Status objašnjenja u raspravi o naučnom statusu sociokulturne antropologije
The status of explanation in debate of scientific status of sociocultural anthropology

2014
Authors
Kulenović, Nina
Contributors
Milenković, Miloš
Bošković, Aleksandar
Kamerer, Eva

Zorić, Aleksandra
Pišev, Marko
Doctoral thesis (Published version)
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Osnovni cilj disertacije jeste da – kroz kombinovanu prizmu istorije antropoloških teorija i metoda, antropologije nauke, antropologije antropologije, opšte metodologije nauka i filozofije nauke – osvetli, problematizuje i preispita status objašnjenja u sociokulturnoj antropologiji, teţeći da osvetli kako osnove za privilegovanje i prihvatanje određenog tipa objašnjenja kao jemca naučnosti antropologije tako i osnove za diskvalifikovanje i odbacivanje određenog tipa objašnjenja, bilo zbog eksplanatornog neuspeha, s jedne strane, ili zbog nelegitimnosti ili nekog drugog neepistemičkog razloga, s druge. Osnovni predmet disertacije je rasprava o naučnom statusu sociokulturne antropologije, koja se u radu posmatra kroz prizmu spora o statusu objašnjenja u antropologiji, kao kontinuirani i nikad formalno neokončani spor oko metoda koji antropologija nasleđuje iz vremena akademske institucionalizacije društveno-humanističkih nauka. Osnovna hipoteza istraţivanja jeste da postoji snaţna korela...cija između teorijskih i metodoloških struktura, u tolikoj meri da se one mogu smatrati neodvojivim, a da je objašnjenje, odnosno eksplanatorni potencijal, tačka konvergencije koja se moţe iskoristiti za proveru toga da li je razdvajanje teorijskih i metodoloških struktura uopšte i moguće.
The main objective of the dissertation is to shed light on, problematize and interrogate the status of explanation in socio-cultural anthropology in the combined light of the history of anthropological theories and methods, the anthropology of science, the anthropology of anthropology, the general methodology of science and the philosophy of science. It seeks to elucidate the basis for privileging and accepting a certain type of explanation as a guarantee of the scientific quality of the discipline, as well as the basis for disqualifying and rejecting a certain type of explanation, be it on the grounds of its explanatory failure on the one hand, or lack of legitimacy or some other non-epistemic reason on the other. The main subject of the dissertation is the debate over the status of socio-cultural anthropology as a scientific discipline, which is looked at from the perspective of the controversy over the status of explanation in anthropology as a continual and never formally settled c...ontroversy over the method, which anthropology has inherited from the period of academic institutionalization of social sciences and humanities. The main hypothesis of the dissertation is that there is a strong correlation between theoretical and methodological structures, to the point that they may be seen as inseparable, and that explanation, i.e. explanatory potential, is the point of convergence which may be used to test if separation of theoretical and methodological structures is possible at all.
Keywords:
relativizam / razumevanje / objašnjenje / nauka / naučni status / metodologija etnologije i antropologije / istorija antropoloških ideja / understanding / scientific status / relativism / methodology of ethnology and anthropology / history of anthropological ideas / explanationSource:
2014Publisher:
- Univerzitet u Beogradu, Filozofski fakultet
Funding / projects:
URI
http://eteze.bg.ac.rs/application/showtheses?thesesId=2530http://nardus.mpn.gov.rs/handle/123456789/4852
http://vbs.rs/scripts/cobiss?command=DISPLAY&base=70036&RID=524972439
http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/47
Institution/Community
Etnologija i antropologija / Ethnology and AnthropologyTY - THES AU - Kulenović, Nina PY - 2014 UR - http://eteze.bg.ac.rs/application/showtheses?thesesId=2530 UR - http://nardus.mpn.gov.rs/handle/123456789/4852 UR - http://vbs.rs/scripts/cobiss?command=DISPLAY&base=70036&RID=524972439 UR - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/47 AB - Osnovni cilj disertacije jeste da – kroz kombinovanu prizmu istorije antropoloških teorija i metoda, antropologije nauke, antropologije antropologije, opšte metodologije nauka i filozofije nauke – osvetli, problematizuje i preispita status objašnjenja u sociokulturnoj antropologiji, teţeći da osvetli kako osnove za privilegovanje i prihvatanje određenog tipa objašnjenja kao jemca naučnosti antropologije tako i osnove za diskvalifikovanje i odbacivanje određenog tipa objašnjenja, bilo zbog eksplanatornog neuspeha, s jedne strane, ili zbog nelegitimnosti ili nekog drugog neepistemičkog razloga, s druge. Osnovni predmet disertacije je rasprava o naučnom statusu sociokulturne antropologije, koja se u radu posmatra kroz prizmu spora o statusu objašnjenja u antropologiji, kao kontinuirani i nikad formalno neokončani spor oko metoda koji antropologija nasleđuje iz vremena akademske institucionalizacije društveno-humanističkih nauka. Osnovna hipoteza istraţivanja jeste da postoji snaţna korelacija između teorijskih i metodoloških struktura, u tolikoj meri da se one mogu smatrati neodvojivim, a da je objašnjenje, odnosno eksplanatorni potencijal, tačka konvergencije koja se moţe iskoristiti za proveru toga da li je razdvajanje teorijskih i metodoloških struktura uopšte i moguće. AB - The main objective of the dissertation is to shed light on, problematize and interrogate the status of explanation in socio-cultural anthropology in the combined light of the history of anthropological theories and methods, the anthropology of science, the anthropology of anthropology, the general methodology of science and the philosophy of science. It seeks to elucidate the basis for privileging and accepting a certain type of explanation as a guarantee of the scientific quality of the discipline, as well as the basis for disqualifying and rejecting a certain type of explanation, be it on the grounds of its explanatory failure on the one hand, or lack of legitimacy or some other non-epistemic reason on the other. The main subject of the dissertation is the debate over the status of socio-cultural anthropology as a scientific discipline, which is looked at from the perspective of the controversy over the status of explanation in anthropology as a continual and never formally settled controversy over the method, which anthropology has inherited from the period of academic institutionalization of social sciences and humanities. The main hypothesis of the dissertation is that there is a strong correlation between theoretical and methodological structures, to the point that they may be seen as inseparable, and that explanation, i.e. explanatory potential, is the point of convergence which may be used to test if separation of theoretical and methodological structures is possible at all. PB - Univerzitet u Beogradu, Filozofski fakultet T1 - Status objašnjenja u raspravi o naučnom statusu sociokulturne antropologije T1 - The status of explanation in debate of scientific status of sociocultural anthropology UR - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_nardus_4852 ER -
@phdthesis{ author = "Kulenović, Nina", year = "2014", abstract = "Osnovni cilj disertacije jeste da – kroz kombinovanu prizmu istorije antropoloških teorija i metoda, antropologije nauke, antropologije antropologije, opšte metodologije nauka i filozofije nauke – osvetli, problematizuje i preispita status objašnjenja u sociokulturnoj antropologiji, teţeći da osvetli kako osnove za privilegovanje i prihvatanje određenog tipa objašnjenja kao jemca naučnosti antropologije tako i osnove za diskvalifikovanje i odbacivanje određenog tipa objašnjenja, bilo zbog eksplanatornog neuspeha, s jedne strane, ili zbog nelegitimnosti ili nekog drugog neepistemičkog razloga, s druge. Osnovni predmet disertacije je rasprava o naučnom statusu sociokulturne antropologije, koja se u radu posmatra kroz prizmu spora o statusu objašnjenja u antropologiji, kao kontinuirani i nikad formalno neokončani spor oko metoda koji antropologija nasleđuje iz vremena akademske institucionalizacije društveno-humanističkih nauka. Osnovna hipoteza istraţivanja jeste da postoji snaţna korelacija između teorijskih i metodoloških struktura, u tolikoj meri da se one mogu smatrati neodvojivim, a da je objašnjenje, odnosno eksplanatorni potencijal, tačka konvergencije koja se moţe iskoristiti za proveru toga da li je razdvajanje teorijskih i metodoloških struktura uopšte i moguće., The main objective of the dissertation is to shed light on, problematize and interrogate the status of explanation in socio-cultural anthropology in the combined light of the history of anthropological theories and methods, the anthropology of science, the anthropology of anthropology, the general methodology of science and the philosophy of science. It seeks to elucidate the basis for privileging and accepting a certain type of explanation as a guarantee of the scientific quality of the discipline, as well as the basis for disqualifying and rejecting a certain type of explanation, be it on the grounds of its explanatory failure on the one hand, or lack of legitimacy or some other non-epistemic reason on the other. The main subject of the dissertation is the debate over the status of socio-cultural anthropology as a scientific discipline, which is looked at from the perspective of the controversy over the status of explanation in anthropology as a continual and never formally settled controversy over the method, which anthropology has inherited from the period of academic institutionalization of social sciences and humanities. The main hypothesis of the dissertation is that there is a strong correlation between theoretical and methodological structures, to the point that they may be seen as inseparable, and that explanation, i.e. explanatory potential, is the point of convergence which may be used to test if separation of theoretical and methodological structures is possible at all.", publisher = "Univerzitet u Beogradu, Filozofski fakultet", title = "Status objašnjenja u raspravi o naučnom statusu sociokulturne antropologije, The status of explanation in debate of scientific status of sociocultural anthropology", url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_nardus_4852" }
Kulenović, N.. (2014). Status objašnjenja u raspravi o naučnom statusu sociokulturne antropologije. Univerzitet u Beogradu, Filozofski fakultet.. https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_nardus_4852
Kulenović N. Status objašnjenja u raspravi o naučnom statusu sociokulturne antropologije. 2014;. https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_nardus_4852 .
Kulenović, Nina, "Status objašnjenja u raspravi o naučnom statusu sociokulturne antropologije" (2014), https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_nardus_4852 .
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Konstruisanje identiteta u rimskoj Dalmaciji - salonitanski gladijatori i njihov društveni status / Constructing identities in the roman Dalmatia: Gladiators of Salona and their social status
Janković, Marko (Univerzitet u Beogradu - Filozofski fakultet - Odeljenje za etnologiju i antropologiju, Beograd, 2011) -
Obrazovno-ekonomski status Roma u Srbiji i njegova regionalna zastupljenost / Educational and economic status of Roma in Serbia and its regional distribution
Sokolovska, Valentina; Jarić, Isidora (Sociološko društvo Srbije, Beograd, 2014) -
Društveni status materinstva sa posebnim osvrtom na Srbiju danas / Social status of motherhood with special reference to Serbia today
Sekulić, Nada (Sociološko udruženje Srbije i Crne Gore, Beograd i Univerzitet u Beogradu - Filozofski fakultet - Institut za sociološka istraživanja, Beograd, 2014)