Prikaz osnovnih podataka o dokumentu

dc.creatorDeretić, Irina
dc.creatorKnežević, Višnja
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-12T13:17:52Z
dc.date.available2021-10-12T13:17:52Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.issn2196-5102
dc.identifier.urihttp://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/3099
dc.description.abstractWe critically reconsider an old hypothesis of the role of the dekad in Pythagorean philosophy. Unlike Zhmud, we claim that: 1) the dekad did play a role in Philolaus' astronomical system, and 2) Aristotle did not project Plato's theory of the ten eidetic numbers onto the Pythagoreans. We claim that the dekad, as the should be understood in Philolaus' philosophy as completeness and the basis of counting in Greek - as in most other languages - in a decimal system. Additionally, we argue that the number ten is not even a candidate for the in Plato's philosophy. As a final result of our discussion, we compare and contrast Philolaus', Plato's, and Speusippus' accounts of completeness in relation to numbers.en
dc.publisherWalter de Gruyter Gmbh, Berlin
dc.rightsrestrictedAccess
dc.sourceRhizomata-A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science
dc.subjectPlatoen
dc.subjectPhilolausen
dc.subjectdekaden
dc.subjectcounter-earthen
dc.subjectAristotleen
dc.titleThe Number Ten Reconsidered: Did the Pythagoreans Have an Account of the Dekad?en
dc.typearticle
dc.rights.licenseARR
dc.citation.epage58
dc.citation.issue1
dc.citation.other8(1): 37-58
dc.citation.spage37
dc.citation.volume8
dc.identifier.doi10.1515/rhiz-2020-0001
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85097311689
dc.identifier.wos000594470300002
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion


Dokumenti

Thumbnail

Ovaj dokument se pojavljuje u sledećim kolekcijama

Prikaz osnovnih podataka o dokumentu