REFF - Faculty of Philosophy Repository
University of Belgrade - Faculty of Philosophy
    • English
    • Српски
    • Српски (Serbia)
  • English 
    • English
    • Serbian (Cyrillic)
    • Serbian (Latin)
  • Login
View Item 
  •   REFF
  • Sociologija / Sociology
  • Radovi istraživača / Researcher's publications - Odeljenje za sociologiju
  • View Item
  •   REFF
  • Sociologija / Sociology
  • Radovi istraživača / Researcher's publications - Odeljenje za sociologiju
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Rusoistički temelji Šmitovog shvatanja (totalne) države

Rousseauist foundations of Schmitt's concept of (total) state

Thumbnail
2010
1038.pdf (290.9Kb)
Authors
Molnar, Aleksandar
Article (Published version)
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
U radu se autor bavi konceptom političkog i ustavnim učenjem Karla Šmita. On nastoji da pokaže da je logika Šmitovog argumenta protiv liberalne demokratije i u korist plebiscitarne demokratije sledi sve najvažnije zaključke do kojih je Žan-Žak Ruso došao u svom Društvenom ugovoru, sa samo jednim izuzetkom. Šmit, naime, nije bio voljan da prihvati da je do društvenog ugovora ikada došlo u bilo kom istorijskom društvu i verovao je da se on ne može koristiti čak ni kao metodološko sredstvo pošto nema nikakvog smisla u samim temeljima političke zajednice. Rusoovi stavovi o 'opštoj volji', 'narodu' i neposrednoj demokratiji bili su Šmitu mnogo zanimljiviji za njegove namere uobličenja modela totalne države.
In this paper the author discusses Carl Schmitt's concept of 'the political' (das Politische), and his constitutional teaching (Verfassungslehre). He is trying to explain that the logic of Schmitt's argument against liberal democracy and in favor of populist democracy follows all the important conclusions made by Jean-Jacques Rousseau in his Social Contract, with only one exception. Schmitt was, namely, reluctant to accept that the social contract ever occurred in any historical society and he believed that it could not be used even as a methodological tool, because it has no meaning in the very foundations of political community. Rousseau's statements on 'general will', 'people', and immediate democracy Schmitt found more attractive for his purposes of designing the model of total state.
Keywords:
Žan-Žak Ruso / ustav / totalitarizam / politika / narod / liberalizam / Karl Šmit / država / demokratija / totalitarianism / state / politics / people / liberalism / Jean-Jacques Rousseau / democracy / constitution / Carl Schmitt
Source:
Sociologija, 2010, 52, 3, 225-236
Publisher:
  • Sociološko udruženje Srbije i Crne Gore, Beograd i Univerzitet u Beogradu - Filozofski fakultet - Institut za sociološka istraživanja, Beograd

DOI: 10.2298/SOC1003225M

ISSN: 0038-0318

Scopus: 2-s2.0-78549231612
[ Google Scholar ]
URI
http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1041
Collections
  • Radovi istraživača / Researcher's publications - Odeljenje za sociologiju
Institution/Community
Sociologija / Sociology
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Molnar, Aleksandar
PY  - 2010
UR  - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1041
AB  - U radu se autor bavi konceptom političkog i ustavnim učenjem Karla Šmita. On nastoji da pokaže da je logika Šmitovog argumenta protiv liberalne demokratije i u korist plebiscitarne demokratije sledi sve najvažnije zaključke do kojih je Žan-Žak Ruso došao u svom Društvenom ugovoru, sa samo jednim izuzetkom. Šmit, naime, nije bio voljan da prihvati da je do društvenog ugovora ikada došlo u bilo kom istorijskom društvu i verovao je da se on ne može koristiti čak ni kao metodološko sredstvo pošto nema nikakvog smisla u samim temeljima političke zajednice. Rusoovi stavovi o 'opštoj volji', 'narodu' i neposrednoj demokratiji bili su Šmitu mnogo zanimljiviji za njegove namere uobličenja modela totalne države.
AB  - In this paper the author discusses Carl Schmitt's concept of 'the political' (das Politische), and his constitutional teaching (Verfassungslehre). He is trying to explain that the logic of Schmitt's argument against liberal democracy and in favor of populist democracy follows all the important conclusions made by Jean-Jacques Rousseau in his Social Contract, with only one exception. Schmitt was, namely, reluctant to accept that the social contract ever occurred in any historical society and he believed that it could not be used even as a methodological tool, because it has no meaning in the very foundations of political community. Rousseau's statements on 'general will', 'people', and immediate democracy Schmitt found more attractive for his purposes of designing the model of total state.
PB  - Sociološko udruženje Srbije i Crne Gore, Beograd i Univerzitet u Beogradu - Filozofski fakultet - Institut za sociološka istraživanja, Beograd
T2  - Sociologija
T1  - Rusoistički temelji Šmitovog shvatanja (totalne) države
T1  - Rousseauist foundations of Schmitt's concept of (total) state
EP  - 236
IS  - 3
SP  - 225
VL  - 52
DO  - 10.2298/SOC1003225M
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Molnar, Aleksandar",
year = "2010",
abstract = "U radu se autor bavi konceptom političkog i ustavnim učenjem Karla Šmita. On nastoji da pokaže da je logika Šmitovog argumenta protiv liberalne demokratije i u korist plebiscitarne demokratije sledi sve najvažnije zaključke do kojih je Žan-Žak Ruso došao u svom Društvenom ugovoru, sa samo jednim izuzetkom. Šmit, naime, nije bio voljan da prihvati da je do društvenog ugovora ikada došlo u bilo kom istorijskom društvu i verovao je da se on ne može koristiti čak ni kao metodološko sredstvo pošto nema nikakvog smisla u samim temeljima političke zajednice. Rusoovi stavovi o 'opštoj volji', 'narodu' i neposrednoj demokratiji bili su Šmitu mnogo zanimljiviji za njegove namere uobličenja modela totalne države., In this paper the author discusses Carl Schmitt's concept of 'the political' (das Politische), and his constitutional teaching (Verfassungslehre). He is trying to explain that the logic of Schmitt's argument against liberal democracy and in favor of populist democracy follows all the important conclusions made by Jean-Jacques Rousseau in his Social Contract, with only one exception. Schmitt was, namely, reluctant to accept that the social contract ever occurred in any historical society and he believed that it could not be used even as a methodological tool, because it has no meaning in the very foundations of political community. Rousseau's statements on 'general will', 'people', and immediate democracy Schmitt found more attractive for his purposes of designing the model of total state.",
publisher = "Sociološko udruženje Srbije i Crne Gore, Beograd i Univerzitet u Beogradu - Filozofski fakultet - Institut za sociološka istraživanja, Beograd",
journal = "Sociologija",
title = "Rusoistički temelji Šmitovog shvatanja (totalne) države, Rousseauist foundations of Schmitt's concept of (total) state",
pages = "236-225",
number = "3",
volume = "52",
doi = "10.2298/SOC1003225M"
}
Molnar, A.. (2010). Rusoistički temelji Šmitovog shvatanja (totalne) države. in Sociologija
Sociološko udruženje Srbije i Crne Gore, Beograd i Univerzitet u Beogradu - Filozofski fakultet - Institut za sociološka istraživanja, Beograd., 52(3), 225-236.
https://doi.org/10.2298/SOC1003225M
Molnar A. Rusoistički temelji Šmitovog shvatanja (totalne) države. in Sociologija. 2010;52(3):225-236.
doi:10.2298/SOC1003225M .
Molnar, Aleksandar, "Rusoistički temelji Šmitovog shvatanja (totalne) države" in Sociologija, 52, no. 3 (2010):225-236,
https://doi.org/10.2298/SOC1003225M . .

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About REFF | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB
 

 

All of DSpaceInstitutions/communitiesAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis institutionAuthorsTitlesSubjects

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About REFF | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB