REFF - Faculty of Philosophy Repository
University of Belgrade - Faculty of Philosophy
    • English
    • Српски
    • Српски (Serbia)
  • English 
    • English
    • Serbian (Cyrillic)
    • Serbian (Latin)
  • Login
View Item 
  •   REFF
  • Sociologija / Sociology
  • Radovi istraživača / Researcher's publications - Odeljenje za sociologiju
  • View Item
  •   REFF
  • Sociologija / Sociology
  • Radovi istraživača / Researcher's publications - Odeljenje za sociologiju
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Različita shvatanja posmatranja u sociologiji i antropologiji

Different conceptions of observation in sociology and anthropology

Thumbnail
2013
1569.pdf (273.3Kb)
Authors
Ilić, Vladimir
Article (Published version)
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
Napis sadrži uvodna razmatranja o posmatranju kao metodu i istraživačkom postupku u društvenim naukama. Posmatranje je danas u velikoj meri zanemareno u odnosu na takozvane kvalitativne istraživačke metode ili terenska istraživanja. Posmatranje je najsnažniji istraživački postupak zbog toga što ima najneposredniji pristup proučavanoj pojavi. U ovom tekstu se razmatraju različite tradicije posmatranja u društvenim naukama (sociologija, psihologija, antropologija, pedagogija). Trenutno zanemarivanje posmatranja se objašnjava uticajem epistemoloških i društvenih činilaca. Prvi su povezani sa rastućom podelom između filozofije nauke i metodologija pojedinih nauka. Drugi su uslovljeni podrivačkim potencijalom posmatranja u poređenju sa metodama i postupcima koji su 'više u modi'.
The paper contains introductory considerations regarding the observation such as particular method and research procedure in social sciences. The observation is greatly neglected in favor of so called qualitative research methods or field work today. The observation is the strongest research procedure due to it has the most direct approach to the examined phenomena. In this text the different traditions of the observation in social sciences (sociology, psychology, anthropology, pedagogy) are considered. Present neglecting of observation is explained by the impact of epistemological as well as social factors. Former ones are related to the growing division among the philosophy of science and the methodologies of particular sciences. Latter are conditioned by subversive potential of observation in comparison to more fashioned methods and procedures.
Keywords:
sociologija / posmatranje / antropologija / sociology / observation / anthropology
Source:
Sociologija, 2013, 55, 4, 519-540
Publisher:
  • Sociološko udruženje Srbije i Crne Gore, Beograd i Univerzitet u Beogradu - Filozofski fakultet - Institut za sociološka istraživanja, Beograd
Funding / projects:
  • Challenges of New Social Integration in Serbia: Concepts and Actors (RS-179035)

DOI: 10.2298/SOC1304519I

ISSN: 0038-0318

Scopus: 2-s2.0-84892391905
[ Google Scholar ]
4
URI
http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1572
Collections
  • Radovi istraživača / Researcher's publications - Odeljenje za sociologiju
Institution/Community
Sociologija / Sociology
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Ilić, Vladimir
PY  - 2013
UR  - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1572
AB  - Napis sadrži uvodna razmatranja o posmatranju kao metodu i istraživačkom postupku u društvenim naukama. Posmatranje je danas u velikoj meri zanemareno u odnosu na takozvane kvalitativne istraživačke metode ili terenska istraživanja. Posmatranje je najsnažniji istraživački postupak zbog toga što ima najneposredniji pristup proučavanoj pojavi. U ovom tekstu se razmatraju različite tradicije posmatranja u društvenim naukama (sociologija, psihologija, antropologija, pedagogija). Trenutno zanemarivanje posmatranja se objašnjava uticajem epistemoloških i društvenih činilaca. Prvi su povezani sa rastućom podelom između filozofije nauke i metodologija pojedinih nauka. Drugi su uslovljeni podrivačkim potencijalom posmatranja u poređenju sa metodama i postupcima koji su 'više u modi'.
AB  - The paper contains introductory considerations regarding the observation such as particular method and research procedure in social sciences. The observation is greatly neglected in favor of so called qualitative research methods or field work today. The observation is the strongest research procedure due to it has the most direct approach to the examined phenomena. In this text the different traditions of the observation in social sciences (sociology, psychology, anthropology, pedagogy) are considered. Present neglecting of observation is explained by the impact of epistemological as well as social factors. Former ones are related to the growing division among the philosophy of science and the methodologies of particular sciences. Latter are conditioned by subversive potential of observation in comparison to more fashioned methods and procedures.
PB  - Sociološko udruženje Srbije i Crne Gore, Beograd i Univerzitet u Beogradu - Filozofski fakultet - Institut za sociološka istraživanja, Beograd
T2  - Sociologija
T1  - Različita shvatanja posmatranja u sociologiji i antropologiji
T1  - Different conceptions of observation in sociology and anthropology
EP  - 540
IS  - 4
SP  - 519
VL  - 55
DO  - 10.2298/SOC1304519I
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Ilić, Vladimir",
year = "2013",
abstract = "Napis sadrži uvodna razmatranja o posmatranju kao metodu i istraživačkom postupku u društvenim naukama. Posmatranje je danas u velikoj meri zanemareno u odnosu na takozvane kvalitativne istraživačke metode ili terenska istraživanja. Posmatranje je najsnažniji istraživački postupak zbog toga što ima najneposredniji pristup proučavanoj pojavi. U ovom tekstu se razmatraju različite tradicije posmatranja u društvenim naukama (sociologija, psihologija, antropologija, pedagogija). Trenutno zanemarivanje posmatranja se objašnjava uticajem epistemoloških i društvenih činilaca. Prvi su povezani sa rastućom podelom između filozofije nauke i metodologija pojedinih nauka. Drugi su uslovljeni podrivačkim potencijalom posmatranja u poređenju sa metodama i postupcima koji su 'više u modi'., The paper contains introductory considerations regarding the observation such as particular method and research procedure in social sciences. The observation is greatly neglected in favor of so called qualitative research methods or field work today. The observation is the strongest research procedure due to it has the most direct approach to the examined phenomena. In this text the different traditions of the observation in social sciences (sociology, psychology, anthropology, pedagogy) are considered. Present neglecting of observation is explained by the impact of epistemological as well as social factors. Former ones are related to the growing division among the philosophy of science and the methodologies of particular sciences. Latter are conditioned by subversive potential of observation in comparison to more fashioned methods and procedures.",
publisher = "Sociološko udruženje Srbije i Crne Gore, Beograd i Univerzitet u Beogradu - Filozofski fakultet - Institut za sociološka istraživanja, Beograd",
journal = "Sociologija",
title = "Različita shvatanja posmatranja u sociologiji i antropologiji, Different conceptions of observation in sociology and anthropology",
pages = "540-519",
number = "4",
volume = "55",
doi = "10.2298/SOC1304519I"
}
Ilić, V.. (2013). Različita shvatanja posmatranja u sociologiji i antropologiji. in Sociologija
Sociološko udruženje Srbije i Crne Gore, Beograd i Univerzitet u Beogradu - Filozofski fakultet - Institut za sociološka istraživanja, Beograd., 55(4), 519-540.
https://doi.org/10.2298/SOC1304519I
Ilić V. Različita shvatanja posmatranja u sociologiji i antropologiji. in Sociologija. 2013;55(4):519-540.
doi:10.2298/SOC1304519I .
Ilić, Vladimir, "Različita shvatanja posmatranja u sociologiji i antropologiji" in Sociologija, 55, no. 4 (2013):519-540,
https://doi.org/10.2298/SOC1304519I . .

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About REFF | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB
 

 

All of DSpaceInstitutions/communitiesAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis institutionAuthorsTitlesSubjects

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About REFF | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB