Приказ основних података о документу

dc.creatorKostić, Jovana
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-12T13:21:01Z
dc.date.available2021-10-12T13:21:01Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.issn1820-0958
dc.identifier.urihttp://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/3148
dc.description.abstractIn this paper, we follow Gödel's remarks on an envisioned theory of concepts to determine which properties should a logical basis of such a theory have. The discussion is organized around the question of suitability of the classical predicate calculus for this role. Some reasons to think that classical logic is not an appropriate basis for the theory of concepts, will be presented. We consider, based on these reasons, which alternative logical system could fare better as a logical foundation of, in Gödel's opinion, the most important theory in logic yet to be developed. This paper should, in particular, motivate the study of partial predicates in a certain system of three-valued logic, as a promising starting point for the foundation of the theory of concepts.en
dc.publisherUniverzitet u Novom Sadu - Filozofski fakultet - Odsek za filozofiju, Novi Sad
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MESTD/Basic Research (BR or ON)/179041/RS//
dc.rightsrestrictedAccess
dc.sourceJournal of Philosophy ARHE
dc.subjectThree-valued logicen
dc.subjectPartial predicateen
dc.subjectMeaningful applicabilityen
dc.subjectIntensionen
dc.subjectConnectiveen
dc.subjectConcepten
dc.titleLogic for the theory of concepts2en
dc.typearticle
dc.rights.licenseARR
dc.citation.epage102
dc.citation.issue34
dc.citation.other27(34): 85-102
dc.citation.rankM51~
dc.citation.spage85
dc.citation.volume27
dc.identifier.doi10.19090/arhe.2020.34.85-102
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85104268097
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion


Документи

Thumbnail

Овај документ се појављује у следећим колекцијама

Приказ основних података о документу