REFF - Faculty of Philosophy Repository
University of Belgrade - Faculty of Philosophy
    • English
    • Српски
    • Српски (Serbia)
  • English 
    • English
    • Serbian (Cyrillic)
    • Serbian (Latin)
  • Login
View Item 
  •   REFF
  • Filozofija / Philosophy
  • Radovi istraživača / Researcher's publications - Odeljenje za filozofiju
  • View Item
  •   REFF
  • Filozofija / Philosophy
  • Radovi istraživača / Researcher's publications - Odeljenje za filozofiju
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Na zalasku debate o kanonima - kategorije, vrednovanje i priroda estetičke vrednosti

At the end of the debate about canons: Categories, evaluation and the nature of aesthetic value

Thumbnail
2020
3003.pdf (334.7Kb)
Authors
Jovanović, Monika
Article (Published version)
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
Filozofskim javnim mnjenjem upravlja mnoštvo faktora i ponekad se dešava da neka ideja dobije opšte priznanje, a da istovremeno prođe čak nekoliko decenija pre nego što joj se posveti sistematska pažnja. U savremenoj estetici je malo tekstova koji se po originalnosti i uticaju mogu meriti sa radom "Kategorije umetnosti" Kendala Voltona; zato i ne čudi što se savremeni estetičari često nadovezuju na Voltonovu tezu. Pa ipak, posle gotovo pola veka od objavljivanja, još uvek nemamo iscrpnu i obuhvatnu interpretaciju njegovog teksta. Ni sam Volton, štaviše, nigde ne nudi detaljnu razradu ideja koje u tom radu formuliše, od kojih su mnoge date tek u skici. Osim toga, Volton svoju tezu ne primenjuje na vrednosne estetičke sudove, iako bi NAM TA ideja danas, na zalasku debate o kanonima, više nego ikad mogla pomoći da razumemo prirodu estetičkog vrednovanja. Ovaj rad ima za cilj da još jednom skrene pažnju na značaj Voltonove teze i preispita njen prijem u savremenoj estetici.
The public opinion in philosophy is guided by a multitude of factors and sometimes an idea gets general recognition but is systematically studied only after a few decades have passed. There aren't many papers in contemporary aesthetics that can match the originality and influence of Kendall Walton's 'Categories of Art'. It is unsurprising, then, that contemporary aestheticians often expand upon its main theses. Nevertheless, even after almost half a century from its first publication, an exhaustive and comprehensive interpretation of Walton's paper is still lacking. Moreover, even Walton himself doesn't provide a detailed elucidation of his ideas, many of which are merely outlined in his seminal paper. Furthermore, he doesn't apply his view to evaluative aesthetic judgments, even though such an attempt could today, when the debate about aesthetic canons is on the wane, might help us understand the nature of aesthetic evaluation. The goal of this paper is to once again shed some light o...n the significance of Walton's approach and on its reception in contemporary aesthetics.

Keywords:
standardno/kontra-standardno / relativizam / namere autora / kategorije umetnosti / formalizam/anti-formalizam / estetičko vrednovanje / estetička vrednost / datiranje
Source:
Theoria, 2020, 63, 1, 143-158
Publisher:
  • Srpsko filozofsko društvo, Beograd
Funding / projects:
  • Dynamic Systems in Nature and Society: Philosophical and Empirical Aspects (RS-179041)

DOI: 10.2298/THEO2001143J

ISSN: 0351-2274

[ Google Scholar ]
URI
http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/3006
Collections
  • Radovi istraživača / Researcher's publications - Odeljenje za filozofiju
Institution/Community
Filozofija / Philosophy
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Jovanović, Monika
PY  - 2020
UR  - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/3006
AB  - Filozofskim javnim mnjenjem upravlja mnoštvo faktora i ponekad se dešava da neka ideja dobije opšte priznanje, a da istovremeno prođe čak nekoliko decenija pre nego što joj se posveti sistematska pažnja. U savremenoj estetici je malo tekstova koji se po originalnosti i uticaju mogu meriti sa radom "Kategorije umetnosti" Kendala Voltona; zato i ne čudi što se savremeni estetičari često nadovezuju na Voltonovu tezu. Pa ipak, posle gotovo pola veka od objavljivanja, još uvek nemamo iscrpnu i obuhvatnu interpretaciju njegovog teksta. Ni sam Volton, štaviše, nigde ne nudi detaljnu razradu ideja koje u tom radu formuliše, od kojih su mnoge date tek u skici. Osim toga, Volton svoju tezu ne primenjuje na vrednosne estetičke sudove, iako bi NAM TA ideja danas, na zalasku debate o kanonima, više nego ikad mogla pomoći da razumemo prirodu estetičkog vrednovanja. Ovaj rad ima za cilj da još jednom skrene pažnju na značaj Voltonove teze i preispita njen prijem u savremenoj estetici.
AB  - The public opinion in philosophy is guided by a multitude of factors and sometimes an idea gets general recognition but is systematically studied only after a few decades have passed. There aren't many papers in contemporary aesthetics that can match the originality and influence of Kendall Walton's 'Categories of Art'. It is unsurprising, then, that contemporary aestheticians often expand upon its main theses. Nevertheless, even after almost half a century from its first publication, an exhaustive and comprehensive interpretation of Walton's paper is still lacking. Moreover, even Walton himself doesn't provide a detailed elucidation of his ideas, many of which are merely outlined in his seminal paper. Furthermore, he doesn't apply his view to evaluative aesthetic judgments, even though such an attempt could today, when the debate about aesthetic canons is on the wane, might help us understand the nature of aesthetic evaluation. The goal of this paper is to once again shed some light on the significance of Walton's approach and on its reception in contemporary aesthetics.
PB  - Srpsko filozofsko društvo, Beograd
T2  - Theoria
T1  - Na zalasku debate o kanonima - kategorije, vrednovanje i priroda estetičke vrednosti
T1  - At the end of the debate about canons: Categories, evaluation and the nature of aesthetic value
EP  - 158
IS  - 1
SP  - 143
VL  - 63
DO  - 10.2298/THEO2001143J
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Jovanović, Monika",
year = "2020",
abstract = "Filozofskim javnim mnjenjem upravlja mnoštvo faktora i ponekad se dešava da neka ideja dobije opšte priznanje, a da istovremeno prođe čak nekoliko decenija pre nego što joj se posveti sistematska pažnja. U savremenoj estetici je malo tekstova koji se po originalnosti i uticaju mogu meriti sa radom "Kategorije umetnosti" Kendala Voltona; zato i ne čudi što se savremeni estetičari često nadovezuju na Voltonovu tezu. Pa ipak, posle gotovo pola veka od objavljivanja, još uvek nemamo iscrpnu i obuhvatnu interpretaciju njegovog teksta. Ni sam Volton, štaviše, nigde ne nudi detaljnu razradu ideja koje u tom radu formuliše, od kojih su mnoge date tek u skici. Osim toga, Volton svoju tezu ne primenjuje na vrednosne estetičke sudove, iako bi NAM TA ideja danas, na zalasku debate o kanonima, više nego ikad mogla pomoći da razumemo prirodu estetičkog vrednovanja. Ovaj rad ima za cilj da još jednom skrene pažnju na značaj Voltonove teze i preispita njen prijem u savremenoj estetici., The public opinion in philosophy is guided by a multitude of factors and sometimes an idea gets general recognition but is systematically studied only after a few decades have passed. There aren't many papers in contemporary aesthetics that can match the originality and influence of Kendall Walton's 'Categories of Art'. It is unsurprising, then, that contemporary aestheticians often expand upon its main theses. Nevertheless, even after almost half a century from its first publication, an exhaustive and comprehensive interpretation of Walton's paper is still lacking. Moreover, even Walton himself doesn't provide a detailed elucidation of his ideas, many of which are merely outlined in his seminal paper. Furthermore, he doesn't apply his view to evaluative aesthetic judgments, even though such an attempt could today, when the debate about aesthetic canons is on the wane, might help us understand the nature of aesthetic evaluation. The goal of this paper is to once again shed some light on the significance of Walton's approach and on its reception in contemporary aesthetics.",
publisher = "Srpsko filozofsko društvo, Beograd",
journal = "Theoria",
title = "Na zalasku debate o kanonima - kategorije, vrednovanje i priroda estetičke vrednosti, At the end of the debate about canons: Categories, evaluation and the nature of aesthetic value",
pages = "158-143",
number = "1",
volume = "63",
doi = "10.2298/THEO2001143J"
}
Jovanović, M.. (2020). Na zalasku debate o kanonima - kategorije, vrednovanje i priroda estetičke vrednosti. in Theoria
Srpsko filozofsko društvo, Beograd., 63(1), 143-158.
https://doi.org/10.2298/THEO2001143J
Jovanović M. Na zalasku debate o kanonima - kategorije, vrednovanje i priroda estetičke vrednosti. in Theoria. 2020;63(1):143-158.
doi:10.2298/THEO2001143J .
Jovanović, Monika, "Na zalasku debate o kanonima - kategorije, vrednovanje i priroda estetičke vrednosti" in Theoria, 63, no. 1 (2020):143-158,
https://doi.org/10.2298/THEO2001143J . .

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About REFF | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB
 

 

All of DSpaceInstitutions/communitiesAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis institutionAuthorsTitlesSubjects

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About REFF | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB