REFF - Faculty of Philosophy Repository
University of Belgrade - Faculty of Philosophy
    • English
    • Српски
    • Српски (Serbia)
  • English 
    • English
    • Serbian (Cyrillic)
    • Serbian (Latin)
  • Login
View Item 
  •   REFF
  • Psihologija / Psychology
  • Radovi istraživača / Researcher's publications - Odeljenje za psihologiju
  • View Item
  •   REFF
  • Psihologija / Psychology
  • Radovi istraživača / Researcher's publications - Odeljenje za psihologiju
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Does parochial cooperation exist in childhood and adolescence? A meta-analysis

No Thumbnail
Authors
Lazić, Aleksandra
Purić, Danka
Krstić, Ksenija
Article (Published version)
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
Although previous meta-analytic evidence supports the existence of parochialism in cooperation among adults, the extent to which children and adolescents are more willing to incur a personal cost to benefit ingroups, compared to outgroups, is not yet clear. We provide the first meta-analysis on the existence and magnitude of parochialism in cooperation among pre-adults. Based on 20 experimental economics studies (k = 69, N = 5268, age = 3-19, 12 countries, published 2008-2019), a multilevel meta-analytic model revealed a small overall effect size indicating that children and adolescents were more cooperative towards ingroups (d = 0.22, 95% CI [0.07, 0.38]). A series of single-moderator analyses tested for the following conditions: participant age and sex; game type ([mini-]dictator game, prisoner's dilemma, public goods dilemma, trust game, ultimatum game); outcome interdependence; membership manipulation (between- vs. within-subjects); group type (natural vs. experimental); reward typ...e (monetary vs. non-monetary); and country of the participant. Parochial cooperation did not vary with participants' age. Parochialism was larger in non-interdependent (dictator-type) compared to interdependent (bargaining and social dilemma) games. There were no moderating effects of group type, membership manipulation or reward type. To provide more data on how parochialism develops, primary studies should report age ranges more precisely and use more restricted age groups.

Keywords:
Parochial cooperation / Meta-analysis / Intergroup bias / Children / Behavioural economics
Source:
International Journal of Psychology, 2021
Publisher:
  • John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester
Funding / projects:
  • Identification, measurement and development of the cognitive and emotional competences important for a Europe-oriented society (RS-179018)

DOI: 10.1002/ijop.12791

ISSN: 0020-7594

PubMed: 34212370

WoS: 000668741200001

Scopus: 2-s2.0-85109322525
[ Google Scholar ]
4
1
URI
http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/3248
Collections
  • Radovi istraživača / Researcher's publications - Odeljenje za psihologiju
Institution/Community
Psihologija / Psychology
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Lazić, Aleksandra
AU  - Purić, Danka
AU  - Krstić, Ksenija
PY  - 2021
UR  - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/3248
AB  - Although previous meta-analytic evidence supports the existence of parochialism in cooperation among adults, the extent to which children and adolescents are more willing to incur a personal cost to benefit ingroups, compared to outgroups, is not yet clear. We provide the first meta-analysis on the existence and magnitude of parochialism in cooperation among pre-adults. Based on 20 experimental economics studies (k = 69, N = 5268, age = 3-19, 12 countries, published 2008-2019), a multilevel meta-analytic model revealed a small overall effect size indicating that children and adolescents were more cooperative towards ingroups (d = 0.22, 95% CI [0.07, 0.38]). A series of single-moderator analyses tested for the following conditions: participant age and sex; game type ([mini-]dictator game, prisoner's dilemma, public goods dilemma, trust game, ultimatum game); outcome interdependence; membership manipulation (between- vs. within-subjects); group type (natural vs. experimental); reward type (monetary vs. non-monetary); and country of the participant. Parochial cooperation did not vary with participants' age. Parochialism was larger in non-interdependent (dictator-type) compared to interdependent (bargaining and social dilemma) games. There were no moderating effects of group type, membership manipulation or reward type. To provide more data on how parochialism develops, primary studies should report age ranges more precisely and use more restricted age groups.
PB  - John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester
T2  - International Journal of Psychology
T1  - Does parochial cooperation exist in childhood and adolescence? A meta-analysis
DO  - 10.1002/ijop.12791
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Lazić, Aleksandra and Purić, Danka and Krstić, Ksenija",
year = "2021",
abstract = "Although previous meta-analytic evidence supports the existence of parochialism in cooperation among adults, the extent to which children and adolescents are more willing to incur a personal cost to benefit ingroups, compared to outgroups, is not yet clear. We provide the first meta-analysis on the existence and magnitude of parochialism in cooperation among pre-adults. Based on 20 experimental economics studies (k = 69, N = 5268, age = 3-19, 12 countries, published 2008-2019), a multilevel meta-analytic model revealed a small overall effect size indicating that children and adolescents were more cooperative towards ingroups (d = 0.22, 95% CI [0.07, 0.38]). A series of single-moderator analyses tested for the following conditions: participant age and sex; game type ([mini-]dictator game, prisoner's dilemma, public goods dilemma, trust game, ultimatum game); outcome interdependence; membership manipulation (between- vs. within-subjects); group type (natural vs. experimental); reward type (monetary vs. non-monetary); and country of the participant. Parochial cooperation did not vary with participants' age. Parochialism was larger in non-interdependent (dictator-type) compared to interdependent (bargaining and social dilemma) games. There were no moderating effects of group type, membership manipulation or reward type. To provide more data on how parochialism develops, primary studies should report age ranges more precisely and use more restricted age groups.",
publisher = "John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester",
journal = "International Journal of Psychology",
title = "Does parochial cooperation exist in childhood and adolescence? A meta-analysis",
doi = "10.1002/ijop.12791"
}
Lazić, A., Purić, D.,& Krstić, K.. (2021). Does parochial cooperation exist in childhood and adolescence? A meta-analysis. in International Journal of Psychology
John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester..
https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12791
Lazić A, Purić D, Krstić K. Does parochial cooperation exist in childhood and adolescence? A meta-analysis. in International Journal of Psychology. 2021;.
doi:10.1002/ijop.12791 .
Lazić, Aleksandra, Purić, Danka, Krstić, Ksenija, "Does parochial cooperation exist in childhood and adolescence? A meta-analysis" in International Journal of Psychology (2021),
https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12791 . .

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About REFF | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB
 

 

All of DSpaceInstitutions/communitiesAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis institutionAuthorsTitlesSubjects

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About REFF | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB