Приказ основних података о документу

dc.creatorTybur, Joshua M.
dc.creatorInbar, Yoel
dc.creatorAaroe, Lene
dc.creatorBarclay, Pat
dc.creatorBarlow, Fiona Kate
dc.creatorde Barra, Micheal
dc.creatorBecker, D. Vaughn
dc.creatorBorovoi, Leah
dc.creatorChoi, Incheol
dc.creatorChoi, Jong An
dc.creatorConsedine, Nathan S.
dc.creatorConway, Alan
dc.creatorConway, Jane Rebecca
dc.creatorConway, Paul
dc.creatorČubela-Adorić, Vera
dc.creatorDemirci, Dilara Ekin
dc.creatorMaria Fernandez, Ana
dc.creatorFerreira, Diogo Conque Seco
dc.creatorIshii, Keiko
dc.creatorJaksić, Ivana
dc.creatorJi, Tingting
dc.creatorvan Leeuwen, Florian
dc.creatorLewis, David M. G.
dc.creatorLi, Norman P.
dc.creatorMcIntyre, Jason C.
dc.creatorMukherjee, Sumitava
dc.creatorPark, Justin H.
dc.creatorPawlowski, Boguslaw
dc.creatorPetersen, Michael Bang
dc.creatorPizarro, David
dc.creatorProdromitis, Gerasimos
dc.creatorProkop, Pavol
dc.creatorRantala, Markus J.
dc.creatorReynolds, Lisa M.
dc.creatorSandin, Bonifacio
dc.creatorSevi, Baris
dc.creatorDe Smet, Delphine
dc.creatorSrinivasan, Narayanan
dc.creatorTewari, Shruti
dc.creatorWilson, Cameron
dc.creatorYong, Jose C.
dc.creatorŽeželj, Iris
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-12T12:16:58Z
dc.date.available2021-10-12T12:16:58Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.issn0027-8424
dc.identifier.urihttp://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2122
dc.description.abstractPeople who are more avoidant of pathogens are more politically conservative, as are nations with greater parasite stress. In the current research, we test two prominent hypotheses that have been proposed as explanations for these relationships. The first, which is an intragroup account, holds that these relationships between pathogens and politics are based on motivations to adhere to local norms, which are sometimes shaped by cultural evolution to have pathogenneutralizing properties. The second, which is an intergroup account, holds that these same relationships are based on motivations to avoid contact with outgroups, who might pose greater infectious disease threats than ingroup members. Results from a study surveying 11,501 participants across 30 nations are more consistent with the intragroup account than with the intergroup account. National parasite stress relates to traditionalism (an aspect of conservatism especially related to adherence to group norms) but not to social dominance orientation (SDO; an aspect of conservatism especially related to endorsements of intergroup barriers and negativity toward ethnic and racial outgroups). Further, individual differences in pathogen-avoidance motives (i.e., disgust sensitivity) relate more strongly to traditionalism than to SDO within the 30 nations.en
dc.publisherNatl Acad Sciences, Washington
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/680002/EU//
dc.relationJapan Society for the Promotion of Science Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (KAKENHI) [26380843]
dc.rightsrestrictedAccess
dc.sourceProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
dc.subjectpolitical ideologyen
dc.subjectpathogensen
dc.subjectevolutionary psychologyen
dc.subjectdisgusten
dc.subjectcultureen
dc.titleParasite stress and pathogen avoidance relate to distinct dimensions of political ideology across 30 nationsen
dc.typearticle
dc.rights.licenseARR
dc.citation.epage12413
dc.citation.issue44
dc.citation.other113(44): 12408-12413
dc.citation.rankaM21
dc.citation.spage12408
dc.citation.volume113
dc.identifier.doi10.1073/pnas.1607398113
dc.identifier.pmid27791090
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84994365871
dc.identifier.wos000386608200041
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion


Документи

Thumbnail

Овај документ се појављује у следећим колекцијама

Приказ основних података о документу