Приказ основних података о документу

dc.creatorPrelević, Duško
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-12T12:12:33Z
dc.date.available2021-10-12T12:12:33Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.issn0873-626X
dc.identifier.urihttp://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2052
dc.description.abstractIn his "anti-zombie argument", Keith Frankish turns the tables on "zombists", forcing them to find an independent argument against the conceivability of anti-zombies. I argue that zombists can shoulder the burden, for there is an important asymmetry between the conceivability of zombies and the conceivability of anti-zombies, which is reflected in the embedding of a totality-clause under the conceivability operator. This makes the anti-zombie argument susceptible to what I call the 'Modified Incompleteness', according to which we cannot conceive of scenarios. In this paper I also argue that conceiving of the zombie-situation is a good starting point for rendering the zombie argument plausible.en
dc.publisherSciendo, Warsaw
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MESTD/Basic Research (BR or ON)/179067/RS//
dc.rightsrestrictedAccess
dc.sourceDisputatio-International Journal of Philosophy
dc.subjectThe zombie argumenten
dc.subjectthe anti-zombie argumenten
dc.subjectsituationen
dc.subjectscenarioen
dc.subjectconceivabilityen
dc.titleZombies Slap Back: Why the Anti-Zombie Parody Does Not Worken
dc.typearticle
dc.rights.licenseARR
dc.citation.epage43
dc.citation.issue40
dc.citation.other7(40): 25-43
dc.citation.spage25
dc.citation.volume7
dc.identifier.doi10.2478/disp-2015-0002
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84931460489
dc.identifier.wos000386429800002
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion


Документи

Thumbnail

Овај документ се појављује у следећим колекцијама

Приказ основних података о документу