In her book Democracy and Truth: The Conflict between Political and Epistemic Virtues, Snjezana Prijic Samarzija advocates a stance that not only political, but also epistemic values are necessary for justification of democracy. Specifically, she mounts defense for one particular type of public deliberation on epistemic grounds. In this paper, l will discuss the following issue: What connects this type of public deliberation to the wider context of (epistemic) justification of democracy? I will attempt to explain why Prijie Samarzija's stance can be understood as a version of deliberative epistemic instrumentalism and to discuss the role played by the public deliberation within this framework.
Keywords:
public deliberation / procedure / epistemic values / democratic system / democracy
Source:
Filozofija i društvo, 2020, 31, 1, 3-11
Publisher:
Univerzitet u Beogradu - Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, Beograd
TY - JOUR
AU - Mladenović, Ivan
PY - 2020
UR - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/3178
AB - In her book Democracy and Truth: The Conflict between Political and Epistemic Virtues, Snjezana Prijic Samarzija advocates a stance that not only political, but also epistemic values are necessary for justification of democracy. Specifically, she mounts defense for one particular type of public deliberation on epistemic grounds. In this paper, l will discuss the following issue: What connects this type of public deliberation to the wider context of (epistemic) justification of democracy? I will attempt to explain why Prijie Samarzija's stance can be understood as a version of deliberative epistemic instrumentalism and to discuss the role played by the public deliberation within this framework.
PB - Univerzitet u Beogradu - Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, Beograd
T2 - Filozofija i društvo
T1 - Deliberative epistemic instrumentalism, or something near enough
EP - 11
IS - 1
SP - 3
VL - 31
DO - 10.2298/FID2001003M
ER -
@article{
author = "Mladenović, Ivan",
year = "2020",
abstract = "In her book Democracy and Truth: The Conflict between Political and Epistemic Virtues, Snjezana Prijic Samarzija advocates a stance that not only political, but also epistemic values are necessary for justification of democracy. Specifically, she mounts defense for one particular type of public deliberation on epistemic grounds. In this paper, l will discuss the following issue: What connects this type of public deliberation to the wider context of (epistemic) justification of democracy? I will attempt to explain why Prijie Samarzija's stance can be understood as a version of deliberative epistemic instrumentalism and to discuss the role played by the public deliberation within this framework.",
publisher = "Univerzitet u Beogradu - Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, Beograd",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo",
title = "Deliberative epistemic instrumentalism, or something near enough",
pages = "11-3",
number = "1",
volume = "31",
doi = "10.2298/FID2001003M"
}
Mladenović, I.. (2020). Deliberative epistemic instrumentalism, or something near enough. in Filozofija i društvo
Univerzitet u Beogradu - Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, Beograd., 31(1), 3-11.
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2001003M
Mladenović I. Deliberative epistemic instrumentalism, or something near enough. in Filozofija i društvo. 2020;31(1):3-11.
doi:10.2298/FID2001003M .
Mladenović, Ivan, "Deliberative epistemic instrumentalism, or something near enough" in Filozofija i društvo, 31, no. 1 (2020):3-11,
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2001003M . .
