Приказ основних података о документу
Kontraktualizam versus kontraktarijanizam
Contractualism vs. contractarianism
| dc.creator | Dobrijević, Aleksandar | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-10-12T11:15:04Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2021-10-12T11:15:04Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0353-5738 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1154 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Autor nastoji da pokaže da je uobičajena podela na 'hobsovsku' i 'kantovsku' liniju mišljenja u sklopu savremene recepcije tradicije društvenog ugovora potpuno opravdana. U tekstu se takođe naglašava kako se ideja društvenog kao 'moralnog' ugovora, nasuprot izvornijem 'političkom' ugovoru, artikuliše tek u poznoj 'evolucionoj' fazi te ideje, naročito u dvadesetom veku (pre svega u teorijama Dejvida Gotijea i Tomasa Skenlona). Najposle, odbacuje se pokušaj redefinisanja kontraktualizma kao neke vrste 'konstruktivizma', budući da u kontraktualizmu nema nikakvih elemenata 'proceduralnog' rasuđivanja koje je, prema opštem uverenju, karakteristično za 'konstruktivističku' misao. | sr |
| dc.description.abstract | The author insists that, within contemporary theory, common division of social contract tradition on 'Hobbesian' and 'Kantian' line of thought is entirely justified. Analyzing the theories of David Gauthier and Thomas Scanlon, he also indicates the important difference between 'moral' and 'political' dimension of the idea of social contract. Finally, he rejects recent attempts of identifying contractualism with constructivism. | en |
| dc.publisher | Univerzitet u Beogradu - Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, Beograd | |
| dc.relation | info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MESTD/Integrated and Interdisciplinary Research (IIR or III)/43007/RS// | |
| dc.rights | openAccess | |
| dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | |
| dc.source | Filozofija i društvo | |
| dc.subject | tradicija društvenog ugovora | sr |
| dc.subject | Tomas Skenlon | sr |
| dc.subject | kontraktualizam | sr |
| dc.subject | kontraktarijanizam | sr |
| dc.subject | konstruktivizam | sr |
| dc.subject | Dejvid Gotije | sr |
| dc.subject | aktualna i hipotetička saglasnost | sr |
| dc.subject | Thomas Scanlon | en |
| dc.subject | social contract tradition | en |
| dc.subject | David Gauthier | en |
| dc.subject | contractualism | en |
| dc.subject | contractarianism | en |
| dc.subject | constructivism | en |
| dc.subject | actual and hypothetical agreement | en |
| dc.title | Kontraktualizam versus kontraktarijanizam | sr |
| dc.title | Contractualism vs. contractarianism | en |
| dc.type | article | |
| dc.rights.license | BY-NC-ND | |
| dc.citation.epage | 44 | |
| dc.citation.issue | 3 | |
| dc.citation.other | 22(3): 27-44 | |
| dc.citation.rank | M51 | |
| dc.citation.spage | 27 | |
| dc.citation.volume | 22 | |
| dc.identifier.fulltext | http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/bitstream/id/146/1151.pdf | |
| dc.identifier.rcub | https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_1154 | |
| dc.type.version | publishedVersion |
