Rani neolit u Srbiji - kulturno hronološki odnosi
The early Neolithic in Serbia: Cultural and chronological problems
Апстракт
U tekstu se ukazuje ma neke neusaglašene stavove o najstarijoj fazi starčevačke kulture. Istaknuto je da je rani neolit na teritoriji Srbije zastupljen na više od 40 lokaliteta na kojima se može pratiti proces uobličavanja klasične starčevačke kulture.
In spite of several classifications of the Starčevo culture, disagreements concerning the earliest phase are still existed, so the problem of chronological and cultural relations between phase Starčevo I and Protostarčevo remained unclear. Bearing in mind that all attempts to explain a development of the Starčevo culture are mainly based upon the study of painted vessels, chronological position of more than 30 sites without painted pottery has not been adequately examined. According to D. Garašanin and M. Garašanin the sites of phase Starčevo I arc marked by coarse vessels and barbotine as a dominant mode of decoration. However, there is no evidence that this type of settlements existed. It was neglected that a small amount of pottery fragments in Starčevo pits 3, 8 and 5A (form subpit deeper level) could be the reason for lacking the painted vessels.
Кључне речи:
Starčevačka kultura / protostarčevo / hronologijaИзвор:
Glasnik Srpskog arheološkog društva, 2001, 17, 9-20Издавач:
- Srpsko arheološko društvo, Beograd
Институција/група
Arheologija / ArchaeologyTY - JOUR AU - Nikolić, Dubravka PY - 2001 UR - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/346 AB - U tekstu se ukazuje ma neke neusaglašene stavove o najstarijoj fazi starčevačke kulture. Istaknuto je da je rani neolit na teritoriji Srbije zastupljen na više od 40 lokaliteta na kojima se može pratiti proces uobličavanja klasične starčevačke kulture. AB - In spite of several classifications of the Starčevo culture, disagreements concerning the earliest phase are still existed, so the problem of chronological and cultural relations between phase Starčevo I and Protostarčevo remained unclear. Bearing in mind that all attempts to explain a development of the Starčevo culture are mainly based upon the study of painted vessels, chronological position of more than 30 sites without painted pottery has not been adequately examined. According to D. Garašanin and M. Garašanin the sites of phase Starčevo I arc marked by coarse vessels and barbotine as a dominant mode of decoration. However, there is no evidence that this type of settlements existed. It was neglected that a small amount of pottery fragments in Starčevo pits 3, 8 and 5A (form subpit deeper level) could be the reason for lacking the painted vessels. PB - Srpsko arheološko društvo, Beograd T2 - Glasnik Srpskog arheološkog društva T1 - Rani neolit u Srbiji - kulturno hronološki odnosi T1 - The early Neolithic in Serbia: Cultural and chronological problems EP - 20 IS - 17 SP - 9 UR - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_346 ER -
@article{ author = "Nikolić, Dubravka", year = "2001", abstract = "U tekstu se ukazuje ma neke neusaglašene stavove o najstarijoj fazi starčevačke kulture. Istaknuto je da je rani neolit na teritoriji Srbije zastupljen na više od 40 lokaliteta na kojima se može pratiti proces uobličavanja klasične starčevačke kulture., In spite of several classifications of the Starčevo culture, disagreements concerning the earliest phase are still existed, so the problem of chronological and cultural relations between phase Starčevo I and Protostarčevo remained unclear. Bearing in mind that all attempts to explain a development of the Starčevo culture are mainly based upon the study of painted vessels, chronological position of more than 30 sites without painted pottery has not been adequately examined. According to D. Garašanin and M. Garašanin the sites of phase Starčevo I arc marked by coarse vessels and barbotine as a dominant mode of decoration. However, there is no evidence that this type of settlements existed. It was neglected that a small amount of pottery fragments in Starčevo pits 3, 8 and 5A (form subpit deeper level) could be the reason for lacking the painted vessels.", publisher = "Srpsko arheološko društvo, Beograd", journal = "Glasnik Srpskog arheološkog društva", title = "Rani neolit u Srbiji - kulturno hronološki odnosi, The early Neolithic in Serbia: Cultural and chronological problems", pages = "20-9", number = "17", url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_346" }
Nikolić, D.. (2001). Rani neolit u Srbiji - kulturno hronološki odnosi. in Glasnik Srpskog arheološkog društva Srpsko arheološko društvo, Beograd.(17), 9-20. https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_346
Nikolić D. Rani neolit u Srbiji - kulturno hronološki odnosi. in Glasnik Srpskog arheološkog društva. 2001;(17):9-20. https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_346 .
Nikolić, Dubravka, "Rani neolit u Srbiji - kulturno hronološki odnosi" in Glasnik Srpskog arheološkog društva, no. 17 (2001):9-20, https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_346 .