Приказ основних података о документу

dc.creatorVagvoelgyi, Reka
dc.creatorBergstroem, Kirstin
dc.creatorBulajić, Aleksandar
dc.creatorKlatte, Maria
dc.creatorFernandes, Tania
dc.creatorGrosche, Michael
dc.creatorHuettig, Falk
dc.creatorRuesseler, Jascha
dc.creatorLachmann, Thomas
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-12T13:27:10Z
dc.date.available2021-10-12T13:27:10Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.issn2520-100X
dc.identifier.urihttp://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/3245
dc.description.abstractA considerable amount of the population in more economically developed countries are functionally illiterate (i.e., low literate). Despite some years of schooling and basic reading skills, these individuals cannot properly read and write and, as a consequence have problems to understand even short texts. An often-discussed approach (Greenberg et al. 1997) assumes weak phonological processing skills coupled with untreated developmental dyslexia as possible causes of functional illiteracy. Although there is some data suggesting commonalities between low literacy and developmental dyslexia, it is still not clear, whether these reflect shared consequences (i.e., cognitive and behavioral profile) or shared causes. The present systematic review aims at exploring the similarities and differences identified in empirical studies investigating both functional illiterate and developmental dyslexic samples. Nine electronic databases were searched in order to identify all quantitative studies published in English or German. Although a broad search strategy and few limitations were applied, only 5 studies have been identified adequate from the resulting 9269 references. The results point to the lack of studies directly comparing functional illiterate with developmental dyslexic samples. Moreover, a huge variance has been identified between the studies in how they approached the concept of functional illiteracy, particularly when it came to critical categories such the applied definition, terminology, criteria for inclusion in the sample, research focus, and outcome measures. The available data highlight the need for more direct comparisons in order to understand what extent functional illiteracy and dyslexia share common characteristics.en
dc.publisherSpringernature, London
dc.relationProjekt DEAL
dc.relationGerman Federal Ministry of Educational Research (BMBF 01GJ1801)
dc.rightsrestrictedAccess
dc.sourceJournal of Cultural Cognitive Science
dc.subjectReadingen
dc.subjectLow literateen
dc.subjectIlliteracyen
dc.subjectDyslexiaen
dc.subjectComprehensionen
dc.subjectAdult basic educationen
dc.titleFunctional illiteracy and developmental dyslexia: looking for common roots. A systematic reviewen
dc.typearticle
dc.rights.licenseARR
dc.citation.epage179
dc.citation.issue2
dc.citation.other5(2): 159-179
dc.citation.spage159
dc.citation.volume5
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s41809-021-00074-9
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85103188024
dc.identifier.wos000677545500007
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion


Документи

Thumbnail

Овај документ се појављује у следећим колекцијама

Приказ основних података о документу