Platon i moderne prirodne nauke
Plato and modern natural sciences
Abstract
Između Platonovog pojma nauke (episteme) i modernog pojma nauke postoje gotovo nepremostive razlike, ali i određene sličnosti. U poznim dijalozima kao što su Teetet, Fileb, ili Timaj, Platon u izvesnoj meri redefiniše sopstveni pojam znanja koji je razvio u Državi. Pravo znanje se ne mora odnositi isključivo na nepromenljive aspekte stvarnosti. Platonova karakterizacija kosmologije kao eikos logos-a ("verovatne" priče, eng. likely story) u dijalogu Timaj predstavlja jedan vid anticipacije koncepta opovrgljivosti, koji dominira modernom filozofijom nauke. Iskustvo i osmatranje, te matematički, psihološki i biološki pojmovi, zauzimaju značajno, neizostavno mesto u strukturi Timajevog kosmološkog modela.
There are almost irreconcilable differences between Plato's notion of science (episteme) and the modern notion, but also certain similarities. In the late dialogues such as The Theaetetus, The Philebus, and The Timaeus, Plato redefines his own notion of knowledge developed in The Republic to some extent. Genuine knowledge does not refer solely to the unchangeable aspects of reality. Plato's characterization of cosmology as an eikos logos ("likely story") in The Timaeus is an anticipation of the concept of falsifiabilit that dominates modern philosophy of science. Experience and observation, as well as mathematical, psychological and biological concepts, occupy a significant, indispensable place within the structure of Timaeus' cosmological model.
Keywords:
platonizam / moderne prirodne nauke / model / matematika / kosmologija / Platonism / modern natural sciences / model / mathematics / cosmologySource:
Theoria, 2019, 62, 3, 17-28Publisher:
- Srpsko filozofsko društvo, Beograd
Funding / projects:
- History of Serbian Philosophy (RS-179064)
Institution/Community
Filozofija / PhilosophyTY - JOUR AU - Kandić, Aleksandar PY - 2019 UR - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2810 AB - Između Platonovog pojma nauke (episteme) i modernog pojma nauke postoje gotovo nepremostive razlike, ali i određene sličnosti. U poznim dijalozima kao što su Teetet, Fileb, ili Timaj, Platon u izvesnoj meri redefiniše sopstveni pojam znanja koji je razvio u Državi. Pravo znanje se ne mora odnositi isključivo na nepromenljive aspekte stvarnosti. Platonova karakterizacija kosmologije kao eikos logos-a ("verovatne" priče, eng. likely story) u dijalogu Timaj predstavlja jedan vid anticipacije koncepta opovrgljivosti, koji dominira modernom filozofijom nauke. Iskustvo i osmatranje, te matematički, psihološki i biološki pojmovi, zauzimaju značajno, neizostavno mesto u strukturi Timajevog kosmološkog modela. AB - There are almost irreconcilable differences between Plato's notion of science (episteme) and the modern notion, but also certain similarities. In the late dialogues such as The Theaetetus, The Philebus, and The Timaeus, Plato redefines his own notion of knowledge developed in The Republic to some extent. Genuine knowledge does not refer solely to the unchangeable aspects of reality. Plato's characterization of cosmology as an eikos logos ("likely story") in The Timaeus is an anticipation of the concept of falsifiabilit that dominates modern philosophy of science. Experience and observation, as well as mathematical, psychological and biological concepts, occupy a significant, indispensable place within the structure of Timaeus' cosmological model. PB - Srpsko filozofsko društvo, Beograd T2 - Theoria T1 - Platon i moderne prirodne nauke T1 - Plato and modern natural sciences EP - 28 IS - 3 SP - 17 VL - 62 DO - 10.2298/THEO1903017K ER -
@article{ author = "Kandić, Aleksandar", year = "2019", abstract = "Između Platonovog pojma nauke (episteme) i modernog pojma nauke postoje gotovo nepremostive razlike, ali i određene sličnosti. U poznim dijalozima kao što su Teetet, Fileb, ili Timaj, Platon u izvesnoj meri redefiniše sopstveni pojam znanja koji je razvio u Državi. Pravo znanje se ne mora odnositi isključivo na nepromenljive aspekte stvarnosti. Platonova karakterizacija kosmologije kao eikos logos-a ("verovatne" priče, eng. likely story) u dijalogu Timaj predstavlja jedan vid anticipacije koncepta opovrgljivosti, koji dominira modernom filozofijom nauke. Iskustvo i osmatranje, te matematički, psihološki i biološki pojmovi, zauzimaju značajno, neizostavno mesto u strukturi Timajevog kosmološkog modela., There are almost irreconcilable differences between Plato's notion of science (episteme) and the modern notion, but also certain similarities. In the late dialogues such as The Theaetetus, The Philebus, and The Timaeus, Plato redefines his own notion of knowledge developed in The Republic to some extent. Genuine knowledge does not refer solely to the unchangeable aspects of reality. Plato's characterization of cosmology as an eikos logos ("likely story") in The Timaeus is an anticipation of the concept of falsifiabilit that dominates modern philosophy of science. Experience and observation, as well as mathematical, psychological and biological concepts, occupy a significant, indispensable place within the structure of Timaeus' cosmological model.", publisher = "Srpsko filozofsko društvo, Beograd", journal = "Theoria", title = "Platon i moderne prirodne nauke, Plato and modern natural sciences", pages = "28-17", number = "3", volume = "62", doi = "10.2298/THEO1903017K" }
Kandić, A.. (2019). Platon i moderne prirodne nauke. in Theoria Srpsko filozofsko društvo, Beograd., 62(3), 17-28. https://doi.org/10.2298/THEO1903017K
Kandić A. Platon i moderne prirodne nauke. in Theoria. 2019;62(3):17-28. doi:10.2298/THEO1903017K .
Kandić, Aleksandar, "Platon i moderne prirodne nauke" in Theoria, 62, no. 3 (2019):17-28, https://doi.org/10.2298/THEO1903017K . .