The aim of this paper is to reexamine the importance of Rip van Winkle’s case for the problem of cognitive dynamics. First I shall present the main problem of cognitive dynamics. Then I shall explain the relevance of Rip’s case to this problem. After that I shall provide a short presentation of the main solutions to this problem. I shall explicate the problem concerning the manner in which philosophers who propose those solutions defend their response to the question of Rip’s case. My argument shall be that they defend their response either in overly dogmatic or in circular way. Finally, I shall suggest a way out of that problem.
TY - JOUR
AU - Čukljević, Filip
PY - 2021
UR - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/3924
AB - The aim of this paper is to reexamine the importance of Rip van Winkle’s case for the problem of cognitive dynamics. First I shall present the main problem of cognitive dynamics. Then I shall explain the relevance of Rip’s case to this problem. After that I shall provide a short presentation of the main solutions to this problem. I shall explicate the problem concerning the manner in which philosophers who propose those solutions defend their response to the question of Rip’s case. My argument shall be that they defend their response either in overly dogmatic or in circular way. Finally, I shall suggest a way out of that problem.
PB - Romanian Academy, Iasi Branch - "Gheorghe Zane" , Institute for Economic and Social Research
T2 - Logos & Episteme
T1 - Why Rip Matters?: Reexamining the Problem of Cognitive Dynamics
EP - 173
IS - 2
SP - 153
VL - 12
DO - https://doi.org/10.5840/logos-episteme202112211
ER -
@article{
author = "Čukljević, Filip",
year = "2021",
abstract = "The aim of this paper is to reexamine the importance of Rip van Winkle’s case for the problem of cognitive dynamics. First I shall present the main problem of cognitive dynamics. Then I shall explain the relevance of Rip’s case to this problem. After that I shall provide a short presentation of the main solutions to this problem. I shall explicate the problem concerning the manner in which philosophers who propose those solutions defend their response to the question of Rip’s case. My argument shall be that they defend their response either in overly dogmatic or in circular way. Finally, I shall suggest a way out of that problem.",
publisher = "Romanian Academy, Iasi Branch - "Gheorghe Zane" , Institute for Economic and Social Research",
journal = "Logos & Episteme",
title = "Why Rip Matters?: Reexamining the Problem of Cognitive Dynamics",
pages = "173-153",
number = "2",
volume = "12",
doi = "https://doi.org/10.5840/logos-episteme202112211"
}
Čukljević, F.. (2021). Why Rip Matters?: Reexamining the Problem of Cognitive Dynamics. in Logos & Episteme
Romanian Academy, Iasi Branch - "Gheorghe Zane" , Institute for Economic and Social Research., 12(2), 153-173.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5840/logos-episteme202112211
Čukljević F. Why Rip Matters?: Reexamining the Problem of Cognitive Dynamics. in Logos & Episteme. 2021;12(2):153-173.
doi:https://doi.org/10.5840/logos-episteme202112211 .
Čukljević, Filip, "Why Rip Matters?: Reexamining the Problem of Cognitive Dynamics" in Logos & Episteme, 12, no. 2 (2021):153-173,
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5840/logos-episteme202112211 . .
