Dissonance – a Pretty Harsh Term to Define Towards Understanding the Importance of Safeguarding the Pluralism of Heritage Meanings in Public Spaces
2018
Аутори
Božić Marojević, MilicaОстала ауторства
Tanurovska Kjulavkovski, BiljanaBodrožić, Nataša
Kachakova, Violeta
Поглавље у монографији (Објављена верзија)
Метаподаци
Приказ свих података о документуАпстракт
When we say dissonance, in the context
of heritage we usually think of the diversity of meanings attached to it, or so to
say of non-existence of the agreement in the manner that heritage is remembered,
represented, understood and interpreted by different actors (Tunbridge and Ashworth 1996:20-33). Still, knowing that doesn’t end our troubles, not just because we
borrowed the term from musicology, but since dissonance is a quality that exists in
every heritage (Tunbridge and Ashworth 1996:97; Ashworth and Graham 1997:381;
Silvén and Björklund 2006:263). From that point of view, another question naturally
arises - if that feature exists in all of our inheritance, why do we bother to emphasize
it? Well, sometimes that dissonance is vague and not so problematic, because we
have a long-term arrangement about what certain heritage is, what it means and
represents. But if it comes to the situation that circumstances are changed, that new
standpoints are found (whether they are sci...entific/factual whether political/ideological in nature) and some other meanings detected, it becomes more evident. Then,
as a result, we can have discordance which can lead to political struggles, national
tensions or regional confusions. In those situations, certain efforts have to be made
so we could be able to talk about variety of meanings of the mentioned heritage
(Božić Marojević 2014b:39; Silvén and Björklund 2006:263; Harrison 2006:154-196;
Laclau 1994).
Кључне речи:
dissonance / heritage / public spacesИзвор:
MODELLING public space(s) in culture: rethinking institutional practices in culture and historical (Dis) continuities, 2018, 218-223Издавач:
- Lokomotiva - Centre for New Initiatives in Arts and Culture, Skopje, Macedonia
Финансирање / пројекти:
- Српска и византијска уметност у позном средњем веку (RS-MESTD-MPN2006-2010-147019)
Институција/група
Istorija umetnosti / History of ArtTY - CHAP AU - Božić Marojević, Milica PY - 2018 UR - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/4114 AB - When we say dissonance, in the context of heritage we usually think of the diversity of meanings attached to it, or so to say of non-existence of the agreement in the manner that heritage is remembered, represented, understood and interpreted by different actors (Tunbridge and Ashworth 1996:20-33). Still, knowing that doesn’t end our troubles, not just because we borrowed the term from musicology, but since dissonance is a quality that exists in every heritage (Tunbridge and Ashworth 1996:97; Ashworth and Graham 1997:381; Silvén and Björklund 2006:263). From that point of view, another question naturally arises - if that feature exists in all of our inheritance, why do we bother to emphasize it? Well, sometimes that dissonance is vague and not so problematic, because we have a long-term arrangement about what certain heritage is, what it means and represents. But if it comes to the situation that circumstances are changed, that new standpoints are found (whether they are scientific/factual whether political/ideological in nature) and some other meanings detected, it becomes more evident. Then, as a result, we can have discordance which can lead to political struggles, national tensions or regional confusions. In those situations, certain efforts have to be made so we could be able to talk about variety of meanings of the mentioned heritage (Božić Marojević 2014b:39; Silvén and Björklund 2006:263; Harrison 2006:154-196; Laclau 1994). PB - Lokomotiva - Centre for New Initiatives in Arts and Culture, Skopje, Macedonia T2 - MODELLING public space(s) in culture: rethinking institutional practices in culture and historical (Dis) continuities T1 - Dissonance – a Pretty Harsh Term to Define Towards Understanding the Importance of Safeguarding the Pluralism of Heritage Meanings in Public Spaces EP - 223 SP - 218 UR - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4114 ER -
@inbook{ author = "Božić Marojević, Milica", year = "2018", abstract = "When we say dissonance, in the context of heritage we usually think of the diversity of meanings attached to it, or so to say of non-existence of the agreement in the manner that heritage is remembered, represented, understood and interpreted by different actors (Tunbridge and Ashworth 1996:20-33). Still, knowing that doesn’t end our troubles, not just because we borrowed the term from musicology, but since dissonance is a quality that exists in every heritage (Tunbridge and Ashworth 1996:97; Ashworth and Graham 1997:381; Silvén and Björklund 2006:263). From that point of view, another question naturally arises - if that feature exists in all of our inheritance, why do we bother to emphasize it? Well, sometimes that dissonance is vague and not so problematic, because we have a long-term arrangement about what certain heritage is, what it means and represents. But if it comes to the situation that circumstances are changed, that new standpoints are found (whether they are scientific/factual whether political/ideological in nature) and some other meanings detected, it becomes more evident. Then, as a result, we can have discordance which can lead to political struggles, national tensions or regional confusions. In those situations, certain efforts have to be made so we could be able to talk about variety of meanings of the mentioned heritage (Božić Marojević 2014b:39; Silvén and Björklund 2006:263; Harrison 2006:154-196; Laclau 1994).", publisher = "Lokomotiva - Centre for New Initiatives in Arts and Culture, Skopje, Macedonia", journal = "MODELLING public space(s) in culture: rethinking institutional practices in culture and historical (Dis) continuities", booktitle = "Dissonance – a Pretty Harsh Term to Define Towards Understanding the Importance of Safeguarding the Pluralism of Heritage Meanings in Public Spaces", pages = "223-218", url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4114" }
Božić Marojević, M.. (2018). Dissonance – a Pretty Harsh Term to Define Towards Understanding the Importance of Safeguarding the Pluralism of Heritage Meanings in Public Spaces. in MODELLING public space(s) in culture: rethinking institutional practices in culture and historical (Dis) continuities Lokomotiva - Centre for New Initiatives in Arts and Culture, Skopje, Macedonia., 218-223. https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4114
Božić Marojević M. Dissonance – a Pretty Harsh Term to Define Towards Understanding the Importance of Safeguarding the Pluralism of Heritage Meanings in Public Spaces. in MODELLING public space(s) in culture: rethinking institutional practices in culture and historical (Dis) continuities. 2018;:218-223. https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4114 .
Božić Marojević, Milica, "Dissonance – a Pretty Harsh Term to Define Towards Understanding the Importance of Safeguarding the Pluralism of Heritage Meanings in Public Spaces" in MODELLING public space(s) in culture: rethinking institutional practices in culture and historical (Dis) continuities (2018):218-223, https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4114 .