Приказ основних података о документу
The role of individual differences in the accuracy of confidence judgments
dc.creator | Pallier, G | |
dc.creator | Wilkinson, R | |
dc.creator | Danthiir, V | |
dc.creator | Kleitman, S | |
dc.creator | Knežević, Goran | |
dc.creator | Stankov, Lazar | |
dc.creator | Roberts, RD | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-10-12T10:26:02Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-10-12T10:26:02Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2002 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0022-1309 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/377 | |
dc.description.abstract | Generally, self-assessment of accuracy in the cognitive domain produces overconfidence, whereas self-assessment of visual perceptual judgments results in underconfidence. Despite contrary empirical evidence, in models attempting to explain those phenomena, individual differences have often been disregarded. The authors report on 2 studies in which that shortcoming was addressed. In Experiment 1, participants (N = 520) completed a large number of cognitive-ability tests. Results indicated that individual differences provide a meaningful source of overconfidence and that a metacognitive trait might mediate that effect. In further analysis, there was only a relatively small correlation between test accuracy and confidence bias. In Experiment 2 (N = 107 participants), both perceptual and cognitive ability tests were included, along with measures of personality. Results again indicated the presence of a confidence factor that transcended the nature of the testing vehicle. Furthermore, a small relationship was found between that factor and some self-reported personality measures. Thus, personality traits, and cognitive ability appeared to play only a small role in determining the accuracy of self-assessment. Collectively, the present results suggest that there are multiple causes of miscalibration, which current models of over- and underconfidence fail to encompass. | en |
dc.publisher | Routledge Journals, Taylor & Francis Ltd, Abingdon | |
dc.rights | restrictedAccess | |
dc.source | Journal of General Psychology | |
dc.subject | self-assessment | en |
dc.subject | metacognition | en |
dc.subject | confidence judgments | en |
dc.subject | cognitive ability | en |
dc.subject | calibration | en |
dc.title | The role of individual differences in the accuracy of confidence judgments | en |
dc.type | article | |
dc.rights.license | ARR | |
dc.citation.epage | 299 | |
dc.citation.issue | 3 | |
dc.citation.other | 129(3): 257-299 | |
dc.citation.rank | M23 | |
dc.citation.spage | 257 | |
dc.citation.volume | 129 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/00221300209602099 | |
dc.identifier.pmid | 12224810 | |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-0036651733 | |
dc.identifier.wos | 000177735100004 | |
dc.type.version | publishedVersion |