REFF - Faculty of Philosophy Repository
University of Belgrade - Faculty of Philosophy
    • English
    • Српски
    • Српски (Serbia)
  • English 
    • English
    • Serbian (Cyrillic)
    • Serbian (Latin)
  • Login
View Item 
  •   REFF
  • Filozofija / Philosophy
  • Radovi istraživača / Researcher's publications - Odeljenje za filozofiju
  • View Item
  •   REFF
  • Filozofija / Philosophy
  • Radovi istraživača / Researcher's publications - Odeljenje za filozofiju
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Mil , Utilitarizam pravila i "primedba na osnovu nekoherencije"

Mill, rule-utilitarianism and "incoherence objection"

Thumbnail
2018
2485.pdf (291.3Kb)
Authors
Cekić, Nenad
Article (Published version)
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
Primedba na osnovu nekoherencije" ili "obožavanje pravila" je jedna od najčešćih tema rasprave koja se vodi između dva glavna tabora unutar utilitarističkog pogleda na moral - "utilitarista postupaka" i "utilitarista pravila". Reč je o primedbi koja su stvorili utilitaristi postupaka da bi osporili utilitarizam pravila. Autor razmatra dve teze: 1) da je još Džon Stjuart Mil bio svestan ove primedbe; i 2) da su neke rane kritike Milovog utilitarizma bile zasnovane na ovoj primedbi. U zaključku, autor ispituje da li bi teorijsko razlikovanje "sumarnih pravila" i "pravila prakse" moglo razrešiti problem nekoherencije unutar utilitarizma pravila
So-called "incoherence objection" or "rule-worship" objection is one of the most famous objections to "rule-utilitarianism" approach to ethics. The author analyzes two indications present in current ethical literature: 1) that John Stuart Mill was aware of "incoherence objection"; and 2) that some early critics of Mill's Utilitarianism were founded on this objection. In the end, the author examines if John Rawls' distinction between "summary" and "practice" rules could resolve the issue posed by incoherence objection
Keywords:
utilitarizam pravila / sumarna pravila / primedba na osnovu nekoherencije / pravila prakse / obožavanje pravila / summary rules / rule-worship / rule-utilitarianism / practice rules / incoherence objection
Source:
Theoria, 2018, 61, 2, 101-120
Publisher:
  • Srpsko filozofsko društvo, Beograd
Funding / projects:
  • Dynamic Systems in Nature and Society: Philosophical and Empirical Aspects (RS-179041)

DOI: 10.2298/THEO1802101C

ISSN: 0351-2274

[ Google Scholar ]
URI
http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2488
Collections
  • Radovi istraživača / Researcher's publications - Odeljenje za filozofiju
Institution/Community
Filozofija / Philosophy
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Cekić, Nenad
PY  - 2018
UR  - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2488
AB  - Primedba na osnovu nekoherencije" ili "obožavanje pravila" je jedna od najčešćih tema rasprave koja se vodi između dva glavna tabora unutar utilitarističkog pogleda na moral - "utilitarista postupaka" i "utilitarista pravila". Reč je o primedbi koja su stvorili utilitaristi postupaka da bi osporili utilitarizam pravila. Autor razmatra dve teze: 1) da je još Džon Stjuart Mil bio svestan ove primedbe; i 2) da su neke rane kritike Milovog utilitarizma bile zasnovane na ovoj primedbi. U zaključku, autor ispituje da li bi teorijsko razlikovanje "sumarnih pravila" i "pravila prakse" moglo razrešiti problem nekoherencije unutar utilitarizma pravila
AB  - So-called "incoherence objection" or "rule-worship" objection is one of the most famous objections to "rule-utilitarianism" approach to ethics. The author analyzes two indications present in current ethical literature: 1) that John Stuart Mill was aware of "incoherence objection"; and 2) that some early critics of Mill's Utilitarianism were founded on this objection. In the end, the author examines if John Rawls' distinction between "summary" and "practice" rules could resolve the issue posed by incoherence objection
PB  - Srpsko filozofsko društvo, Beograd
T2  - Theoria
T1  - Mil , Utilitarizam pravila i "primedba na osnovu nekoherencije"
T1  - Mill, rule-utilitarianism and "incoherence objection"
EP  - 120
IS  - 2
SP  - 101
VL  - 61
DO  - 10.2298/THEO1802101C
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Cekić, Nenad",
year = "2018",
abstract = "Primedba na osnovu nekoherencije" ili "obožavanje pravila" je jedna od najčešćih tema rasprave koja se vodi između dva glavna tabora unutar utilitarističkog pogleda na moral - "utilitarista postupaka" i "utilitarista pravila". Reč je o primedbi koja su stvorili utilitaristi postupaka da bi osporili utilitarizam pravila. Autor razmatra dve teze: 1) da je još Džon Stjuart Mil bio svestan ove primedbe; i 2) da su neke rane kritike Milovog utilitarizma bile zasnovane na ovoj primedbi. U zaključku, autor ispituje da li bi teorijsko razlikovanje "sumarnih pravila" i "pravila prakse" moglo razrešiti problem nekoherencije unutar utilitarizma pravila, So-called "incoherence objection" or "rule-worship" objection is one of the most famous objections to "rule-utilitarianism" approach to ethics. The author analyzes two indications present in current ethical literature: 1) that John Stuart Mill was aware of "incoherence objection"; and 2) that some early critics of Mill's Utilitarianism were founded on this objection. In the end, the author examines if John Rawls' distinction between "summary" and "practice" rules could resolve the issue posed by incoherence objection",
publisher = "Srpsko filozofsko društvo, Beograd",
journal = "Theoria",
title = "Mil , Utilitarizam pravila i "primedba na osnovu nekoherencije", Mill, rule-utilitarianism and "incoherence objection"",
pages = "120-101",
number = "2",
volume = "61",
doi = "10.2298/THEO1802101C"
}
Cekić, N.. (2018). Mil , Utilitarizam pravila i "primedba na osnovu nekoherencije". in Theoria
Srpsko filozofsko društvo, Beograd., 61(2), 101-120.
https://doi.org/10.2298/THEO1802101C
Cekić N. Mil , Utilitarizam pravila i "primedba na osnovu nekoherencije". in Theoria. 2018;61(2):101-120.
doi:10.2298/THEO1802101C .
Cekić, Nenad, "Mil , Utilitarizam pravila i "primedba na osnovu nekoherencije"" in Theoria, 61, no. 2 (2018):101-120,
https://doi.org/10.2298/THEO1802101C . .

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About REFF | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB
 

 

All of DSpaceInstitutions/communitiesAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis institutionAuthorsTitlesSubjects

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About REFF | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB