REFF - Faculty of Philosophy Repository
University of Belgrade - Faculty of Philosophy
    • English
    • Српски
    • Српски (Serbia)
  • English 
    • English
    • Serbian (Cyrillic)
    • Serbian (Latin)
  • Login
View Item 
  •   REFF
  • Psihologija / Psychology
  • Radovi istraživača / Researcher's publications - Institut za psihologiju
  • View Item
  •   REFF
  • Psihologija / Psychology
  • Radovi istraživača / Researcher's publications - Institut za psihologiju
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Coping with secondary traumatic stress

Thumbnail
2022
bitstream_9631.pdf (664.7Kb)
Authors
Vukčević Marković, Maša
Živanović, Marko
Article (Published version)
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
Exposure to the traumatic experiences of others can lead to secondary traumatization (STS), a condition comprising trauma-related symptoms. There is a lack of evidence on efficient ways to mitigate STS among professionals working with refugees, who are secondarily exposed to traumatic content. This study examines the latent structure of coping mechanisms and explores the predictive power of coping strategies for STS in a sample of professionals working with refugees. A total of 288 participants (age: M = 34.01, SD = 10.03; 57.3% female) working with refugees completed the COPE Inventory and Secondary Traumatic Stress Scale. Factor analysis of the COPE Inventory showed that coping mechanisms are grouped around four interrelated factors—Problem-focused, Socially supported emotion-focused, Avoidant, and Passive coping—which accounted for 46.7% of the variance. The regression model showed that Avoidant coping positively predicts negative alterations in cognition, mood, and reactivity (NA...CMR) and intrusions, and Passive coping was positively associated with NACMR and avoidance. Problem-focused coping was related to lower NACMR and avoidance, while Socially supported emotion-focused coping was not associated with any of the STS symptoms. In total, coping factors accounted for 10.8%, 6.3%, and 4.3% of the variance of NACMR, intrusions, and avoidance, respectively. The study provides a foundation for programs to mitigate STS among professionals working with refugees.

Keywords:
coping mechanisms / secondary traumatic stress (STS) / secondary trauma / secondary exposure to trauma / traumatic experience / professionals working with refugees
Source:
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2022, 19, 12881-
Publisher:
  • Basel : MDPI
Funding / projects:
  • Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia (University of Belgrade, Faculty of Philosophy - grant no. 451-03-68/2022-14/200163)
  • Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) - project Towards the improvement of mental health protection of vulnerable groups through networking and evidence-based practice

DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191912881

Scopus: 2-s2.0-85139948315
[ Google Scholar ]
1
URI
http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/4007
Collections
  • Radovi istraživača / Researcher's publications - Institut za psihologiju
Institution/Community
Psihologija / Psychology
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Vukčević Marković, Maša
AU  - Živanović, Marko
PY  - 2022
UR  - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/4007
AB  - Exposure to the traumatic experiences of others can lead to secondary traumatization (STS),
a condition comprising trauma-related symptoms. There is a lack of evidence on efficient ways to
mitigate STS among professionals working with refugees, who are secondarily exposed to traumatic content. This study examines the latent structure of coping mechanisms and explores the predictive power of coping strategies for STS in a sample of professionals working with refugees. A total of 288 participants (age: M = 34.01, SD = 10.03; 57.3% female) working with refugees completed the COPE Inventory and Secondary Traumatic Stress Scale. Factor analysis of the COPE Inventory showed that coping mechanisms are grouped around four interrelated factors—Problem-focused, Socially supported emotion-focused, Avoidant, and Passive coping—which accounted for 46.7% of the variance. The regression model showed that Avoidant coping positively predicts negative alterations in cognition, mood, and reactivity (NACMR) and intrusions, and Passive coping was positively associated with NACMR and avoidance. Problem-focused coping was related to lower NACMR and avoidance, while Socially supported emotion-focused coping was not associated with any of the STS symptoms. In total, coping factors accounted for 10.8%, 6.3%, and 4.3% of the variance of NACMR, intrusions, and avoidance, respectively. The study provides a foundation for programs to mitigate STS among professionals working with refugees.
PB  - Basel : MDPI
T2  - International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
T1  - Coping with secondary traumatic stress
SP  - 12881
VL  - 19
DO  - 10.3390/ijerph191912881
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Vukčević Marković, Maša and Živanović, Marko",
year = "2022",
abstract = "Exposure to the traumatic experiences of others can lead to secondary traumatization (STS),
a condition comprising trauma-related symptoms. There is a lack of evidence on efficient ways to
mitigate STS among professionals working with refugees, who are secondarily exposed to traumatic content. This study examines the latent structure of coping mechanisms and explores the predictive power of coping strategies for STS in a sample of professionals working with refugees. A total of 288 participants (age: M = 34.01, SD = 10.03; 57.3% female) working with refugees completed the COPE Inventory and Secondary Traumatic Stress Scale. Factor analysis of the COPE Inventory showed that coping mechanisms are grouped around four interrelated factors—Problem-focused, Socially supported emotion-focused, Avoidant, and Passive coping—which accounted for 46.7% of the variance. The regression model showed that Avoidant coping positively predicts negative alterations in cognition, mood, and reactivity (NACMR) and intrusions, and Passive coping was positively associated with NACMR and avoidance. Problem-focused coping was related to lower NACMR and avoidance, while Socially supported emotion-focused coping was not associated with any of the STS symptoms. In total, coping factors accounted for 10.8%, 6.3%, and 4.3% of the variance of NACMR, intrusions, and avoidance, respectively. The study provides a foundation for programs to mitigate STS among professionals working with refugees.",
publisher = "Basel : MDPI",
journal = "International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health",
title = "Coping with secondary traumatic stress",
pages = "12881",
volume = "19",
doi = "10.3390/ijerph191912881"
}
Vukčević Marković, M.,& Živanović, M.. (2022). Coping with secondary traumatic stress. in International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Basel : MDPI., 19, 12881.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912881
Vukčević Marković M, Živanović M. Coping with secondary traumatic stress. in International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022;19:12881.
doi:10.3390/ijerph191912881 .
Vukčević Marković, Maša, Živanović, Marko, "Coping with secondary traumatic stress" in International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19 (2022):12881,
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912881 . .

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About REFF | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB
 

 

All of DSpaceInstitutions/communitiesAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis institutionAuthorsTitlesSubjects

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About REFF | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB