Приказ основних података о документу

dc.creatorMaksimović, Katarina
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-12T13:21:05Z
dc.date.available2021-10-12T13:21:05Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.issn1820-0958
dc.identifier.urihttp://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/3149
dc.description.abstractThe goal of this paper is to introduce the reader to the distinction between intensional and extensional as a distinction between different approaches to meaning. We will argue that despite the common belief, intensional aspects of mathematical notions can be, and in fact have been successfully described in mathematics. One that is for us particularly interesting is the notion of deduction as depicted in general proof theory. Our considerations result in defending a) the importance of a rule-based semantical approach and b) the position according to which non-reductive and somewhat circular explanations play an essential role in describing intensionality in mathematics.en
dc.publisherUniverzitet u Novom Sadu - Filozofski fakultet - Odsek za filozofiju, Novi Sad
dc.rightsrestrictedAccess
dc.sourceJournal of Philosophy ARHE
dc.subjectProof-theoretic semanticsen
dc.subjectProof theoryen
dc.subjectIntensional logicen
dc.subjectIntensional definitionen
dc.subjectImplicit definitionsen
dc.titleFacets of intensionalityen
dc.typearticle
dc.rights.licenseARR
dc.citation.epage83
dc.citation.issue34
dc.citation.other27(34): 61-83
dc.citation.rankM51~
dc.citation.spage61
dc.citation.volume27
dc.identifier.doi10.19090/arhe.2020.34.61-83
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85104242565
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion


Документи

Thumbnail

Овај документ се појављује у следећим колекцијама

Приказ основних података о документу