REFF - Репозиторијум Филозофског факултета
Универзитет у Београду - Филозофски факултет
    • English
    • Српски
    • Српски (Serbia)
  • Српски (ћирилица) 
    • Енглески
    • Српски (ћирилица)
    • Српски (латиница)
  • Пријава
Преглед записа 
  •   REFF
  • Arheologija / Archaeology
  • Radovi istraživača / Researcher's publications - Odeljenje za arheologiju
  • Преглед записа
  •   REFF
  • Arheologija / Archaeology
  • Radovi istraživača / Researcher's publications - Odeljenje za arheologiju
  • Преглед записа
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Temples in the Ghassulian Culture: Terminology and social implications

Thumbnail
2016
2269.pdf (327.6Kb)
Аутори
Gošić, Milena
Чланак у часопису (Објављена верзија)
Метаподаци
Приказ свих података о документу
Апстракт
Archaeological discussions on prehistoric ritual are largely concerned with their material remains, including architectural debris. The first step in interpretation of such remains is their precise identification and categorization. There are numerous terms for objects and architectural remains that are widely utilized in the archaeological jargon, including, but not limited to, the terms temple, sanctuary and shrine. During almost a century of studying the Chalcolithic Ghassulian culture of the southern Levant, various architectural structures excavated at the sites of Teleilat Ghassul, Gilat and En Gedi have all been interpreted as temples, sanctuaries, or shrines - terms that in case of the Ghassulian culture are used as synonymous of temples. However, the actual architectural remains from these sites differ significantly and explicit definitions on what is meant by the terms used are rare. Apart from demonstrating the importance of properly defining a term in a context in which it ...is used, the aim of the present paper is to compare these various architectural remains, as well as various interpretations of Ghassulian society and the role the presumed temples played in them. This will be the basis for evaluating how classifying archaeological structures as temples has influenced interpretations of Ghassulian social organization.

Кључне речи:
terminology / temple / social complexity / ritual / Levant / Ghassulian / Chalcolithic
Извор:
Etnoantropološki problemi, 2016, 11, 3, 869-893
Издавач:
  • Univerzitet u Beogradu - Filozofski fakultet - Odeljenje za etnologiju i antropologiju, Beograd

DOI: 10.21301/EAP.V11I3.11

ISSN: 0353-1589

WoS: 000408769600011

[ Google Scholar ]
URI
http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2272
Колекције
  • Radovi istraživača / Researcher's publications - Odeljenje za arheologiju
Институција/група
Arheologija / Archaeology
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Gošić, Milena
PY  - 2016
UR  - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2272
AB  - Archaeological discussions on prehistoric ritual are largely concerned with their material remains, including architectural debris. The first step in interpretation of such remains is their precise identification and categorization. There are numerous terms for objects and architectural remains that are widely utilized in the archaeological jargon, including, but not limited to, the terms temple, sanctuary and shrine. During almost a century of studying the Chalcolithic Ghassulian culture of the southern Levant, various architectural structures excavated at the sites of Teleilat Ghassul, Gilat and En Gedi have all been interpreted as temples, sanctuaries, or shrines - terms that in case of the Ghassulian culture are used as synonymous of temples. However, the actual architectural remains from these sites differ significantly and explicit definitions on what is meant by the terms used are rare. Apart from demonstrating the importance of properly defining a term in a context in which it is used, the aim of the present paper is to compare these various architectural remains, as well as various interpretations of Ghassulian society and the role the presumed temples played in them. This will be the basis for evaluating how classifying archaeological structures as temples has influenced interpretations of Ghassulian social organization.
PB  - Univerzitet u Beogradu - Filozofski fakultet - Odeljenje za etnologiju i antropologiju, Beograd
T2  - Etnoantropološki problemi
T1  - Temples in the Ghassulian Culture: Terminology and social implications
EP  - 893
IS  - 3
SP  - 869
VL  - 11
DO  - 10.21301/EAP.V11I3.11
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Gošić, Milena",
year = "2016",
abstract = "Archaeological discussions on prehistoric ritual are largely concerned with their material remains, including architectural debris. The first step in interpretation of such remains is their precise identification and categorization. There are numerous terms for objects and architectural remains that are widely utilized in the archaeological jargon, including, but not limited to, the terms temple, sanctuary and shrine. During almost a century of studying the Chalcolithic Ghassulian culture of the southern Levant, various architectural structures excavated at the sites of Teleilat Ghassul, Gilat and En Gedi have all been interpreted as temples, sanctuaries, or shrines - terms that in case of the Ghassulian culture are used as synonymous of temples. However, the actual architectural remains from these sites differ significantly and explicit definitions on what is meant by the terms used are rare. Apart from demonstrating the importance of properly defining a term in a context in which it is used, the aim of the present paper is to compare these various architectural remains, as well as various interpretations of Ghassulian society and the role the presumed temples played in them. This will be the basis for evaluating how classifying archaeological structures as temples has influenced interpretations of Ghassulian social organization.",
publisher = "Univerzitet u Beogradu - Filozofski fakultet - Odeljenje za etnologiju i antropologiju, Beograd",
journal = "Etnoantropološki problemi",
title = "Temples in the Ghassulian Culture: Terminology and social implications",
pages = "893-869",
number = "3",
volume = "11",
doi = "10.21301/EAP.V11I3.11"
}
Gošić, M.. (2016). Temples in the Ghassulian Culture: Terminology and social implications. in Etnoantropološki problemi
Univerzitet u Beogradu - Filozofski fakultet - Odeljenje za etnologiju i antropologiju, Beograd., 11(3), 869-893.
https://doi.org/10.21301/EAP.V11I3.11
Gošić M. Temples in the Ghassulian Culture: Terminology and social implications. in Etnoantropološki problemi. 2016;11(3):869-893.
doi:10.21301/EAP.V11I3.11 .
Gošić, Milena, "Temples in the Ghassulian Culture: Terminology and social implications" in Etnoantropološki problemi, 11, no. 3 (2016):869-893,
https://doi.org/10.21301/EAP.V11I3.11 . .

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
О репозиторијуму REFF | Пошаљите запажања

OpenAIRERCUB
 

 

Комплетан репозиторијумИнституције/групеАуториНасловиТемеОва институцијаАуториНасловиТеме

Статистика

Преглед статистика

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
О репозиторијуму REFF | Пошаљите запажања

OpenAIRERCUB