A Rejoinder to Comments by Eyal, Liberman, & Trope and Gong & Medin

dc.creator	Žeželj, Iris
dc.creator	Jokić, Biljana
dc.date.accessioned	2021-10-12T11:57:09Z
dc.date.available	2021-10-12T11:57:09Z
dc.date.issued	2014
dc.identifier.issn	1864-9335
dc.identifier.uri	http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1810
dc.description.abstract	In two replication attempts, procedural priming of a high construal mindset ("why" condition) unexpectedly led to less harsh judgment of moral transgressions compared to priming of a low construal mindset ("how" condition). Eyal, Liberman, and Trope (EL&T, 2014) proposed the mechanism that explained these findings, and obtained some supporting data. We expand on it by testing the mechanism on virtuous acts instead of on moral transgressions. We conclude by discussing the need to re-evaluate the procedures in the context of specific studies.	en
dc.publisher	Hogrefe & Huber Publishers, Gottingen
dc.rights	restrictedAccess
dc.source	Social Psychology
dc.subject	pro-social acts	en
dc.subject	moral reasoning	en
dc.subject	mindset priming	en
dc.subject	construal level	en
dc.title	A Rejoinder to Comments by Eyal, Liberman, & Trope and Gong & Medin	en
dc.type	contributionToPeriodical
dc.rights.license	ARR
dc.citation.epage	334
dc.citation.issue	4
dc.citation.other	45(4): 332-334
dc.citation.rank	M22
dc.citation.spage	332
dc.citation.volume	45
dc.identifier.rcub	https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_1810
dc.identifier.wos	000341226100020
dc.type.version	publishedVersion

Документи

Датотеке	Величина	Формат	Преглед
Уз овај запис нема датотека.