REFF - Faculty of Philosophy Repository
University of Belgrade - Faculty of Philosophy
    • English
    • Српски
    • Српски (Serbia)
  • English 
    • English
    • Serbian (Cyrillic)
    • Serbian (Latin)
  • Login
View Item 
  •   REFF
  • Istorija / History
  • Radovi istraživača / Researcher's publications - Odeljenje za istoriju
  • View Item
  •   REFF
  • Istorija / History
  • Radovi istraživača / Researcher's publications - Odeljenje za istoriju
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Инокосне породице и задруге у средњовековној Србији

Solitary and communal families in Medieval Serbia

Authorized Users Only
2015
Authors
Mišić, Siniša
Article (Published version)
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
Рад се бави структуром српске породице у позном средњем веку, углавном на основу дипломатичких и османских извора. Српска породица се у овом периоду јавља у два вида организовања: као инокосна и као задружна. Задруге су углавном мале и преовлађују очинске и братске задруге, што има везе и са дужином живота у средњем веку.
In the medieval Serbian state, the family or house as it appears in sources, was the basic unit of society. It could be solitary or communal. Ву analyzing primary diplomatic documents and the first Ottoman defters, we can see that about a quarter of the population lived in solitary families. More than half the families that lived communally did so in small communes of two to three members. Almost all of these communes were either father-son family communes or fratemal communes. Primary resources show only a small number of large communes. Solitary and communal families were present in the aristocracy, as well as among the common (land-bound) population. The structure of the families does not have апу bearing on status. Solitary families could be found anywhere, whereas the characteristics of communal families are the same among the aristocracy, the land serfs, minders, priesthood, members of guilds or fishermen. A notable difference is among the Vlach population where there wa...s a higher than usual number of young men joining their wives' families. This was a result of the attempt of the land-working population to gain status of animal herdsman, as it was considered more advantageous.

Keywords:
породица / задруга / кућа / средњи век / српске земље / властела / земљорадници / сточари
Source:
Гласник Завичајног музеја, 2015, 10/11, 9-28
Publisher:
  • Завичајни музеј Пљевља
Funding / projects:
  • Settlements and Population of the Serbian Lands in the Late Middle Ages (14th-15th Century) (RS-177010)

Cobiss ID: 175484423

ISSN: 1450-8559

[ Google Scholar ]
Handle
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4722
URI
http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/4722
Collections
  • Radovi istraživača / Researcher's publications - Odeljenje za istoriju
Institution/Community
Istorija / History
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Mišić, Siniša
PY  - 2015
UR  - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/4722
AB  - Рад се бави структуром српске породице у позном средњем веку, углавном на основу дипломатичких и османских извора. Српска
породица се у овом периоду јавља у два вида организовања: као инокосна
и као задружна. Задруге су углавном мале и преовлађују очинске и братске
задруге, што има везе и са дужином живота у средњем веку.
AB  - In the medieval Serbian state, the family or house as it appears in sources,
was the basic unit of society. It could be solitary or communal. Ву analyzing primary diplomatic documents and the first Ottoman defters, we can see that about
a quarter of the population lived in solitary families. More than half the families
that lived communally did so in small communes of two to three members. Almost all of these communes were either father-son family communes or fratemal
communes. Primary resources show only a small number of large communes.
Solitary and communal families were present in the aristocracy, as well as
among the common (land-bound) population. The structure of the families does
not have апу bearing on status. Solitary families could be found anywhere,
whereas the characteristics of communal families are the same among the aristocracy, the land serfs, minders, priesthood, members of guilds or fishermen. A
notable difference is among the Vlach population where there was a higher than
usual number of young men joining their wives' families. This was a result of
the attempt of the land-working population to gain status of animal herdsman,
as it was considered more advantageous.
PB  - Завичајни музеј Пљевља
T2  - Гласник Завичајног музеја
T1  - Инокосне породице и задруге у средњовековној Србији
T1  - Solitary and communal families in Medieval Serbia
EP  - 28
SP  - 9
VL  - 10/11
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4722
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Mišić, Siniša",
year = "2015",
abstract = "Рад се бави структуром српске породице у позном средњем веку, углавном на основу дипломатичких и османских извора. Српска
породица се у овом периоду јавља у два вида организовања: као инокосна
и као задружна. Задруге су углавном мале и преовлађују очинске и братске
задруге, што има везе и са дужином живота у средњем веку., In the medieval Serbian state, the family or house as it appears in sources,
was the basic unit of society. It could be solitary or communal. Ву analyzing primary diplomatic documents and the first Ottoman defters, we can see that about
a quarter of the population lived in solitary families. More than half the families
that lived communally did so in small communes of two to three members. Almost all of these communes were either father-son family communes or fratemal
communes. Primary resources show only a small number of large communes.
Solitary and communal families were present in the aristocracy, as well as
among the common (land-bound) population. The structure of the families does
not have апу bearing on status. Solitary families could be found anywhere,
whereas the characteristics of communal families are the same among the aristocracy, the land serfs, minders, priesthood, members of guilds or fishermen. A
notable difference is among the Vlach population where there was a higher than
usual number of young men joining their wives' families. This was a result of
the attempt of the land-working population to gain status of animal herdsman,
as it was considered more advantageous.",
publisher = "Завичајни музеј Пљевља",
journal = "Гласник Завичајног музеја",
title = "Инокосне породице и задруге у средњовековној Србији, Solitary and communal families in Medieval Serbia",
pages = "28-9",
volume = "10/11",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4722"
}
Mišić, S.. (2015). Инокосне породице и задруге у средњовековној Србији. in Гласник Завичајног музеја
Завичајни музеј Пљевља., 10/11, 9-28.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4722
Mišić S. Инокосне породице и задруге у средњовековној Србији. in Гласник Завичајног музеја. 2015;10/11:9-28.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4722 .
Mišić, Siniša, "Инокосне породице и задруге у средњовековној Србији" in Гласник Завичајног музеја, 10/11 (2015):9-28,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4722 .

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About REFF | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB
 

 

All of DSpaceInstitutions/communitiesAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis institutionAuthorsTitlesSubjects

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About REFF | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB