REFF - Faculty of Philosophy Repository
University of Belgrade - Faculty of Philosophy
    • English
    • Српски
    • Српски (Serbia)
  • English 
    • English
    • Serbian (Cyrillic)
    • Serbian (Latin)
  • Login
View Item 
  •   REFF
  • Filozofija / Philosophy
  • Radovi istraživača / Researcher's publications - Odeljenje za filozofiju
  • View Item
  •   REFF
  • Filozofija / Philosophy
  • Radovi istraživača / Researcher's publications - Odeljenje za filozofiju
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Granice seksualne slobode i pojam perverzije - da li je seksualna etika "primenjena"?

Limits of sexual freedom and the notion of perversion: Is sexual ethics "applied"?

Thumbnail
2018
2507.pdf (260.4Kb)
Authors
Cekić, Nenad
Article (Published version)
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
Autor ovog članka iznosi dve teze: 1) nema razloga zbog kojih bi "seksualnu etiku" trebalo isključiti iz danas popularne "bioetike"; i 2) da ključni pojmovi seksualne etike, kao što je pojam "perverzije", zaslužuju podrobnu filozofsku analizu. Kao primer potreba za takvom analizom autor iznosi argumentaciju zašto pojam perverzije, uprkos vladajućoj "libertarijanskoj" paradigmi, treba zadržati u upotrebi.
This article has two main points: 1) there are no reasons why sexual ethics should be excluded from fashionable "applied ethics" and "bioethics" investigations, and 2) that the key concepts of "sexual discourse" - especially the concept of "perversion"deserves full philosophical attention. As an example, the author offers a brief analysis of the reasons why, despite the ruling "libertarian paradigm", the concept of "perversion" should be kept in ordinary language.
Keywords:
svakodnevni jezik / seksualna etika / perverzija / bioetika / sexual ethics / perversion / ordinary language / bioethics
Source:
Facta universitatis - series: Philosophy, Sociology, Psychology and History, 2018, 17, 1, 89-95
Publisher:
  • Univerzitet u Nišu, Niš

DOI: 10.22190/FUPSPH1801089C

ISSN: 1820-8495

[ Google Scholar ]
URI
http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2510
Collections
  • Radovi istraživača / Researcher's publications - Odeljenje za filozofiju
Institution/Community
Filozofija / Philosophy
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Cekić, Nenad
PY  - 2018
UR  - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2510
AB  - Autor ovog članka iznosi dve teze: 1) nema razloga zbog kojih bi "seksualnu etiku" trebalo isključiti iz danas popularne "bioetike"; i 2) da ključni pojmovi seksualne etike, kao što je pojam "perverzije", zaslužuju podrobnu filozofsku analizu. Kao primer potreba za takvom analizom autor iznosi argumentaciju zašto pojam perverzije, uprkos vladajućoj "libertarijanskoj" paradigmi, treba zadržati u upotrebi.
AB  - This article has two main points: 1) there are no reasons why sexual ethics should be excluded from fashionable "applied ethics" and "bioethics" investigations, and 2) that the key concepts of "sexual discourse" - especially the concept of "perversion"deserves full philosophical attention. As an example, the author offers a brief analysis of the reasons why, despite the ruling "libertarian paradigm", the concept of "perversion" should be kept in ordinary language.
PB  - Univerzitet u Nišu, Niš
T2  - Facta universitatis - series: Philosophy, Sociology, Psychology and History
T1  - Granice seksualne slobode i pojam perverzije - da li je seksualna etika "primenjena"?
T1  - Limits of sexual freedom and the notion of perversion: Is sexual ethics "applied"?
EP  - 95
IS  - 1
SP  - 89
VL  - 17
DO  - 10.22190/FUPSPH1801089C
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Cekić, Nenad",
year = "2018",
abstract = "Autor ovog članka iznosi dve teze: 1) nema razloga zbog kojih bi "seksualnu etiku" trebalo isključiti iz danas popularne "bioetike"; i 2) da ključni pojmovi seksualne etike, kao što je pojam "perverzije", zaslužuju podrobnu filozofsku analizu. Kao primer potreba za takvom analizom autor iznosi argumentaciju zašto pojam perverzije, uprkos vladajućoj "libertarijanskoj" paradigmi, treba zadržati u upotrebi., This article has two main points: 1) there are no reasons why sexual ethics should be excluded from fashionable "applied ethics" and "bioethics" investigations, and 2) that the key concepts of "sexual discourse" - especially the concept of "perversion"deserves full philosophical attention. As an example, the author offers a brief analysis of the reasons why, despite the ruling "libertarian paradigm", the concept of "perversion" should be kept in ordinary language.",
publisher = "Univerzitet u Nišu, Niš",
journal = "Facta universitatis - series: Philosophy, Sociology, Psychology and History",
title = "Granice seksualne slobode i pojam perverzije - da li je seksualna etika "primenjena"?, Limits of sexual freedom and the notion of perversion: Is sexual ethics "applied"?",
pages = "95-89",
number = "1",
volume = "17",
doi = "10.22190/FUPSPH1801089C"
}
Cekić, N.. (2018). Granice seksualne slobode i pojam perverzije - da li je seksualna etika "primenjena"?. in Facta universitatis - series: Philosophy, Sociology, Psychology and History
Univerzitet u Nišu, Niš., 17(1), 89-95.
https://doi.org/10.22190/FUPSPH1801089C
Cekić N. Granice seksualne slobode i pojam perverzije - da li je seksualna etika "primenjena"?. in Facta universitatis - series: Philosophy, Sociology, Psychology and History. 2018;17(1):89-95.
doi:10.22190/FUPSPH1801089C .
Cekić, Nenad, "Granice seksualne slobode i pojam perverzije - da li je seksualna etika "primenjena"?" in Facta universitatis - series: Philosophy, Sociology, Psychology and History, 17, no. 1 (2018):89-95,
https://doi.org/10.22190/FUPSPH1801089C . .

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About REFF | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB
 

 

All of DSpaceInstitutions/communitiesAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis institutionAuthorsTitlesSubjects

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About REFF | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB