artificial morality: Making of the artificial moral agents",
pages = "49-27",
number = "32",
doi = "10.5937/BPA1932027K"
}

Kušić, M.,& Nurkić, P.. (2019). Artificial morality: Making of the artificial moral agents. in Belgrade Philosophical Annual
Univerzitet u Beogradu - Filozofski fakultet - Institut za filozofiju, Beograd.(32), 27-49.
https://doi.org/10.5937/BPA1932027K

Kušić M, Nurkić P. Artificial morality: Making of the artificial moral agents. in Belgrade Philosophical Annual. 2019;(32):27-49.
doi:10.5937/BPA1932027K .

Kušić, Marija, Nurkić, Petar, "Artificial morality: Making of the artificial moral agents" in Belgrade Philosophical Annual, no. 32 (2019):27-49,
https://doi.org/10.5937/BPA1932027K . .