Soviet Diplomacy on the Creation of the Independent State of Croatia
Само за регистроване кориснике
2019
Чланак у часопису (Објављена верзија)
Метаподаци
Приказ свих података о документуАпстракт
During the interwar period, in the climate of a lack of regular diplomatic relations between the Yugoslav kingdom and Soviet Russia/the USSR, the Soviet side came to see the Yugoslav state as an artificial creation that needed to be destroyed. Later, the stance that the Yugoslav state needed to be reconstituted on a federal basis became more accepted. Despite a series of attempts to normalise interstate relations, a series of controversies, one of the most important being the Soviet stance towards the national question in Yugoslavia, resulted in a lack of regular diplomatic communication between the two states. After long negotiations, official diplomatic relations were established in summer 1940. The most influential Croatian political party - the Croatian Peasant Party led by Vladko Macek - supported the Yugoslav rapprochement with the USSR, seeing in it a sort of counterbalance to aggressive Italian policy towards the Balkans. The Soviet side saw Croatian-Serbian relations - the bac...kbone of the Yugoslav state - as deeply conflicting interests of two opposed bourgeoisies that maintain their political monopoly through compromises and agreements and thus oppose the revolutionary strivings of the working people. They believed that Italy, and especially Germany, would try to use the deep-rooted contradictions between the Serbian and Croatian national bodies in the Yugoslav state in order to destabilise it from within. Soviet diplomacy was convinced that Germany would try to convert Croatia into a starting point for spreading its influence in the Yugoslav lands. They anticipated that, instead of the Croatian Peasant Party, the Axis forces would place their trust in the Ustasha movement and entrust its leader, Ante Pavelic, to lead an independent Croatian state, which would in fact be a puppet state similar to Slovakia. They believed that the Ustasha movement, through its statements and proclamations during the April War, managed to play an important role in the collapse of the Yugoslav kingdom. The Soviets considered the newly-established Croatian state under German and Italian patronage a quisling political creation completely dependent on the Axis powers. The Independent State of Croatia's political and economic treaties with Italy were interpreted as proof of its status as an Italian protectorate. Despite the fears of the Yugoslav government in exile that the USSR could recognise the Independent State of Croatia and establish diplomatic relations with it, this did not come to pass due to the Soviets' negation of its state subjectivity.
Кључне речи:
Soviet Union / Italy / Independent State of Croatia / Germany / diplomacy / April War (Axis invasion of Yugoslavia) / 1941Извор:
Casopis Za Suvremenu Povijest, 2019, 51, 2, 465-480Издавач:
- Hrvatski Inst Povijest, Zagreb
DOI: 10.22586/csp.v51i2.8419
ISSN: 0590-9597
WoS: 000486143100005
Scopus: 2-s2.0-85075720813
Институција/група
Istorija / HistoryTY - JOUR AU - Životić, Aleksandar PY - 2019 UR - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2987 AB - During the interwar period, in the climate of a lack of regular diplomatic relations between the Yugoslav kingdom and Soviet Russia/the USSR, the Soviet side came to see the Yugoslav state as an artificial creation that needed to be destroyed. Later, the stance that the Yugoslav state needed to be reconstituted on a federal basis became more accepted. Despite a series of attempts to normalise interstate relations, a series of controversies, one of the most important being the Soviet stance towards the national question in Yugoslavia, resulted in a lack of regular diplomatic communication between the two states. After long negotiations, official diplomatic relations were established in summer 1940. The most influential Croatian political party - the Croatian Peasant Party led by Vladko Macek - supported the Yugoslav rapprochement with the USSR, seeing in it a sort of counterbalance to aggressive Italian policy towards the Balkans. The Soviet side saw Croatian-Serbian relations - the backbone of the Yugoslav state - as deeply conflicting interests of two opposed bourgeoisies that maintain their political monopoly through compromises and agreements and thus oppose the revolutionary strivings of the working people. They believed that Italy, and especially Germany, would try to use the deep-rooted contradictions between the Serbian and Croatian national bodies in the Yugoslav state in order to destabilise it from within. Soviet diplomacy was convinced that Germany would try to convert Croatia into a starting point for spreading its influence in the Yugoslav lands. They anticipated that, instead of the Croatian Peasant Party, the Axis forces would place their trust in the Ustasha movement and entrust its leader, Ante Pavelic, to lead an independent Croatian state, which would in fact be a puppet state similar to Slovakia. They believed that the Ustasha movement, through its statements and proclamations during the April War, managed to play an important role in the collapse of the Yugoslav kingdom. The Soviets considered the newly-established Croatian state under German and Italian patronage a quisling political creation completely dependent on the Axis powers. The Independent State of Croatia's political and economic treaties with Italy were interpreted as proof of its status as an Italian protectorate. Despite the fears of the Yugoslav government in exile that the USSR could recognise the Independent State of Croatia and establish diplomatic relations with it, this did not come to pass due to the Soviets' negation of its state subjectivity. PB - Hrvatski Inst Povijest, Zagreb T2 - Casopis Za Suvremenu Povijest T1 - Soviet Diplomacy on the Creation of the Independent State of Croatia EP - 480 IS - 2 SP - 465 VL - 51 DO - 10.22586/csp.v51i2.8419 ER -
@article{ author = "Životić, Aleksandar", year = "2019", abstract = "During the interwar period, in the climate of a lack of regular diplomatic relations between the Yugoslav kingdom and Soviet Russia/the USSR, the Soviet side came to see the Yugoslav state as an artificial creation that needed to be destroyed. Later, the stance that the Yugoslav state needed to be reconstituted on a federal basis became more accepted. Despite a series of attempts to normalise interstate relations, a series of controversies, one of the most important being the Soviet stance towards the national question in Yugoslavia, resulted in a lack of regular diplomatic communication between the two states. After long negotiations, official diplomatic relations were established in summer 1940. The most influential Croatian political party - the Croatian Peasant Party led by Vladko Macek - supported the Yugoslav rapprochement with the USSR, seeing in it a sort of counterbalance to aggressive Italian policy towards the Balkans. The Soviet side saw Croatian-Serbian relations - the backbone of the Yugoslav state - as deeply conflicting interests of two opposed bourgeoisies that maintain their political monopoly through compromises and agreements and thus oppose the revolutionary strivings of the working people. They believed that Italy, and especially Germany, would try to use the deep-rooted contradictions between the Serbian and Croatian national bodies in the Yugoslav state in order to destabilise it from within. Soviet diplomacy was convinced that Germany would try to convert Croatia into a starting point for spreading its influence in the Yugoslav lands. They anticipated that, instead of the Croatian Peasant Party, the Axis forces would place their trust in the Ustasha movement and entrust its leader, Ante Pavelic, to lead an independent Croatian state, which would in fact be a puppet state similar to Slovakia. They believed that the Ustasha movement, through its statements and proclamations during the April War, managed to play an important role in the collapse of the Yugoslav kingdom. The Soviets considered the newly-established Croatian state under German and Italian patronage a quisling political creation completely dependent on the Axis powers. The Independent State of Croatia's political and economic treaties with Italy were interpreted as proof of its status as an Italian protectorate. Despite the fears of the Yugoslav government in exile that the USSR could recognise the Independent State of Croatia and establish diplomatic relations with it, this did not come to pass due to the Soviets' negation of its state subjectivity.", publisher = "Hrvatski Inst Povijest, Zagreb", journal = "Casopis Za Suvremenu Povijest", title = "Soviet Diplomacy on the Creation of the Independent State of Croatia", pages = "480-465", number = "2", volume = "51", doi = "10.22586/csp.v51i2.8419" }
Životić, A.. (2019). Soviet Diplomacy on the Creation of the Independent State of Croatia. in Casopis Za Suvremenu Povijest Hrvatski Inst Povijest, Zagreb., 51(2), 465-480. https://doi.org/10.22586/csp.v51i2.8419
Životić A. Soviet Diplomacy on the Creation of the Independent State of Croatia. in Casopis Za Suvremenu Povijest. 2019;51(2):465-480. doi:10.22586/csp.v51i2.8419 .
Životić, Aleksandar, "Soviet Diplomacy on the Creation of the Independent State of Croatia" in Casopis Za Suvremenu Povijest, 51, no. 2 (2019):465-480, https://doi.org/10.22586/csp.v51i2.8419 . .