Ninković, Milica

Link to this page

Authority KeyName Variants
orcid::0000-0003-4294-1426
  • Ninković, Milica (36)
  • Ninković, Milica G. (3)
Projects

Author's Bibliography

Women's trust in the healthcare system in Serbia: Validation of the Women's Trust and Confidence in Healthcare System scale

Ninković, Milica; Ilić, Sandra; Damnjanovic, Kaja

(SAGE Publications Inc., 2024)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Ninković, Milica
AU  - Ilić, Sandra
AU  - Damnjanovic, Kaja
PY  - 2024
UR  - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/6477
AB  - Background:
Women’s role as patients is associated with power relationships embedded in society. Although trust in the health care system is a general prerequisite for positive health outcomes, practices regarding women’s agency in healthcare systems in Southeastern Europe reinforce women’s passivity. Most of the current psychological measures of trust have been constructed and validated in “WEIRD” (samples that are drawn from populations that are White, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, and Democratic) countries, thus having a limited application in other social contexts.
Objectives:
We aimed to construct an instrument for assessing women’s trust in healthcare systems to describe the structure of trust: Women’s Trust and Confidence in the Healthcare System scale.
Design:
Two independent samples (N1 = 329; N2 = 333) of adult women in Serbia voluntarily completed an online questionnaire. The questionnaire comprised 20 trust-related items which were selected from an extensive collection of women’s experiences in the healthcare system and evaluated by experts on a 5-point Likert-type scale.
Methods:
We used exploratory factor analysis of the Women’s Trust and Confidence in the Healthcare System scale to analyze the structure of trust in the first sample data set and validated it with the second sample using confirmatory factor analysis. We tested concurrent validity by exploring how women’s trust in the healthcare system predicts health-related behaviors (multigroup structural equation modeling). All analyses were conducted using R statistical software.
Results:
The Women’s Trust and Confidence in the Healthcare System scale (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.86) indicated a three-factor structure of trust in the healthcare system: trust in healthcare professionals, distrust in the public healthcare system, and confidence in healthcare system. This was validated using an independent sample. Interpersonal trust positively predicted women’s desirable health behaviors, while trust in the system had a negative impact.
Conclusion:
The Women’s Trust and Confidence in the Healthcare System scale captures women’s trust in a paternalistic healthcare system, is reliable, and has a stable three-factor structure. The study’s findings reveal the relationship between women’s trust and health-related behavior: in paternalistic environments, trust reinforces women’s passivity.
PB  - SAGE Publications Inc.
T2  - Women's health
T1  - Women's trust in the healthcare system in Serbia: Validation of the Women's Trust and Confidence in Healthcare System scale
SP  - 17455057241249864.
VL  - 20
DO  - 10.1177/17455057241249864
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Ninković, Milica and Ilić, Sandra and Damnjanovic, Kaja",
year = "2024",
abstract = "Background:
Women’s role as patients is associated with power relationships embedded in society. Although trust in the health care system is a general prerequisite for positive health outcomes, practices regarding women’s agency in healthcare systems in Southeastern Europe reinforce women’s passivity. Most of the current psychological measures of trust have been constructed and validated in “WEIRD” (samples that are drawn from populations that are White, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, and Democratic) countries, thus having a limited application in other social contexts.
Objectives:
We aimed to construct an instrument for assessing women’s trust in healthcare systems to describe the structure of trust: Women’s Trust and Confidence in the Healthcare System scale.
Design:
Two independent samples (N1 = 329; N2 = 333) of adult women in Serbia voluntarily completed an online questionnaire. The questionnaire comprised 20 trust-related items which were selected from an extensive collection of women’s experiences in the healthcare system and evaluated by experts on a 5-point Likert-type scale.
Methods:
We used exploratory factor analysis of the Women’s Trust and Confidence in the Healthcare System scale to analyze the structure of trust in the first sample data set and validated it with the second sample using confirmatory factor analysis. We tested concurrent validity by exploring how women’s trust in the healthcare system predicts health-related behaviors (multigroup structural equation modeling). All analyses were conducted using R statistical software.
Results:
The Women’s Trust and Confidence in the Healthcare System scale (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.86) indicated a three-factor structure of trust in the healthcare system: trust in healthcare professionals, distrust in the public healthcare system, and confidence in healthcare system. This was validated using an independent sample. Interpersonal trust positively predicted women’s desirable health behaviors, while trust in the system had a negative impact.
Conclusion:
The Women’s Trust and Confidence in the Healthcare System scale captures women’s trust in a paternalistic healthcare system, is reliable, and has a stable three-factor structure. The study’s findings reveal the relationship between women’s trust and health-related behavior: in paternalistic environments, trust reinforces women’s passivity.",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
journal = "Women's health",
title = "Women's trust in the healthcare system in Serbia: Validation of the Women's Trust and Confidence in Healthcare System scale",
pages = "17455057241249864.",
volume = "20",
doi = "10.1177/17455057241249864"
}
Ninković, M., Ilić, S.,& Damnjanovic, K.. (2024). Women's trust in the healthcare system in Serbia: Validation of the Women's Trust and Confidence in Healthcare System scale. in Women's health
SAGE Publications Inc.., 20, 17455057241249864..
https://doi.org/10.1177/17455057241249864
Ninković M, Ilić S, Damnjanovic K. Women's trust in the healthcare system in Serbia: Validation of the Women's Trust and Confidence in Healthcare System scale. in Women's health. 2024;20:17455057241249864..
doi:10.1177/17455057241249864 .
Ninković, Milica, Ilić, Sandra, Damnjanovic, Kaja, "Women's trust in the healthcare system in Serbia: Validation of the Women's Trust and Confidence in Healthcare System scale" in Women's health, 20 (2024):17455057241249864.,
https://doi.org/10.1177/17455057241249864 . .
4
1

Turning away from conventional medicine to traditional, complementary and alternative medical treatments - an irrational choice

Ninković, Milica; Knežević, Goran; Purić, Danka; Opačić, Goran; Lazarević, Ljiljana B.; Petrović, Marija B.; Teovanović, Predrag; Stanković, Sanda; Zupan, Zorana; Žeželj, Iris Lav

(Institute of Psychology & Laboratory for Experimental Psychology, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Belgrade, 2024)

TY  - CONF
AU  - Ninković, Milica
AU  - Knežević, Goran
AU  - Purić, Danka
AU  - Opačić, Goran
AU  - Lazarević, Ljiljana B.
AU  - Petrović, Marija B.
AU  - Teovanović, Predrag
AU  - Stanković, Sanda
AU  - Zupan, Zorana
AU  - Žeželj, Iris Lav
PY  - 2024
UR  - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/6479
AB  - Although it lacks a solid evidence base, people use traditional, complementary, and alternative
medicine (TCAM), and they do so in three distinct ways: 1) for preventive purposes, 2)
complementarily to prescribed therapy, and 3) as an alternative to it. While preventive use of
TCAM is of least concern, these treatments can sometimes have detrimental interactions with
conventional when used as complementary, and especially as an alternative to treatment. Using
TCAM instead of conventional treatments can delay efficient cure and decrease the chance of
recovery. Previous studies have indicated that the use of TCAM is rooted in the “irrational
mindset” (IM) - a composite of irrational beliefs and cognitive biases. However, different ways
of using TCAM may not be equally irrational. Here, we explored whether the IM predicts the
three ways of TCAM use. Participants from a nationally representative Serbian sample (N =
1003) filled in a set of the IM measures: Medical conspiracy theories (ɑ = .83), Superstition (ɑ
= .70), Magical beliefs about health (ɑ = .77), Extrasensory beliefs (ɑ = .77), and Naturalness
bias (single item). They also indicated how they typically used different domains of TCAM
practices (preventively, complementarily, alternatively, or none). We coded their answers “1”
if they indicated that they used a domain in a particular way and with “0” otherwise.
We tested the explanatory power of IM variables for the ways of TCAM use within three binary
logistic regression models, one for each way of use. The irrational mindset was the most
predictive for the alternative use of TCAM (χ2(5) = 40.56, p < .001; Nagelkerke R2 = .07).
Those endorsing medical conspiracy theories (OR = 1.48, p = .001) and extrasensory
perception beliefs (OR = 1.41, p = .009) were more likely to turn to TCAM alternative to the
prescribed therapy. On the other hand, the predictive power of IM was quite weak for
preventive (χ2(5) = 14.39, p = .013; Nagelkerke R2 = .02) and complementary use (χ2(5) =
18.06, p = .003; Nagelkerke R2 = .02) suggesting these behaviors not to be irrational.
Whilst abandoning treatment and turning to TCAM is the rarest scenario (17%), it is the most
dangerous one, particularly in case of life-threatening illnesses. This is why health
communication interventions must cut deeper and also address its underlying irrational beliefs:
endorsing unfounded extrasensory abilities and dismissing official medicine due to so-called
“Big pharma conspiracies”.
PB  - Institute of Psychology & Laboratory for Experimental Psychology, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Belgrade
C3  - Book of Apstacts of the XXX Scientific Conference Empirical Studies in Psychology
T1  - Turning away from conventional medicine to traditional, complementary and alternative medical treatments - an irrational choice
EP  - 94
SP  - 94
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_6479
ER  - 
@conference{
author = "Ninković, Milica and Knežević, Goran and Purić, Danka and Opačić, Goran and Lazarević, Ljiljana B. and Petrović, Marija B. and Teovanović, Predrag and Stanković, Sanda and Zupan, Zorana and Žeželj, Iris Lav",
year = "2024",
abstract = "Although it lacks a solid evidence base, people use traditional, complementary, and alternative
medicine (TCAM), and they do so in three distinct ways: 1) for preventive purposes, 2)
complementarily to prescribed therapy, and 3) as an alternative to it. While preventive use of
TCAM is of least concern, these treatments can sometimes have detrimental interactions with
conventional when used as complementary, and especially as an alternative to treatment. Using
TCAM instead of conventional treatments can delay efficient cure and decrease the chance of
recovery. Previous studies have indicated that the use of TCAM is rooted in the “irrational
mindset” (IM) - a composite of irrational beliefs and cognitive biases. However, different ways
of using TCAM may not be equally irrational. Here, we explored whether the IM predicts the
three ways of TCAM use. Participants from a nationally representative Serbian sample (N =
1003) filled in a set of the IM measures: Medical conspiracy theories (ɑ = .83), Superstition (ɑ
= .70), Magical beliefs about health (ɑ = .77), Extrasensory beliefs (ɑ = .77), and Naturalness
bias (single item). They also indicated how they typically used different domains of TCAM
practices (preventively, complementarily, alternatively, or none). We coded their answers “1”
if they indicated that they used a domain in a particular way and with “0” otherwise.
We tested the explanatory power of IM variables for the ways of TCAM use within three binary
logistic regression models, one for each way of use. The irrational mindset was the most
predictive for the alternative use of TCAM (χ2(5) = 40.56, p < .001; Nagelkerke R2 = .07).
Those endorsing medical conspiracy theories (OR = 1.48, p = .001) and extrasensory
perception beliefs (OR = 1.41, p = .009) were more likely to turn to TCAM alternative to the
prescribed therapy. On the other hand, the predictive power of IM was quite weak for
preventive (χ2(5) = 14.39, p = .013; Nagelkerke R2 = .02) and complementary use (χ2(5) =
18.06, p = .003; Nagelkerke R2 = .02) suggesting these behaviors not to be irrational.
Whilst abandoning treatment and turning to TCAM is the rarest scenario (17%), it is the most
dangerous one, particularly in case of life-threatening illnesses. This is why health
communication interventions must cut deeper and also address its underlying irrational beliefs:
endorsing unfounded extrasensory abilities and dismissing official medicine due to so-called
“Big pharma conspiracies”.",
publisher = "Institute of Psychology & Laboratory for Experimental Psychology, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Belgrade",
journal = "Book of Apstacts of the XXX Scientific Conference Empirical Studies in Psychology",
title = "Turning away from conventional medicine to traditional, complementary and alternative medical treatments - an irrational choice",
pages = "94-94",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_6479"
}
Ninković, M., Knežević, G., Purić, D., Opačić, G., Lazarević, L. B., Petrović, M. B., Teovanović, P., Stanković, S., Zupan, Z.,& Žeželj, I. L.. (2024). Turning away from conventional medicine to traditional, complementary and alternative medical treatments - an irrational choice. in Book of Apstacts of the XXX Scientific Conference Empirical Studies in Psychology
Institute of Psychology & Laboratory for Experimental Psychology, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Belgrade., 94-94.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_6479
Ninković M, Knežević G, Purić D, Opačić G, Lazarević LB, Petrović MB, Teovanović P, Stanković S, Zupan Z, Žeželj IL. Turning away from conventional medicine to traditional, complementary and alternative medical treatments - an irrational choice. in Book of Apstacts of the XXX Scientific Conference Empirical Studies in Psychology. 2024;:94-94.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_6479 .
Ninković, Milica, Knežević, Goran, Purić, Danka, Opačić, Goran, Lazarević, Ljiljana B., Petrović, Marija B., Teovanović, Predrag, Stanković, Sanda, Zupan, Zorana, Žeželj, Iris Lav, "Turning away from conventional medicine to traditional, complementary and alternative medical treatments - an irrational choice" in Book of Apstacts of the XXX Scientific Conference Empirical Studies in Psychology (2024):94-94,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_6479 .

Predictors of Ethnic identity delegitimization in two entities in Bosnia and Herzegovina

Ninković, Milica; Žeželj, Iris Lav

(Institute of Psychology & Laboratory for Experimental Psychology, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Belgrade, 2024)

TY  - CONF
AU  - Ninković, Milica
AU  - Žeželj, Iris Lav
PY  - 2024
UR  - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/6478
AB  - Ethnic identity delegitimization (EIDL) is a belief that ethnic groups with a shorter history have
less rights to self-determination and recognition than those with a longer history. Although this
belief is defined as a general tendency - i.e., unrelated to a particular ethnic group - it can be
exploited in (post-)conflict contexts to deny the rights of adversarial groups. In the region of
ex-Yugoslavia, it is a widespread defensive strategy to diminish the outgroup’s legitimacy,
especially for those groups whose ethnic identity was defined through religious affiliation (e.g.,
Bosniaks, who were labeled as Muslims in Yugoslavia). Previous studies showed that EIDL is
rooted in ideological attitudes and meta-identity beliefs. EIDL was also found to predict
attitudes towards the groups whose identity is usually disproven in nationalistic narratives but
not towards those whose identity is perceived as stable. However, there is still no evidence that
the predictors of EIDL are unique across ethnic groups. We address this gap using a community
sample from Bosnia and Herzegovina (N = 763). Around half of the participants (51%) self-
declared as Bosniaks, while the rest self-declared as Serbs. Participants filled in the short EIDL
scale (four items, ɑ = .94) and three items measuring Ethnic identification (ɑ = .85), and
reported their religiosity (single-item) and social and economic political orientation (single-
item measures, high scores indicating right-wing/conservative orientation). To test the
predictors of EIDL across the two ethnic groups, we built a hierarchical linear regression
model. The first step indicated that Serbs hold higher EIDL beliefs on average (β = .19, p <
.001). In the second step, social political orientation (β = .21,p < .001) and Ethnic identification
(β = .15, p < .001) emerged as significant predictors of EIDL over and above ethnicity (ΔR2 =
.12, ΔF(4, 757) = 24.89, p < .001). Finally, in step 3 (ΔR2 = .01, ΔF(2, 755) = 4.43, p = .012),
we observed a significant interaction between Ethnic identification and ethnicity (β = .07, p =
.018). However, their main effects were insignificant (ps > .11), indicating that Ethnic
identification predicted EIDL only in the sub-sample of Serbs, but not Bosniaks. Our results
are in line with previous studies suggesting that EIDL is rooted in ideology. They also shed
new light on its relation to Ethnic identification, indicating that it varies across the groups
regarding their perceived identity stability.
PB  - Institute of Psychology & Laboratory for Experimental Psychology, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Belgrade
C3  - Book of abstracts, 30th Scientific Conference “Empirical Studies in Psychology”, Belgrade, 2024
T1  - Predictors of Ethnic identity delegitimization in two entities in Bosnia and Herzegovina
EP  - 89
SP  - 89
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_6478
ER  - 
@conference{
author = "Ninković, Milica and Žeželj, Iris Lav",
year = "2024",
abstract = "Ethnic identity delegitimization (EIDL) is a belief that ethnic groups with a shorter history have
less rights to self-determination and recognition than those with a longer history. Although this
belief is defined as a general tendency - i.e., unrelated to a particular ethnic group - it can be
exploited in (post-)conflict contexts to deny the rights of adversarial groups. In the region of
ex-Yugoslavia, it is a widespread defensive strategy to diminish the outgroup’s legitimacy,
especially for those groups whose ethnic identity was defined through religious affiliation (e.g.,
Bosniaks, who were labeled as Muslims in Yugoslavia). Previous studies showed that EIDL is
rooted in ideological attitudes and meta-identity beliefs. EIDL was also found to predict
attitudes towards the groups whose identity is usually disproven in nationalistic narratives but
not towards those whose identity is perceived as stable. However, there is still no evidence that
the predictors of EIDL are unique across ethnic groups. We address this gap using a community
sample from Bosnia and Herzegovina (N = 763). Around half of the participants (51%) self-
declared as Bosniaks, while the rest self-declared as Serbs. Participants filled in the short EIDL
scale (four items, ɑ = .94) and three items measuring Ethnic identification (ɑ = .85), and
reported their religiosity (single-item) and social and economic political orientation (single-
item measures, high scores indicating right-wing/conservative orientation). To test the
predictors of EIDL across the two ethnic groups, we built a hierarchical linear regression
model. The first step indicated that Serbs hold higher EIDL beliefs on average (β = .19, p <
.001). In the second step, social political orientation (β = .21,p < .001) and Ethnic identification
(β = .15, p < .001) emerged as significant predictors of EIDL over and above ethnicity (ΔR2 =
.12, ΔF(4, 757) = 24.89, p < .001). Finally, in step 3 (ΔR2 = .01, ΔF(2, 755) = 4.43, p = .012),
we observed a significant interaction between Ethnic identification and ethnicity (β = .07, p =
.018). However, their main effects were insignificant (ps > .11), indicating that Ethnic
identification predicted EIDL only in the sub-sample of Serbs, but not Bosniaks. Our results
are in line with previous studies suggesting that EIDL is rooted in ideology. They also shed
new light on its relation to Ethnic identification, indicating that it varies across the groups
regarding their perceived identity stability.",
publisher = "Institute of Psychology & Laboratory for Experimental Psychology, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Belgrade",
journal = "Book of abstracts, 30th Scientific Conference “Empirical Studies in Psychology”, Belgrade, 2024",
title = "Predictors of Ethnic identity delegitimization in two entities in Bosnia and Herzegovina",
pages = "89-89",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_6478"
}
Ninković, M.,& Žeželj, I. L.. (2024). Predictors of Ethnic identity delegitimization in two entities in Bosnia and Herzegovina. in Book of abstracts, 30th Scientific Conference “Empirical Studies in Psychology”, Belgrade, 2024
Institute of Psychology & Laboratory for Experimental Psychology, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Belgrade., 89-89.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_6478
Ninković M, Žeželj IL. Predictors of Ethnic identity delegitimization in two entities in Bosnia and Herzegovina. in Book of abstracts, 30th Scientific Conference “Empirical Studies in Psychology”, Belgrade, 2024. 2024;:89-89.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_6478 .
Ninković, Milica, Žeželj, Iris Lav, "Predictors of Ethnic identity delegitimization in two entities in Bosnia and Herzegovina" in Book of abstracts, 30th Scientific Conference “Empirical Studies in Psychology”, Belgrade, 2024 (2024):89-89,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_6478 .

Tracking variations in daily questionable health behaviors and their psychological roots: a preregistered experience sampling study

Lazarević, Ljiljana; Knežević, Goran; Purić, Danka; Teovanović, Predrag; Petrović, Marija; Ninković, Milica; Živanović, Marko; Stanković, Sanda; Branković, Marija; Lukić, Petar; Opačić, Goran; Žeželj, Iris

(2023)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Lazarević, Ljiljana
AU  - Knežević, Goran
AU  - Purić, Danka
AU  - Teovanović, Predrag
AU  - Petrović, Marija
AU  - Ninković, Milica
AU  - Živanović, Marko
AU  - Stanković, Sanda
AU  - Branković, Marija
AU  - Lukić, Petar
AU  - Opačić, Goran
AU  - Žeželj, Iris
PY  - 2023
UR  - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/4763
AB  - People resort to various questionable health practices to preserve or regain health - they intentionally do not adhere to medical recommendations (e.g. self-medicate or modify the prescribed therapies; iNAR), or use traditional/complementary/alternative (TCAM) medicine. As retrospective reports overestimate adherence and suffer from recall and desirability bias, we tracked the variations in daily questionable health behaviors and compared them to their retrospectively reported lifetime use. We also preregistered and explored their relations to a wide set of psychological predictors - distal (personality traits and basic thinking dispositions) and proximal (different unfounded beliefs and biases grouped under the term irrational mindset). A community sample (N = 224) tracked daily engagement in iNAR and TCAM use for 14 days, resulting in 3136 data points. We observed a high rate of questionable health practices over the 14 days; daily engagement rates roughly corresponded to lifetime ones. Both iNAR and TCAM were weakly, but robustly positively related. Independent of the assessment method, an irrational mindset was the most important predictor of TCAM use. For iNAR, however, psychological predictors emerged as relevant only when assessed retrospectively. Our study offers insight into questionable health behaviors from both a within and between-person perspective and highlights the importance of their psychological roots.
T2  - Scientific Reports
T1  - Tracking variations in daily questionable health behaviors and their psychological roots: a preregistered experience sampling study
SP  - 14058
VL  - 13
DO  - 10.1038/s41598-023-41243-w
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Lazarević, Ljiljana and Knežević, Goran and Purić, Danka and Teovanović, Predrag and Petrović, Marija and Ninković, Milica and Živanović, Marko and Stanković, Sanda and Branković, Marija and Lukić, Petar and Opačić, Goran and Žeželj, Iris",
year = "2023",
abstract = "People resort to various questionable health practices to preserve or regain health - they intentionally do not adhere to medical recommendations (e.g. self-medicate or modify the prescribed therapies; iNAR), or use traditional/complementary/alternative (TCAM) medicine. As retrospective reports overestimate adherence and suffer from recall and desirability bias, we tracked the variations in daily questionable health behaviors and compared them to their retrospectively reported lifetime use. We also preregistered and explored their relations to a wide set of psychological predictors - distal (personality traits and basic thinking dispositions) and proximal (different unfounded beliefs and biases grouped under the term irrational mindset). A community sample (N = 224) tracked daily engagement in iNAR and TCAM use for 14 days, resulting in 3136 data points. We observed a high rate of questionable health practices over the 14 days; daily engagement rates roughly corresponded to lifetime ones. Both iNAR and TCAM were weakly, but robustly positively related. Independent of the assessment method, an irrational mindset was the most important predictor of TCAM use. For iNAR, however, psychological predictors emerged as relevant only when assessed retrospectively. Our study offers insight into questionable health behaviors from both a within and between-person perspective and highlights the importance of their psychological roots.",
journal = "Scientific Reports",
title = "Tracking variations in daily questionable health behaviors and their psychological roots: a preregistered experience sampling study",
pages = "14058",
volume = "13",
doi = "10.1038/s41598-023-41243-w"
}
Lazarević, L., Knežević, G., Purić, D., Teovanović, P., Petrović, M., Ninković, M., Živanović, M., Stanković, S., Branković, M., Lukić, P., Opačić, G.,& Žeželj, I.. (2023). Tracking variations in daily questionable health behaviors and their psychological roots: a preregistered experience sampling study. in Scientific Reports, 13, 14058.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-41243-w
Lazarević L, Knežević G, Purić D, Teovanović P, Petrović M, Ninković M, Živanović M, Stanković S, Branković M, Lukić P, Opačić G, Žeželj I. Tracking variations in daily questionable health behaviors and their psychological roots: a preregistered experience sampling study. in Scientific Reports. 2023;13:14058.
doi:10.1038/s41598-023-41243-w .
Lazarević, Ljiljana, Knežević, Goran, Purić, Danka, Teovanović, Predrag, Petrović, Marija, Ninković, Milica, Živanović, Marko, Stanković, Sanda, Branković, Marija, Lukić, Petar, Opačić, Goran, Žeželj, Iris, "Tracking variations in daily questionable health behaviors and their psychological roots: a preregistered experience sampling study" in Scientific Reports, 13 (2023):14058,
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-41243-w . .
9
1

Development of a novel instrument for assessing intentional non-adherence to official medical recommendations (iNAR-12): a sequential mixed-methods study in Serbia

Purić, Danka; Petrović, Marija; Živanović, Marko; Lukić, Petar; Zupan, Zorana; Branković, Marija; Ninković, Milica; Lazarević, Ljiljana; Stanković, Sanda; Žeželj, Iris

(2023)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Purić, Danka
AU  - Petrović, Marija
AU  - Živanović, Marko
AU  - Lukić, Petar
AU  - Zupan, Zorana
AU  - Branković, Marija
AU  - Ninković, Milica
AU  - Lazarević, Ljiljana
AU  - Stanković, Sanda
AU  - Žeželj, Iris
PY  - 2023
UR  - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/4631
AB  - Objectives We aimed to (1) develop a novel instrument, suitable for the general population, capturing intentional non-adherence (iNAR), consisting of non-adherence to prescribed therapy, self-medication and avoidance of seeking medical treatment; (2) differentiate it from other forms of non-adherence, for example, smoking; and (3) relate iNAR to patient-related factors, such as sociodemographics, health status and endorsement of irrational beliefs (conspiratorial thinking and superstitions) and to healthcare-related beliefs and experiences ((mis)trust and negative experiences with the healthcare system, normalisation of patient passivity).

Design То generate iNAR items, we employed a focus group with medical doctors, supplemented it with a literature search and invited a public health expert to refine it further. We examined the internal structure and predictors of iNAR in an observational study.

Setting Data were collected online using snowball sampling and social networks.

Participants After excluding those who failed one or more out of three attention checks, the final sample size was n=583 adult Serbian citizens, 74.4% female, mean age 39.01 years (SD=12.10).

Primary and secondary outcome measures The primary, planned outcome is the iNAR Questionnaire, while smoking was used for comparison purposes.

Results Factor analysis yielded a one-factor solution, and the final 12-item iNAR Questionnaire had satisfactory internal reliability (alpha=0.72). Health condition and healthcare-related variables accounted for 14% of the variance of iNAR behaviours, whereas sociodemographics and irrational beliefs did not additionally contribute.

Conclusions We constructed a brief yet comprehensive measure of iNAR behaviours and related them to health and sociodemographic variables and irrational beliefs. The findings suggest that public health interventions should attempt to improve patients' experiences with the system and build trust with their healthcare practitioners rather than aim at specific demographic groups or at correcting patients’ unfounded beliefs.
T2  - BMJ Open
T1  - Development of a novel instrument for assessing intentional non-adherence to official medical recommendations (iNAR-12): a sequential mixed-methods study in Serbia
IS  - 6
SP  - e069978
VL  - 13
DO  - 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069978
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Purić, Danka and Petrović, Marija and Živanović, Marko and Lukić, Petar and Zupan, Zorana and Branković, Marija and Ninković, Milica and Lazarević, Ljiljana and Stanković, Sanda and Žeželj, Iris",
year = "2023",
abstract = "Objectives We aimed to (1) develop a novel instrument, suitable for the general population, capturing intentional non-adherence (iNAR), consisting of non-adherence to prescribed therapy, self-medication and avoidance of seeking medical treatment; (2) differentiate it from other forms of non-adherence, for example, smoking; and (3) relate iNAR to patient-related factors, such as sociodemographics, health status and endorsement of irrational beliefs (conspiratorial thinking and superstitions) and to healthcare-related beliefs and experiences ((mis)trust and negative experiences with the healthcare system, normalisation of patient passivity).

Design То generate iNAR items, we employed a focus group with medical doctors, supplemented it with a literature search and invited a public health expert to refine it further. We examined the internal structure and predictors of iNAR in an observational study.

Setting Data were collected online using snowball sampling and social networks.

Participants After excluding those who failed one or more out of three attention checks, the final sample size was n=583 adult Serbian citizens, 74.4% female, mean age 39.01 years (SD=12.10).

Primary and secondary outcome measures The primary, planned outcome is the iNAR Questionnaire, while smoking was used for comparison purposes.

Results Factor analysis yielded a one-factor solution, and the final 12-item iNAR Questionnaire had satisfactory internal reliability (alpha=0.72). Health condition and healthcare-related variables accounted for 14% of the variance of iNAR behaviours, whereas sociodemographics and irrational beliefs did not additionally contribute.

Conclusions We constructed a brief yet comprehensive measure of iNAR behaviours and related them to health and sociodemographic variables and irrational beliefs. The findings suggest that public health interventions should attempt to improve patients' experiences with the system and build trust with their healthcare practitioners rather than aim at specific demographic groups or at correcting patients’ unfounded beliefs.",
journal = "BMJ Open",
title = "Development of a novel instrument for assessing intentional non-adherence to official medical recommendations (iNAR-12): a sequential mixed-methods study in Serbia",
number = "6",
pages = "e069978",
volume = "13",
doi = "10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069978"
}
Purić, D., Petrović, M., Živanović, M., Lukić, P., Zupan, Z., Branković, M., Ninković, M., Lazarević, L., Stanković, S.,& Žeželj, I.. (2023). Development of a novel instrument for assessing intentional non-adherence to official medical recommendations (iNAR-12): a sequential mixed-methods study in Serbia. in BMJ Open, 13(6), e069978.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069978
Purić D, Petrović M, Živanović M, Lukić P, Zupan Z, Branković M, Ninković M, Lazarević L, Stanković S, Žeželj I. Development of a novel instrument for assessing intentional non-adherence to official medical recommendations (iNAR-12): a sequential mixed-methods study in Serbia. in BMJ Open. 2023;13(6):e069978.
doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069978 .
Purić, Danka, Petrović, Marija, Živanović, Marko, Lukić, Petar, Zupan, Zorana, Branković, Marija, Ninković, Milica, Lazarević, Ljiljana, Stanković, Sanda, Žeželj, Iris, "Development of a novel instrument for assessing intentional non-adherence to official medical recommendations (iNAR-12): a sequential mixed-methods study in Serbia" in BMJ Open, 13, no. 6 (2023):e069978,
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069978 . .
7
1
1

To prevent or to cure: How people use traditional, complementary and alternative medicine

Purić, Danka; Opačić, Goran; Petrović, Marija; Knežević, Goran; Stanković, Sanda; Lazić, Aleksandra; Lukić, Petar; Lazarević, Ljiljana B.; Teovanović, Predrag; Zupan, Zorana; Ninković, Milica; Branković, Marija; Živanović, Marko; Žeželj, Iris

(Institut za psihologiju, Filozofski fakultet, Beograd, 2023)

TY  - CONF
AU  - Purić, Danka
AU  - Opačić, Goran
AU  - Petrović, Marija
AU  - Knežević, Goran
AU  - Stanković, Sanda
AU  - Lazić, Aleksandra
AU  - Lukić, Petar
AU  - Lazarević, Ljiljana B.
AU  - Teovanović, Predrag
AU  - Zupan, Zorana
AU  - Ninković, Milica
AU  - Branković, Marija
AU  - Živanović, Marko
AU  - Žeželj, Iris
PY  - 2023
UR  - http://empirijskaistrazivanja.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/EIP23_proceedings.pdf
UR  - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/4927
AB  - To understand the reasons behind the trend of growing use of traditional, complementary and alternative (TCAM) practices this study sought to uncover how people use them - to prevent disease/promote health, to treat medical conditions by complementing official medical treatments, or as an alternative to them. A sample of N = 583 Serbian citizens completed an online questionnaire assessing four TCAM domains: Alternative medical systems (AMS), Natural product-based practices (NP), New Age medicine (NA), and Rituals/Customs (RC). Participants indicated whether they had used a given practice in the past year, and if yes, how they used it. Overall, participants used TCAM preventively in two-thirds of cases, but we also found a significant association between TCAM domain and way of use. AMS was used alternatively more than any other TCAM domain, NP was the most prevalent complementary treatment, while NA and RC were predominantly used preventively. Our results suggest that different domains of TCAM practices may impact people’s health differently, depending on how they are used, which should inform interventions.
PB  - Institut za psihologiju, Filozofski fakultet, Beograd
PB  - Laboratorija za eksperimentalnu psihologiju, Filozofski fakultet, Beograd
C3  - Proceedings - 29th scientific conference Empirical Studies in Psychology
T1  - To prevent or to cure: How people use traditional, complementary and alternative medicine
EP  - 25
SP  - 22
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4927
ER  - 
@conference{
author = "Purić, Danka and Opačić, Goran and Petrović, Marija and Knežević, Goran and Stanković, Sanda and Lazić, Aleksandra and Lukić, Petar and Lazarević, Ljiljana B. and Teovanović, Predrag and Zupan, Zorana and Ninković, Milica and Branković, Marija and Živanović, Marko and Žeželj, Iris",
year = "2023",
abstract = "To understand the reasons behind the trend of growing use of traditional, complementary and alternative (TCAM) practices this study sought to uncover how people use them - to prevent disease/promote health, to treat medical conditions by complementing official medical treatments, or as an alternative to them. A sample of N = 583 Serbian citizens completed an online questionnaire assessing four TCAM domains: Alternative medical systems (AMS), Natural product-based practices (NP), New Age medicine (NA), and Rituals/Customs (RC). Participants indicated whether they had used a given practice in the past year, and if yes, how they used it. Overall, participants used TCAM preventively in two-thirds of cases, but we also found a significant association between TCAM domain and way of use. AMS was used alternatively more than any other TCAM domain, NP was the most prevalent complementary treatment, while NA and RC were predominantly used preventively. Our results suggest that different domains of TCAM practices may impact people’s health differently, depending on how they are used, which should inform interventions.",
publisher = "Institut za psihologiju, Filozofski fakultet, Beograd, Laboratorija za eksperimentalnu psihologiju, Filozofski fakultet, Beograd",
journal = "Proceedings - 29th scientific conference Empirical Studies in Psychology",
title = "To prevent or to cure: How people use traditional, complementary and alternative medicine",
pages = "25-22",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4927"
}
Purić, D., Opačić, G., Petrović, M., Knežević, G., Stanković, S., Lazić, A., Lukić, P., Lazarević, L. B., Teovanović, P., Zupan, Z., Ninković, M., Branković, M., Živanović, M.,& Žeželj, I.. (2023). To prevent or to cure: How people use traditional, complementary and alternative medicine. in Proceedings - 29th scientific conference Empirical Studies in Psychology
Institut za psihologiju, Filozofski fakultet, Beograd., 22-25.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4927
Purić D, Opačić G, Petrović M, Knežević G, Stanković S, Lazić A, Lukić P, Lazarević LB, Teovanović P, Zupan Z, Ninković M, Branković M, Živanović M, Žeželj I. To prevent or to cure: How people use traditional, complementary and alternative medicine. in Proceedings - 29th scientific conference Empirical Studies in Psychology. 2023;:22-25.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4927 .
Purić, Danka, Opačić, Goran, Petrović, Marija, Knežević, Goran, Stanković, Sanda, Lazić, Aleksandra, Lukić, Petar, Lazarević, Ljiljana B., Teovanović, Predrag, Zupan, Zorana, Ninković, Milica, Branković, Marija, Živanović, Marko, Žeželj, Iris, "To prevent or to cure: How people use traditional, complementary and alternative medicine" in Proceedings - 29th scientific conference Empirical Studies in Psychology (2023):22-25,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4927 .

To prevent or to cure: How people use traditional, complementary and alternative medicine

Purić, Danka; Opačić, Goran; Petrović, Marija; Stanković, Sanda; Lazić, Aleksandra; Lukić, Petar; Lazarević, Ljiljana B.; Teovanović, Predrag; Zupan, Zorana; Ninković, Milica; Branković, Marija; Živanović, Marko; Žeželj, Iris

(2023)

TY  - CONF
AU  - Purić, Danka
AU  - Opačić, Goran
AU  - Petrović, Marija
AU  - Stanković, Sanda
AU  - Lazić, Aleksandra
AU  - Lukić, Petar
AU  - Lazarević, Ljiljana B.
AU  - Teovanović, Predrag
AU  - Zupan, Zorana
AU  - Ninković, Milica
AU  - Branković, Marija
AU  - Živanović, Marko
AU  - Žeželj, Iris
PY  - 2023
UR  - http://empirijskaistrazivanja.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/EIP2023_book_of_abstracts.pdf
UR  - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/4928
AB  - To understand the reasons behind the trend of growing use of traditional, complementary and alternative (TCAM) practices we should first reflect on how people use them - to prevent disease/promote health, to treat medical conditions by complementing official medical treatments, or as an alternative to them. A total of N = 583 (Mage = 39.01 years, SDage = 12.10; 74.4% females) participants from Serbia completed an online survey including a list of 24 TCAM practices, grouped into four domains: Alternative Medical Systems (e.g., acupuncture, homeopathy), Natural product-based practices (e.g., herbal extracts/supplements), New Age medicine (e.g., yoga, mindfulness) and Rituals/Customs (e.g., visiting monasteries for health). Participants who indicated using a certain practice in the past year were asked to consider their most recent experience with that practice and choose only one option for how they used it: for preventive purposes/advancing health, at the same time with official medicine therapy, instead of official medicine therapy. Participants also provided information on whether a TCAM practitioner was involved in their last use of any of the TCAM practices and how often, in general, they consult TCAM practitioners. Overall, 63%, 95%CI [60, 65] of participants used TCAM practices for preventive purposes, 31% [29, 34] in parallel with, and 6% [5, 8] as an alternative to official treatments. Of the four domains of TCAM use, New Age medicine and Rituals/Customs were most frequently used for prevention, with 78% [74, 83] and 77% [72, 82], respectively, while Natural product-based practices were used for prevention in 57% [54, 60] and Alternative Medical Systems in 41% [33, 49] of the cases. Alternative use of TCAM practices was the most common in the case of Alternative Medical Systems (21% [14, 28]), while it amounted to no more than 7% of participants for any of the other domains. For 24% of participants, a TCAM practitioner was present during their last TCAM use, 10% reported a practitioner previously prescribing the practice, while 66% of participants reported no practitioner involvement. The results suggest the importance of treating different domains of TCAM practices separately, as they may have different impacts on people’s health behavior. We especially point to the importance of monitoring adherence to alternative medical systems, as they may potentially distract patients from official therapies and thus further compromise their health.
C3  - Book of abstracts - XXIX scientific conference Empirical Studies in Psychology
T1  - To prevent or to cure: How people use traditional, complementary and alternative medicine
EP  - 56
SP  - 55
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4928
ER  - 
@conference{
author = "Purić, Danka and Opačić, Goran and Petrović, Marija and Stanković, Sanda and Lazić, Aleksandra and Lukić, Petar and Lazarević, Ljiljana B. and Teovanović, Predrag and Zupan, Zorana and Ninković, Milica and Branković, Marija and Živanović, Marko and Žeželj, Iris",
year = "2023",
abstract = "To understand the reasons behind the trend of growing use of traditional, complementary and alternative (TCAM) practices we should first reflect on how people use them - to prevent disease/promote health, to treat medical conditions by complementing official medical treatments, or as an alternative to them. A total of N = 583 (Mage = 39.01 years, SDage = 12.10; 74.4% females) participants from Serbia completed an online survey including a list of 24 TCAM practices, grouped into four domains: Alternative Medical Systems (e.g., acupuncture, homeopathy), Natural product-based practices (e.g., herbal extracts/supplements), New Age medicine (e.g., yoga, mindfulness) and Rituals/Customs (e.g., visiting monasteries for health). Participants who indicated using a certain practice in the past year were asked to consider their most recent experience with that practice and choose only one option for how they used it: for preventive purposes/advancing health, at the same time with official medicine therapy, instead of official medicine therapy. Participants also provided information on whether a TCAM practitioner was involved in their last use of any of the TCAM practices and how often, in general, they consult TCAM practitioners. Overall, 63%, 95%CI [60, 65] of participants used TCAM practices for preventive purposes, 31% [29, 34] in parallel with, and 6% [5, 8] as an alternative to official treatments. Of the four domains of TCAM use, New Age medicine and Rituals/Customs were most frequently used for prevention, with 78% [74, 83] and 77% [72, 82], respectively, while Natural product-based practices were used for prevention in 57% [54, 60] and Alternative Medical Systems in 41% [33, 49] of the cases. Alternative use of TCAM practices was the most common in the case of Alternative Medical Systems (21% [14, 28]), while it amounted to no more than 7% of participants for any of the other domains. For 24% of participants, a TCAM practitioner was present during their last TCAM use, 10% reported a practitioner previously prescribing the practice, while 66% of participants reported no practitioner involvement. The results suggest the importance of treating different domains of TCAM practices separately, as they may have different impacts on people’s health behavior. We especially point to the importance of monitoring adherence to alternative medical systems, as they may potentially distract patients from official therapies and thus further compromise their health.",
journal = "Book of abstracts - XXIX scientific conference Empirical Studies in Psychology",
title = "To prevent or to cure: How people use traditional, complementary and alternative medicine",
pages = "56-55",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4928"
}
Purić, D., Opačić, G., Petrović, M., Stanković, S., Lazić, A., Lukić, P., Lazarević, L. B., Teovanović, P., Zupan, Z., Ninković, M., Branković, M., Živanović, M.,& Žeželj, I.. (2023). To prevent or to cure: How people use traditional, complementary and alternative medicine. in Book of abstracts - XXIX scientific conference Empirical Studies in Psychology, 55-56.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4928
Purić D, Opačić G, Petrović M, Stanković S, Lazić A, Lukić P, Lazarević LB, Teovanović P, Zupan Z, Ninković M, Branković M, Živanović M, Žeželj I. To prevent or to cure: How people use traditional, complementary and alternative medicine. in Book of abstracts - XXIX scientific conference Empirical Studies in Psychology. 2023;:55-56.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4928 .
Purić, Danka, Opačić, Goran, Petrović, Marija, Stanković, Sanda, Lazić, Aleksandra, Lukić, Petar, Lazarević, Ljiljana B., Teovanović, Predrag, Zupan, Zorana, Ninković, Milica, Branković, Marija, Živanović, Marko, Žeželj, Iris, "To prevent or to cure: How people use traditional, complementary and alternative medicine" in Book of abstracts - XXIX scientific conference Empirical Studies in Psychology (2023):55-56,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4928 .

The latent structure of traditional, complementary, and alternative medicine practices based on patterns of use

Purić, Danka; Petrović, Marija; Teovanović, Predrag; Živanović, Marko; Ninković, Milica; Zupan, Zorana; Lazarević, Ljiljana B.; Stanković, Sanda; Lukić, Petar; Branković, Marija; Opačić, Goran; Lazić, Aleksandra; Žeželj, Iris

(2023)

TY  - CONF
AU  - Purić, Danka
AU  - Petrović, Marija
AU  - Teovanović, Predrag
AU  - Živanović, Marko
AU  - Ninković, Milica
AU  - Zupan, Zorana
AU  - Lazarević, Ljiljana B.
AU  - Stanković, Sanda
AU  - Lukić, Petar
AU  - Branković, Marija
AU  - Opačić, Goran
AU  - Lazić, Aleksandra
AU  - Žeželj, Iris
PY  - 2023
UR  - http://empirijskaistrazivanja.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/EIP2023_book_of_abstracts.pdf
UR  - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/4925
AB  - Despite unknown efficiency, known risks, and associated adverse effects of certain traditional, complementary, and alternative medicine (TCAM) practices, the number of people using them appears to be on the rise. Existing taxonomies of TCAM practices mostly relied on either conceptual reasons, or they relied on attitudes toward TCAM, rather than its actual use. In this study, we sought to group TCAM practices based on their patterns of use. A sample of N = 583 (Mage = 39.01 years, SDage = 12.10; 74.4% females) participants residing in Serbia completed an online survey including a list of 71 TCAM practices. For each practice, they indicated if and when they used it to promote their own or their children's health (options: never heard about it/never used it/more than a year ago/in the past year/during the past two weeks). To evaluate the lifetime use of TCAM, we binarized all TCAM items to reflect whether participants have ever used a given practice (never using a practice was coded as 0, using it at least once as 1). After excluding items with frequencies below 5%, we performed an exploratory factor analysis on the tetrachoric correlation matrix for the remaining 49 items. Using a minimum residual method of extraction and oblimin rotation, we identified four meaningful factors explaining 42% of total variance: 1) Natural product-based practices (NP) comprising the use of products such as extracts and supplements of herbal and non-herbal origin; 2) Rituals/Customs (RC) which reflected the use of traditional medicine and religious practices, such as visiting monasteries; 3) New age medicine (NA) incorporating mind-body therapies and energy medicine practices; and 4) Alternative medical systems (AMS) such as acupuncture, homeopathy, quantum medicine, and osteopathy/chiropractic. Factor correlations ranged from r = .18, p <.001 for RC and AMS to r = .30, p < .001 for NA and AMS. The latent structure we obtained based on the pattern of TCAM use corresponds closely to existing conceptual typologies, as well as to those based on attitudes toward TCAM. This suggests that consumers are sensitive to common characteristics of certain TCAM treatments and are more likely to resort to similar types of TCAM practices to promote their health. The existence of relatively independent factors of TCAM use opens the possibility of differential patterns of their psychological predictors and health-related outcomes.
C3  - Book of abstracts - XXIX scientific conference Empirical Studies in Psychology
T1  - The latent structure of traditional, complementary, and alternative medicine practices based on patterns of use
EP  - 55
SP  - 54
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4925
ER  - 
@conference{
author = "Purić, Danka and Petrović, Marija and Teovanović, Predrag and Živanović, Marko and Ninković, Milica and Zupan, Zorana and Lazarević, Ljiljana B. and Stanković, Sanda and Lukić, Petar and Branković, Marija and Opačić, Goran and Lazić, Aleksandra and Žeželj, Iris",
year = "2023",
abstract = "Despite unknown efficiency, known risks, and associated adverse effects of certain traditional, complementary, and alternative medicine (TCAM) practices, the number of people using them appears to be on the rise. Existing taxonomies of TCAM practices mostly relied on either conceptual reasons, or they relied on attitudes toward TCAM, rather than its actual use. In this study, we sought to group TCAM practices based on their patterns of use. A sample of N = 583 (Mage = 39.01 years, SDage = 12.10; 74.4% females) participants residing in Serbia completed an online survey including a list of 71 TCAM practices. For each practice, they indicated if and when they used it to promote their own or their children's health (options: never heard about it/never used it/more than a year ago/in the past year/during the past two weeks). To evaluate the lifetime use of TCAM, we binarized all TCAM items to reflect whether participants have ever used a given practice (never using a practice was coded as 0, using it at least once as 1). After excluding items with frequencies below 5%, we performed an exploratory factor analysis on the tetrachoric correlation matrix for the remaining 49 items. Using a minimum residual method of extraction and oblimin rotation, we identified four meaningful factors explaining 42% of total variance: 1) Natural product-based practices (NP) comprising the use of products such as extracts and supplements of herbal and non-herbal origin; 2) Rituals/Customs (RC) which reflected the use of traditional medicine and religious practices, such as visiting monasteries; 3) New age medicine (NA) incorporating mind-body therapies and energy medicine practices; and 4) Alternative medical systems (AMS) such as acupuncture, homeopathy, quantum medicine, and osteopathy/chiropractic. Factor correlations ranged from r = .18, p <.001 for RC and AMS to r = .30, p < .001 for NA and AMS. The latent structure we obtained based on the pattern of TCAM use corresponds closely to existing conceptual typologies, as well as to those based on attitudes toward TCAM. This suggests that consumers are sensitive to common characteristics of certain TCAM treatments and are more likely to resort to similar types of TCAM practices to promote their health. The existence of relatively independent factors of TCAM use opens the possibility of differential patterns of their psychological predictors and health-related outcomes.",
journal = "Book of abstracts - XXIX scientific conference Empirical Studies in Psychology",
title = "The latent structure of traditional, complementary, and alternative medicine practices based on patterns of use",
pages = "55-54",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4925"
}
Purić, D., Petrović, M., Teovanović, P., Živanović, M., Ninković, M., Zupan, Z., Lazarević, L. B., Stanković, S., Lukić, P., Branković, M., Opačić, G., Lazić, A.,& Žeželj, I.. (2023). The latent structure of traditional, complementary, and alternative medicine practices based on patterns of use. in Book of abstracts - XXIX scientific conference Empirical Studies in Psychology, 54-55.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4925
Purić D, Petrović M, Teovanović P, Živanović M, Ninković M, Zupan Z, Lazarević LB, Stanković S, Lukić P, Branković M, Opačić G, Lazić A, Žeželj I. The latent structure of traditional, complementary, and alternative medicine practices based on patterns of use. in Book of abstracts - XXIX scientific conference Empirical Studies in Psychology. 2023;:54-55.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4925 .
Purić, Danka, Petrović, Marija, Teovanović, Predrag, Živanović, Marko, Ninković, Milica, Zupan, Zorana, Lazarević, Ljiljana B., Stanković, Sanda, Lukić, Petar, Branković, Marija, Opačić, Goran, Lazić, Aleksandra, Žeželj, Iris, "The latent structure of traditional, complementary, and alternative medicine practices based on patterns of use" in Book of abstracts - XXIX scientific conference Empirical Studies in Psychology (2023):54-55,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4925 .

Plausible or not plausible: How participants assess the experimental interventions as a result of motivated reasoning

Ninković, Milica; Žeželj, Iris Lav

(European Association of Social Psychology, 2023)

TY  - CONF
AU  - Ninković, Milica
AU  - Žeželj, Iris Lav
PY  - 2023
UR  - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/5880
AB  - In experimental research, we often prime participants with an idea about their ingroup (IG) or outgroup (OG): e.g., IG members accept/empathize with OG, or OG members are willing to share disputed territory/have an inclusive sense of victimhood. As a part of a manipulation check, we ask participants to assess plausibility of the given content; those who assessed it as implausible are excluded from the analyses. By the motivated reasoning account, participants’ prior beliefs should affect the success of priming: participants find the intervention less plausible if it goes against their initial attitudes. In two experiments, we explored how individual differences in IG identification, perceived OG threat, political orientation, and ethnocultural empathy affect the plausibility assessment of two dual identity interventions: a) exposing participants to a descriptive norm by  IG (majority accepts that minority identifies dually, both with ethnic and national group), or b) exposing them to an OG experience (minority members claim to identify dually). In study 1 (N = 184, university students), those who perceived OG as a threat assessed the intervention as less plausible, but only if it was framed from the OG perspective. We replicated this effect in study 2 (N = 329, general population). It shows that exclusion practices based on plausibility assessment lead us to omit the most prejudiced respondents from analyses, which impacts intervention effect size and its generalizability.
PB  - European Association of Social Psychology
C3  - Book of abstracts, 19th General Meeting of the European Association of Social Psychology, Krakow
T1  - Plausible or not plausible: How participants assess the experimental interventions as a result of motivated reasoning
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_5880
ER  - 
@conference{
author = "Ninković, Milica and Žeželj, Iris Lav",
year = "2023",
abstract = "In experimental research, we often prime participants with an idea about their ingroup (IG) or outgroup (OG): e.g., IG members accept/empathize with OG, or OG members are willing to share disputed territory/have an inclusive sense of victimhood. As a part of a manipulation check, we ask participants to assess plausibility of the given content; those who assessed it as implausible are excluded from the analyses. By the motivated reasoning account, participants’ prior beliefs should affect the success of priming: participants find the intervention less plausible if it goes against their initial attitudes. In two experiments, we explored how individual differences in IG identification, perceived OG threat, political orientation, and ethnocultural empathy affect the plausibility assessment of two dual identity interventions: a) exposing participants to a descriptive norm by  IG (majority accepts that minority identifies dually, both with ethnic and national group), or b) exposing them to an OG experience (minority members claim to identify dually). In study 1 (N = 184, university students), those who perceived OG as a threat assessed the intervention as less plausible, but only if it was framed from the OG perspective. We replicated this effect in study 2 (N = 329, general population). It shows that exclusion practices based on plausibility assessment lead us to omit the most prejudiced respondents from analyses, which impacts intervention effect size and its generalizability.",
publisher = "European Association of Social Psychology",
journal = "Book of abstracts, 19th General Meeting of the European Association of Social Psychology, Krakow",
title = "Plausible or not plausible: How participants assess the experimental interventions as a result of motivated reasoning",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_5880"
}
Ninković, M.,& Žeželj, I. L.. (2023). Plausible or not plausible: How participants assess the experimental interventions as a result of motivated reasoning. in Book of abstracts, 19th General Meeting of the European Association of Social Psychology, Krakow
European Association of Social Psychology..
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_5880
Ninković M, Žeželj IL. Plausible or not plausible: How participants assess the experimental interventions as a result of motivated reasoning. in Book of abstracts, 19th General Meeting of the European Association of Social Psychology, Krakow. 2023;.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_5880 .
Ninković, Milica, Žeželj, Iris Lav, "Plausible or not plausible: How participants assess the experimental interventions as a result of motivated reasoning" in Book of abstracts, 19th General Meeting of the European Association of Social Psychology, Krakow (2023),
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_5880 .

Who replaces conventional medicine with herbs and supplements? The role of irrational mindset

Ninković, Milica; Puhalo, Srđan; Petrović, Marija; Purić, Danka; Lukić, Petar; Žeželj, Iris Lav

(Odsjek za psihologiju Filozofskog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Zagrebu, 2023)

TY  - CONF
AU  - Ninković, Milica
AU  - Puhalo, Srđan
AU  - Petrović, Marija
AU  - Purić, Danka
AU  - Lukić, Petar
AU  - Žeželj, Iris Lav
PY  - 2023
UR  - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/5879
AB  - Traditional, complementary, and alternative medicine (TCAM) refers to healthcare practices that are not a part of conventional health systems. Their use can be subsumed into four domains: Alternative medical systems (e.g., homeopathy), New age practices (e.g., art therapy), Natural product-based practices (e.g., herbal balms), and Rituals/Customs (e.g., prayers for health). These practices can be used in three distinct ways: for preventive purposes, together with official medical practices, or as an alternative to them, with the latter being the most problematic. Psychological roots of the tendency to resort to these practices is repeatedly proved to be an “irrational mindset” (IM), a composite of irrational beliefs and cognitive biases. Here we explored whether IM (Superstition, Magical health beliefs, Conspiracy mentality, and Naturalness bias) can differentiate between different types of TCAM use. To this end, for each of the four domains participants indicated the way they typically use it. We recruited 470 participants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (Mage = 44.9, SDage = 10.2; 65 % women). Using Linear discriminant analysis (LDA), we explored the relation between ways of TCAM use and IM. Since only Natural product-based medicine had frequency of alternative use > 4 %, we ran LDA to explore how IM predicts the way of use for this TCAM domain. Discriminant function indicated that IM has a role in predicting the way people use natural product-based medicine (Wilk’s Λ = .96, χ2 (12) = 21.06, R = .20, p = .050), with Superstition and Naturalness bias as the crucial predictors. The obtained function best
differentiates the individuals who used natural product-based medicine as an alternative to the conventional treatments from the others. Our results show that people who tend to abandon official medical practices for TCAM are those prone to superstition and searching for naturalness. The official health communication could be tailored to specifically target these beliefs.
PB  - Odsjek za psihologiju Filozofskog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Zagrebu
C3  - Book of Abstracts, 26th Ramiro and Zoran Bujas Days
T1  - Who replaces conventional medicine with herbs and supplements? The role of irrational mindset
SP  - 102
DO  - 10.17234/DRZB26
ER  - 
@conference{
author = "Ninković, Milica and Puhalo, Srđan and Petrović, Marija and Purić, Danka and Lukić, Petar and Žeželj, Iris Lav",
year = "2023",
abstract = "Traditional, complementary, and alternative medicine (TCAM) refers to healthcare practices that are not a part of conventional health systems. Their use can be subsumed into four domains: Alternative medical systems (e.g., homeopathy), New age practices (e.g., art therapy), Natural product-based practices (e.g., herbal balms), and Rituals/Customs (e.g., prayers for health). These practices can be used in three distinct ways: for preventive purposes, together with official medical practices, or as an alternative to them, with the latter being the most problematic. Psychological roots of the tendency to resort to these practices is repeatedly proved to be an “irrational mindset” (IM), a composite of irrational beliefs and cognitive biases. Here we explored whether IM (Superstition, Magical health beliefs, Conspiracy mentality, and Naturalness bias) can differentiate between different types of TCAM use. To this end, for each of the four domains participants indicated the way they typically use it. We recruited 470 participants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (Mage = 44.9, SDage = 10.2; 65 % women). Using Linear discriminant analysis (LDA), we explored the relation between ways of TCAM use and IM. Since only Natural product-based medicine had frequency of alternative use > 4 %, we ran LDA to explore how IM predicts the way of use for this TCAM domain. Discriminant function indicated that IM has a role in predicting the way people use natural product-based medicine (Wilk’s Λ = .96, χ2 (12) = 21.06, R = .20, p = .050), with Superstition and Naturalness bias as the crucial predictors. The obtained function best
differentiates the individuals who used natural product-based medicine as an alternative to the conventional treatments from the others. Our results show that people who tend to abandon official medical practices for TCAM are those prone to superstition and searching for naturalness. The official health communication could be tailored to specifically target these beliefs.",
publisher = "Odsjek za psihologiju Filozofskog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Zagrebu",
journal = "Book of Abstracts, 26th Ramiro and Zoran Bujas Days",
title = "Who replaces conventional medicine with herbs and supplements? The role of irrational mindset",
pages = "102",
doi = "10.17234/DRZB26"
}
Ninković, M., Puhalo, S., Petrović, M., Purić, D., Lukić, P.,& Žeželj, I. L.. (2023). Who replaces conventional medicine with herbs and supplements? The role of irrational mindset. in Book of Abstracts, 26th Ramiro and Zoran Bujas Days
Odsjek za psihologiju Filozofskog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Zagrebu., 102.
https://doi.org/10.17234/DRZB26
Ninković M, Puhalo S, Petrović M, Purić D, Lukić P, Žeželj IL. Who replaces conventional medicine with herbs and supplements? The role of irrational mindset. in Book of Abstracts, 26th Ramiro and Zoran Bujas Days. 2023;:102.
doi:10.17234/DRZB26 .
Ninković, Milica, Puhalo, Srđan, Petrović, Marija, Purić, Danka, Lukić, Petar, Žeželj, Iris Lav, "Who replaces conventional medicine with herbs and supplements? The role of irrational mindset" in Book of Abstracts, 26th Ramiro and Zoran Bujas Days (2023):102,
https://doi.org/10.17234/DRZB26 . .

Some superstition, some magical health, but all natural: beliefs that makes us prone to traditional, complementary and alternative medicine practices

Petrović, Marija; Puhalo, Srđan; Ninković, Milica; Purić, Danka; Lukić, Petar; Žeželj, Iris Lav

(2023)

TY  - CONF
AU  - Petrović, Marija
AU  - Puhalo, Srđan
AU  - Ninković, Milica
AU  - Purić, Danka
AU  - Lukić, Petar
AU  - Žeželj, Iris Lav
PY  - 2023
UR  - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/5878
AB  - To preserve their health, people are increasingly resorting to traditional, complementary and alternative medicine (TCAM). While its appeal grows, it is still lacking a strong evidence base and can lead to adverse effects. In a previous study in Serbia, we developed a new instrument to measure the lifetime use of diverse TCAM practices (e.g., acupuncture, art therapy, herbal balms, prayer, etc.) and explored its psychological antecedents. The results showed that the pattern of use of TCAM practices can be classified into four domains: Alternative medical systems, Natural product-based practices, New age medicine, and Rituals/Customs. Moreover, an irrational mindset (IM; consisting of irrational beliefs and cognitive biases) contributed to the prediction of TCAM use, over and above socio-demographics, ideological beliefs, and self-reported health status. To conceptually replicate the results, we validated the measure in a novel setting (Bosnia and Herzegovina). Participants first reported their lifetime TCAM use (N = 580). Using CFA, we replicated a four-factor structure of TCAM domains (CFI = 0.94; TLI = 0.93; RMSEA = .03 (95 % CI .03-.04)). Next, for the participants who filled out all measures (N = 470, 65 % women; Mage = 44.9, SDage = 10.2), we explored whether IM variables (magical health beliefs, conspiracist thinking, superstition, and the naturalness bias) contributed to the prediction of TCAM use. As expected, after controlling for sociodemographics, ideological beliefs, and self-reported health 
status, IM significantly contributed to the prediction (ΔF (4,457) = 20.33, p < .001, ΔR2 = .127), with magical health beliefs, superstition, and naturalness bias contributing over and above other predictors. Magical health beliefs were the strongest predictor, alongside gender. We find that our
results largely replicate in a novel setting, offering further evidence of the importance of
including IM when considering the susceptibility to TCAM use.
C3  - Book of Abstracts, 26th Ramiro and Zoran Bujas Days
T1  - Some superstition, some magical health, but all natural: beliefs that makes us prone to traditional, complementary and alternative medicine practices
SP  - 109
DO  - 10.17234/DRZB26
ER  - 
@conference{
author = "Petrović, Marija and Puhalo, Srđan and Ninković, Milica and Purić, Danka and Lukić, Petar and Žeželj, Iris Lav",
year = "2023",
abstract = "To preserve their health, people are increasingly resorting to traditional, complementary and alternative medicine (TCAM). While its appeal grows, it is still lacking a strong evidence base and can lead to adverse effects. In a previous study in Serbia, we developed a new instrument to measure the lifetime use of diverse TCAM practices (e.g., acupuncture, art therapy, herbal balms, prayer, etc.) and explored its psychological antecedents. The results showed that the pattern of use of TCAM practices can be classified into four domains: Alternative medical systems, Natural product-based practices, New age medicine, and Rituals/Customs. Moreover, an irrational mindset (IM; consisting of irrational beliefs and cognitive biases) contributed to the prediction of TCAM use, over and above socio-demographics, ideological beliefs, and self-reported health status. To conceptually replicate the results, we validated the measure in a novel setting (Bosnia and Herzegovina). Participants first reported their lifetime TCAM use (N = 580). Using CFA, we replicated a four-factor structure of TCAM domains (CFI = 0.94; TLI = 0.93; RMSEA = .03 (95 % CI .03-.04)). Next, for the participants who filled out all measures (N = 470, 65 % women; Mage = 44.9, SDage = 10.2), we explored whether IM variables (magical health beliefs, conspiracist thinking, superstition, and the naturalness bias) contributed to the prediction of TCAM use. As expected, after controlling for sociodemographics, ideological beliefs, and self-reported health 
status, IM significantly contributed to the prediction (ΔF (4,457) = 20.33, p < .001, ΔR2 = .127), with magical health beliefs, superstition, and naturalness bias contributing over and above other predictors. Magical health beliefs were the strongest predictor, alongside gender. We find that our
results largely replicate in a novel setting, offering further evidence of the importance of
including IM when considering the susceptibility to TCAM use.",
journal = "Book of Abstracts, 26th Ramiro and Zoran Bujas Days",
title = "Some superstition, some magical health, but all natural: beliefs that makes us prone to traditional, complementary and alternative medicine practices",
pages = "109",
doi = "10.17234/DRZB26"
}
Petrović, M., Puhalo, S., Ninković, M., Purić, D., Lukić, P.,& Žeželj, I. L.. (2023). Some superstition, some magical health, but all natural: beliefs that makes us prone to traditional, complementary and alternative medicine practices. in Book of Abstracts, 26th Ramiro and Zoran Bujas Days, 109.
https://doi.org/10.17234/DRZB26
Petrović M, Puhalo S, Ninković M, Purić D, Lukić P, Žeželj IL. Some superstition, some magical health, but all natural: beliefs that makes us prone to traditional, complementary and alternative medicine practices. in Book of Abstracts, 26th Ramiro and Zoran Bujas Days. 2023;:109.
doi:10.17234/DRZB26 .
Petrović, Marija, Puhalo, Srđan, Ninković, Milica, Purić, Danka, Lukić, Petar, Žeželj, Iris Lav, "Some superstition, some magical health, but all natural: beliefs that makes us prone to traditional, complementary and alternative medicine practices" in Book of Abstracts, 26th Ramiro and Zoran Bujas Days (2023):109,
https://doi.org/10.17234/DRZB26 . .

How science gets politicized: The role of conspiratorial narratives in questioning science in general and dismissing contested scientific topics

Petrović, Marija; Lukić, Petar; Ninković, Milica; Žeželj, Iris Lav

(European Association for Social Psychology, 2023)

TY  - CONF
AU  - Petrović, Marija
AU  - Lukić, Petar
AU  - Ninković, Milica
AU  - Žeželj, Iris Lav
PY  - 2023
UR  - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/5883
AB  - While scientific knowledge should be inherently apolitical, ideological contestation of science and of certain scientific topics  is well-documented, however predominantly in the US. Trust in science is often eroded by conspiratorial narratives - be it general or targeted - resulting in less support for science-based policies. Across two studies with Serbian respondents, we explore how ideology and conspiratorial thinking predict attitudes towards science. In Study 1 (N=224), conspiracy mentality and belief in medical CTs predicted less trust in science, over and above right-wing ideology. In Study 2 (N=271), we sought to replicate this finding, but introduced social and economic conservatism, and attitudes towards contested science topics (climate change, biotechnology, GMO, and nuclear energy). Right-wing ideology, and social but not economic conservatism predicted general distrust in science; medical conspiracism, but not conspiracy mentality contributed over and above ideology. We observed a similar ideological pattern for prediction of specific science related attitudes; conspiratorial beliefs added to the prediction of attitudes towards climate change, GMO and nuclear energy, but not towards biotechnology. Despite some differences, it seems that conservative ideology, coupled with general conspiratorial tendencies and content-specific medical conspiratorial beliefs, hinder trust in science altogether, and, somewhat less, reflect in scientific controversies of the day.
PB  - European Association for Social Psychology
C3  - Belief in conspiracy theories: New insights and current challenges Preconference, 19th General Meeting of the European Association of Social Psychology, Krakow, Poland
T1  - How science gets politicized: The role of conspiratorial narratives in questioning science in general and dismissing contested scientific topics
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_5883
ER  - 
@conference{
author = "Petrović, Marija and Lukić, Petar and Ninković, Milica and Žeželj, Iris Lav",
year = "2023",
abstract = "While scientific knowledge should be inherently apolitical, ideological contestation of science and of certain scientific topics  is well-documented, however predominantly in the US. Trust in science is often eroded by conspiratorial narratives - be it general or targeted - resulting in less support for science-based policies. Across two studies with Serbian respondents, we explore how ideology and conspiratorial thinking predict attitudes towards science. In Study 1 (N=224), conspiracy mentality and belief in medical CTs predicted less trust in science, over and above right-wing ideology. In Study 2 (N=271), we sought to replicate this finding, but introduced social and economic conservatism, and attitudes towards contested science topics (climate change, biotechnology, GMO, and nuclear energy). Right-wing ideology, and social but not economic conservatism predicted general distrust in science; medical conspiracism, but not conspiracy mentality contributed over and above ideology. We observed a similar ideological pattern for prediction of specific science related attitudes; conspiratorial beliefs added to the prediction of attitudes towards climate change, GMO and nuclear energy, but not towards biotechnology. Despite some differences, it seems that conservative ideology, coupled with general conspiratorial tendencies and content-specific medical conspiratorial beliefs, hinder trust in science altogether, and, somewhat less, reflect in scientific controversies of the day.",
publisher = "European Association for Social Psychology",
journal = "Belief in conspiracy theories: New insights and current challenges Preconference, 19th General Meeting of the European Association of Social Psychology, Krakow, Poland",
title = "How science gets politicized: The role of conspiratorial narratives in questioning science in general and dismissing contested scientific topics",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_5883"
}
Petrović, M., Lukić, P., Ninković, M.,& Žeželj, I. L.. (2023). How science gets politicized: The role of conspiratorial narratives in questioning science in general and dismissing contested scientific topics. in Belief in conspiracy theories: New insights and current challenges Preconference, 19th General Meeting of the European Association of Social Psychology, Krakow, Poland
European Association for Social Psychology..
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_5883
Petrović M, Lukić P, Ninković M, Žeželj IL. How science gets politicized: The role of conspiratorial narratives in questioning science in general and dismissing contested scientific topics. in Belief in conspiracy theories: New insights and current challenges Preconference, 19th General Meeting of the European Association of Social Psychology, Krakow, Poland. 2023;.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_5883 .
Petrović, Marija, Lukić, Petar, Ninković, Milica, Žeželj, Iris Lav, "How science gets politicized: The role of conspiratorial narratives in questioning science in general and dismissing contested scientific topics" in Belief in conspiracy theories: New insights and current challenges Preconference, 19th General Meeting of the European Association of Social Psychology, Krakow, Poland (2023),
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_5883 .

From distrust in science to pseudoscience: Psychological roots of resorting to questionable health practices

Petrović, Marija; Ninković, Milica; Žeželj, Iris

(2023)

TY  - CONF
AU  - Petrović, Marija
AU  - Ninković, Milica
AU  - Žeželj, Iris
PY  - 2023
UR  - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/5629
AB  - In an effort to preserve their health, people may rely on official medical recommendations, or turn to non-evidence based, pseudoscientific practices (from unproven traditional herbal remedies to alternative medical systems like homeopathy). These pseudoscientific practices (PSP) may be particularly appealing to people with a "high entropy" mindset, i.e. more prone to endorsing irrational beliefs, such as conspiracy theories, superstition or mutually contradictory beliefs (i.e. doublethink). These irrational beliefs may further stem from the lack of trust in the official epistemic authorities, with science being the most prominent one. Drawing from a student sample (N=270), we tested path models in which distrust in science (both general and in specific domains) predicts the use of PSP through the endorsement of irrational beliefs. General distrust in science indirectly affected the use of PSP, through all three types of irrational beliefs. Lack of trust in science of genetically modified foods predicted the use of PSP both directly, and indirectly through all three types of irrational beliefs. Lack of trust in climate science, biotechnology and nuclear energy, on the other hand, did not contribute to the prediction, indicating cultural differences in the scientific content being disputed in the media. Interventions aiming to foster better health decisions should therefore aim to build general trust in science and to challenge specific irrational beliefs.
C3  - Book of abstracts, 19th General Meeting of the European Association of Social Psychology, Krakow, Poland
T1  - From distrust in science to pseudoscience: Psychological roots of resorting to questionable health practices
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_5629
ER  - 
@conference{
author = "Petrović, Marija and Ninković, Milica and Žeželj, Iris",
year = "2023",
abstract = "In an effort to preserve their health, people may rely on official medical recommendations, or turn to non-evidence based, pseudoscientific practices (from unproven traditional herbal remedies to alternative medical systems like homeopathy). These pseudoscientific practices (PSP) may be particularly appealing to people with a "high entropy" mindset, i.e. more prone to endorsing irrational beliefs, such as conspiracy theories, superstition or mutually contradictory beliefs (i.e. doublethink). These irrational beliefs may further stem from the lack of trust in the official epistemic authorities, with science being the most prominent one. Drawing from a student sample (N=270), we tested path models in which distrust in science (both general and in specific domains) predicts the use of PSP through the endorsement of irrational beliefs. General distrust in science indirectly affected the use of PSP, through all three types of irrational beliefs. Lack of trust in science of genetically modified foods predicted the use of PSP both directly, and indirectly through all three types of irrational beliefs. Lack of trust in climate science, biotechnology and nuclear energy, on the other hand, did not contribute to the prediction, indicating cultural differences in the scientific content being disputed in the media. Interventions aiming to foster better health decisions should therefore aim to build general trust in science and to challenge specific irrational beliefs.",
journal = "Book of abstracts, 19th General Meeting of the European Association of Social Psychology, Krakow, Poland",
title = "From distrust in science to pseudoscience: Psychological roots of resorting to questionable health practices",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_5629"
}
Petrović, M., Ninković, M.,& Žeželj, I.. (2023). From distrust in science to pseudoscience: Psychological roots of resorting to questionable health practices. in Book of abstracts, 19th General Meeting of the European Association of Social Psychology, Krakow, Poland.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_5629
Petrović M, Ninković M, Žeželj I. From distrust in science to pseudoscience: Psychological roots of resorting to questionable health practices. in Book of abstracts, 19th General Meeting of the European Association of Social Psychology, Krakow, Poland. 2023;.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_5629 .
Petrović, Marija, Ninković, Milica, Žeželj, Iris, "From distrust in science to pseudoscience: Psychological roots of resorting to questionable health practices" in Book of abstracts, 19th General Meeting of the European Association of Social Psychology, Krakow, Poland (2023),
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_5629 .

Irrational health choices: What drives people to not adhere to science-based recommendations and resort to alternatives

Petrović, Marija; Purić, Danka; Branković, Marija; Lukić, Petar; Ninković, Milica; Žeželj, Iris

(2023)

TY  - CONF
AU  - Petrović, Marija
AU  - Purić, Danka
AU  - Branković, Marija
AU  - Lukić, Petar
AU  - Ninković, Milica
AU  - Žeželj, Iris
PY  - 2023
UR  - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/5628
AB  - While some health practices are supported by science and recommended by authorities, for others scientific evidence-base might be lacking or is yet to be established. Both non-adhering to recommendations and resorting to non evidence-based practices (typically in the domain of traditional, complementary and alternative medicine (TCAM)) can be detrimental for health. We investigated psychological roots of two types of health practices, focusing on their relationship with an “irrational mindset”, an umbrella term comprising certain cognitive biases, belief in conspiracy theories, superstition and magical health beliefs. In a preregistered study (N = 583) we contrasted how an irrational mindset contributes to the prediction of both types of health practices, above other relevant factors, such as sociodemographics, ideological beliefs, health status or relation to the healthcare system. Although the two types of health practices were positively related, they could be traced to different predictors: non-adherence was primarily explained by negative experiences with the health system, whilst irrational mindset did not additionally contribute. In contrast, irrational mindset consistently added to the prediction of different types of TCAM use, with magical health beliefs being the strongest predictor. We highlight the importance of tailoring interventions to the type of health practices so they also target underlying irrational beliefs, on top of providing correct information.
C3  - Book of abstracts, 19th General Meeting of the European Association of Social Psychology, Krakow, Poland
T1  - Irrational health choices: What drives people to not adhere to science-based recommendations and resort to alternatives
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_5628
ER  - 
@conference{
author = "Petrović, Marija and Purić, Danka and Branković, Marija and Lukić, Petar and Ninković, Milica and Žeželj, Iris",
year = "2023",
abstract = "While some health practices are supported by science and recommended by authorities, for others scientific evidence-base might be lacking or is yet to be established. Both non-adhering to recommendations and resorting to non evidence-based practices (typically in the domain of traditional, complementary and alternative medicine (TCAM)) can be detrimental for health. We investigated psychological roots of two types of health practices, focusing on their relationship with an “irrational mindset”, an umbrella term comprising certain cognitive biases, belief in conspiracy theories, superstition and magical health beliefs. In a preregistered study (N = 583) we contrasted how an irrational mindset contributes to the prediction of both types of health practices, above other relevant factors, such as sociodemographics, ideological beliefs, health status or relation to the healthcare system. Although the two types of health practices were positively related, they could be traced to different predictors: non-adherence was primarily explained by negative experiences with the health system, whilst irrational mindset did not additionally contribute. In contrast, irrational mindset consistently added to the prediction of different types of TCAM use, with magical health beliefs being the strongest predictor. We highlight the importance of tailoring interventions to the type of health practices so they also target underlying irrational beliefs, on top of providing correct information.",
journal = "Book of abstracts, 19th General Meeting of the European Association of Social Psychology, Krakow, Poland",
title = "Irrational health choices: What drives people to not adhere to science-based recommendations and resort to alternatives",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_5628"
}
Petrović, M., Purić, D., Branković, M., Lukić, P., Ninković, M.,& Žeželj, I.. (2023). Irrational health choices: What drives people to not adhere to science-based recommendations and resort to alternatives. in Book of abstracts, 19th General Meeting of the European Association of Social Psychology, Krakow, Poland.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_5628
Petrović M, Purić D, Branković M, Lukić P, Ninković M, Žeželj I. Irrational health choices: What drives people to not adhere to science-based recommendations and resort to alternatives. in Book of abstracts, 19th General Meeting of the European Association of Social Psychology, Krakow, Poland. 2023;.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_5628 .
Petrović, Marija, Purić, Danka, Branković, Marija, Lukić, Petar, Ninković, Milica, Žeželj, Iris, "Irrational health choices: What drives people to not adhere to science-based recommendations and resort to alternatives" in Book of abstracts, 19th General Meeting of the European Association of Social Psychology, Krakow, Poland (2023),
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_5628 .

Psychological roots of ethnic identity delegitimization

Ninković, Milica; Žeželj, Iris

(Institut za psihologiju i Laboratorija za eksperimentalnu psihologiju, 2023)

TY  - CONF
AU  - Ninković, Milica
AU  - Žeželj, Iris
PY  - 2023
UR  - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/4632
AB  - Ethnic identity delegitimization (EIDL) is a tendency to deny the self-determination and
recognition rights to ethnic groups on the basis of the length of their existence. It is
conceptualized as a general tendency, i.e., as a belief unrelated to a particular group. This
tendency, however, predicted attitude towards specific ethnic outgroups over and above its
well-known predictors, such as ingroup identification, and political orientation. However, the
antecedents of EIDL are still understudied. Since EIDL is a general belief about ethnic identity,
it is reasonable to assume that it stems from trait-like ideological beliefs (e.g., Right-wing
authoritarianism [RWA] and Social dominance orientation, [SDO]), as well as from metaidentity beliefs, e.g., psychological essentialism and perceived possibility to hold complex
social identities. In this study, we recruited a total of 1370 participants from the Republic of
Srpska (65% women), aged 18-35 (M = 18.6, SD = 2.15), as a part of a larger project. They
completed short versions of the following scales, all measured 1-5: RWA (α = .76), SDO (α =
.57), essentialism (α = .70), identity complexity (α = .77), as well as four items from EIDL
scale that loaded on two relatively independent latent dimensions: delegitimization and
legitimization. For this purpose, we analyzed only the delegitimization dimension. We tested a
hierarchical linear regression model with EIDL as an outcome, ideological beliefs (RWA and
SDO) as predictors in the first step, and beliefs about identity (essentialism and identity
complexity) were in the second step. As expected, both ideological beliefs contributed
positively and explained 11% of EIDL (F(2,1367) = 88.40, p < .001). Similarly, both meta
identity beliefs contributed positively and added another 11% of the variance (F(2,1365) =
93.27, p < .001). All predictors significantly contributed to the model (ps < .001). Our results
show that the tendency to deny the existence of ethnic groups is rooted in more basic social
beliefs about the origin of the group membership, identity boundaries, as well as about the
power relations between the groups. Positioning EIDL in the nomological network of
sociopsychological constructs helps us understand its nature and uniqueness.
PB  - Institut za psihologiju i Laboratorija za eksperimentalnu psihologiju
C3  - Book of abstracts, XXIX Scientific Conference “Empirical Studies in Psychology”, Belgrade
T1  - Psychological roots of ethnic identity delegitimization
SP  - 83
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4632
ER  - 
@conference{
author = "Ninković, Milica and Žeželj, Iris",
year = "2023",
abstract = "Ethnic identity delegitimization (EIDL) is a tendency to deny the self-determination and
recognition rights to ethnic groups on the basis of the length of their existence. It is
conceptualized as a general tendency, i.e., as a belief unrelated to a particular group. This
tendency, however, predicted attitude towards specific ethnic outgroups over and above its
well-known predictors, such as ingroup identification, and political orientation. However, the
antecedents of EIDL are still understudied. Since EIDL is a general belief about ethnic identity,
it is reasonable to assume that it stems from trait-like ideological beliefs (e.g., Right-wing
authoritarianism [RWA] and Social dominance orientation, [SDO]), as well as from metaidentity beliefs, e.g., psychological essentialism and perceived possibility to hold complex
social identities. In this study, we recruited a total of 1370 participants from the Republic of
Srpska (65% women), aged 18-35 (M = 18.6, SD = 2.15), as a part of a larger project. They
completed short versions of the following scales, all measured 1-5: RWA (α = .76), SDO (α =
.57), essentialism (α = .70), identity complexity (α = .77), as well as four items from EIDL
scale that loaded on two relatively independent latent dimensions: delegitimization and
legitimization. For this purpose, we analyzed only the delegitimization dimension. We tested a
hierarchical linear regression model with EIDL as an outcome, ideological beliefs (RWA and
SDO) as predictors in the first step, and beliefs about identity (essentialism and identity
complexity) were in the second step. As expected, both ideological beliefs contributed
positively and explained 11% of EIDL (F(2,1367) = 88.40, p < .001). Similarly, both meta
identity beliefs contributed positively and added another 11% of the variance (F(2,1365) =
93.27, p < .001). All predictors significantly contributed to the model (ps < .001). Our results
show that the tendency to deny the existence of ethnic groups is rooted in more basic social
beliefs about the origin of the group membership, identity boundaries, as well as about the
power relations between the groups. Positioning EIDL in the nomological network of
sociopsychological constructs helps us understand its nature and uniqueness.",
publisher = "Institut za psihologiju i Laboratorija za eksperimentalnu psihologiju",
journal = "Book of abstracts, XXIX Scientific Conference “Empirical Studies in Psychology”, Belgrade",
title = "Psychological roots of ethnic identity delegitimization",
pages = "83",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4632"
}
Ninković, M.,& Žeželj, I.. (2023). Psychological roots of ethnic identity delegitimization. in Book of abstracts, XXIX Scientific Conference “Empirical Studies in Psychology”, Belgrade
Institut za psihologiju i Laboratorija za eksperimentalnu psihologiju., 83.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4632
Ninković M, Žeželj I. Psychological roots of ethnic identity delegitimization. in Book of abstracts, XXIX Scientific Conference “Empirical Studies in Psychology”, Belgrade. 2023;:83.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4632 .
Ninković, Milica, Žeželj, Iris, "Psychological roots of ethnic identity delegitimization" in Book of abstracts, XXIX Scientific Conference “Empirical Studies in Psychology”, Belgrade (2023):83,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4632 .

Crisis as Opportunity, Risk, or Turmoil: Qualitative Study of Youth Narratives About the COVID-19 Pandemic

Nikitović, Tijana; Vuletić, Teodora; Ignjatović, Natalija; Grujić, Kristina; Ninković, Milica G.; Krnjaić, Zora; Krstić, Ksenija

(2023)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Nikitović, Tijana
AU  - Vuletić, Teodora
AU  - Ignjatović, Natalija
AU  - Grujić, Kristina
AU  - Ninković, Milica G.
AU  - Krnjaić, Zora
AU  - Krstić, Ksenija
PY  - 2023
UR  - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/4586
AB  - Purpose
The present study employed a narrative approach in order to explore how young people constructed meanings regarding their sense of self in the context of COVID-19 experiences. Adolescents have been identified as a particularly vulnerable group, as the developmental challenges they face are superimposed and amplified by the accidental crisis caused by the pandemic.
Methods
An in-depth narrative analysis was conducted on written accounts of 13 females aged 17–23 years from Serbia. We selected these narratives from a larger sample of 70 responses (M = 20.1; SD = 2.9; 85.7% female) collected via an online form. We used reflexive thematic analysis as a tool for the selection process of the narratives subjected to in-depth narrative analysis.
Results
Young people told stories that differ significantly in coherence, affective tone, personal agency, and depth of self-exploration. Narrative analysis of the selected accounts identified three distinct types of stories: (1) crisis as an opportunity for personal growth, (2) crisis as a risk for the sense of self, and (3) crisis as inner turmoil.
Discussion
Narrative analysis enabled us to recognize three distinct processes of youth meaning-making related to the sense of self in times of crisis, all reflecting a significant impact on their core developmental task. Personal narratives served different functions; for some, the pandemic was framed as a challenge one could grow from, while others were left devastated or overwhelmed. Narrative coherence reflected youths' capacities for integrating experiences not necessarily connected to their psychological well-being.
Implications and Contribution
The insights from this study may be helpful to those offering support to youth by helping them understand the roles self-narratives play in shaping young people's sense of self in times of crisis. Narratives can be of great value for mitigating the adverse effects of the superimposed crisis during adolescence.
T2  - Journal of Adolescent Health
T1  - Crisis as Opportunity, Risk, or Turmoil: Qualitative Study of Youth Narratives About the COVID-19 Pandemic
DO  - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2023.05.017
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Nikitović, Tijana and Vuletić, Teodora and Ignjatović, Natalija and Grujić, Kristina and Ninković, Milica G. and Krnjaić, Zora and Krstić, Ksenija",
year = "2023",
abstract = "Purpose
The present study employed a narrative approach in order to explore how young people constructed meanings regarding their sense of self in the context of COVID-19 experiences. Adolescents have been identified as a particularly vulnerable group, as the developmental challenges they face are superimposed and amplified by the accidental crisis caused by the pandemic.
Methods
An in-depth narrative analysis was conducted on written accounts of 13 females aged 17–23 years from Serbia. We selected these narratives from a larger sample of 70 responses (M = 20.1; SD = 2.9; 85.7% female) collected via an online form. We used reflexive thematic analysis as a tool for the selection process of the narratives subjected to in-depth narrative analysis.
Results
Young people told stories that differ significantly in coherence, affective tone, personal agency, and depth of self-exploration. Narrative analysis of the selected accounts identified three distinct types of stories: (1) crisis as an opportunity for personal growth, (2) crisis as a risk for the sense of self, and (3) crisis as inner turmoil.
Discussion
Narrative analysis enabled us to recognize three distinct processes of youth meaning-making related to the sense of self in times of crisis, all reflecting a significant impact on their core developmental task. Personal narratives served different functions; for some, the pandemic was framed as a challenge one could grow from, while others were left devastated or overwhelmed. Narrative coherence reflected youths' capacities for integrating experiences not necessarily connected to their psychological well-being.
Implications and Contribution
The insights from this study may be helpful to those offering support to youth by helping them understand the roles self-narratives play in shaping young people's sense of self in times of crisis. Narratives can be of great value for mitigating the adverse effects of the superimposed crisis during adolescence.",
journal = "Journal of Adolescent Health",
title = "Crisis as Opportunity, Risk, or Turmoil: Qualitative Study of Youth Narratives About the COVID-19 Pandemic",
doi = "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2023.05.017"
}
Nikitović, T., Vuletić, T., Ignjatović, N., Grujić, K., Ninković, M. G., Krnjaić, Z.,& Krstić, K.. (2023). Crisis as Opportunity, Risk, or Turmoil: Qualitative Study of Youth Narratives About the COVID-19 Pandemic. in Journal of Adolescent Health.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2023.05.017
Nikitović T, Vuletić T, Ignjatović N, Grujić K, Ninković MG, Krnjaić Z, Krstić K. Crisis as Opportunity, Risk, or Turmoil: Qualitative Study of Youth Narratives About the COVID-19 Pandemic. in Journal of Adolescent Health. 2023;.
doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2023.05.017 .
Nikitović, Tijana, Vuletić, Teodora, Ignjatović, Natalija, Grujić, Kristina, Ninković, Milica G., Krnjaić, Zora, Krstić, Ksenija, "Crisis as Opportunity, Risk, or Turmoil: Qualitative Study of Youth Narratives About the COVID-19 Pandemic" in Journal of Adolescent Health (2023),
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2023.05.017 . .

Delegitimizacija etničkog identiteta: ideološki i metaidentitietski prediktori

Ninković, Milica; Žeželj, Iris

(Primaprom, Banjaluka, 2023)

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Ninković, Milica
AU  - Žeželj, Iris
PY  - 2023
UR  - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/4627
AB  - Uverenja zasnovana na istorijskim argumentima, koja su u funkciji odbrane statusa sopstvene grupe u međugrupnim odnosima, posebno su istraživački interesantna u kontekstu konflikata između grupa. Jedno od ovakvih uverenja, posebno prisutno na našim prostorima, jeste delegitimizacija etničkog identiteta – uverenje da neke etničke grupe zaslužuju status naroda u većoj meri od drugih, samo zbog toga što postoje duže. Prva istraživanja delegitimizacije etničkog identiteta ukazala su na njenu povezanost sa konzervativnim političkim stavovima, kao i na njen potencijal da predvidi stepen negativnosti stava prema drugim etničkim grupama. Međutim, do sada nije ispitano koje bazične psihološke osobine čine ljude podložnijim za zagovaranje ovakvog uverenja. U ovoj studiji ispitali smo u kojoj meri ideološka uverenja (orijentacija ka socijalnoj dominaciji i desničarska autoritarnost) i metaidentitetska uverenja (esencijalizam i kompleksnost etničkog identiteta) mogu objasniti individualne razlike u delegitimizaciji etničkog identiteta. Rezultati pokazuju da kako ideološka, tako i metaidentitetska uverenja, delimično stoje u osnovi delegitimizacije. Nalazi su pozicionirani u kontekstu postojećih istraživanja psiholoških konstrukata zasnovanih na istorijskim argumentima, diskutovana je njihova moguća zloupotreba u dnevno-političke svrhe, date su preporuke za buduća istraživanja o prirodi ovog konstrukta.
PB  - Primaprom, Banjaluka
T2  - Društvene identifikacije i međugrupne pristrasnosti mladih
T1  - Delegitimizacija etničkog identiteta: ideološki i metaidentitietski prediktori
EP  - 79
SP  - 68
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4627
ER  - 
@inbook{
author = "Ninković, Milica and Žeželj, Iris",
year = "2023",
abstract = "Uverenja zasnovana na istorijskim argumentima, koja su u funkciji odbrane statusa sopstvene grupe u međugrupnim odnosima, posebno su istraživački interesantna u kontekstu konflikata između grupa. Jedno od ovakvih uverenja, posebno prisutno na našim prostorima, jeste delegitimizacija etničkog identiteta – uverenje da neke etničke grupe zaslužuju status naroda u većoj meri od drugih, samo zbog toga što postoje duže. Prva istraživanja delegitimizacije etničkog identiteta ukazala su na njenu povezanost sa konzervativnim političkim stavovima, kao i na njen potencijal da predvidi stepen negativnosti stava prema drugim etničkim grupama. Međutim, do sada nije ispitano koje bazične psihološke osobine čine ljude podložnijim za zagovaranje ovakvog uverenja. U ovoj studiji ispitali smo u kojoj meri ideološka uverenja (orijentacija ka socijalnoj dominaciji i desničarska autoritarnost) i metaidentitetska uverenja (esencijalizam i kompleksnost etničkog identiteta) mogu objasniti individualne razlike u delegitimizaciji etničkog identiteta. Rezultati pokazuju da kako ideološka, tako i metaidentitetska uverenja, delimično stoje u osnovi delegitimizacije. Nalazi su pozicionirani u kontekstu postojećih istraživanja psiholoških konstrukata zasnovanih na istorijskim argumentima, diskutovana je njihova moguća zloupotreba u dnevno-političke svrhe, date su preporuke za buduća istraživanja o prirodi ovog konstrukta.",
publisher = "Primaprom, Banjaluka",
journal = "Društvene identifikacije i međugrupne pristrasnosti mladih",
booktitle = "Delegitimizacija etničkog identiteta: ideološki i metaidentitietski prediktori",
pages = "79-68",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4627"
}
Ninković, M.,& Žeželj, I.. (2023). Delegitimizacija etničkog identiteta: ideološki i metaidentitietski prediktori. in Društvene identifikacije i međugrupne pristrasnosti mladih
Primaprom, Banjaluka., 68-79.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4627
Ninković M, Žeželj I. Delegitimizacija etničkog identiteta: ideološki i metaidentitietski prediktori. in Društvene identifikacije i međugrupne pristrasnosti mladih. 2023;:68-79.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4627 .
Ninković, Milica, Žeželj, Iris, "Delegitimizacija etničkog identiteta: ideološki i metaidentitietski prediktori" in Društvene identifikacije i međugrupne pristrasnosti mladih (2023):68-79,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4627 .

“They are going to islamize us”: intergroup conspiracy beliefs shape discriminatory behavior against refugees and migrants through intergroup threat perceptions

Ninković, Milica; Živanović, Marko; Vukčević Marković, Maša

(Institut za psihologiju i Laboratorija za eksperimentalnu psihologiju, 2022)

TY  - CONF
AU  - Ninković, Milica
AU  - Živanović, Marko
AU  - Vukčević Marković, Maša
PY  - 2022
UR  - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/4634
AB  - The Intergroup threat theory (ITT) proposes that perception of an outgroup (OG) as threatening to
the ingroup (IG) leads to prejudice towards that OG. Prejudice can further result in discriminatory
behavior against the OG. Although conspiracy beliefs (CBs) are generally considered an outcome
of threat perception, some authors argue that CBs about a particular OG can serve as a generator
of intergroup threat rather than its consequence. Thus, we examined how CBs about refugees and
migrants shape behavior. More precisely, we tested the hypothesis that such CBs elicit perception
of this OG as a threat to the IG that in turn results in higher discrimination intentions. The sample
consisted of 798 participants (48% men; age 18-87 [M = 49.3, SD = 16.8]). We constructed four
intergroup CBs items (5-point Likert scale, α = .82) based on the narrative that was salient in
Serbian media at the time of data collection. Participants also filled in the following scales (5-
point Likert): intergroup threat perception scale that captures symbolic (two items, α = .81) and
realistic threats (three items, α = .82), as well as a scale that captures discrimination intentions
against refugees (three items, α = .77). We also registered and statistically controlled for
participants’ religiosity and ethnic identification (both single-item, 7-point scale), and frequency
of OG contact (positive and negative, four items). Since only 31% of participants reported having
any contact with the outgroup, we computed two binary variables that indicated presence or
absence of (a) positive and (b) negative outgroup contact. To test our hypothesis, we built a
structural equation model (SEM) with Intergroup CBs as a predictor and discrimination
intentions as an outcome. Perceptions of symbolic and realistic threat served as mediators. The
model proved to fit the data well (x2 (58) = 342.63, p < .001, CFI = .936, TLI = .906, RMSEA =
.078, SRMR = .085). The intergroup CBs predicted discrimination intentions both directly (β =
.21, p = .034) and indirectly through the perception of refugees as a realistic threat (β = .28, p <
.001). On the contrary, the indirect effect through symbolic threat perception was not significant
(β = .19, p = .173). Our results confirm that CBs about a particular OG can make fertile ground
for the perceptions of that OG as a threat to the IG, and this threat can further act as a booster of
the intention to discriminate against the same OG. This pattern of the effects indicates that
intergroup CBs should be experimentally examined as a generator of the intergroup threat,
although they are traditionally seen as its outcome. It also points out the adverse outcomes that
conspiratorial narratives in media can have on people’s behavioral intentions.
PB  - Institut za psihologiju i Laboratorija za eksperimentalnu psihologiju
C3  - Book of abstracts, XXVIII Scientific Conference “Empirical Studies in Psychology”, Belgrade
T1  - “They are going to islamize us”: intergroup conspiracy beliefs shape discriminatory behavior against refugees and migrants through intergroup threat perceptions
SP  - 131
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4634
ER  - 
@conference{
author = "Ninković, Milica and Živanović, Marko and Vukčević Marković, Maša",
year = "2022",
abstract = "The Intergroup threat theory (ITT) proposes that perception of an outgroup (OG) as threatening to
the ingroup (IG) leads to prejudice towards that OG. Prejudice can further result in discriminatory
behavior against the OG. Although conspiracy beliefs (CBs) are generally considered an outcome
of threat perception, some authors argue that CBs about a particular OG can serve as a generator
of intergroup threat rather than its consequence. Thus, we examined how CBs about refugees and
migrants shape behavior. More precisely, we tested the hypothesis that such CBs elicit perception
of this OG as a threat to the IG that in turn results in higher discrimination intentions. The sample
consisted of 798 participants (48% men; age 18-87 [M = 49.3, SD = 16.8]). We constructed four
intergroup CBs items (5-point Likert scale, α = .82) based on the narrative that was salient in
Serbian media at the time of data collection. Participants also filled in the following scales (5-
point Likert): intergroup threat perception scale that captures symbolic (two items, α = .81) and
realistic threats (three items, α = .82), as well as a scale that captures discrimination intentions
against refugees (three items, α = .77). We also registered and statistically controlled for
participants’ religiosity and ethnic identification (both single-item, 7-point scale), and frequency
of OG contact (positive and negative, four items). Since only 31% of participants reported having
any contact with the outgroup, we computed two binary variables that indicated presence or
absence of (a) positive and (b) negative outgroup contact. To test our hypothesis, we built a
structural equation model (SEM) with Intergroup CBs as a predictor and discrimination
intentions as an outcome. Perceptions of symbolic and realistic threat served as mediators. The
model proved to fit the data well (x2 (58) = 342.63, p < .001, CFI = .936, TLI = .906, RMSEA =
.078, SRMR = .085). The intergroup CBs predicted discrimination intentions both directly (β =
.21, p = .034) and indirectly through the perception of refugees as a realistic threat (β = .28, p <
.001). On the contrary, the indirect effect through symbolic threat perception was not significant
(β = .19, p = .173). Our results confirm that CBs about a particular OG can make fertile ground
for the perceptions of that OG as a threat to the IG, and this threat can further act as a booster of
the intention to discriminate against the same OG. This pattern of the effects indicates that
intergroup CBs should be experimentally examined as a generator of the intergroup threat,
although they are traditionally seen as its outcome. It also points out the adverse outcomes that
conspiratorial narratives in media can have on people’s behavioral intentions.",
publisher = "Institut za psihologiju i Laboratorija za eksperimentalnu psihologiju",
journal = "Book of abstracts, XXVIII Scientific Conference “Empirical Studies in Psychology”, Belgrade",
title = "“They are going to islamize us”: intergroup conspiracy beliefs shape discriminatory behavior against refugees and migrants through intergroup threat perceptions",
pages = "131",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4634"
}
Ninković, M., Živanović, M.,& Vukčević Marković, M.. (2022). “They are going to islamize us”: intergroup conspiracy beliefs shape discriminatory behavior against refugees and migrants through intergroup threat perceptions. in Book of abstracts, XXVIII Scientific Conference “Empirical Studies in Psychology”, Belgrade
Institut za psihologiju i Laboratorija za eksperimentalnu psihologiju., 131.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4634
Ninković M, Živanović M, Vukčević Marković M. “They are going to islamize us”: intergroup conspiracy beliefs shape discriminatory behavior against refugees and migrants through intergroup threat perceptions. in Book of abstracts, XXVIII Scientific Conference “Empirical Studies in Psychology”, Belgrade. 2022;:131.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4634 .
Ninković, Milica, Živanović, Marko, Vukčević Marković, Maša, "“They are going to islamize us”: intergroup conspiracy beliefs shape discriminatory behavior against refugees and migrants through intergroup threat perceptions" in Book of abstracts, XXVIII Scientific Conference “Empirical Studies in Psychology”, Belgrade (2022):131,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4634 .

The self in youth narratives: personal lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic

Nikitović, Tijana; Ninković, Milica G.; Krstić, Ksenija

(European Association for Research on Adolescence, 2022)

TY  - CONF
AU  - Nikitović, Tijana
AU  - Ninković, Milica G.
AU  - Krstić, Ksenija
PY  - 2022
UR  - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/4989
AB  - Adolescence and emerging adulthood are recognized as transitional periods in which exploration and development of the self take place. Times of crises, such as the current COVID-19 pandemic, bring about additional challenges for this primary psychosocial task. Everyday lives of young people have been radically
altered by the current pandemic, from schools and universities closing, to social distancing measures that affected their social lives in particular.
The aim of our study was to give youth a voice in order to understand the impact of the COVID‐19 pandemic on their lives, and particularly, their sense of self. In line with our aim, we asked participants to write their own accounts of the pandemic and the consequences it had on their lives in the form of narratives.
We collected written narratives from 70 young people from Serbia aged 14-26 (Mage = 20.1; Sd = 2.9, 85.7% female) via an online form. Thematic analysis was used in order to analyse the qualitative data. In total, 86 coded segments from 46 youth narratives refer to the view of one’s self. Thematic analysis revealed several major themes that refer to (1) the pandemic as an opportunity for personal growth; (2) changes in perspective on life brought about by the pandemic; (3) (in)essentiality of others for one’s sense of self; (4) adverse effect of the pandemic on one’s sense of self and (5) irrelevance of the pandemic for one’s sense of self.
The results reveal the varied effects of pandemic on youth’s sense of self, shaking its foundations for some, while leaving others impervious. Some young people choose to highlight the positive impact of the pandemic, helping them mature and take on more personal responsibilities and become “the best versions of themselves”. It also brought insights about the “importance of appreciating the little things in life”, as well as teaching them that there are things that are out of their control and that they cannot constantly live in fear. The importance of
others in developing one’s sense of self is highlighted as well. For some young people, the pandemic emphasised human’s social nature, while it allowed others to focus on their individual strengths and revealed their ability to thrive in solitude. Finally, for some the pandemic was an opportunity to identify the truly
important people in their lives. The negative effects of the pandemic on one’s sense of self mainly involve growing pessimism, as well as a sense of low self-efficacy and confidence. Lastly, some point out that while the pandemic had an impact on society or their way of life, it only affirmed their sense of self. 
The pandemic posed youth with the challenge of developing a stable sense of self in an unstable world. These findings helped us gain a better understanding of the ways in which young people can reshape their sense of self in times of crisis.
PB  - European Association for Research on Adolescence
C3  - Presentation at 18th Biennial Conference of the European Association for Research on Adolescence
T1  - The self in youth narratives: personal lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4989
ER  - 
@conference{
author = "Nikitović, Tijana and Ninković, Milica G. and Krstić, Ksenija",
year = "2022",
abstract = "Adolescence and emerging adulthood are recognized as transitional periods in which exploration and development of the self take place. Times of crises, such as the current COVID-19 pandemic, bring about additional challenges for this primary psychosocial task. Everyday lives of young people have been radically
altered by the current pandemic, from schools and universities closing, to social distancing measures that affected their social lives in particular.
The aim of our study was to give youth a voice in order to understand the impact of the COVID‐19 pandemic on their lives, and particularly, their sense of self. In line with our aim, we asked participants to write their own accounts of the pandemic and the consequences it had on their lives in the form of narratives.
We collected written narratives from 70 young people from Serbia aged 14-26 (Mage = 20.1; Sd = 2.9, 85.7% female) via an online form. Thematic analysis was used in order to analyse the qualitative data. In total, 86 coded segments from 46 youth narratives refer to the view of one’s self. Thematic analysis revealed several major themes that refer to (1) the pandemic as an opportunity for personal growth; (2) changes in perspective on life brought about by the pandemic; (3) (in)essentiality of others for one’s sense of self; (4) adverse effect of the pandemic on one’s sense of self and (5) irrelevance of the pandemic for one’s sense of self.
The results reveal the varied effects of pandemic on youth’s sense of self, shaking its foundations for some, while leaving others impervious. Some young people choose to highlight the positive impact of the pandemic, helping them mature and take on more personal responsibilities and become “the best versions of themselves”. It also brought insights about the “importance of appreciating the little things in life”, as well as teaching them that there are things that are out of their control and that they cannot constantly live in fear. The importance of
others in developing one’s sense of self is highlighted as well. For some young people, the pandemic emphasised human’s social nature, while it allowed others to focus on their individual strengths and revealed their ability to thrive in solitude. Finally, for some the pandemic was an opportunity to identify the truly
important people in their lives. The negative effects of the pandemic on one’s sense of self mainly involve growing pessimism, as well as a sense of low self-efficacy and confidence. Lastly, some point out that while the pandemic had an impact on society or their way of life, it only affirmed their sense of self. 
The pandemic posed youth with the challenge of developing a stable sense of self in an unstable world. These findings helped us gain a better understanding of the ways in which young people can reshape their sense of self in times of crisis.",
publisher = "European Association for Research on Adolescence",
journal = "Presentation at 18th Biennial Conference of the European Association for Research on Adolescence",
title = "The self in youth narratives: personal lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4989"
}
Nikitović, T., Ninković, M. G.,& Krstić, K.. (2022). The self in youth narratives: personal lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic. in Presentation at 18th Biennial Conference of the European Association for Research on Adolescence
European Association for Research on Adolescence..
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4989
Nikitović T, Ninković MG, Krstić K. The self in youth narratives: personal lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic. in Presentation at 18th Biennial Conference of the European Association for Research on Adolescence. 2022;.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4989 .
Nikitović, Tijana, Ninković, Milica G., Krstić, Ksenija, "The self in youth narratives: personal lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic" in Presentation at 18th Biennial Conference of the European Association for Research on Adolescence (2022),
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4989 .

"We Just Wanted to Go Out, Have a Drink, Meet Everyone, Hug..." - Youth Narratives About Life During the Pandemic

Krstić, Ksenija; Nikitović, Tijana; Ninković, Milica G.

(Institute of Psychology, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Belgrade, 2022)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Krstić, Ksenija
AU  - Nikitović, Tijana
AU  - Ninković, Milica G.
PY  - 2022
UR  - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/4988
AB  - The outbreak of the Covid-19 pandemic at the beginning of 2020 brought great changes in the daily lives of people of all ages. The initial empirical research conducted during the pandemic in many countries indicated an increased tendency of young people to develop psychological problems. This research aimed to shed additional light on young people's perspectives on the crisis and give them the opportunity to share their experiences of the pandemic. Through online form we collected 70 written narratives of adolescents and young people aged 14-26 (Mage = 20.1; SD = 2.9; 85.7% female). Collected narratives differed in length, coherence, valence, and content, which reflected young people's complex and diverse experiences during this pandemic crisis. In total, 755 segments were coded. Thematic analysis revealed eight major themes, with several subthemes within each. These major themes referred to 1) Sense of self, 2) Coping strategies, 3) Positive experiences, 4) Negative experiences, 5) Negative mental states, 6) Fears & anxieties, 7) Nostalgia & longing, and 8) Public attitudes. These findings can help us to "hear their voice" and gain a better understanding of adolescents’ perspectives and experiences during the pandemic.
PB  - Institute of Psychology, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Belgrade
PB  - Laboratory for Experimental Psychology, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Belgrade
T2  - Proceedings of the XXVIII Scientific Conference: Empirical Studies in Psycholog
T1  - "We Just Wanted to Go Out, Have a Drink, Meet Everyone, Hug..."  - Youth Narratives About Life During the Pandemic
EP  - 91
SP  - 88
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4988
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Krstić, Ksenija and Nikitović, Tijana and Ninković, Milica G.",
year = "2022",
abstract = "The outbreak of the Covid-19 pandemic at the beginning of 2020 brought great changes in the daily lives of people of all ages. The initial empirical research conducted during the pandemic in many countries indicated an increased tendency of young people to develop psychological problems. This research aimed to shed additional light on young people's perspectives on the crisis and give them the opportunity to share their experiences of the pandemic. Through online form we collected 70 written narratives of adolescents and young people aged 14-26 (Mage = 20.1; SD = 2.9; 85.7% female). Collected narratives differed in length, coherence, valence, and content, which reflected young people's complex and diverse experiences during this pandemic crisis. In total, 755 segments were coded. Thematic analysis revealed eight major themes, with several subthemes within each. These major themes referred to 1) Sense of self, 2) Coping strategies, 3) Positive experiences, 4) Negative experiences, 5) Negative mental states, 6) Fears & anxieties, 7) Nostalgia & longing, and 8) Public attitudes. These findings can help us to "hear their voice" and gain a better understanding of adolescents’ perspectives and experiences during the pandemic.",
publisher = "Institute of Psychology, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Belgrade, Laboratory for Experimental Psychology, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Belgrade",
journal = "Proceedings of the XXVIII Scientific Conference: Empirical Studies in Psycholog",
title = ""We Just Wanted to Go Out, Have a Drink, Meet Everyone, Hug..."  - Youth Narratives About Life During the Pandemic",
pages = "91-88",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4988"
}
Krstić, K., Nikitović, T.,& Ninković, M. G.. (2022). "We Just Wanted to Go Out, Have a Drink, Meet Everyone, Hug..."  - Youth Narratives About Life During the Pandemic. in Proceedings of the XXVIII Scientific Conference: Empirical Studies in Psycholog
Institute of Psychology, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Belgrade., 88-91.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4988
Krstić K, Nikitović T, Ninković MG. "We Just Wanted to Go Out, Have a Drink, Meet Everyone, Hug..."  - Youth Narratives About Life During the Pandemic. in Proceedings of the XXVIII Scientific Conference: Empirical Studies in Psycholog. 2022;:88-91.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4988 .
Krstić, Ksenija, Nikitović, Tijana, Ninković, Milica G., ""We Just Wanted to Go Out, Have a Drink, Meet Everyone, Hug..."  - Youth Narratives About Life During the Pandemic" in Proceedings of the XXVIII Scientific Conference: Empirical Studies in Psycholog (2022):88-91,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4988 .

REASON4HEALTH: Methodology

Zupan, Zorana; Žeželj, Iris; Knežević, Goran; Opačić, Goran; Lazarević, Ljiljana B.; Purić, Danka; Branković, Marija; Teovanović, Predrag; Živanović, Marko; Stanković, Sanda; Lazić, Aleksandra; Lukić, Petar; Ninković, Milica; Petrović, Marija

(2022)

TY  - CONF
AU  - Zupan, Zorana
AU  - Žeželj, Iris
AU  - Knežević, Goran
AU  - Opačić, Goran
AU  - Lazarević, Ljiljana B.
AU  - Purić, Danka
AU  - Branković, Marija
AU  - Teovanović, Predrag
AU  - Živanović, Marko
AU  - Stanković, Sanda
AU  - Lazić, Aleksandra
AU  - Lukić, Petar
AU  - Ninković, Milica
AU  - Petrović, Marija
PY  - 2022
UR  - http://empirijskaistrazivanja.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/KNJIGA-REZIMEA-2022_FIN-sa-isbn_bez_linija-1.pdf
UR  - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/4930
AB  - The main project methodology is planned in five stages that inform one another and cross-validate data from multiple methods. These include: (1) A study documenting online media coverage of TM/CAM practices in Serbia. This study will use a qualitative methodology, and conduct a content analysis of news stories from the five most popular news websites in Serbia, focusing on identifying the types of reported practices and content of the advice (e.g., whether risks are addressed) (2) Development of instruments for assessing familiarity and frequency of two types of health behaviors: engagement with different TM/CAM practices, as well as the frequency of NAR. Instrument development will be based on the results of the qualitative study, literature review, input from medical and CAM practitioners. The instrument will be piloted on a convenience sample (3) A study tracking the prevalence and the pattern of TM/CAM usage and NAR during 3 weeks on a community sample. This study will consist of a development of a mobile app and battery for experience sampling of TM/CAM and NAR behaviors over 21 days and their relations with personality and cognitive styles in a community sample (4) Examining the relations between these two types of health behaviors on a general population. This study will explore the relations between TM/CAM, NAR, personality, and cognitive styles on a representative sample in Serbia. (5) Developing interventions aimed at reducing TM/CAM use and NAR through changing the irrational mindset. This study will be experimental and will examine how inducing or reducing irrational beliefs affects health behaviors, and if certain personality traits and/or thinking styles moderate the outcome of these interventions.
C3  - Book of abstracts - XXVIII scientific conference Empirical Studies in Psychology
T1  - REASON4HEALTH: Methodology
SP  - 27
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4930
ER  - 
@conference{
author = "Zupan, Zorana and Žeželj, Iris and Knežević, Goran and Opačić, Goran and Lazarević, Ljiljana B. and Purić, Danka and Branković, Marija and Teovanović, Predrag and Živanović, Marko and Stanković, Sanda and Lazić, Aleksandra and Lukić, Petar and Ninković, Milica and Petrović, Marija",
year = "2022",
abstract = "The main project methodology is planned in five stages that inform one another and cross-validate data from multiple methods. These include: (1) A study documenting online media coverage of TM/CAM practices in Serbia. This study will use a qualitative methodology, and conduct a content analysis of news stories from the five most popular news websites in Serbia, focusing on identifying the types of reported practices and content of the advice (e.g., whether risks are addressed) (2) Development of instruments for assessing familiarity and frequency of two types of health behaviors: engagement with different TM/CAM practices, as well as the frequency of NAR. Instrument development will be based on the results of the qualitative study, literature review, input from medical and CAM practitioners. The instrument will be piloted on a convenience sample (3) A study tracking the prevalence and the pattern of TM/CAM usage and NAR during 3 weeks on a community sample. This study will consist of a development of a mobile app and battery for experience sampling of TM/CAM and NAR behaviors over 21 days and their relations with personality and cognitive styles in a community sample (4) Examining the relations between these two types of health behaviors on a general population. This study will explore the relations between TM/CAM, NAR, personality, and cognitive styles on a representative sample in Serbia. (5) Developing interventions aimed at reducing TM/CAM use and NAR through changing the irrational mindset. This study will be experimental and will examine how inducing or reducing irrational beliefs affects health behaviors, and if certain personality traits and/or thinking styles moderate the outcome of these interventions.",
journal = "Book of abstracts - XXVIII scientific conference Empirical Studies in Psychology",
title = "REASON4HEALTH: Methodology",
pages = "27",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4930"
}
Zupan, Z., Žeželj, I., Knežević, G., Opačić, G., Lazarević, L. B., Purić, D., Branković, M., Teovanović, P., Živanović, M., Stanković, S., Lazić, A., Lukić, P., Ninković, M.,& Petrović, M.. (2022). REASON4HEALTH: Methodology. in Book of abstracts - XXVIII scientific conference Empirical Studies in Psychology, 27.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4930
Zupan Z, Žeželj I, Knežević G, Opačić G, Lazarević LB, Purić D, Branković M, Teovanović P, Živanović M, Stanković S, Lazić A, Lukić P, Ninković M, Petrović M. REASON4HEALTH: Methodology. in Book of abstracts - XXVIII scientific conference Empirical Studies in Psychology. 2022;:27.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4930 .
Zupan, Zorana, Žeželj, Iris, Knežević, Goran, Opačić, Goran, Lazarević, Ljiljana B., Purić, Danka, Branković, Marija, Teovanović, Predrag, Živanović, Marko, Stanković, Sanda, Lazić, Aleksandra, Lukić, Petar, Ninković, Milica, Petrović, Marija, "REASON4HEALTH: Methodology" in Book of abstracts - XXVIII scientific conference Empirical Studies in Psychology (2022):27,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4930 .

REASON4HEALTH: Rationale and impact

Žeželj, Iris; Knežević, Goran; Opačić, Goran; Lazarević, Ljiljana B.; Purić, Danka; Branković, Marija; Zupan, Zorana; Teovanović, Predrag; Živanović, Marko; Stanković, Sanda; Lazić, Aleksandra; Lukić, Petar; Ninković, Milica; Petrović, Marija

(2022)

TY  - CONF
AU  - Žeželj, Iris
AU  - Knežević, Goran
AU  - Opačić, Goran
AU  - Lazarević, Ljiljana B.
AU  - Purić, Danka
AU  - Branković, Marija
AU  - Zupan, Zorana
AU  - Teovanović, Predrag
AU  - Živanović, Marko
AU  - Stanković, Sanda
AU  - Lazić, Aleksandra
AU  - Lukić, Petar
AU  - Ninković, Milica
AU  - Petrović, Marija
PY  - 2022
UR  - http://empirijskaistrazivanja.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/KNJIGA-REZIMEA-2022_FIN-sa-isbn_bez_linija-1.pdf
UR  - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/4929
AB  - Non-adherence to medical recommendations (NAR) leads to increasing mortality/disease rates and raises the costs of treatments, thus it is a burden on the healthcare system. Typically viewed as harmless, the use of traditional/complementary/alternative medicine (TM/CAM) can lead to adverse health events, but also to avoidance of official treatment or undesirable interaction with it. Thus, there is an increasing call in the medical community to promote evidence-based use of TM/CAM and adherence to official advice; understanding why consumers opt for questionable health practices can contribute to this call. We put forward a comprehensive program to study the psychological roots of these two broad categories of questionable health practices. The program offers a framework for concepts from cognitive, personality, social, and health psychology. We propose that an irrational mindset (a system of irrational thinking and beliefs), rooted in basic psychological dispositions (personality, thinking styles) makes certain consumers susceptible to NAR and TM/CAM practices. We plan to: a. explore the media environment the consumers are exposed to (e.g. predatory practices in advertising TM/CAM), b. identify the large spectrum of NAR and TM/CAM typical for the local cultural context, c. test whether irrational beliefs of very different content really form a mindset (how they are interrelated), d. measure the prevalence of NAR and TM/CAM and relate them to irrational mindset and further to personality traits, and e. test whether the TM/CAM proneness can be affected by manipulating irrational beliefs. The results will be useful to stakeholders in different ways: information on the prevalence of TM/CAM and NAR in Serbia is useful by itself, but identifying their underlying psychological mechanisms will help in understanding the most vulnerable portions of the population. In addition, we will provide useful input for designing interventions that will support consumers in making rational health decisions.
C3  - Book of abstracts - XXVIII scientific conference Empirical Studies in Psychology
T1  - REASON4HEALTH: Rationale and impact
SP  - 26
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4929
ER  - 
@conference{
author = "Žeželj, Iris and Knežević, Goran and Opačić, Goran and Lazarević, Ljiljana B. and Purić, Danka and Branković, Marija and Zupan, Zorana and Teovanović, Predrag and Živanović, Marko and Stanković, Sanda and Lazić, Aleksandra and Lukić, Petar and Ninković, Milica and Petrović, Marija",
year = "2022",
abstract = "Non-adherence to medical recommendations (NAR) leads to increasing mortality/disease rates and raises the costs of treatments, thus it is a burden on the healthcare system. Typically viewed as harmless, the use of traditional/complementary/alternative medicine (TM/CAM) can lead to adverse health events, but also to avoidance of official treatment or undesirable interaction with it. Thus, there is an increasing call in the medical community to promote evidence-based use of TM/CAM and adherence to official advice; understanding why consumers opt for questionable health practices can contribute to this call. We put forward a comprehensive program to study the psychological roots of these two broad categories of questionable health practices. The program offers a framework for concepts from cognitive, personality, social, and health psychology. We propose that an irrational mindset (a system of irrational thinking and beliefs), rooted in basic psychological dispositions (personality, thinking styles) makes certain consumers susceptible to NAR and TM/CAM practices. We plan to: a. explore the media environment the consumers are exposed to (e.g. predatory practices in advertising TM/CAM), b. identify the large spectrum of NAR and TM/CAM typical for the local cultural context, c. test whether irrational beliefs of very different content really form a mindset (how they are interrelated), d. measure the prevalence of NAR and TM/CAM and relate them to irrational mindset and further to personality traits, and e. test whether the TM/CAM proneness can be affected by manipulating irrational beliefs. The results will be useful to stakeholders in different ways: information on the prevalence of TM/CAM and NAR in Serbia is useful by itself, but identifying their underlying psychological mechanisms will help in understanding the most vulnerable portions of the population. In addition, we will provide useful input for designing interventions that will support consumers in making rational health decisions.",
journal = "Book of abstracts - XXVIII scientific conference Empirical Studies in Psychology",
title = "REASON4HEALTH: Rationale and impact",
pages = "26",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4929"
}
Žeželj, I., Knežević, G., Opačić, G., Lazarević, L. B., Purić, D., Branković, M., Zupan, Z., Teovanović, P., Živanović, M., Stanković, S., Lazić, A., Lukić, P., Ninković, M.,& Petrović, M.. (2022). REASON4HEALTH: Rationale and impact. in Book of abstracts - XXVIII scientific conference Empirical Studies in Psychology, 26.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4929
Žeželj I, Knežević G, Opačić G, Lazarević LB, Purić D, Branković M, Zupan Z, Teovanović P, Živanović M, Stanković S, Lazić A, Lukić P, Ninković M, Petrović M. REASON4HEALTH: Rationale and impact. in Book of abstracts - XXVIII scientific conference Empirical Studies in Psychology. 2022;:26.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4929 .
Žeželj, Iris, Knežević, Goran, Opačić, Goran, Lazarević, Ljiljana B., Purić, Danka, Branković, Marija, Zupan, Zorana, Teovanović, Predrag, Živanović, Marko, Stanković, Sanda, Lazić, Aleksandra, Lukić, Petar, Ninković, Milica, Petrović, Marija, "REASON4HEALTH: Rationale and impact" in Book of abstracts - XXVIII scientific conference Empirical Studies in Psychology (2022):26,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4929 .

Perceived outgroup threat makes it harder to attribute complex identities to minority groups

Ninković, Milica; Žeželj, Iris

(Odjel za psihologiju, Sveučilište u Zadru, 2022)

TY  - CONF
AU  - Ninković, Milica
AU  - Žeželj, Iris
PY  - 2022
UR  - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/4641
AB  - Recent experimental interventions aimed at reducing the intergroup bias have employed the potential of dually identified minority group members to act as a socalled “gateway” between two groups they represent. In a typical intervention, minority members (e.g. Bosniaks from the Sandžak region) are portrayed as strongly identified both with Bosniak ethnicity and Serbian nationality. Learning this generalizes to less prejudice against Bosniaks as a group. There are two ways to employ these interventions: [a] the majority ingroup perspective – participants are presented with the descriptive norm according to which majority members (Serbs) perceive the minority (Sandžak Bosniaks) as dually identified, or [b] the minority outgroup (OG) perspective – participants are presented with the story in which minority (Sandžak Bosniaks) describe themselves as dually identified. The precondition for both types of interventions to generalize is for participants to endorse the idea that a minority group can be dually identified. To this end, we contrasted the effectiveness of the two interventions in a single design. Additionally, we tested whether OG feelings and perception of OG as a threat affect their effectiveness. Participants (N = 145, ethnic Serbs) first filled in an intergroup threat scale (9 items, α = .92) and indicated their feelings towards Bosniaks using the Feeling thermometer. Then they were randomly exposed to either [a] intervention based on the ingroup descriptive norm, or [b] intervention based on the outgroup’s experience of dual identity. Finally, they indicated the extent to which they perceive Sandžak Bosniaks as having Serbian and Bosniak identity; we computed the dual identity perception score that ranged 0-100. Hierarchical linear regression analysis showed that the two interventions were equally effective in inducing the perception of the minority group’s dual identity (Step 1). However, we observed strong effects of both OG threat perception and OG feelings that accounted for 40% of the variance (p < .001) of dual identity perception (Step 2). There was no interaction between intervention type and threat or feelings (step 3). Although our results are encouraging in that they show that both interventions successfully induced the idea of dual identity of a minority group, they call for caution as this effectiveness is reduced in people who perceive the minority as a threat and are more prejudiced (i.e. in the very people that should be targeted).
PB  - Odjel za psihologiju, Sveučilište u Zadru
C3  - Book of abstracts, 23rd Psychology Days in Zadar
T1  - Perceived outgroup threat makes it harder to attribute complex identities to minority groups
SP  - 109
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4641
ER  - 
@conference{
author = "Ninković, Milica and Žeželj, Iris",
year = "2022",
abstract = "Recent experimental interventions aimed at reducing the intergroup bias have employed the potential of dually identified minority group members to act as a socalled “gateway” between two groups they represent. In a typical intervention, minority members (e.g. Bosniaks from the Sandžak region) are portrayed as strongly identified both with Bosniak ethnicity and Serbian nationality. Learning this generalizes to less prejudice against Bosniaks as a group. There are two ways to employ these interventions: [a] the majority ingroup perspective – participants are presented with the descriptive norm according to which majority members (Serbs) perceive the minority (Sandžak Bosniaks) as dually identified, or [b] the minority outgroup (OG) perspective – participants are presented with the story in which minority (Sandžak Bosniaks) describe themselves as dually identified. The precondition for both types of interventions to generalize is for participants to endorse the idea that a minority group can be dually identified. To this end, we contrasted the effectiveness of the two interventions in a single design. Additionally, we tested whether OG feelings and perception of OG as a threat affect their effectiveness. Participants (N = 145, ethnic Serbs) first filled in an intergroup threat scale (9 items, α = .92) and indicated their feelings towards Bosniaks using the Feeling thermometer. Then they were randomly exposed to either [a] intervention based on the ingroup descriptive norm, or [b] intervention based on the outgroup’s experience of dual identity. Finally, they indicated the extent to which they perceive Sandžak Bosniaks as having Serbian and Bosniak identity; we computed the dual identity perception score that ranged 0-100. Hierarchical linear regression analysis showed that the two interventions were equally effective in inducing the perception of the minority group’s dual identity (Step 1). However, we observed strong effects of both OG threat perception and OG feelings that accounted for 40% of the variance (p < .001) of dual identity perception (Step 2). There was no interaction between intervention type and threat or feelings (step 3). Although our results are encouraging in that they show that both interventions successfully induced the idea of dual identity of a minority group, they call for caution as this effectiveness is reduced in people who perceive the minority as a threat and are more prejudiced (i.e. in the very people that should be targeted).",
publisher = "Odjel za psihologiju, Sveučilište u Zadru",
journal = "Book of abstracts, 23rd Psychology Days in Zadar",
title = "Perceived outgroup threat makes it harder to attribute complex identities to minority groups",
pages = "109",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4641"
}
Ninković, M.,& Žeželj, I.. (2022). Perceived outgroup threat makes it harder to attribute complex identities to minority groups. in Book of abstracts, 23rd Psychology Days in Zadar
Odjel za psihologiju, Sveučilište u Zadru., 109.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4641
Ninković M, Žeželj I. Perceived outgroup threat makes it harder to attribute complex identities to minority groups. in Book of abstracts, 23rd Psychology Days in Zadar. 2022;:109.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4641 .
Ninković, Milica, Žeželj, Iris, "Perceived outgroup threat makes it harder to attribute complex identities to minority groups" in Book of abstracts, 23rd Psychology Days in Zadar (2022):109,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4641 .

Intergroup bias reduction: What makes our interventions effective?

Ninković, Milica; Žeželj, Iris

(Institut za psihologiju i Laboratorija za eksperimentalnu psihologiju, 2022)

TY  - CONF
AU  - Ninković, Milica
AU  - Žeželj, Iris
PY  - 2022
UR  - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/4633
AB  - Recent line of experiments that aim to reduce intergroup bias has explored the role of groups
with dual identity - i.e. whether these groups can serve as a gateway between the two
conflicted groups their two identities represent. For example, Bosniaks from Sandžak can be portrayed as a gateway group, i.e. strongly identified with both Bosniak ethnic group and
Serbian national group. This was shown to reduce Serbs’ prejudice towards Bosniaks in
general. The prerequisite to reducing bias is making participants endorse the idea that
members of the gateway group have dual identity. This can be done in two ways: (1) minority
perspective – portraying minority members as experiencing strong dual identification or (2)
majority perspective – describing that ingroup (IG) members mostly perceive the gateway
group as dually identified. In the first case, the key component of the intervention is gateway
group members’ experience; in the second, it is a descriptive social norm that the IG sets. We
contrasted the two interventions in a single design and tested if they were equally effective in
inducing the perception of the dual identity. We also examined if participants’ political
orientation moderated their effectiveness. Participants (N = 123, ethnic Serbs) first indicated
their political orientation (left-right; 11-point scale). Then they were randomly exposed to
one of the interventions: (1) Dual identity experience or (2) Dual identity as a descriptive
norm. Finally, they indicated how strong they found the gateway group identified with (a)
Serbs and (b) Bosniaks on the 100-point scale. We calculated the dual identity score that
ranged 0-100. GLM analysis revealed that the Dual identity experience intervention was
more effective in inducing DI (M = 61.3, SD = 18.7) than the norm-based one (M = 57.2, SD
= 22.9), F(1,117) = 7.10, p = .009, ηp2 = .06. While the main effect of political orientation
was not significant (F(2,117) = 2.83, p = .063), intervention type * political orientation
interaction was (F(2,117) = 4.01, p = .021, ηp2 = .06). More precisely, the Dual identity
experience intervention was equally effective across all levels of political orientation, while
the norm-based one was ineffective for the conservatives. We showed that the two types of
intervention might not be equally effective in inducing the idea of dual identity and that their
potential to reduce intergroup bias should be further examined. Further, it seems that
individual differences moderate their effectiveness. These findings should be taken into
account when applying interventions in a wider social context.
PB  - Institut za psihologiju i Laboratorija za eksperimentalnu psihologiju
C3  - Book of abstracts, XXVIII Scientific Conference “Empirical Studies in Psychology”, Belgrade
T1  - Intergroup bias reduction: What makes our interventions effective?
EP  - 129
SP  - 128
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4633
ER  - 
@conference{
author = "Ninković, Milica and Žeželj, Iris",
year = "2022",
abstract = "Recent line of experiments that aim to reduce intergroup bias has explored the role of groups
with dual identity - i.e. whether these groups can serve as a gateway between the two
conflicted groups their two identities represent. For example, Bosniaks from Sandžak can be portrayed as a gateway group, i.e. strongly identified with both Bosniak ethnic group and
Serbian national group. This was shown to reduce Serbs’ prejudice towards Bosniaks in
general. The prerequisite to reducing bias is making participants endorse the idea that
members of the gateway group have dual identity. This can be done in two ways: (1) minority
perspective – portraying minority members as experiencing strong dual identification or (2)
majority perspective – describing that ingroup (IG) members mostly perceive the gateway
group as dually identified. In the first case, the key component of the intervention is gateway
group members’ experience; in the second, it is a descriptive social norm that the IG sets. We
contrasted the two interventions in a single design and tested if they were equally effective in
inducing the perception of the dual identity. We also examined if participants’ political
orientation moderated their effectiveness. Participants (N = 123, ethnic Serbs) first indicated
their political orientation (left-right; 11-point scale). Then they were randomly exposed to
one of the interventions: (1) Dual identity experience or (2) Dual identity as a descriptive
norm. Finally, they indicated how strong they found the gateway group identified with (a)
Serbs and (b) Bosniaks on the 100-point scale. We calculated the dual identity score that
ranged 0-100. GLM analysis revealed that the Dual identity experience intervention was
more effective in inducing DI (M = 61.3, SD = 18.7) than the norm-based one (M = 57.2, SD
= 22.9), F(1,117) = 7.10, p = .009, ηp2 = .06. While the main effect of political orientation
was not significant (F(2,117) = 2.83, p = .063), intervention type * political orientation
interaction was (F(2,117) = 4.01, p = .021, ηp2 = .06). More precisely, the Dual identity
experience intervention was equally effective across all levels of political orientation, while
the norm-based one was ineffective for the conservatives. We showed that the two types of
intervention might not be equally effective in inducing the idea of dual identity and that their
potential to reduce intergroup bias should be further examined. Further, it seems that
individual differences moderate their effectiveness. These findings should be taken into
account when applying interventions in a wider social context.",
publisher = "Institut za psihologiju i Laboratorija za eksperimentalnu psihologiju",
journal = "Book of abstracts, XXVIII Scientific Conference “Empirical Studies in Psychology”, Belgrade",
title = "Intergroup bias reduction: What makes our interventions effective?",
pages = "129-128",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4633"
}
Ninković, M.,& Žeželj, I.. (2022). Intergroup bias reduction: What makes our interventions effective?. in Book of abstracts, XXVIII Scientific Conference “Empirical Studies in Psychology”, Belgrade
Institut za psihologiju i Laboratorija za eksperimentalnu psihologiju., 128-129.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4633
Ninković M, Žeželj I. Intergroup bias reduction: What makes our interventions effective?. in Book of abstracts, XXVIII Scientific Conference “Empirical Studies in Psychology”, Belgrade. 2022;:128-129.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4633 .
Ninković, Milica, Žeželj, Iris, "Intergroup bias reduction: What makes our interventions effective?" in Book of abstracts, XXVIII Scientific Conference “Empirical Studies in Psychology”, Belgrade (2022):128-129,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4633 .

Ethnic identity delegitimization as a predictor of attitudes towards ethnic outgroups

Ninković, Milica

(Odsjek za psihologiju Filozofskog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Zagrebu, 2021)

TY  - CONF
AU  - Ninković, Milica
PY  - 2021
UR  - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/4642
AB  - Ethnic identity delegitimization (EIDL) is a general tendency to question or deny the existence of ethnic groups that have existed less long than one’s ingroup. It is based on a belief that ethnic identity derived from such groups is made up, i.e. that it is not a legitimate identity. EIDL is typically used in conservative (post-) conflict narratives to “prove” that the outgroup’s (OG) ethnic identity is less worthy than the ingroup’s (IG) one, in order to assimilate OG with the IG. In previous studies, EIDL was shown to be positively related to the essentialist view of ethnicity, strength of ethnic identification, and autochthony beliefs. It was also negatively related to some OG attitudes. Here we report the results of two studies focused on the relation between EIDL and ethnic OG attitudes within the young Serbian population. In both Study 1 (S1; N = 99, Mage = 23.9) and Study 2 (S2; N = 137, Mage = 20.9) we used short form of EIDL scale (α = .92 and α = .94, respectively) to predict attitude towards three OGs: Bosniaks (S1), Albanians (S2), and refugees from Middle East (S2). We also registered participants’ strength of ethnic identification. OG attitudes were measured on Feeling thermometer as a differential score between OG and IG feelings. We conducted three hierarchical linear regressions with strength of ethnic identification as a predictor in the first step and EIDL in the second. After controlling for strength of ethnic identification, EIDL emerged as a significant predictor of attitude towards Bosniaks. On the other hand, EIDL predicted neither attitude towards Albanians, nor attitude towards refugees from the Middle East. Our results suggest that the predictive power of EIDL is limited to attitude towards the OGs whose ethnic identity is generally disproven in a wider socio-political narrative. Future studies should explore this relation in other (post-) conflict contexts, and experimentally test the effects of EIDL on support for outgroup assimilation.
PB  - Odsjek za psihologiju Filozofskog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Zagrebu
C3  - Book of abstracts, XXV International Scientific Psychology Conference “Ramiro and Zoran Bujas Days”, Zagreb
T1  - Ethnic identity delegitimization as a predictor of attitudes towards ethnic outgroups
SP  - 51
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4642
ER  - 
@conference{
author = "Ninković, Milica",
year = "2021",
abstract = "Ethnic identity delegitimization (EIDL) is a general tendency to question or deny the existence of ethnic groups that have existed less long than one’s ingroup. It is based on a belief that ethnic identity derived from such groups is made up, i.e. that it is not a legitimate identity. EIDL is typically used in conservative (post-) conflict narratives to “prove” that the outgroup’s (OG) ethnic identity is less worthy than the ingroup’s (IG) one, in order to assimilate OG with the IG. In previous studies, EIDL was shown to be positively related to the essentialist view of ethnicity, strength of ethnic identification, and autochthony beliefs. It was also negatively related to some OG attitudes. Here we report the results of two studies focused on the relation between EIDL and ethnic OG attitudes within the young Serbian population. In both Study 1 (S1; N = 99, Mage = 23.9) and Study 2 (S2; N = 137, Mage = 20.9) we used short form of EIDL scale (α = .92 and α = .94, respectively) to predict attitude towards three OGs: Bosniaks (S1), Albanians (S2), and refugees from Middle East (S2). We also registered participants’ strength of ethnic identification. OG attitudes were measured on Feeling thermometer as a differential score between OG and IG feelings. We conducted three hierarchical linear regressions with strength of ethnic identification as a predictor in the first step and EIDL in the second. After controlling for strength of ethnic identification, EIDL emerged as a significant predictor of attitude towards Bosniaks. On the other hand, EIDL predicted neither attitude towards Albanians, nor attitude towards refugees from the Middle East. Our results suggest that the predictive power of EIDL is limited to attitude towards the OGs whose ethnic identity is generally disproven in a wider socio-political narrative. Future studies should explore this relation in other (post-) conflict contexts, and experimentally test the effects of EIDL on support for outgroup assimilation.",
publisher = "Odsjek za psihologiju Filozofskog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Zagrebu",
journal = "Book of abstracts, XXV International Scientific Psychology Conference “Ramiro and Zoran Bujas Days”, Zagreb",
title = "Ethnic identity delegitimization as a predictor of attitudes towards ethnic outgroups",
pages = "51",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4642"
}
Ninković, M.. (2021). Ethnic identity delegitimization as a predictor of attitudes towards ethnic outgroups. in Book of abstracts, XXV International Scientific Psychology Conference “Ramiro and Zoran Bujas Days”, Zagreb
Odsjek za psihologiju Filozofskog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Zagrebu., 51.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4642
Ninković M. Ethnic identity delegitimization as a predictor of attitudes towards ethnic outgroups. in Book of abstracts, XXV International Scientific Psychology Conference “Ramiro and Zoran Bujas Days”, Zagreb. 2021;:51.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4642 .
Ninković, Milica, "Ethnic identity delegitimization as a predictor of attitudes towards ethnic outgroups" in Book of abstracts, XXV International Scientific Psychology Conference “Ramiro and Zoran Bujas Days”, Zagreb (2021):51,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4642 .