REFF - Faculty of Philosophy Repository
University of Belgrade - Faculty of Philosophy
    • English
    • Српски
    • Српски (Serbia)
  • English 
    • English
    • Serbian (Cyrillic)
    • Serbian (Latin)
  • Login
View Item 
  •   REFF
  • Istorija / History
  • Radovi istraživača / Researcher's publications - Odeljenje za istoriju
  • View Item
  •   REFF
  • Istorija / History
  • Radovi istraživača / Researcher's publications - Odeljenje za istoriju
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Salustije o Marku Antoniju

Sallust on Mark Antony

Thumbnail
2019
2696.pdf (351.6Kb)
Authors
Petković, Žarko
Article (Published version)
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
Iako se sa izvesnošću može reći da Salustije Krisp nije bio pristalica režima Drugog Trijumvirata, nema direktnih svedočanstava da je on nastupao protiv režima koji su uspostavili Oktavijan, Marko Antonije i Lepid. Uprkos tome, niz indicija, čija ukupna vrednost ima snagu dokaza, govori da je Salustije bio nezadovoljan ili razočaran političkom situacijom u Rimu posle ubistva Cezara. Cilj ovog rada je da se pokaže kako je TA skrivena i oprezna kritika uperena i protiv Marka Antonija lično. Na primer, Salustije, između ostalog, izobličava postupak Lucija Antonija, Markovog brata (Cat. 51.36) i predstavlja niz ljudi bliskih Marku Antoniju u krajnje nepovoljnom svetlu. Konačno, verujem da Salustijeva (za antička shvatanja iznenađujuća) primedba o lovu kao ropskom poslu (servilium officium, Cat. 4.1) jeste aluzija na ponašanje Marka Antonija, koji se u času nastanka Katilinine zavere (kako je tvrdila njemu neprijateljska propaganda) u društvu kraljice Kleopatre oblačio kao rob, ali se i bav...io lovom (Plut. Ant. 29.1).

It was previously postulated and convincingly shown that Sallust was not a friend of Octavian, Mark Antony and Lepidus' regime, although there is no information that he openly opposed the Triumvirs. Sallust's retirement from public office after Caesar's death and more than one allusion to contemporary politics in his monographs leave no space for any other conclusion. The aim of this contribution is to show that Sallust's hidden critique - which was the only possible at the time when the memories of recent sufferings during the Civil War and proscriptions were still strong - was specially aimed against Mark Antony. Concluding argument - but not the only one - could be found in Sallust's (so far) unclear remark on hunting as servilium officium (Cat. 4.1): in fact, well known scandalous behaviour of Mark Antony and Cleopatra included hunting (Plut. Ant. 29.1).
Keywords:
Salustije Krisp / proskripcije / Plutarh / Oktavijan / Marko Antonije / lov / drugi trijumvirat / second triumvirate / Sallust / proscriptions / Plutarch / Octavian / Mark Antony / hunting
Source:
Lucida intervalla - prilozi odeljenja za klasične nauke, 2019, 48, 63-76
Publisher:
  • Univerzitet u Beogradu - Filozofski fakultet - Odeljenje za klasične nauke, Beograd

ISSN: 1450-6645

[ Google Scholar ]
Handle
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_2699
URI
http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2699
Collections
  • Radovi istraživača / Researcher's publications - Odeljenje za istoriju
Institution/Community
Istorija / History
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Petković, Žarko
PY  - 2019
UR  - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2699
AB  - Iako se sa izvesnošću može reći da Salustije Krisp nije bio pristalica režima Drugog Trijumvirata, nema direktnih svedočanstava da je on nastupao protiv režima koji su uspostavili Oktavijan, Marko Antonije i Lepid. Uprkos tome, niz indicija, čija ukupna vrednost ima snagu dokaza, govori da je Salustije bio nezadovoljan ili razočaran političkom situacijom u Rimu posle ubistva Cezara. Cilj ovog rada je da se pokaže kako je TA skrivena i oprezna kritika uperena i protiv Marka Antonija lično. Na primer, Salustije, između ostalog, izobličava postupak Lucija Antonija, Markovog brata (Cat. 51.36) i predstavlja niz ljudi bliskih Marku Antoniju u krajnje nepovoljnom svetlu. Konačno, verujem da Salustijeva (za antička shvatanja iznenađujuća) primedba o lovu kao ropskom poslu (servilium officium, Cat. 4.1) jeste aluzija na ponašanje Marka Antonija, koji se u času nastanka Katilinine zavere (kako je tvrdila njemu neprijateljska propaganda) u društvu kraljice Kleopatre oblačio kao rob, ali se i bavio lovom (Plut. Ant. 29.1).
AB  - It was previously postulated and convincingly shown that Sallust was not a friend of Octavian, Mark Antony and Lepidus' regime, although there is no information that he openly opposed the Triumvirs. Sallust's retirement from public office after Caesar's death and more than one allusion to contemporary politics in his monographs leave no space for any other conclusion. The aim of this contribution is to show that Sallust's hidden critique - which was the only possible at the time when the memories of recent sufferings during the Civil War and proscriptions were still strong - was specially aimed against Mark Antony. Concluding argument - but not the only one - could be found in Sallust's (so far) unclear remark on hunting as servilium officium (Cat. 4.1): in fact, well known scandalous behaviour of Mark Antony and Cleopatra included hunting (Plut. Ant. 29.1).
PB  - Univerzitet u Beogradu - Filozofski fakultet - Odeljenje za klasične nauke, Beograd
T2  - Lucida intervalla - prilozi odeljenja za klasične nauke
T1  - Salustije o Marku Antoniju
T1  - Sallust on Mark Antony
EP  - 76
IS  - 48
SP  - 63
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_2699
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Petković, Žarko",
year = "2019",
abstract = "Iako se sa izvesnošću može reći da Salustije Krisp nije bio pristalica režima Drugog Trijumvirata, nema direktnih svedočanstava da je on nastupao protiv režima koji su uspostavili Oktavijan, Marko Antonije i Lepid. Uprkos tome, niz indicija, čija ukupna vrednost ima snagu dokaza, govori da je Salustije bio nezadovoljan ili razočaran političkom situacijom u Rimu posle ubistva Cezara. Cilj ovog rada je da se pokaže kako je TA skrivena i oprezna kritika uperena i protiv Marka Antonija lično. Na primer, Salustije, između ostalog, izobličava postupak Lucija Antonija, Markovog brata (Cat. 51.36) i predstavlja niz ljudi bliskih Marku Antoniju u krajnje nepovoljnom svetlu. Konačno, verujem da Salustijeva (za antička shvatanja iznenađujuća) primedba o lovu kao ropskom poslu (servilium officium, Cat. 4.1) jeste aluzija na ponašanje Marka Antonija, koji se u času nastanka Katilinine zavere (kako je tvrdila njemu neprijateljska propaganda) u društvu kraljice Kleopatre oblačio kao rob, ali se i bavio lovom (Plut. Ant. 29.1)., It was previously postulated and convincingly shown that Sallust was not a friend of Octavian, Mark Antony and Lepidus' regime, although there is no information that he openly opposed the Triumvirs. Sallust's retirement from public office after Caesar's death and more than one allusion to contemporary politics in his monographs leave no space for any other conclusion. The aim of this contribution is to show that Sallust's hidden critique - which was the only possible at the time when the memories of recent sufferings during the Civil War and proscriptions were still strong - was specially aimed against Mark Antony. Concluding argument - but not the only one - could be found in Sallust's (so far) unclear remark on hunting as servilium officium (Cat. 4.1): in fact, well known scandalous behaviour of Mark Antony and Cleopatra included hunting (Plut. Ant. 29.1).",
publisher = "Univerzitet u Beogradu - Filozofski fakultet - Odeljenje za klasične nauke, Beograd",
journal = "Lucida intervalla - prilozi odeljenja za klasične nauke",
title = "Salustije o Marku Antoniju, Sallust on Mark Antony",
pages = "76-63",
number = "48",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_2699"
}
Petković, Ž.. (2019). Salustije o Marku Antoniju. in Lucida intervalla - prilozi odeljenja za klasične nauke
Univerzitet u Beogradu - Filozofski fakultet - Odeljenje za klasične nauke, Beograd.(48), 63-76.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_2699
Petković Ž. Salustije o Marku Antoniju. in Lucida intervalla - prilozi odeljenja za klasične nauke. 2019;(48):63-76.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_2699 .
Petković, Žarko, "Salustije o Marku Antoniju" in Lucida intervalla - prilozi odeljenja za klasične nauke, no. 48 (2019):63-76,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_2699 .

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About REFF | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB
 

 

All of DSpaceInstitutions/communitiesAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis institutionAuthorsTitlesSubjects

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About REFF | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB