McDowell and Brandom on observational knowledge
Samo za registrovane korisnike
2021
Članak u časopisu (Objavljena verzija)
Metapodaci
Prikaz svih podataka o dokumentuApstrakt
In this paper, I will analyze whether John McDowell’s critique of Robert Brandom’s account of observational knowledge is a success. First, I will present Brandom’s view of observational knowledge. Then I will lay out the main objections that McDowell raises against it. I will argue that McDowell’s arguments can be divided into semantic and epistemic. The analysis will show that the epistemic arguments face serious difficulty and that McDowell should focus on semantic critique.
Ključne reči:
Reliability / Observational knowledge / Justification / Inference / Empirical contentIzvor:
Filozofia, 2021, 76, 6, 423-435Izdavač:
- Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Theatre and Film Research of the Center for Research in Art
DOI: 10.31577/filozofia.2021.76.6.3
ISSN: 0046-385X
WoS: 000708059800003
Scopus: 2-s2.0-85113225685
Institucija/grupa
Filozofija / PhilosophyTY - JOUR AU - Čukljević, Filip PY - 2021 UR - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/3285 AB - In this paper, I will analyze whether John McDowell’s critique of Robert Brandom’s account of observational knowledge is a success. First, I will present Brandom’s view of observational knowledge. Then I will lay out the main objections that McDowell raises against it. I will argue that McDowell’s arguments can be divided into semantic and epistemic. The analysis will show that the epistemic arguments face serious difficulty and that McDowell should focus on semantic critique. PB - Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Theatre and Film Research of the Center for Research in Art T2 - Filozofia T1 - McDowell and Brandom on observational knowledge EP - 435 IS - 6 SP - 423 VL - 76 DO - 10.31577/filozofia.2021.76.6.3 ER -
@article{ author = "Čukljević, Filip", year = "2021", abstract = "In this paper, I will analyze whether John McDowell’s critique of Robert Brandom’s account of observational knowledge is a success. First, I will present Brandom’s view of observational knowledge. Then I will lay out the main objections that McDowell raises against it. I will argue that McDowell’s arguments can be divided into semantic and epistemic. The analysis will show that the epistemic arguments face serious difficulty and that McDowell should focus on semantic critique.", publisher = "Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Theatre and Film Research of the Center for Research in Art", journal = "Filozofia", title = "McDowell and Brandom on observational knowledge", pages = "435-423", number = "6", volume = "76", doi = "10.31577/filozofia.2021.76.6.3" }
Čukljević, F.. (2021). McDowell and Brandom on observational knowledge. in Filozofia Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Theatre and Film Research of the Center for Research in Art., 76(6), 423-435. https://doi.org/10.31577/filozofia.2021.76.6.3
Čukljević F. McDowell and Brandom on observational knowledge. in Filozofia. 2021;76(6):423-435. doi:10.31577/filozofia.2021.76.6.3 .
Čukljević, Filip, "McDowell and Brandom on observational knowledge" in Filozofia, 76, no. 6 (2021):423-435, https://doi.org/10.31577/filozofia.2021.76.6.3 . .