REFF - Faculty of Philosophy Repository
University of Belgrade - Faculty of Philosophy
    • English
    • Српски
    • Српски (Serbia)
  • English 
    • English
    • Serbian (Cyrillic)
    • Serbian (Latin)
  • Login
View Item 
  •   REFF
  • Pedagogija / Pedagogy
  • Radovi istraživača / Researcher's publications - Odeljenje za pedagogiju
  • View Item
  •   REFF
  • Pedagogija / Pedagogy
  • Radovi istraživača / Researcher's publications - Odeljenje za pedagogiju
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Različita određenja pojma evaluacija kao rezultat razlika u shvatanjima cilja, funkcije, sadržaja i metodološke osnove evaluacije

Different defining of the concept of evaluations as a result of differences in conceiving the aim, function, content and methodological basis of evaluation

No Thumbnail
Authors
Hebib, Emina
Article (Published version)
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
Authors dealing with the problem of evaluation in the field of education and teaching do not agree about terminology for this complex process; the same problem comes when they speak about the concepts. So, the terms such as evaluation, evaluate, measure, mark, following, etc., are used with small differences. However, which term a certain author chooses, how he defines a certain concept - it all depends on the authors' conception of the aim and function of evaluation, possibility of its putting into practice. The way certain authors regard the nature of pedagogical evaluation depends on their view of nature of education and teaching. We have tried to point out to that dependency by quoting and explaining certain number of defining.
Source:
Pedagogija, 1992, 27, 3-4, 87-94
Publisher:
  • Forum pedagoga Srbije i Crne Gore, Beograd

ISSN: 0031-3807

[ Google Scholar ]
Handle
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_125
URI
http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/125
Collections
  • Radovi istraživača / Researcher's publications - Odeljenje za pedagogiju
Institution/Community
Pedagogija / Pedagogy
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Hebib, Emina
PY  - 1992
UR  - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/125
AB  - Authors dealing with the problem of evaluation in the field of education and teaching do not agree about terminology for this complex process; the same problem comes when they speak about the concepts. So, the terms such as evaluation, evaluate, measure, mark, following, etc., are used with small differences. However, which term a certain author chooses, how he defines a certain concept - it all depends on the authors' conception of the aim and function of evaluation, possibility of its putting into practice. The way certain authors regard the nature of pedagogical evaluation depends on their view of nature of education and teaching. We have tried to point out to that dependency by quoting and explaining certain number of defining.
PB  - Forum pedagoga Srbije i Crne Gore, Beograd
T2  - Pedagogija
T1  - Različita određenja pojma evaluacija kao rezultat razlika u shvatanjima cilja, funkcije, sadržaja i metodološke osnove evaluacije
T1  - Different defining of the concept of evaluations as a result of differences in conceiving the aim, function, content and methodological basis of evaluation
EP  - 94
IS  - 3-4
SP  - 87
VL  - 27
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_125
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Hebib, Emina",
year = "1992",
abstract = "Authors dealing with the problem of evaluation in the field of education and teaching do not agree about terminology for this complex process; the same problem comes when they speak about the concepts. So, the terms such as evaluation, evaluate, measure, mark, following, etc., are used with small differences. However, which term a certain author chooses, how he defines a certain concept - it all depends on the authors' conception of the aim and function of evaluation, possibility of its putting into practice. The way certain authors regard the nature of pedagogical evaluation depends on their view of nature of education and teaching. We have tried to point out to that dependency by quoting and explaining certain number of defining.",
publisher = "Forum pedagoga Srbije i Crne Gore, Beograd",
journal = "Pedagogija",
title = "Različita određenja pojma evaluacija kao rezultat razlika u shvatanjima cilja, funkcije, sadržaja i metodološke osnove evaluacije, Different defining of the concept of evaluations as a result of differences in conceiving the aim, function, content and methodological basis of evaluation",
pages = "94-87",
number = "3-4",
volume = "27",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_125"
}
Hebib, E.. (1992). Različita određenja pojma evaluacija kao rezultat razlika u shvatanjima cilja, funkcije, sadržaja i metodološke osnove evaluacije. in Pedagogija
Forum pedagoga Srbije i Crne Gore, Beograd., 27(3-4), 87-94.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_125
Hebib E. Različita određenja pojma evaluacija kao rezultat razlika u shvatanjima cilja, funkcije, sadržaja i metodološke osnove evaluacije. in Pedagogija. 1992;27(3-4):87-94.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_125 .
Hebib, Emina, "Različita određenja pojma evaluacija kao rezultat razlika u shvatanjima cilja, funkcije, sadržaja i metodološke osnove evaluacije" in Pedagogija, 27, no. 3-4 (1992):87-94,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_125 .

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About REFF | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB
 

 

All of DSpaceInstitutions/communitiesAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis institutionAuthorsTitlesSubjects

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About REFF | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB